Politics | A US National Health Care System?


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: puborectalis who wrote (23627)4/6/2012 12:24:41 PM
From: jlallen   of 25840
 
Nonsense. Its the same thing. lol

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Lane3 who wrote (23592)4/6/2012 12:38:47 PM
From: skinowski2 Recommendations   of 25840
 
They could have made it a tax but they were so keen on not using the "t" word


It had to be hidden. People do not like new taxes. Besides, a tax is too obvious - it makes it difficult to maintain the delusion that the corn is free.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: puborectalis who wrote (23625)4/6/2012 12:48:13 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation   of 25840
 
Even if Romney was to miraculously win the prez,he will by stymied by the same recalcitrant opposition in Congress ending in total gridlock. Be careful what you wish for.

I'm a big fan of gridlock, personally.

But if Romney wins, there will be gridlock only if he doesn't get both the House & Senate, and this at least seems like a reasonable possibility.

The key thing is that if the Court doesn't throw out Obamacare, there needs to some way of getting this train wreck cleaned up. If the Rs get control and then fail to straighten out the mess it will be on them.

The reason Obamacare is so messed up is clear: there was no mandate for the kind of reform they were pushing which meant they had to twist arms and bribe legislators for support. The process was as close to being corrupt as anything I've seen in DC in my life and it does not form the basis for good law. What we got is a turkey that will reduce the quality while increasing overall costs of health care in this country.

Perhaps, as a physician, you see that as a good thing. I do not.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: i-node who wrote (23594)4/6/2012 1:11:00 PM
From: skinowski2 Recommendations   of 25840
 
Some experts estimate that up to one-third of the $2 trillion of annual health care costs in the United States each year is spent on unnecessary hospitalizations and tests, unproven treatments, ineffective new drugs and medical devices, and futile care at the end of life.


Start off with reforming malpractice laws. ER docs find themselves under pressure to admit questionable cases. They cannot afford to alienate "squeaky wheel" patients who "expect" to get admitted. They get sued quite a lot, and even if they win the case, they lose, considering all the aggravation. Similar issues exist with tests. In those cases when in time there actually proves to be a problem and a test was not done, the doc burns.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: skinowski who wrote (23632)4/6/2012 1:20:03 PM
From: i-node   of 25840
 
>> Start off with reforming malpractice laws.

My wife & I were talking about this article and that was her first response: What are you going to do about legal reform? After all, that is the source of the problem. Strangely, the genius that is Obamacare doesn't even touch it.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: i-node who wrote (23617)4/6/2012 1:23:58 PM
From: skinowski2 Recommendations   of 25840
 
Skinowski, you're excepted ;)


lOL! Thanks... :)

And yet, it is also true that most years financially I did better as an employee than as a private practitioner. As an employee I benefit from the so called "hospital contribution" - which is the case, as far as I know, with every Hospitalist program in the country. In other words, there is a redistribution taking place, from part A to part B. For the same reason, these days most primary care settings in the nation are owned or controlled by hospitals. Money talks -- even *misallocated* money.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: i-node who wrote (23633)4/6/2012 1:38:50 PM
From: skinowski2 Recommendations   of 25840
 
I am convinced that patients must have legal recourse - and compensation - in cases of true malpractice. Regrettably, the way things evolved, too often it is a legal shakedown racket, adding greatly to healthcare costs. Obama didn't even want to touch it.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: i-node4/8/2012 3:06:59 AM
2 Recommendations   of 25840
 
Milton Friedman on government involvement in health care (1976). Prescient.

youtube.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: TimF4/8/2012 11:45:16 AM
   of 25840
 
Markets in Everything: Market-Based, Deeply-Discounted Surgery for Cash, Payable in Advance

mjperry.blogspot.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: TimF who wrote (23637)4/8/2012 1:03:35 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation   of 25840
 
Complete list of surgery prices:

surgerycenterok.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.