SI
SI
discoversearch

 Politics | View from the Center and Left


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: Dale Baker5/1/2012 3:18:05 PM
of 264926
 
Obama’s April average in Gallup tracking of job approval was 47%, highest since last May.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read


From: Dale Baker5/1/2012 3:39:55 PM
of 264926
 
How can this be when Obama wrecked the economy? Don't those manufacturers know they are supposed to be scared and uncertain and unwilling to create new jobs?

LOL

"The pace of growth in the U.S. manufacturing sector unexpectedly picked up in April, while new orders gained, according to an industry report released on Tuesday. The Institute for Supply Management said its index of national factory activity rose to 54.8 from 53.4 in March, besting expectations of 53.0.

A reading below 50 indicates contraction in the manufacturing sector, while a number above 50 means expansion.

New orders climbed to 58.2 from 54.5, while the employment index also improved to 57.3 from 56.1


Read more: foxbusiness.com

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read


To: Dale Baker who wrote (187977)5/1/2012 3:43:03 PM
From: Sam
of 264926
 
I do not understand the Log Cabin Republicans.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)


To: epicure who wrote (187973)5/1/2012 3:46:48 PM
From: Steve Lokness
of 264926
 
<<<<<a woman talking about her daughter- who could not get insurance because she had a pre-existing condition (she was pregnant)>>>>>

But that turns capitalism on it's head. I see nothing but continual strife if we try to cram down insurance companies throats money losing customers. It's just one more example of why health care really is different. Single payer is the only solution - but who see's that on the horizon any time soon? Arrrrg.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read


To: Sam who wrote (187980)5/1/2012 3:48:45 PM
From: T L Comiskey
of 264926
 
re....I do not understand the Log Cabin Republicans.

MONEY........

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read


To: Sam who wrote (187980)5/1/2012 3:52:58 PM
From: Dale Baker
of 264926
 
I do, there is nothing contradictory about believing in the older traditional views of the Republican Party and also being gay; it's running into the buzz saw of today's zealot, intolerant party that has made them a strange anachronism.

I suspect many of them just don't vote at all.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)


From: JohnM5/1/2012 4:29:19 PM
of 264926
 
Political Animal Blog
May 01, 2012 3:26 PM
Fallows Barbecues Romney on Carter Slur
By Ed Kilgore

In his reaction to reminders of his 2007 statement suggesting a pursuit of Osama bin Laden was a waste of time and money, Mitt Romney suggested the decision to pull the trigger on the operation was such a no-brainer that “even Jimmy Carter would have given that order.”

This got the attention of Washington Monthly alumnus (and former Carter speechwriter) James Fallows, who took Mitt to the woodshed in a column for The Atlantic:
Jimmy Carter is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy who spent ten years in the uniformed service of his country. As far as I can tell, this is ten years more than the cumulative service of all members of the Romney clan. Obviously you don’t have to be a veteran to have judgments about military policy or criticisms of others’ views. But when it comes to casual slurs about someone else’s strength or resolve, you want to be careful, as a guy on the sidelines, sounding this way about people who have served.
Jimmy Carter did indeed make a gutsy go/no-go call. It turned out to be a tactical, strategic, and political disaster. You can read the blow-by-blow in Mark Bowden’s retrospective of “The Desert One Debacle.” With another helicopter, the mission to rescue U.S. diplomats then captive in Teheran might well have succeeded — and Carter is known still to believe that if the raid had succeeded, he would probably have been re-elected. Full discussion another time, but I think he’s right. (Even with the fiasco, and a miserable “stagflation” economy, the 1980 presidential race was very close until the very end.)
But here’s the main point about Carter. Deciding to go ahead with that raid was a close call. Carter’s own Secretary of State, Cyrus Vance, had opposed the raid and handed in his resignation even before the results were known. And it was a daring call — a choice in favor of a risky possible solution to a festering problem, knowing that if it went wrong there would be bad consequences all around, including for Carter himself. So if you say “even Jimmy Carter” to mean “even a wimp,” as Romney clearly did, you’re showing that you don’t know the first thing about the choice he really made.
Since Romney in particular and Republicans generally keep trying to make this election a rerun of 1980, they’d probably do well to get their facts a little straighter about Jimmy Carter (and while they are at it, about Ronald Reagan the serial tax-hiker).

UPDATE: At Ten Miles Square, Mark Kleiman also gives Romney a good roasting:
The only reason I can think of for Romney to say what he said is that the statement, as he made it, is obviously false, and Romney is addicted to lying. We know what Jimmy Carter would have done, because we know what he actually did do, under parallel circumstances: allow himself to be talked into going in without enough resources, risking having to scrub the mission if three out of eight helicopters failed (compared to a predicted two out of eight). Obama, by contrast, personally insisted on what turned out to be the essential extra chopper going into Abbotabad.
Moreover, of course, while making the final call was indeed dramatic, the key moves that Obama took - and Bush didn’t take - involved putting in motion the machinery that got us to the place where the final call was there to be made. Obama got bin Laden because Obama wanted to get bin Laden. There’s no evidence on the record that any of the Republicans - Bush, McCain, or Romney - shared that desire.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)


To: JohnM who wrote (187984)5/1/2012 4:50:25 PM
From: epicure
of 264926
 
Ah hubris- and from a mitten

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read


To: JohnM who wrote (187984)5/1/2012 4:57:59 PM
From: Sam
of 264926
 
Not to mention the fact that, had the attempt failed, Obama would have been roasted by these people who now say it was a "no-brainer," lol.

These people are shameless.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (187952)5/1/2012 5:01:10 PM
From: Sam
of 264926
 
Paul Ryan in his own words, from The Last Word:
Paul Ryan rewrites himself over Ayn Rand
msnbc.msn.com

Come on, Mitt--
WE WANT RYAN! WE WANT RYAN! WE WANT RYAN!

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2014 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.