SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Technology Stocks | RFID and NFC Technologies


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: Glenn Petersen12/14/2004 7:02:35 PM
   of 1620
 
Information Week has selected Wal-Mart's IT staff as its business-technology team of the year.

Team Of The Year

At Wal-Mart, business technology is a team effort--the retailer's far-reaching RFID project would be impossible to achieve if it weren't. This year, InformationWeek recognizes CIO Linda Dillman and her IT staff--some 2,400 strong--as our business-technology team of the year.

By Laurie Sullivan, InformationWeek

Dec. 13, 2004

URL: informationweek.com 

Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s I.T. team is just a couple of weeks away from the first wave of suppliers participating in its ambitious radio-frequency identification project. When RFID-tagged pallets and cases begin moving en masse into three distribution centers in Texas, and data begins to flow from them into Wal-Mart's Web-based supplier-collaboration system, it will be the start of a revolution in supply-chain management.

Executive VP and CIO Linda Dillman and some 2,400 people who make up Wal-Mart's Information Systems Division can take credit for leading the charge that already has expanded far beyond the retailer's four walls. A couple of years ago, Wal-Mart was involved with MIT's Auto-ID Center doing field studies on RFID. It was perfect research work, but too fragmented an effort to drive industrywide adoption, Dillman says. "You couldn't try RFID in all the scenarios," she says. So Wal-Mart picked one approach--tagging cases and pallets--and issued an edict to have its top 100 suppliers focus on that for a January 2005 deployment, in the process driving commitment from some major, but hesitant, tech vendors. "That was critical to make the technology work," Dillman says.

Within Wal-Mart, a team of four RFID pioneers (later expanded to eight people) headed by Simon Langford, manager of global RFID strategy, did a lot of the heavy lifting. But both Dillman and Langford point out that the project was possible only because of the support of Wal-Mart's entire Information Systems Division. "There's no sense of pride to solve something yourself," says Dillman, a 12-year Wal-Mart veteran who joined the retailer when it acquired the Wholesale Club in Indianapolis, Ind., where she had been a senior systems analyst. "There is strength in numbers, in reaching out to others."

In the last year, collaboration in the division has fueled some 2,500 projects, from the RFID deployment to rolling out global financial systems that make it easier for stores to more quickly close their books each month, as well as adding features to point-of-sale systems that help Wal-Mart's approximately 1,360 discount stores, 76 Neighborhood Markets, 1,062 Supercenters, and 550 Sam's Clubs nationwide comply with local labor laws.

Indeed, collaboration is critical for speed, efficiency, and innovation. The company has more than $250 billion in yearly revenue and a below-the-industry-average IT budget, relies on homegrown software to run its business, eschews outsourcing, and requires systems to be available for global use. "The [application] development isn't successful if the infrastructure team that builds the physical system isn't successful," says Dillman, 48, whose career at the retailer included manager, director, and VP positions in application development before she became VP of international systems. "The infrastructure team isn't successful if the operations team doesn't know how to measure the system. They all are measured in their success based on the final impact to the business." That shouldn't be a surprise, given that the Wal-Mart culture is to consider every employee a merchant first, and each one's goal is to serve the customer.

Dillman objects to being the star behind any of Wal-mart's IT productions, including the RFID drama. For one thing, the first push for using RFID in the supply chain came from Thomas Coughlin, now vice chairman of the board of directors, she says. The result of the combined efforts of many people within Wal-Mart is that retailers Best Buy, Target, and others, as well as the Department of Defense and the pharmaceutical industry, have begun RFID initiatives; the travel industry, health care, and other government agencies are interested in what RFID can do for them; and leading vendors are shipping in volume RFID tags and software that supports the technology.

