Silicon Investor
SI
SI

 Politics | Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Orcastraiter who wrote (26512)1/17/2005 4:30:00 AM
From: Sully-   of 90039
 
So many lies, so little time.

In the 2003 State of the Union address Bush said: "Some have
said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when
have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions,
politely putting us on notice before they strike?"

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Selectric II who wrote (26608)1/17/2005 4:36:58 AM
From: Sully-   of 90039
 
The headlines for the LA Times the day after the SOTUA read
in huge block letters.......

'Bush calls Iraq Imminent Threat!'

Ted Kennedy was bitching on national TV within hours of the
speech about Bush calling Iraq an "Imminent Threat".

They don't give a rat's ass about truth, facts or reality.

It was & remains all about regaining power by any means
necessary.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (26626)1/17/2005 4:48:23 AM
From: Sully-   of 90039
 
How about a link to that comment so we can see the whole
transcript. But you won't link to it.

It was taken out of context from a press conference.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (26628)1/17/2005 4:50:52 AM
From: Sully-   of 90039
 
Yup, the Iraq Survey Group proved that Bush was right too.

Read it & weep.....

Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD

30 September 2004

cia.gov 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Selectric II who wrote (26629)1/17/2005 4:56:14 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™   of 90039
 
Several posters here want to crawl back into the pre 9/11 womb, and hide like cowards... they must have a difficult time in real life trying to cope with the real world... but whatever, it's their foolish choice...

GZ

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: trouthead who wrote (26632)1/17/2005 4:58:19 AM
From: Sully-   of 90039
 
"Everything they said was a reason to take preemptive actions has turned out to not be true."

So many lies, so little time.

Click on the link & get the facts. Then read on....

Message 20948849

The bottom line is that Bush was right to remove Saddam
based solely on the facts. The Iraq Survey Group report
provides ample evidence to support those facts.

Bush repeatedly mentioned that Saddam had failed to comply
with UN Resolutions for more than 12 years. All of the
resolutions included references to complete compliance with
UN Resolution #687.........

The Gulf War Cease Fire Agreement - AKA - UN Resolution #687,
was a ZERO TOLERANCE policy. That meant Saddam had to;

1) Completely eliminate every aspect of his WMD PROGRAMS (not
just "stockpiles"). This included provisions for the complete
destruction of all offensive weapons. This had to be done in
a completely verifiable manner to UN Inspectors.

2) Saddam had to completely eliminate every tie to terrorists
(internal & external).

3) Saddam had to completely halt his crimes against humanity.

4) Saddam had to make full reparations to Kuwait, ET AL.

Now this was the short & sweet version. There were absolutely
no provisions that allowed any deviation from each explicit
requirement. It meant 100%, unconditional compliance. Every
single UN Resolution, including Resolution 1441 was
irrevocably tied to #687.

Saddam spent more than 12 years in utter defiance of every
one of the above requirements before Bush's so-called "rush
to war". You know, where "Bush lied & misled" America
into a "unilateral", "illegal" war to take over their oil for
his Big Oil cronies?

Text of UN Resolution 687

dalebroux.com 

Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD

cia.gov 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (26636)1/17/2005 5:06:49 AM
From: Sully-   of 90039
 
The closest the leftist think-tank came to conclusive evidence was a February 10, 2003. remark by White House spokesman Scott MCCLELLAN: “This is about an IMMINENT threat.” But while the quote is reproduced faithfully, its context is not. A review of the press conference transcript shows MCCLELLAN’s comment was directed to a specific question—about Turkey, not Iraq.

Message 20407803

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: trouthead who wrote (26714)1/17/2005 5:18:41 AM
From: Sully-   of 90039
 
Bush was right about removing Saddam & now you have access to
real facts that prove it irrefutably. All you need to do is
read them.

Message 20956446

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: longnshort who wrote (26774)1/17/2005 5:43:02 AM
From: Sully-   of 90039
 
He remains

ANAL

ROTFLMAO!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: longnshort who wrote (26774)1/17/2005 7:04:54 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™   of 90039
 
You probably hit a nerve there somewhere, some people just can't handle the truth, I wouldn't sweat it...<g>

GZ

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQ
Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.