SI
SI
discoversearch

 Technology Stocks | Intel Corporation (INTC)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: relentless who wrote (90108)10/13/1999 10:28:00 AM
From: The Duke of URL©
of 186765
 
wsrn


wsrn.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: AurumRabosa who wrote (90128)10/13/1999 10:41:00 AM
From: The Duke of URL©
of 186765
 
Fuchi!!! your back, we missed you. :)

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (90140)10/13/1999 10:56:00 AM
From: greg s
of 186765
 
Thank you Duke & Relentless!

This data is helpful. I wouldn't have found this if you hadn't mentioned it.

Greg.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read


To: Amy J who wrote (90090)10/13/1999 11:02:00 AM
From: Tony Viola
of 186765
 
Hi Amy, just a couple additions to your very concise recap of the CC, thanks much for that:

Q4 GM will be a couple of points higher (GM 58.7 for Q3, so that's 60.7 for Q4!) because of improvement
from .18 lower unit costs, inventory costs, and something else which I missed


What I wrote down about GM improvement prediction for 4Q was: seasonal improvement (guess this is a supply/demand driver, 4Q always being the best Q), plus better ASP (0.18 chips are faster, can sell for more) plus 0.18 efficiencies (more die/wafer, etc.). Also, he said that microprocessor production costs have been coming in lower than estimations for a while now. I'll give Process Boy some of the credit here.

And you're right, he didn't say significantly up revs for 4Q. I guess I manufactured that term myself when he said up vs. slightly up and he did say that his prediction for 4Q over 3Q is stronger than his prediction was for 3Q over 2Q, and the latter was up 8 or 9% as I recall. I know, a lot of hanging on words here and taking things all over the place re context. But you did report on this better than I did.

Did you say that Paul O. said that both microprocessors and chipsets set new records for shipments (revs or units?) in 3Q? And, he said that PIII is now the #1 selling micro in the world.

I think I was the first or among the first here to say yesterday that the CC was quite positive about 4Q, and I took some heat. On waking up to the news this morning, it looks like most of the analysts agree with me. You did your summaries last night and it looks like you see things as not so bad also.

Thanks again for the reporting and correcting.

Tony




Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Diamond Jim who wrote (90135)10/13/1999 11:27:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph
of 186765
 

"INTC: GRUNTAL has reiterated estimate for quarter ending 09/99
of $0.60 on 10/12/99"
--
Glenn, when did they issue this? they too missed.


Heavens I have no clue. The timing seemed silly.

Glenn

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Burt Masnick who wrote (90123)10/13/1999 11:35:00 AM
From: Proud_Infidel
of 186765
 
Burt,

Very well said.

BK<eom>

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)


To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (90145)10/13/1999 11:41:00 AM
From: JDN
of 186765
 
Hello everyone, isnt this an exciting buying opportunity? I just finished reading many of the posts since last night (couldnt read them all because so many people posted) however, I dont think I say this information. If my poor old memory serves me right, INTC originally gave guidance of 52 cents this quarter THEN they came out awhile back and said things are going to be better then we thought--and street raised it to 57 cents. Well reality was 55 cents. Thats better than the original guidance but not so good as the UPGRADE in estimated earnings based upon INTC's comment. Well, were I INTC I would say, hey 55 cents beats 52 cents so in fact we were better than we thought. JDN

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: JDN who wrote (90146)10/13/1999 11:44:00 AM
From: Mr. Tomatohead
of 186765
 
Qualifies as a nice little overreaction if you ask me...added a few shares, would've gotten more but stuck some in SUNW this month.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (90122)10/13/1999 11:44:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis
of 186765
 
RE:"INTC: GRUNTAL reconfirms the recommendation as Strong Buy on
10/12/99 "...

Isn't that where Joe Battataglia works? The guy who crushed Fleckenstein during those bull-bear debates on CNBC... You could see the fear in Flecks eyes. Apparently Joe is about 6'8", 300lbs. :>)

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)


To: JDN who wrote (90146)10/13/1999 12:04:00 PM
From: Ali Chen
of 186765
 
JDN, <Well reality was 55 cents. >
It looks like real reality
intel.com 
shows EPS of 0.42...

Of course, in wishful reality of "pro forma information",
which "is not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles"
intel.com 
the "excused" EPS looks more like 0.55. Who you want
to fool?


Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2014 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.