But Dillman certainly has played an important role since March 2003, when she stepped on stage at the Retail Systems show in Chicago to unveil Wal-Mart's plan. She's been out in front collaborating with her competitors to make sure that the industry's efforts succeed, has been involved in helping to clear up confusion about RFID's costs and benefits, has worked with suppliers to overcome their initial skepticism, and helped drive the adoption of EPCglobal standards (see "Wal-Mart's Way," Sept. 27, p. 36). "RFID needs quiet persuaders," says Kevin Ashton, co-founder of the Auto-ID Center and VP of marketing at ThingMagic LLC, an RFID-reader manufacturer. When Dillman said Wal-Mart wanted to use RFID in its supply chain, "no one actually laughed at the idea, but there was tremendous skepticism, ... and a hangover period where skeptics huddled in corners explaining to each other why she would have to back down and why it couldn't happen in that time frame. And here we are now; it's pretty much happening."

As Wal-Mart moves forward with its RFID effort and other projects, collaboration is getting even more fine-tuned, the result of a project launched midyear to analyze IT system development and spread best practices through the company. All of Wal-Mart's IT directors donated a staff member to the seven-month effort, and the group is building tools that incorporate this project-development knowledge, including testing environments and tracking systems. "We do a great job at looking at the processes and building the tools to make our internal customers more efficient, but we've never stepped back to examine what tools we should develop to make the IT group more efficient," Dillman says.

Perhaps, but Wal-Mart has the kind of reputation in the IT community that some CIOs can only dream of. Every week, 300 to 400 resumés come in from hopeful IT graduates or professionals, and turnover is just 5%.

"The fun part about working with Wal-Mart [Information Systems Division] is we're treated as business enablers, not computer nerds," says Dan Phillips, VP of operations, data warehousing, databases, large systems, and communications, who was Dillman's first manager at Wal-Mart. "I've worked at companies where you in IS are looked upon as a necessary evil or drain on expenses." Under Dillman's guidance, the division is viewed as just the opposite. "She approaches everything that you bring her as it is today on paper, but also looks at it with a new set of eyes--are there ways to make it better?" says Mark Porter, director of information security. "She's a businessperson first. And that's what I think is the best thing."

In 2005, Wal-Mart's U.S. IT staff is expected to grow between 5% and 6%, and creativity is a core requirement for those who make the cut. Some of that creativity comes out in the company's annual VPI (Volume Producing Item) contest, where various teams within Wal-Mart each pick a product and compete to promote its sales. The totals are tallied in December, and this year, the Information Systems Division has two products in the top 10; for 2005's contest, Dillman is considering choosing Wal-Mart's private-label Great Value powered-drink mix. Some of the division's secrets for boosting its picks: programming messages promoting the items at price scanners located throughout stores and at the bottom of register receipts. "It's part of the way I can prove our technology works," says Dillman, whose likeness in a cardboard figure at retail stores is promoting a contest pick--in her case, Members Mart Detergent at Sam's Clubs.

Typically, the best project leaders get promoted to managers, and Dillman's goal is to foster within those ranks "executives who manage people who manage projects." So Dillman has implemented twice-weekly team-building meetings for her division's senior executives and directors, to promote the idea that "a constant sense of accomplishment means multiple people collaborating in the project from start to finish." Dillman also has added to Wal-Mart's training opportunities a project-management course she believes could generate significant payback by improving developer productivity.

"Under Linda, there's really been a focus on our people, making sure programs are in place that everyone can build a career," says Sam Moses, strategy manager, merchandising systems. Dillman's father, Leonard Wayne Dillman, a U.S. Postal Service letter carrier for 35 years, had a big influence on her in this area. "He did things for other people for no reason other than it was the correct thing to do," she says. "It was a great role model in understanding what real success looks like."

