SI
SI
discoversearch

 Technology Stocks | Intel Corporation (INTC)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Road Walker who wrote (186523)2/3/2012 5:54:26 PM
From: Elmer Phud
of 186768
 
Apple hasn't really been agnostic historically. They were the A in the AIM project which developed the PPC. They were in a sense forced to Intel's products because it became obvious that IBM couldn't keep pace with Intel's process and Apple made the switch, because they had to. I think the same thing will happen again in a process generation or two then it becomes apparent again that what Intel can do, nobody else can do. Go with Intel or get left behind.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)


To: greg s who wrote (186522)2/3/2012 5:57:29 PM
From: DewDiligence_on_SI
of 186768
 
Thanks for your reply. Why is the purple “T” in the corner for accessing E*Trade a problem, IYO? It’s barely even visible on my screen after clicking on the X button. Regards, Dew

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)


To: DewDiligence_on_SI who wrote (186526)2/3/2012 6:08:23 PM
From: greg s
of 186768
 
Lots of paying members were upset. Especially those using the iPad ... the Purple T threw the rest of the page to the left and took away about an inch of screen real estate on a 9 inch screen.

Again, I see a trend. A trend away from customer orientation. Heck, I could be wrong. Like I said: this is just a Plan B for the Intel board IF it's needed in the future.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read


To: DewDiligence_on_SI who wrote (186526)2/3/2012 6:09:20 PM
From: Elmer Phud
of 186768
 
I'm able to block it.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (186528)2/3/2012 6:13:42 PM
From: DewDiligence_on_SI
of 186768
 
By clicking on the X button… or by doing something else? T.i.a.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)


To: DewDiligence_on_SI who wrote (186529)2/3/2012 6:21:30 PM
From: greg s
of 186768
 

del

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)


To: greg s who wrote (186530)2/3/2012 6:24:09 PM
From: Elmer Phud
of 186768
 
you might want to delete this and send via PM

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (186525)2/3/2012 6:31:05 PM
From: Road Walker
of 186768
 
Apple hasn't really been agnostic historically. They were the A in the AIM project which developed the PPC. They were in a sense forced to Intel's products because it became obvious that IBM couldn't keep pace with Intel's process and Apple made the switch, because they had to. I think the same thing will happen again in a process generation or two then it becomes apparent again that what Intel can do, nobody else can do. Go with Intel or get left behind.

It's the incumbent advantage. Intel can't be a little better, they have to "force" Apple to change as you say.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (186518)2/3/2012 10:34:28 PM
From: Kirk ©
of 186768
 
Great point! We've had our disagreements over the years but we try to remain civil and usually learn something in the process. It makes this a good place.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read


From: greg s2/6/2012 11:03:48 AM
of 186768
 
A very interesting article on the risk/reward of AMD's ultrathin notebook strategy, courtesy of Golfbum on iHub.

The author: Patrick Moorhead, "I departed AMD in 2011 where I served as Corporate Vice President and Corporate Fellow in the strategy group. There, I developed long-term strategies for mobile computing devices and personal computers."

forbes.com

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2014 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.