Gold/Mining/Energy | Big Dog's Boom Boom Room (Moderated)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: XoFruitCake who wrote (65)4/18/2005 9:02:54 PM
From: redfish   of 89
 
"For example, if the Chinese government were to impose severe exchange controls, then loss of all principal is possible."

Just what I look for in a safe haven investment. Sign me up!!!!!!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (66)4/18/2005 9:16:27 PM
From: Think4Yourself   of 89
 
Thanks for your guys input. Very helpful.

EJ, have been enjoying your posts on several other threads I have been looking at today. Since I suspect the pure energy guys find many of my posts distracting, will drop the discussions here.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (68)4/18/2005 9:34:49 PM
From: Bearcatbob   of 89
 
I have avoided all investments in China. I have a hard time actually outside of North America. Every time I do it I get burned. Transglobe is burning up real good now. I simply believe that if energy prices are good - there are plenty of good opportunities here in North America. I find it interesting that metal stocks do not seem to be punished for being in Mexico and there is lots of investment. It seems like there would be similar investment in the Mexican oil industry if it were opened up.

Bob

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (61)4/18/2005 9:46:30 PM
From: The Jack of Hearts   of 89
 
China needs to stimulate consumerism...
Message 21240274

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: Frank4/18/2005 9:47:33 PM
   of 89
 
The old maxims were out in force today on CNBC --I heard " It is not different this time" regarding OS stocks at least three times. Also "The cure for high prices is high prices" came around a couple of times as well -- and all heads nod gravely and knowingly. But have you looked at NG prices the last two years? Where is the cure old pals? -- and EIA just revised production expectations down with no rigs left. Methinks the old timers may be surprised as the NG world has changed and it is different this time. New kids on the block surprisingly shake up the status quo in the neighborhood. Fred L., Kyle Cooper and Jim Wicklund just got their butts kicked as the new kids moved in and didn't play stickball the traditional way -now these forlorn analysts stand in shocked silence watching the evolving game---Frank

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: The Jack of Hearts who wrote (70)4/18/2005 9:58:48 PM
From: Broken_Clock   of 89
 
<<China needs to stimulate consumerism...>>

That's easy! We export Easy Al Greenspan to China.He knows every trick in the book. -ng-

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Frank who wrote (71)4/18/2005 10:25:00 PM
From: gregor_us   of 89
 
Exactly Frank: Here's a Thought: What Doesn't Change

is human behaviour, and tendencies. In other words, market participants will attempt to behave in the future, and, will percieve the future, as being almost a duplicate of the past.

But while human behaviour is predictable, the world itself is always changing. Virtually nothing in the world is the same as it was 35 years ago wrt to Oil. Nothing. Not OPEC. Not Asia. Not the USA. And certainly not the supply of oil.

Ahh. But Ned Riley "remembers" how it all turned out in the 70's, and so does Lee Raymond. You see? This is human nature to say the future will surely look alot like the past. But it doesn't. Not at all. What all these guys on CNBC really mean to say is that "we" have not changed. But they go too far. And they wind up saying the most ridiculous thing of all: That the world itself has not changed.

LP

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Tommaso who wrote (63)4/18/2005 10:31:21 PM
From: gregor_us   of 89
 
What's Needed Tomasso is a Compendium of Hoary Maxims,

Misunderstandings, and False Dillemas wrt to Oil and Energy here in 2005, and looking forward.

I'd also like to try to measure the "spread" between what is more likley to be reality, and, the noise, and volume of noise, on TV, in Washington, etc.

The group of Senators who called for a rejection of the CVX-UCL deal today is for example an attempt to confirm in the public's mind that "Oil Companies" set the price of Oil, and other pet. products.

Regards,

LP

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: yoremonhoj who wrote (14)4/18/2005 10:39:19 PM
From: quehubo   of 89
 
You might want to take a close look at the front month ng contract and OSX over the last 7-8 years.

NG futures led OSX up and down over most all moves of significance.

Futuresource has a symbol for the 18 month WTI strip which IMO would be a better indication of future equity valuations than far ahead future contracts.

Added some PTEN on weakness today and covered my DRQ.

I am still hoping for OIH in the lower 80's. No sense hurrying though the next few weeks will reveal Q1 production and the present S/D balance at $7.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: gregor_us who wrote (73)4/18/2005 10:48:17 PM
From: whitepine   of 89
 
In response to a bullish energy report from CRT Yahoo group, I posted the same message, essentially.

If you haven't read it, it may be worth a look:



research.cibcwm.com 

compliments of Alan Ross and the CRT group on Yahoo...

wp

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.