Technology Stocks | Satellite Radio & Competing Technologies


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: i-node who wrote (150)4/27/2005 7:01:22 PM
From: billcasto   of 179
 
I meant to say support at $26 and change. Lets hope some of the analysis that were on the cc step up tomorrow. They were all over themselves on the cc congratulating the XM guys on such a good quarter.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: billcasto who wrote (152)4/27/2005 7:22:29 PM
From: i-node   of 179
 
>> Lets hope some of the analysis that were on the cc step up tomorrow. They were all over themselves on the cc congratulating the XM guys on such a good quarter.

I'm wondering whether they'll just hold off until SIRI's call is over then update both the following day. It does seem the expectations for SIRI are pretty low, so it may work out for them -- if they come in with 300K subs I think the Street will be okay with it. I'm thinking more like 272K. If it is less than that I suspect both stocks could be hurt.

XM may be in a no-win situation in this respect.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: i-node4/28/2005 2:13:52 AM
   of 179
 
UBS on XM's Quarter End

Solid 1Q05 Results Lead Into Upbeat 2Q05 Outlook
XM reported better than expected net adds (4/1/05), cost metrics, and EBITDA for 1Q05. As a result of the customer reaction thus far to XM's price hike and planned promotions during the quarter, XM has guided to flat net adds in 2Q versus UBS and Street expectations for a sequential decline.

* EBITDA Inflection in 1Q05
XM's EBITDA loss of $(71)M during the quarter was a 9% improvement over 1Q04 and represents an inflection for quarterly EBITDA loss. We note this milestone as it indicates what we believe is key inflection in XM's ultimate ability to achieve positive FCF, EBITDA, and EPS.

* Dad and Grad Promotion for Multiple Subscriber Households
During the Father's Day/Graduation time period in the second half of 2Q05, XM will offer a free Roady 2 with each purchase of an XM receiver. The promotion is intended to increase overall subscribership and will likely result in sub acquisition of lower churn and higher return subs, while benefiting XM's 2Q05 sub growth.

* Valuation: Maintain Buy 2; Increase target to $41 from $40.50
Our target is based on a DCF analysis assuming 3% growth in perpetuity and a 10.2% WACC. Our NPV analysis implies an incr sub valuation of $340, or 25M subs at current levels vs our 29M 10-year forecast. We believe the NPV discount and upside from ad revs support our Buy 2 rating.


* Better Than Expected 1Q05 Results Accompany Upbeat 2Q05 Outlook. XM reported better than expected 1Q05 results highlighted by impressive cost controls, lower SAC (subscriber acquisition costs), CPGA (cost per gross addition), CCPU (cash cost per user—operating expenses less CPGA), improved EBITDA loss, and narrowed EPS loss. As a result of the success during 1Q05 and the promotions planned in 2Q05, XM management expects net additions to be flat with 1Q in the 2Q05, versus our expectation for a sequential decline. First quarter results highlight the operating leverage we expect XM to achieve over the long-term. XM has demonstrated its focus on cost cutting and ultimately achieving positive FCF and positive returns for shareholders. We reiterate our Buy 2 rating and increase our price target modestly to $41 from $40.50 following revisions to our model.


Table 1: XM Satellite Radio—UBS 1Q05 Estimates Versus Actuals

* XM Achieves EBITDA Inflection Point in 1Q05. While revenues and ARPU were essentially in-line with our estimates, XM reported SAC of $52 versus UBSe of $65 and CPGA of $90 versus UBSe of $101. Stronger than expected gross additions of 825k (versus UBSe of 808k) helped to drive lower cost per gross addition metrics, however, total acquisition costs (CPGA times gross additions) of $74 million were still below UBSe of $82 million. In addition, operating expenses excluding acquisition costs (CCPU) were $8.47 per average subscriber or $89 million, which is well below UBSe of $10.61 ($111 million). We would note that for the third quarter in a row XM generated positive EBITDA before marketing (EBITDAM) of $13 million (13% margin). As a result of the better than expected cost metrics, EBITDA loss of $(71) million was well ahead of our $(102) million estimate and was a 9% improvement over 1Q04. While XM has had positive EBITDA inflection points in the past (Chart 1), we believe the trend toward positive EBITDA is highlighted by 1Q05 results and will continue, except for 3Q05E, until EBITDA positive in 2007E.
Chart 1: Annual Change in XM Satellite Radio Quarterly EBITDA (1Q03—4Q07E)

