Politics | CFZ E-wave - politics


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Shack who wrote (9)11/3/2004 3:20:35 AM
From: cthruu   of 32
 
I think the next action by the Democrats will be a pivotal action in uniting this country. If they decide to challenge Ohio to the end, the country will remain divided for ever. If Mr. Kerry has the best interests of the country at his heart, he should concede when the popular vote is counted and current lead for Mr. Bush remains intact.

If Mr. Kerry takes the lawyer route, forget about uniting the country no matter who becomes the President. Mr. Bush already has the popular vote by a large margin.

Just my two cents.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: skinowski11/11/2004 7:15:33 PM
   of 32
 
Arafat the monster

By Jeff Jacoby, Globe Columnist | November 11, 2004

YASSER ARAFAT died at age 75, lying in bed surrounded by familiar faces. He left this world peacefully, unlike the thousands of victims he sent to early graves.

In a better world, the PLO chief would have met his end on a gallows, hanged for mass murder much as the Nazi chiefs were hanged at Nuremberg. In a better world, the French president would not have paid a visit to the bedside of such a monster. In a better world, George Bush would not have said, on hearing the first reports that Arafat had died, "God bless his soul."

God bless his soul? What a grotesque idea! Bless the soul of the man who brought modern terrorism to the world? Who sent his agents to slaughter athletes at the Olympics, blow airliners out of the sky, bomb schools and pizzerias, machine-gun passengers in airline terminals? Who lied, cheated, and stole without compunction? Who inculcated the vilest culture of Jew-hatred since the Third Reich? Human beings might stoop to bless a creature so evil -- as indeed Arafat was blessed, with money, deference, even a Nobel Prize -- but God, I am quite sure, will damn him for eternity.

Arafat always inspired flights of nonsense from Western journalists, and his last two weeks were no exception.

Derek Brown wrote in The Guardian that Arafat's "undisputed courage as a guerrilla leader" was exceeded only "by his extraordinary courage" as a peace negotiator. But it is an odd kind of courage that expresses itself in shooting unarmed victims -- or in signing peace accords and then flagrantly violating their terms.

Another commentator, columnist Gwynne Dyer, asked, "So what did Arafat do right?" The answer: He drew worldwide attention to the Palestinian cause, "for the most part by successful acts of terror." In other words, butchering innocent human beings was "right," since it served an ulterior political motive. No doubt that thought brings daily comfort to all those who were forced to bury a child, parent, or spouse because of Arafat's "successful" terrorism.

Some journalists couldn't wait for Arafat's actual death to begin weeping for him. Take the BBC's Barbara Plett, who burst into tears on the day he was airlifted out of the West Bank. "When the helicopter carrying the frail old man rose above his ruined compound," Plett reported from Ramallah, "I started to cry." Normal people don't weep for brutal murderers, but Plett made it clear that her empathy for Arafat -- whom she praised as "a symbol of Palestinian unity, steadfastness, and resistance" -- was heartfelt:

"I remember well when the Israelis re-conquered the West Bank more than two years ago, how they drove their tanks and bulldozers into Mr. Arafat's headquarters, trapping him in a few rooms, and throwing a military curtain around Ramallah. I remember how Palestinians admired his refusal to flee under fire. They told me: `Our leader is sharing our pain, we are all under the same siege.' And so was I." Such is the state of journalism at the BBC, whose reporters do not seem to have any trouble reporting, dry-eyed, on the plight of Arafat's victims. (That is, when they mention them -- which Plett's teary bon voyage to Arafat did not.)

And what about those victims? Why were they scarcely remembered in this Arafat death watch?

How is it possible to reflect on Arafat's most enduring legacy -- the rise of modern terrorism -- without recalling the legions of men, women, and children whose lives he and his followers destroyed? If Osama bin Laden were on his deathbed, would we neglect to mention all those he murdered on 9/11?

It would take an encyclopedia to catalog all of the evil Arafat committed. But that is no excuse for not trying to recall at least some of it.

Perhaps his signal contribution to the practice of political terror was the introduction of warfare against children. On one black date in May 1974, three PLO terrorists slipped from Lebanon into the northern Israeli town of Ma'alot. They murdered two parents and a child whom they found at home, then seized a local school, taking more than 100 boys and girls hostage and threatening to kill them unless a number of imprisoned terrorists were released. When Israeli troops attempted a rescue, the terrorists exploded hand grenades and opened fire on the students. By the time the horror ended, 25 people were dead; 21 of them were children.

Thirty years later, no one speaks of Ma'alot anymore. The dead children have been forgotten. Everyone knows Arafat's name, but who ever recalls the names of his victims?

So let us recall them: Ilana Turgeman. Rachel Aputa. Yocheved Mazoz. Sarah Ben-Shim'on. Yona Sabag. Yafa Cohen. Shoshana Cohen. Michal Sitrok. Malka Amrosy. Aviva Saada. Yocheved Diyi. Yaakov Levi. Yaakov Kabla. Rina Cohen. Ilana Ne'eman. Sarah Madar. Tamar Dahan. Sarah Soper. Lili Morad. David Madar. Yehudit Madar. The 21 dead children of Ma'alot -- 21 of the thousands of who died at Arafat's command.