Howard Stockdale, CIO at Beaver Street Fisheries Inc., a Wal-Mart supplier for more than 15 years, appreciates Dillman as a "people person" and someone who also has a profound vision for technology. When Stockdale approached Dillman about joining Wal-Mart's RFID initiative this year instead of waiting until 2006, Wal-Mart "rolled out the red carpet for us and made us feel as important as a top 100 supplier," he says. Dillman's concern extends to the next generation of IT talent, as well. Along with Kay Palmer, CIO and executive VP at trucking company J.B. Hunt Transport Inc., and Jeri Dunn, CIO at Tyson Foods Inc., Dillman last year established the Northwest Arkansas chapter for the Network of Executive Women, whose goal is to help women advance in management positions, especially in the IT field, where there's declining interest. Women made up 22% of those majoring in computer science in the United States last year, compared with 37% in 1983, according to University of Arkansas statistics.

In addition to continuing to work on people development, Dillman has on tap for 2005 plans to gain more efficiencies in Wal-Mart's collaborative inventory-management systems to improve in-stock items and forecasting, and to deliver technology to improve in-store processes. For instance, lines could be shortened if cashiers are scheduled and lanes are open to handle grocery sales at peak shopping hours. "What are the things we can we do to make it easier for customers to shop and to be more efficient when they come in the store? And once they're done, what can we do to get them through the checkout faster?" she says.

The full plan for 2005 is still a work in progress, but Dillman is clear that not even one project would happen if it weren't for the team at her back. "There's such an overwhelming sense when I receive recognition because it's really about the team," Dillman says. "There's so little that I do; there's so much the team delivers."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Glenn Petersen12/16/2004 10:23:36 AM
   of 1620
 
IBM has extended its RFID offerings to include the management of RFID readers and data.

rfidjournal.com 

IBM Launches RFID Middleware

The computer and IT giant extends its RFID product lineup with software to manage RFID readers and data.


By Jonathan Collins

Dec. 16, 2004--IBM has released two new software products that extend its RFID offerings all the way to RFID readers and into the devices themselves.

Until now, IBM has turned to partners such as GlobeRanger and OAT Systems to provide its customers with software to connect IBM's enterprise applications and RFID readers. Although those partnerships will continue, IBM's new RFID middleware will compete with those offerings.

"We have many partners who are also competitors, and we will work with them according to specific business and client opportunities," says Ann Breiden Bach, director of strategy for IBM's Sensor and Actuator Solutions business unit.

The first of IBM's new offerings is the WebSphere RFID Premises Server, which is also the first software offering from IBM's Sensor and Actuator Solutions business unit, formed in September (see IBM Bulks Up Its RFID Initiative). The offering consists of a bundle of software applications designed to be deployed at remote locations such as retail stores, distribution centers or manufacturing sites. The Server software not only provides connectivity, management and filtering to RFID readers but also enables RFID-collected data to be managed and analyzed.

"Enabling the execution of processes closer to the edge of the network means locations can start to do more than just simple transaction management," says Breiden Bach. That capability will enable data collected by RFID readers in stores to drive real-time tracking and analysis of a range of local activities such as stores sales and inventory without having to rely on transmitting data back and forth between the store and a centralized server hosting enterprise applications.

While the RFID Premises Server software pushes data management and analysis out to remote locations, IBM says, it also enables a centralized IT facility to monitor and manage the hardware and software in individual remote locations. That remote management capability means that no additional IT staff will need to be assigned to work at remote locations.

The RFID Premises Server bundles IBM's WebSphere Application Server, DB2 Universal Database software, WebSphere MQ messaging software and Tivoli Systems Management middleware. It also includes WebSphere Portal and WebSphere Product Center to help customers connect the system with specialized third-party applications.

The software is priced at $11,000 per two-processor server. So far, it connects to Intermec, Alien Technology, SamSys readers as well as controllers from Arcom, so that RFID data can be integrated into existing control systems such as those used to operate palletizers. IBM says that other reader manufacturers will be added later.

IBM is pushing even deeper into the RFID software market with its other new software release: IBM WebSphere Device Infrastructure, which is middleware that RFID equipment makers can embed in their RFID readers.

"Customers want more intelligent, more sophisticated readers, so they can push processing to the edge of the network," says Breiden Bach. By using IBM's middleware, she explains, reader manufacturers will be able to offer data filtering at the reader and, because it is built around Java, provide a platform that can be integrated with other devices such as indicator lights, motion sensors and industrial automation equipment.