* Upbeat Outlook for 2Q05. XM expects net additions during 2Q05 to be in-line with 1Q05 net additions, while churn is anticipated to remain flat with first quarter results. This outlook is better than we had expected given the impact of the recent price increase that was enacted on April 2, 2005. We had expected a mild increase in churn coupled with lower net additions during the quarter. Our revised estimates for 2Q05 reflect the positive outlook for the quarter, as demonstrated in Table 2. As we discuss below, one of the drivers of the upbeat outlook for 2Q05 is XM’s planned Dads and Grads promotion in the second half of the quarter.


Table 2: XM Satellite Radio—Revised Model (1Q05A—2008E)

* Planned Dad and Grad Promotion during 2Q05. XM intends to run a promotion during the graduation and Father’s Day time frame in the second half of 2Q05, which will feature a free Roady 2 receiver with the purchase of any XM receiver. We believe the market’s initial reaction (trading down at the beginning of the day), that the industry leader does not need to give away free receivers, may have been shortsighted (as was recognized by the stock ultimately closing up on the day). XM is the cost leader in the industry and is well positioned to offer a product promotion that will encourage multiple subscriber households, lower churn, and higher return on investment. We believe this promotion will likely help XM achieve its 2Q05 subscriber growth estimate and keep the company on track to potentially exceed current 2005 subscriber guidance of 5.5 million. We would note, our revised subscriber estimates are now 2.4 million net additions in 2005, which results in 5.6 million total subscribers by year-end.

* Slightly lower ARPU Outlook in the Near-term; Normalized Over the Long-term. In addition to the changes in 2Q05 subscriber growth, we have slightly lowered our ARPU estimates modestly for the quarter and the year as we expect the impact to XM’s financials from the recent price hike to have a longer overall adoption curve. In other words, while we expect ARPU to increase as a result of the price hike, we believe the full impact to XM’s financials will take longer than originally expected due to the company’s plan to push higher rates once billing cycles have been completed, which could push the impact out from our prior estimates.

* Valuation: Increase 12-month price target modestly to $41 from $40.50 representing 45% upside potential; Maintain Buy 2 rating. Following the better than expected first quarter results, we have modestly increased our target to $41 from $40.50. Our target is based on a discounted cash flow analysis assuming 3% growth in perpetuity and a 10.2% weighted average cost of capital. Our target equates to a 15 times 2010E EBITDA multiple and an 11.6 times 2010E FCF multiple. Given the early stage nature of the business, we believe multiple valuation approaches are beneficial to the understanding of the business. Accordingly our NPV analysis implies an incremental subscriber valuation of $340 and the market is valuing 25 million subscribers in the current stock price versus our 29 million 10-year forecast. In addition, the NPV analysis does not incorporate the benefits from advertising revenue. As a result, we believe the NPV discount to our model coupled with upside from advertising supports our Buy 2 rating on the stock.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: i-node who wrote (154)4/28/2005 6:42:17 PM
From: billcasto   of 179
 
I read where the in the know guys were worried about the churn which came at 2.6% or somewhere there abouts. To me that seems pretty low but what do I know. With this market I think we will have to wait until XM puts up some better number which might not be until next quarter. I sold my shares this morning when the market opened. The premarket was lower than the close and I felt some weakness. This might set up some trading with $26 being the support level. Take care.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: billcasto who wrote (155)4/28/2005 7:26:04 PM
From: i-node   of 179
 
The churn numbers are a major point of confusion in the media. Keeping in mind it is a monthly rate, 2.6% would be really, really bad. But these media people are conflating "churn" with promotional subscribers who decide not to become paying subscribers.

