Strategies & Market Trends | Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: Yulya8/12/2010 3:12:45 PM
1 Recommendation   of 115618
 
30,000 unexpectedly turn out in Georgia for public housing sign-up
By the CNN Wire Staff
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

* Panic ensued when the event began, officials say
* Only 10,000 people were initially expected
* Crowds began gathering at the site as early as Monday
* 62 people required medical attention, including 20 who were hospitalized

Atlanta, Georgia (CNN) -- A crush of people 30,000 strong unexpectedly turned out Wednesday in hopes of getting public housing applications in East Point, Georgia, causing a panic to ensue once the process actually began, authorities said.

Crowds began gathering in the municipality on the outskirts of Atlanta as early as Monday for the applications, officials said.

Initially, only 10,000 people were expected, but officials said crowd control became an issue after many families brought more than one member -- children, other relatives and even dogs in some cases, according to Kimberly Lemish, executive director of the East Point Housing Authority.

While the crowd remained orderly and calm leading up to the handout, "as soon as the doors were opened panic ensued," the East Point Fire Department said in a news release.

Maj. Donald Chase of the East Point Police Department said the event was organized with three to four distribution centers as well as a main distribution site.

The crowds, however, tried to circumvent the lines and come around the sides to gain access, Chase said.

As many as 62 people required medical attention, including 20 who were hospitalized as a result of the crowds, the hot weather and the failure of some to take their usual medications, the fire department said.

More than 30 officers were deployed to the site to gain control of the surging crowds.

Despite the initial problems, the housing authority successfully distributed applications to 13,000 families.

cnn.com 


But there are no housing vouchers available...


"Lemish stressed that none of her agency's 455 housing aid vouchers is available at the moment. People who submit applications will be put on a waiting list to receive them as they become available.

Given the volume of applications, Lemish estimated it will take 10 years before all the people on the waiting list receive help so the waiting list can be opened again. The waiting list was last opened in 2002."

savannahnow.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Yulya8/12/2010 4:15:45 PM
1 Recommendation   of 115618
 



Housing Bust Opens New Doors for Subsidized Tenants

Landlords Woo Folks on Government Aid to Fill Empty Homes

By DAWN WOTAPKA
August 2, 2010

HENDERSON, Nev.—When Shawnetta Newburn left her drug-infested St. Louis neighborhood in search of a better life for her family in Las Vegas, she didn’t expect to live in a house with frills worthy of a McMansion.

But Paradise awaited.

That’s the name of the gated community where Ms. Newburn, a single mother who makes $10.50 an hour as a pawn-shop cashier, rents a three-bedroom townhouse with soaring ceilings, a gas-fueled fireplace and an oversize walk-in closet in the largest bedroom. The master bath even includes an enclosed toilet room, a feature popular in mini-mansions.

"The only time I ever saw that was on TV or something," she says during a tour of the approximately 2,000-square-foot home. "I never thought I’d have anything like this." The development has a kidney-shaped swimming pool.

Her previous apartment in St. Louis resembled public housing, she says, and her three sons were crammed into one bedroom. After her refrigerator caught fire, her landlord replaced it with an outdated brown model. She now has gleaming-white appliances.

Ms. Newburn can thank the housing bust. She participates in a government program for low-income families that subsidizes about half of her $1,400 monthly rent. The program, known as Section 8, has for decades put families in functional but basic homes and apartments, sometimes in less-than-desirable communities.

online.wsj.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: russet8/12/2010 4:29:14 PM
8 Recommendations   of 115618
 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: roguedolphin8/12/2010 5:21:44 PM
5 Recommendations   of 115618
 
from westpacific...
investorshub.advfn.com 


Posted by: westpacific Member Level Date: Thursday, August 12, 2010 10:26:17 AM
In reply to: None Post # of 658176 Send a link via email Share on Facebook Tweet this post


50,000 bucks to unemployed underwater homeowners; it was a success...

The Republic is broken; very...