Jeff Jacoby's e-mail address is jacoby@globe.com.



© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: skinowski11/27/2004 9:36:04 PM
   of 32
 
Trade wars continue... the Bear is - more likely - not over:

U.S. law on duties triggers sanctions

By Paul Meller International Herald Tribune Saturday, November 27, 2004

BRUSSELS The World Trade Organization on Friday authorized the European Union, Canada and five other countries to impose about $150 million in trade sanctions against the United States in retaliation for an import duty law that the WTO ruled illegal last year.
.
"It's been approved," said Amina Mohamed, the Kenyan ambassador to the WTO and chairwoman of the organization's dispute settlement body, referring to the sanctions.
.
Sanctions could be aimed at a wide range of American exports, possibly including steel ball bearings, cod, shoes and apples. Most would be imposed by Japan and the European Union, which have been the hardest hit by the U.S. law.
.
Known as the Byrd amendment, after Senator Robert Byrd, the West Virginia Democrat who proposed it in 2000, the law hands American companies the proceeds from duties levied on foreign rivals for alleged dumping - selling goods at below-market prices. Seven trading partners of the United States complained that this punished importers twice over: once with the levy and again by giving a financial windfall to their American competitors.
.
The other five complainants are Brazil, India, Japan, Mexico and South Korea.
.
After the WTO ruled against the law early last year the United States appealed the ruling in a bid to avert sanctions. But the trade arbitrator has stood firm.
.
Although the amounts involved in this trade dispute are modest compared with other recent cases, the Byrd Amendment decision is unusual in that it involved several countries taking action against one.
.
The coordinated action could set a trend in future disputes, said Lourdes Catrain, a trade lawyer and partner in the Brussels office of the law firm Hogan & Hartson. She noted that Europe had built up a coalition of other countries in this case.
.
"This is very significant," she said. "It sends a very important message to the United States: Its trading partners are getting tired of the way the United States behaves."

iht.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: pelm11/28/2004 8:27:04 PM
   of 32
 
Could anyone here help me. My computer is locked up and I have to fill in a password on content advisor 3 times whenever click on anything in silicon valley. Only once other places. A friend told me to try the message boards because there were experts on computers here. Which one? However I love politics. Nice to know that there are places like this.
Well on to the next board. When I get my computer running properly I will be back. Pauline Russell

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: skinowski4/16/2005 8:39:20 AM
   of 32
 

Thousands Hold Anti-Japan Protests in Eastern China
Sat Apr 16, 2005 06:51 AM ET


By Ben Blanchard and Benjamin Kang Lim
SHANGHAI/BEIJING (Reuters) - Shouting "Japanese invaders must die," thousands protested against Japan's wartime past in eastern China on Saturday, hurling rocks and bottles and burning Japanese flags at Tokyo's consulate in Shanghai.

But with thousands of paramilitary police on the streets of Beijing and students warned against protests, authorities headed off a repeat of last weekend's violent demonstrations in the capital, which hosts Japan's foreign minister on Sunday.

Police also barred incidents in southern Guangzhou and southwestern Chongqing, where thousands marched last weekend.

Chinese are protesting against textbooks they see as whitewashing Japan's wartime past and against Tokyo's bid for a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council, among other disputes.

In the third weekend of violent protests against Japan across China, thousands marched on the Japanese consulate in Shanghai, smashing windows with rocks and pelting it with paint bombs and attacking Japanese restaurants along the way.

Some held posters carrying messages such as "Face Up to History." Another warned: "The anti-Japan war is not over yet."

Protesters overturned a Japanese car, leaving it scratched and "Boycott Japan" scrawled on its side.

Hundreds of paramilitary police in full riot gear stood ready as police appealed for order on loud hailers. Isolated scuffles broke out and about a dozen protesters were dragged away.

During moments of relative calm, protesters and police alike were spotted buying lattes at a nearby coffee shop. The demonstration broke up in the early evening.

Japan's foreign ministry lodged a protest, saying the Chinese government failed to protect Japan's diplomatic and commercial facilities from damage by the protesters and urging Beijing to take severe and serious efforts to prevent a recurrence.

"This sort of incident seems to have been repeated every week since the beginning of the month. Whatever the reason for this violent and destructive behavior, we will not accept it, but strongly criticize it," the Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

In the eastern city of Hangzhou, 10,000 protesters chanted anti-Japanese slogans and handed out fliers calling for a boycott of Japanese goods, witnesses said. Journalists were told not to report on it and warned they would be sacked if they took part.

Shopkeepers covered up billboards featuring Japanese electronics goods in Hangzhou and restaurant signs in Beijing. Another 2,000 people marched in Tianjin city, near the capital.

BEIJING SECURE

In Beijing, hundreds of police in riot gear secured the ambassador's home in the northeast diplomatic district and the embassy in the southeast. Both were hit by rocks and bottles by thousands of protesters last weekend but spared this time around.