SIRI's churn was excellent for Q1, as was XM's given its fee increase. But there is a bit of a "gotcha" in SIRI's number:

In their deal with Chrysler, all DCX factory installs received a "free" 1 year prepaid subscription; initially, these numbers were small, but the last couple of quarters they are building.

Just as XM counts "promotional" subscribers as subscribers, so does Sirius. But every quarter, XM loses about 40% of those subscribers when they decide not to continue with a real subscription -- so, XM's sub #s are inflated by about 40% of the previous quarter's promotional subscribers -- currently about 100K.

Sirius, OTOH, is not losing these customers until the end of the 1 year promotional period (XM uses a 3 month promo period), which will be mostly beginning in Q3. So, while XM carries 40% of one quarter's subs on the books which we know are going to churn off, Sirius is carrying almost a full year. It is starting to become significant.

I'm not suggesting they should do anything differently, just that the subscriber numbers are inflated by the facts. SIRI's #s are likely overstated by some 120-150K, which is basically 10% for them.

Anyway, there is a great deal of confusion on the churn figures, but both companies did extremely well in this area in my view.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: i-node4/28/2005 11:21:12 PM
   of 179
 
Panero in TMF Interview:

"Major League Baseball was a terrific deal for us. It was an expensive deal, but we thought it was the right deal. You can't make every single investment in every piece of programming out there, because my experience from the cable industry and the pay-per-view industry and other content platforms I have been on is that those kinds of expenses can eventually bury you. We try to make them in a very reasonable way and with the idea that those investments are not just to create a splash because they get a headline someplace but because they are actually going to add subscribers, which adds to revenue and adds to us getting to the cash flow breakeven in certain time frames."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: i-node who wrote (156)4/29/2005 5:35:22 AM
From: billcasto   of 179
 
I heard the same thing happened to Comcast. They reported a great quarter and the analysis focused in on the churn. Well, hell, what to do?

I think the market is down for the count and people are going to focus on the half empty. Once the fed is done raising rates and oil goes below 50 and stays there, we might see the market move up. Until then cash is King.

By the way, saw Jim Flaws, the CEO of Corning interviewed last night. He said the main driver of their earnings is the screens and not fiber. You were right on on this one. Take care.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: i-node8/12/2006 1:47:05 PM
   of 179
 
XM vs. Sirius Content

washingtonpost.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: TimF1/4/2008 3:34:30 PM
   of 179
 
XM-Sirius Merger on the Ropes?

Reading the tea leaves of delay, Reuters reports (via Drudge) that the DOJ may be gearing up to derail the planned merger, announced 10 months ago, between the nation’s two satellite radio providers:

The delay may be due to the complexity of the issues raised by the merger of the only two U.S. satellite radio companies — or because the Department of Justice (DOJ) is putting together a case to block the deal in federal court, analysts at Stifel Nicolaus said in a research note on Thursday.

Alternatively, top officials at DOJ may be leaning toward approval but might still be weighing arguments from staffers who oppose the deal, Stifel Nicolaus said...

techliberation.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: TimF who wrote (160)1/5/2008 11:48:34 AM
From: i-node   of 179
 
Tim

I am very on-again, off-again about whether I think it will pass. Very much against it, though.

I can find no reasonable legal argument for permitting it: The companies say they aren't going broke without it, and it will create an unregulated monopoly without any real "substitute". It just makes no sense.

OTOH, all these analysts are just so sure it is going to happen, and you have to figure they are getting their information somewhere.

The companies' merger agreement provided for a huge ($175M, I think) penalty for walking away from the deal. However, there is a provision that allows either to walk away if regulatory approval hasn't been received by March. OTOH, Karmazin recently said he would sue the FCC if THEY denied the merger.

Both companies have spent 10s of millions to try to get this done and are still spending, and it seems like it has really wrecked any opportunity for them to proceed individually. SIRI's Q4 subscriber #s were pretty weak (SIRI dominates retail better than 60/40, but neither company is selling squat at retail).

I'm starting to get the sense they'll get approval, but WITH conditions that may be deal-killers. For example, if it is approved but they are required to give up some of their spectrum or one of the FCC licenses, which totally makes the deal unworkable.

DR

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.