RFID vendor Intermec has already integrated IBM WebSphere Device Infrastructure with its new IF-5 Intelligent RFID reader. According to IBM, other reader manufactures will announce use of its software when they launch their new reader products.

IBM would not give pricing details for the WebSphere Device Infrastructure software, but the company says it will price its software competitively to existing offerings from other software developers.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Cooters who wrote (798)12/16/2004 11:22:08 PM
From: Glenn Petersen   of 1620
 
EPCglobal has ratified the Gen 2 Standard. While it says that the standard is royalty-free, it does suggest that vendors might run into problems with Intermec if they stray from the standard. Conversely, Intermec argues that products built to the new standard will infringe on their patents. It should be interesting to see how the market (specifically UNA) reacts to this news tommorow.

EPCglobal Ratifies Gen 2 Standard

The organization announced late today that its board has ratified the Gen 2 specification as an EPC standard and that it will be royalty-free.


rfidjournal.com 

By Mark Roberti

Dec. 16, 2004—EPCglobal announced late today that its board of governors has ratified the second-generation Electronic Product Code specification as an EPC standard. The move paves the way for vendors to begin making products based on the specification, which was designed to work globally and be approved as an international standard by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

"This is the most significant event in our history," Mike Meranda, president of EPCglobal US, told RFID Journal. "It opens the door for a large number of manufacturers to make Gen 2 products quickly. It allows for global interoperability [of EPC systems] and creates a single converged standard. End users won't have to worry about using Class 1 or Class 2 or ISO 18000-6A or 18000-6B."

EPCglobal's Hardware Action Group (HAG) has been working on the draft specification for a year. During the past week, the HAG presented the final specification to EPCglobal's technical steering committee and business steering committee, which both unanimously approved the specification and sent it on to the board to ratify. The business steering committee is charged with ensuring that the standard meets end users' needs. The technical steering committee is responsible for making sure the standard is viable from a technical standpoint.

EPCglobal says the standard is royalty-free. Meranda says that as part of the ratification process, EPCglobal engaged legal counsel to examine claims made by Intermec Technologies, an Everett, Wash.-based RFID systems provider, that the Gen 2 spec contains intellectual property that it has patented. After exhaustive examination, the lawyers concluded that Intermec's patents are not essential to implementing the standard and therefore the standard is royalty-free.

Meranda says that RFID vendors that produce tags and readers based on the Gen 2 standard will take many different approaches and that some of those approaches might infringe Intermec's patents. It would be incumbent upon those companies to negotiate licensing fees with Intermec. In other words, if a vendor wants to make a reader that performs well, it might need Intermec's patents, but that is between the vendor and Intermec.

Intermec indicated it believed that its patents would be infringed by any products built to the new standard. Intermec president Tom Miller said in a statement released tonight that ratification of the Gen 2 standard "is an important step towards bringing the powerful benefits of RFID to market."

"It is important to remember the claim of a royalty-free protocol does not mean UHF RFID products will be royalty-free," he continued. "We believe companies who offer UHF RFID products will still require a license to use Intermec intellectual property. In addition to the IP claims included in the Generation 2 standard, Intermec holds more than 125 additional UHF RFID patents."


Another question surrounding the Gen 2 specification was the use of an eight-bit code on the tags that would be used to identify the source of data on the tag (see Gen 2 Faces Eight-Bit Obstacle). EPCglobal would like the option to create codes that could be used by, say, the U.S. Department of Defense or the automobile industry. But for the standard to be approved by ISO, the eight bits will likely have to be used for what ISO calls an Application Family Identifier (AFI), which is an important part of other ISO RFID standards.

The Gen 2 standard, as approved, includes eight bits that can be used for an AFI, but it doesn't require the use of ISO's AFI. Meranda says that manufacturers can begin making microchips for use in EPC tags, whether the eight bits are used for an AFI or an EPC identifier. In the meantime, EPCglobal will work with ISO to try to resolve the issue, and then any change will have to go through an established procedure for changing the standard.