China appeared keen to keep the capital quiet.

Japanese Foreign Minister Nobutaka Machimura is due to meet his counterpart Li Zhaoxing on Sunday, and aims to ensure disputes -- on everything from gas exploration in disputed waters to Japan's history -- do not hurt $178 billion in annual trade between the economic powers.

Japan has pledged not to let the series of disputes hinder their broader relationship. Even so, Machimura noted security in Shanghai was inadequate and he would share his views with Li.

Chinese fume at what they see as Japan's failure to own up to atrocities committed during its occupation of China from 1931 to 1945. Beijing estimated that up to 35 million Chinese were killed or wounded by invading Japanese troops.

A Japanese encyclopedia says "untold" civilians and about 1.3 million Chinese soldiers died in the war.

Anger flared after Tokyo's approval this month of a history textbook written by Japanese nationalist scholars that many in Asia say glosses over Japan's wartime past.

Tensions edged up another notch on Wednesday when Japan announced it had begun procedures to allocate rights for test-drilling in a disputed area of the East China Sea.

China has come under fire for tacitly encouraging the unrest, which started in Guangdong and Sichuan provinces early this month, spread to Beijing last week and, now, to nearby Tianjin, and to Shanghai and Hangzhou on the east coast.

Beijing denies it deliberately allowed things to spiral and pledged to protect Japanese businesses and nationals in China.

"I have to point out here that such allegations are totally groundless and a serious distortion of truth," State Councillor Tang Jiaxuan, a former foreign minister, said.

Describing relations as being at a "crossroads," Tang blamed the tensions on repeated visits by Japanese leaders, including Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, to the Yasukuni shrine -- where convicted war criminals are honored along with Japan's war dead.

Authorities appeared to be clamping down harder in Beijing to keep the capital peaceful ahead of Machimura's visit. University students were warned by email not to protest.

Top anti-Japanese activists in Beijing were rounded up to prevent protests, Hong Kong's South China Morning Post reported. (Reporting by Edwin Chan, Lucy Hornby, and Doug Young in Shanghai, Reuters Television, and Isabel Reynolds in Tokyo)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.
© Reuters 2005

Close This Window

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: skinowski who wrote (14)4/16/2005 11:11:36 AM
From: Shack   of 32
 
So if the Japanese apologize does that stop the protests? It seems to run deeper than that IMO.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Shack who wrote (15)4/16/2005 11:43:08 AM
From: skinowski   of 32
 
Yeah, it must go deeper... But the interesting thing is that such riots are actually taking place in mainland China. And - I may be wrong - but it appears that they are happening against the will of the Government. Which means that riots and social unrest may happen again -- for different reason, like, perhaps, potential problems with the economy, compensation for workers, etc.

I think that there is a connection between these signs of social unrest and the fact that markets appear to be rolling over.

I read years ago that some people used to track flare ups of tensions in the Middle East, because they seemed to correlate with negative action in the markets. China may become a similar "indicator" - especially since it is an important, rapidly growing economy, maybe on its way to become the dominant one.

If China sneezes, the world may catch... not yet pneumonia, but maybe... bronchitis... g/ng

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: skinowski who wrote (16)4/16/2005 12:05:29 PM
From: Shack   of 32
 
different reason, like, perhaps, potential problems with the economy, compensation for workers

Agreed, that's the real risk over there in terms of social stability. Capitalism only really works when the masses are relatively docile....or can be effectively controlled. In North America we have brainless television for that purpose.-g/ng

think that there is a connection between these signs of social unrest and the fact that markets appear to be rolling over

Possible but that's a big extrapolation. Lots of bad stuff happened during the recent bull, arguably far worse stuff. Also I am not sure what kind of decline you are expecting here but its just an (a) of (B) of B to me.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: skinowski who wrote (16)4/16/2005 12:13:44 PM
From: Shack   of 32
 
BTW, interesting tidbit courtesy Les, Canada's oil industry is getting pretty cozy with China:

news.yahoo.com 


"Factoring in the oilsands, Canada holds the second-largest oil reserves in the world behind Saudi Arabia."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Shack who wrote (17)4/16/2005 1:14:51 PM
From: skinowski   of 32
 
Capitalism only really works when the masses are relatively docile....or can be effectively controlled.

...OR, rather, effectively "paid off" - like, in receiving liveable comfortable compensation.

To me, the simple definition of capitalism is the right to own what's yours, including means of production. Under Socialism, businesses belong to the "people" - but "people" cannot run a business, and hire and fire, and carry the key to the front door. Ergo - in reality, everything is controlled by those who hold the actual power - usually, the Party bosses. A tightly organized ruling class.

A society which respects and protects rights of an individual is necessarily Capitalist. If individual rights are not consistently and firmly protected, such a society is either totalitarian, or is sliding in that direction.

I know that I am not saying anything new here... Things become, of course way more complicated - as one gets deeper into the details...

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.