Insanity grows by the month now!

businessinsider.com 

And this just in Atlanta! Wait till the mobs have no food!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: roguedolphin who wrote (113575)8/12/2010 5:26:19 PM
From: roguedolphin3 Recommendations   of 115618
 
Gerald Celente: « Double Dip Depression Will Lead Us Into War »

bit.ly 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: TobagoJack who wrote (113562)8/12/2010 6:49:56 PM
From: The Jack of Hearts   of 115618
 
With GS on board we may be good for 1250ish before they start selling with abandon... that way all the technicians can call it another failed breakout :O) They're pretty smooth you know :O)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: The Jack of Hearts who wrote (113577)8/12/2010 9:01:35 PM
From: TobagoJack   of 115618
 
fwiw, the preamble to the cs study heads-upped earlier

Credit Suisse has sponsored Professor Wang Xiaolu of the China Reform
Foundation in his second study of China's grey income and income
distribution:
¦ Almost Rmb10 tn in hidden income, or 30% of GDP. Based on a creative
survey technique focusing on the correlation between income and spending
patterns, and with over 4,000 samples across 19 provinces in China,
Prof. Wang estimates that the per-capita disposable income of urban
Chinese households in 2008 should be Rmb32,154, 90% above the official
data. Total hidden income could total Rmb9.3 tn, 30% of GDP, with about
63% of hidden income in the hands of the top 10% of urban households.
¦ The potential of China's consumer market is even bigger than we
expected. Most investors are aware that Chinese income statistics are
underestimated, but the exact amount is subject to much speculation. The
size of grey income revealed by Prof. Wang is striking and could help
investors to understand the rationale of the Chinese government's recent
strong push for faster wage growth and a more equitable income distribution
pattern - which would also help boost overall consumption.
¦ Big ticket items are the biggest beneficiary. While we think that the
Chinese government will try to reduce this huge income disparity problem
and the size of the grey income, this is not likely to change significantly
in
the near future. Chinese property, European luxury goods, high-end retailing
and Macao gaming could be the biggest beneficiaries of the current income
distribution pattern. In particular, we think BMW, Galaxy, Hang Lung
Properties, Mengniu, Swatch and Vanke will benefit most.
Credit Suisse has published a report that tries to quantify the scale
> of hidden, or unreported, income in China. The bank sponsored
> Professor Wang Xiaolu of the China Reform Foundation for this report,
> his second study of China's grey income and income distribution.
>
> Professor Wang makes some startling and conclusions that if accurate
> have significant ramifications for how we should view China's economic
> development, Chinese consumption activity (see Pettis today for his
> dim view of Chinese consumption; not sure he has seen this report) the
> possible existence of property bubbles, and the challenges the Chinese
> government faces in maintaining social stability. If his data is
> correct, it may also mean that many of the concerns about Chinese
> government debt are overblown, as the government has much greater
> potential than expected increase revenue in the future, through
> optimizing the tax code and tax collection. Professor Wang concludes that:
>
> Almost Rmb10 tn in hidden income, or 30% of GDP. Based on a creative
> survey technique focusing on the correlation between income and
> spending patterns, and with over 4,000 samples across 19 provinces in
> China, Prof. Wang estimates that the per-capita disposable income of
> urban Chinese households in 2008 should be Rmb32,154, 90% above the
> official data. Total hidden income could total Rmb9.3 tn, 30% of GDP,
> with about 63% of hidden income in the hands of the top 10% of urban
households.
>
> The potential of China's consumer market is even bigger than we expected.
> Most investors are aware that Chinese income statistics are
> underestimated, but the exact amount is subject to much speculation.
> The size of grey income revealed by Prof. Wang is striking and could
> help investors to understand the rationale of the Chinese government's
> recent strong push for faster wage growth and a more equitable income
> distribution pattern - which would also help boost overall consumption.
>
> The report further states that:
>
> The analysis shows that the top-10% of households should have a
> per-capita disposable income of Rmb139,000 in 2008, instead of the
> official data of Rmb44,000. High income households (the top 20-30%)
> should have a per-capita disposable income of Rmb55,000, instead of
> the officially announced Rmb26,000. Some 80% of hidden income, not
> reflected in the official survey, belongs to the top 20% of
> households. Two thirds of the hidden income comes from the top 10% of
households.
>
> After including the hidden income, urban disposable income per capita
> reaches Rmb32,000, almost double that of the official data. Total
> household disposable income in 2008 is estimated to be Rmb23.2 tn,
> Rmb9.3 tn higher than the Rmb14 tn calculated based on the official
> NBS household income survey and Rmb5.4 tn higher than the Rmb17.9 tn
> total calculated by the Flow of Funds (FOF) accounts in the Economic
> Census This Rmb5.4 tn is referred to as grey income.
>
> Compared with the adjusted household income in 2005, both the hidden
> income (Rmb9.3 tn) or grey income (Rmb5.4 tn) in 2008 doubled, rising
> at a much faster pace than nominal GDP between 2005 and 2008. Due to
> the existence of grey income, GDP and national income could be
underestimated.
> According to our estimation, grey income in 2008 should total around
> 15% of national income, up from 13% in 2005.
>
> The existence of hidden income has expanded the income gap remarkably,
> in our opinion. The per-capita income gap between the incomes of the
> top 10% and bottom 10% of urban residents rose from 9x (based on the
> official data) to 26x, after the adjustment. The per capita income gap
> between the top 10% of urban households and bottom 10% of rural
> households is adjusted from 23x based on the official data to 65x.
> Taking into account the existence of hidden income, the Gini
> coefficient of household income distribution is remarkably higher than the
0.47-0.50 calculated by different experts.
>
> Such a concentration of hidden income in high-income groups
> demonstrates that much of it is not about simple statistical problems
> in the household survey but potentially income from illegal sources.
> Such income includes income without clear definition under laws and
> regulations in addition to its legitimacy, as well as income from an
> unidentifiable sources which is practically illegal. The facts show
> that grey income has its origins in the misuse of power and is closely
connected with corruption.
>
> The widespread existence of grey income has significantly distorted
> national income distribution and reveals the lagging development in
> social reforms compared with economic reforms. Once government power
> is united with capital, the free competition of the market economy
> begins to be replaced by a monopoly of crony capitalism, leading to
> disparity in income and property distribution, lower economic efficiency
and acute social conflicts.
>
> Professor Wang's conclusions cast doubt on much of the arguments that
> China is in the throws of a epic property bubble. As he writes:
>
> based on the official average urban income from China's National
> Statistics Bureau (NSB), China's current affordability ratio is 8x
> (that is, it takes eight years' average income to buy an average
> residential property unit) - lower than for city states, such as
> Singapore (probably not a relevant comparison), but significantly
> higher than for large and developed continental nations such as the
> US. However, if we consider the impact of the grey income, China's
> national affordability ratio drops to 4x -similar to that in the US.
> If the effect of grey income is included, China's Gini index is likely
> to be more than 0.55 - similar to many South American countries'. This
> raises the question over whether strong housing demand in China is
> mainly driven by self-use or investment by rich people. We think both are
important drivers.
>
> Professor Wang recommends a combination of wage increases, which i
> already happening, and reforms to the tax system:
>
> China should not only raise wages, but optimise its tax system to
> narrow the wealth gap. For example, we expect the government to
> implement property tax, which should increase the holding costs for
> rich people's property investments.


