Politics | View from the Center and Left


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: JohnM who wrote (188030)5/2/2012 10:10:44 AM
From: epicure of 224515
 
That's pretty much where I am.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (188032)5/2/2012 10:12:33 AM
From: JohnM of 224515
 
Bad Headline Mars Good NY Times Story Debunking Lindzen’s ‘Discredited’ Cloud Theory. Can You Do Better?
Interesting piece. Thanks.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (188032)5/2/2012 10:20:16 AM
From: T L Comiskey of 224515
 
re..Can you do better..

can I use ..expletives.......????

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: epicure who wrote (187993)5/2/2012 10:20:53 AM
From: Wharf Rat of 224515
 
Maybe you just answered your own question about kids joining SI. How many kids invest these days? How many people invest these days? How many people can afford to invest? I'm not sure this place has grown at all since the dot comm bubble.

I sold off some more in early Jan. My 401 is 90% cash, my IRA maybe 50%.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: T L Comiskey who wrote (188035)5/2/2012 10:21:32 AM
From: Wharf Rat of 224515
 
fuckin'eh right

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: JohnM5/2/2012 10:22:28 AM
of 224515
 
Couldn't agree more.
----------------------------------------------
TPMDC
Krugman: Obama May Lose Re-Election
Sahil Kapur
May 2, 2012, 5:43 AM

There may not be much President Obama can do to improve the economy between now and the election, but telling a clear story about why it remains weak could mean the difference between victory and defeat this November. Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman fears the Obama team is getting that critical narrative wrong.

“They’ve tied themselves up in knots because they’ve bought into this notion that it would sound wrong to admit that they haven’t been able to do everything that they really should have done,” Krugman told TPM in an interview following the release of his new book, “End This Depression Now!” “It’s incredible — they can’t quite make up their minds on whether the theme is that Republicans are standing in the way of doing what has to be done, or things are really good and America’s back on track. The problem is that you can’t perceive both of those lines at the same time.”

Team Obama’s narrative — that the stimulative measures he took were precisely what the country needed, and as a result America is on the mend — is based on a gamble that the economy will be in a steady recovery come Election Day. But if outside factors diminish the outlook, it will leave voters with the impression that Obama’s approach itself was the problem, rather than the vigorous Republican resistance that forced him to scale back his ambitions.

“What they should be saying is, ‘We have the right ideas and we’re pursuing them as far as we can given the opposition from Republicans,’ which would be more or less the true narrative,” Krugman said. “They have decided that it sounds like weakness to say that we haven’t been doing everything that we should be doing. And so they have instead opted to always pretend that what they thought they were able to get is also exactly what they should have done. So they’ve never conceded that that first stimulus was too small, or that there really should have been a second round of stimulus. And that means that if things go badly, they end up owning it. They can’t say, ‘Don’t blame us, blame the do-nothing Congress.’”

In his book, which hit shelves May 1, Krugman laments the “shadow of economic catastrophe” we live in, and the opportunity cost of huge stockpiles of underutilized human and physical capital. The government should put that to work, Krugman says, first by reversing the state layoffs of teachers, firefighters and other employees, and then ideally with a New Deal-style public works push to rebuild American infrastructure by putting the unemployed to work. But even though GOP opposition makes that all but impossible, Krugman believes it’s a mistake for Obama not to go the extra mile and at least tell voters what more he would do if only he could.

“There is a political danger to Obama, which is that [Mitt] Romney can go around saying, ‘The economy is still lousy,’ which is true,” Krugman said. “And the fact that Obama has never made a really clear case for his own economic leadership hurts. Now, I still think Obama will probably win, because there are other issues, but they have created a trap for themselves on the economic policy front by allowing themselves to own a weak economy in a way that they shouldn’t, because a lot of the problem has been tortured opposition from the Republicans.”

The White House’s narrative developed amid strong political headwinds. Pressure not only from Republicans but many Democrats and even administration officials, along with a broad establishment consensus, compelled Obama to pivot to deficit-reduction, after the Democrats’ 2010 congressional losses and in the face of an exploding national debt.

When the ensuing negotiations with Republicans collapsed and nearly took the U.S. economy with it, Obama turned to his current narrative. Krugman worries that the story’s not strong enough, and there’s still some chance that the economic recovery could slip and toss the election to the GOP.