"We have committed to resolving [the issue] within the short term," he says. "The overwhelming opinion of the Hardware Action Group was that it was best to put the standard forward and make changes later. This allows us time to explore the issue and underlines our commitment to work with ISO."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (824)12/16/2004 11:42:14 PM
From: Selectric II   of 1620
 
Is Intermec's technology going to become the standard, a la Qualcomm's CDMA, or doesn't it matter?

Quick -- you have 24 hours to decide and make your case. <g>

I stuck my toes into the water yesterday and am still gauging the temp.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Selectric II who wrote (825)12/17/2004 1:17:01 AM
From: Glenn Petersen   of 1620
 
Quick -- you have 24 hours to decide and make your case.

LOL. I'll have to pass on that challenge. The RFID Journal article left me with the impression that UNA may be in a fairly decent position to assert its case. I suspect that UNA will be issuing some sort of statement tomorrow. The company has to be a pretty safe bet in this sector. My guess is that UNA trades up on Friday.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (826)12/17/2004 1:47:23 AM
From: Selectric II   of 1620
 
Nice. Safe. But QCOM-type technology, patents, demand?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Selectric II who wrote (827)12/17/2004 8:05:30 AM
From: Glenn Petersen   of 1620
 
QCOM has never been on my radar screen so I am not familiar with the particulars of their licensing program and the breadth of their patents. I do know that Intermec is looking for a 7% royalty. When the market opens this morning wiser heads than mine will be weighing in...or not.

Another safe comment, I hope. <gg>

biz.yahoo.com 

Intermec Applauds Ratification of EPCglobal UHF Generation 2 Air Interface Protocol

Friday December 17, 6:00 am ET

EVERETT, Wash.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 17, 2004--Intermec Technologies Corp. today congratulated the EPCglobal Inc community on ratification of a UHF RFID Generation 2 air interface protocol specification. As the first company to demonstrate working Generation 2 products, Intermec believes ratification of the air interface protocol specification by the EPCglobal board of directors represents a significant step toward making the power of RFID available to the market and clears the way for broad-based adoption of the technology.
"It is important to remember that the claim of a royalty-free air interface protocol specification does not mean royalty-free UHF RFID products," said Intermec President Tom Miller. "We believe companies that offer UHF RFID products and solutions will still require a license to use Intermec intellectual property."

In addition to the IP claims included in the Generation 2 standard, Intermec holds more than 125 other UHF RFID patents.
The company, a UHF RFID pioneer, has established a licensing program to make access to its current and future RFID innovations available to all on a reasonable and non-discriminatory basis.

<snip>

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Selectric II who wrote (827)12/17/2004 9:19:22 AM
From: Cooters   of 1620
 
Selectric,

The royalty they are asking for is on par with QCOM, they are asking a higher rate at the moment but that could come down. The differences are the following:

1) QCOM achieved those patents in the process of inventing something, a rock solid avenue to derive essential core patents. I cannot determine how essential UNA's patents are, but they certainly did not derive them in the same manner, as far as I can tell anyway.

2) While the size of the potential RFID market may seem enormous, I don't think it will be anywhere near the size of QCOM's target market. One trillion tags at a penny apiece is $10B, QCOM is probably looking at a $100B market. I'm not sure how to quantify the reader side of UNA's potential.

I would gladly accept #2 and jump all over UNA if I was certain about #1.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Cooters who wrote (829)12/17/2004 11:49:21 AM
From: Selectric II   of 1620
 
One trillion tags at a penny apiece is $10B

Is that UNA's potential royalty, or the total cost per tag?

Thanks for your insights.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (828)12/17/2004 11:53:06 AM
From: Selectric II   of 1620
 
I respected your opinion until you used "market" and "wiser heads than mine" in the same sentence. <g>

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.