... which of course would drive excess capital towards gold and surplus savings towards freedom hk real estate - the sum total of hamoon's doubts ;0)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: carranza2 who wrote (113569)8/12/2010 9:04:32 PM
From: TobagoJack   of 115618
 
i shall only worry when gs tags prospect of gold at 6,000 per current dollar, and shall start selling at 80% of the gs guideline

one can only play in god's workshop against god's workers part of the way

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: roguedolphin8/13/2010 1:31:45 AM
4 Recommendations   of 115618
 
BUSTED: FED SECRETLY MONETIZING DEBT; COLLUDING WITH DEALERS
August 7th, 2009

cryptogon.com 

Via: Chris Martenson:

Just last week, when the auction results were announced it was trumpeted to great fanfare that there was “more than sufficient” bid-to-cover, “strong demand” and all the rest.

And now it turns out that 47% (!) of the bonds that were taken by the primary dealers in that auction have been quietly bought by the Fed and permanently secreted to its balance sheet.

They didn’t even wait a full week! A more honest and open approach would have been for the Fed to simply buy them outright at the auction but this way, using “primary dealers” and “POMOs” and all these other extra steps the basic fact that the Fed is openly monetizing US government debt is effectively hidden from a not-too-terribly inquisitive US press and public.

The speed of the shell game is accelerating.

This immediate repurchase of newly auction bonds by the Fed tells us that demand for these bonds is not nearly as high as advertised, and that things are not quite as strong as represented.

And oh, by the way, don’t expect any stock market weakness while so many billions are being shoveled out the Fed and into the pockets of the primary dealers. They’ll have to do something with all that freshly minted cash…

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: TobagoJack who wrote (113578)8/13/2010 2:49:15 AM
From: Amark$p   of 115618
 
Yes, I read that Wang study. He has a quite interesting take, and could well have merit. Certainly Chinese government stats leave much to be desired. One really needs to review power consumption, Baltic Dry Index, Exports, and similar data to get a better(?) perspective on Chinese growth. FWIW, would like to see Pettis comments regarding the Wang study...

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.