“We have a slowly developing cycle of an improving economy and improving household balance sheets that lead you on the road to recovery,” Krugman said. “But obviously a lot can go wrong if there’s some kind of major setback — problems in Europe could still hurt the United States, or a spike in oil prices as a result of what’s happening in the Middle East. … We could have morning in America still. But probably not in 2012. So I don’t think there’s going to be a strong enough recovery to make it easy for [Obama].”

tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (4)

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (188037)5/2/2012 10:26:48 AM
From: T L Comiskey of 224515
 
try this..

Has Been ..Fooking Bucket of Shit......
posing as MIT professor
accepts Corporate payola for screwing your childrens futures


just a first draft...

give me more time..

tia

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: JohnM who wrote (188038)5/2/2012 10:27:42 AM
From: Wharf Rat of 224515
 
“What they should be saying is, ‘We have the right ideas and we’re pursuing them as far as we can given the opposition from Republicans,’ which would be more or less the true narrative,”

Yup
==
Thieves Make Off With 10-Ton Bridge
(Newser) – How to steal a 10-ton bridge? Easy: Just pretend you've been hired to demolish it. That's what a gang of metal thieves allegedly did in the Czech Republic recently, showing employees at a depot forged paperwork and telling them the bridge over unused railroad tracks needed to come down. "The thieves said they had been hired to demolish the bridge, and remove the unwanted railway track to make way for a new cycle route," says a railroad spokesperson.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: T L Comiskey who wrote (188039)5/2/2012 10:28:20 AM
From: Wharf Rat of 224515
 
Take all the time you need.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: JohnM who wrote (188038)5/2/2012 10:30:53 AM
From: JohnM of 224515
 
Popular health care protections on GOP chopping block
By Steve Benen
Wed May 2, 2012 9:18 AM EDT

A national New York Times/CBS News poll recently asked respondents whether they approve of a specific provision in the Affordable Care Act: protections for those with pre-existing conditions. It was the single most popular element of "Obamacare" -- a whopping 85% approve of the measure.

Keep in mind, these days, 85% of Americans don't agree on much of anything, but they all like this.

That may not matter. Many Republican policymakers, if they succeed in destroying the entirely of the Affordable Care Act, have every intention of ending these wildly popular protections. Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), a member of the House GOP leadership and a point man for the party on health policy, said this week the provision is " a terrible idea."

This matters because a Republican White House, working with a Republican Congress, will roll back the clock on health care reform, pursuing a "repeal and replace" strategy. What would the GOP would replace Obamacare with, exactly? Sahil Kapur reported yesterday:
The pre-existing conditions rule is broadly popular with the public, even among Republicans. But the policy will collapse unless healthy people also enter the insurance pool, spreading costs and defraying risks --- that's the purpose of the less popular individual mandate and subsidies that are also a part of "Obamacare." [...]

That's why Republicans are struggling to come up with an alternative they can broadly support: To date, "Obamacare" remains the most comprehensive free-market approach to tackling the free-rider problem while giving Americans a financial stake in their health care.
The GOP is committed to killing the Affordable Care Act, despite its similarities to previous Republican proposals, despite its reliance on a free-market approach, and despite the popularity of its specific provisions. This leaves Republicans in an unpleasant spot: they've sworn to eliminate every letter of the reform law, but they know Americans won't like their alternative.

Protections for those with pre-existing conditions, for example, will disappear. Republicans also oppose the Obamacare provision that requires coverage for young adults up to age 26. Contraception access, obviously, will be curtailed for millions, as will coverage for low-income children. Medicare's prescription drug "donut hole" will return, too.

This isn't some liberal caricature of the GOP plan; this is what Republicans freely admit they want to do if voters give them the opportunity to govern.

In the meantime, Obamacare is working pretty well. It's already saving seniors billions of dollars, and yielding new benefits for consumers, including $1.3 billion in rebates.

It's also combating fraud and abuse, which in turns saves Americans quite a bit of money; has brought coverage to 2.5 million young adults; is giving a boost to small businesses through ACA tax credits; has slowed the growth of Medicare spending; has provided new treatment options for cancer patients; and, of course, has offered new coverage protections for those with pre-existing conditions.

To those Americans who've been convinced that destroying Obamacare will do wonders for American families, be careful what you wish for.

maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.