Politics | Politics for Pros- moderated


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: mistermj5/19/2012 11:10:23 PM
5 Recommendations   of 536088
 
Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel endorses Walker.

Opinion

OUR VIEW | GUBERNATORIAL RECALL ELECTION
We recommend Walker; his removal isn't justifiedMAY 19, 2012




Associated PressWisconsin Gov. Scott Walker should have the opportunity to complete his term.

No governor in recent memory has been so controversial. No governor in America is so polarizing. Everyone has an opinion about Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin.

Here's ours: We see no reason to remove Walker from office. We recommend him in the June 5 recall election.

Walker's rematch with Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett was prompted by one issue: Walker's tough stance with the state's public-employee unions. It's inconceivable that the recall election would be occurring absent that. And a disagreement over a single policy is simply not enough to justify a vote against the governor.

A Marquette Law School Poll in January showed that many people in the Badger State agree. In that poll, 72% of Republicans, 44% of independents and 17% of Democrats said recalls should be limited to criminal wrongdoing. Republican state Rep. Robin Vos has proposed tightening the recall mechanism; he should continue to push for that after the election, regardless of who wins.

Walker brought some of this animosity on himself. He chose an in-your-face style from the start. To his credit, the governor now acknowledges that he did a poor job of building support for his policies. "The one thing if I could go back in time is I would try to spend a little bit more time building the case," he told the Editorial Board earlier this year.

Whether any amount of explaining would have made a difference is questionable considering the breadth of Walker's vision. We think his limits on collective bargaining went too far. We think Republicans generally took an unfortunate sharp turn to the right on social issues. That led to bills in the Legislature promoting abstinence-only education, limiting women's health options and creating a concealed-carry law with insufficient training requirements.

At the same time, legislators couldn't build consensus on far more important legislation, including a bill to allow additional mining in northern Wisconsin and another to create a pool of funds for promising start-up companies. Both bills were casualties of legislative arrogance by the party Walker leads.

Walker came to office promising that 250,000 new private-sector jobs would be created on his watch. But even considering the more favorable statistics released by the Walker administration last week, job creation has been sluggish.

There are several possible reasons for this: 1) Walker overpromised, forgetting that there is only so much that any one politician can do to promote private-sector job growth; 2) the political turmoil in the state is inhibiting job creation (Walker's argument); or 3) Walker's policies are killing job growth (Democrats' argument).

We think choices 1 and 2 are the most likely reasons. Walker's policies simply haven't been in place long enough to know whether they are to blame. Our view is that global trends, including the turmoil in Europe, have much more to do with whether Wisconsin's companies succeed than the policies of a single politician. We also believe that, at the margins, the yearlong tantrum over Walker has been harmful.

To his credit, Walker has helped to right the state's finances with a minimum of gimmicks - the governor reported recently that the state may be able to book a $154 million surplus next year. This good news has been lost in the clutter surrounding an unnecessary recall election that will cost as much as $18 million just to stage, according to the Government Accountability Board.

The governor also has made a good-faith attempt to shore up the state's economic development efforts through the creation of a public-private entity to head up those efforts, through reform of the state's tort laws, through a series of business tax breaks and by improving Wisconsin's image with business leaders outside the state.

And while we think Act 10 - the law that clipped the wings of most public-employee unions in the state - was an overreach of political power, we understand and supported the need to rein in the state's labor costs. Municipalities and school districts as well as the state needed more control over their budgets, which Act 10 provided.

But Walker's zeal to give governments more control over their destinies was, we believe, matched only by his zeal to deal a harsh blow to a key Democratic constituency. That has made him a national hero to Republicans.

Democrats claim the recall election is about far more than Act 10. The most serious of the charges on their bill of particulars is the ongoing John Doe investigation being conducted by the Milwaukee County district attorney's office. The investigation, which has been going on for nearly two years, has looked into a variety of activities during the time Walker was county executive. Prosecutors have charged three ex-Walker aides and two others; more charges may be coming. Walker has set up a legal-defense fund.

But the governor has insisted that he is not a target of the investigation and that he is cooperating. While the investigation surely is troubling, no evidence revealed so far implicates Walker. Overzealous political associates sometimes get in trouble. The John Doe probe doesn't justify a vote against the governor.

As for Barrett, we think he has been a good steward of Wisconsin's largest city. Taxes and fees are up, but that's hardly unreasonable given the depth of the budget restraints. Services remain solid. Barrett and his team have helped shepherd new development in the Menomonee Valley, downtown and in the neighborhoods. The mayor has helped heal the often raw relationship between Milwaukee and its suburbs.

But as a leader, the mayor can be tentative and slow to act. While building consensus is admirable - the opposite of the approach Walker often takes - the mayor can be risk-averse to a fault. One example: He has been slow to articulate a vision for economic development in the city and to develop a strategic economic plan for Milwaukee that dovetails with regional efforts.

On the campaign trail, Walker has tried to blame rising taxes and poor job growth in Milwaukee on Barrett. In a campaign stop last week, Walker said that people do not want to see Wisconsin "become another Milwaukee."

But Walker's attacks on the state's largest city are overblown and divisive. He forgets to mention the fallout from the worst recession in 80 years or his own responsibility in cutting state shared revenue. Or the fact that he was Milwaukee County executive during the downturn.

Strip away such purple rhetoric, and you find that Barrett, like Walker, is a capable and honorable public servant. But this election isn't about Tom Barrett. It's about Scott Walker.

Even if you disagree with Walker's policies, does that justify cutting short his term as governor? And if so, where does such logic lead? To more recall elections? More turmoil?

It's time to end the bickering and get back to the business of the state. We've had our differences with the governor, but he deserves a chance to complete his term. We recommended him in 2010. We see no reason to change that recommendation. We urge voters to support Walker in the June 5 recall election.

Whom do you favor in the gubernatorial recall election and why? To be considered for publication as a letter to the editor, e-mail your opinion to the Journal Sentinel editorial department.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/we-recommend-walker-his-removal-isnt-justified-l55ecb6-152111305.html

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Neeka5/19/2012 11:33:56 PM
2 Recommendations   of 536088
 
This has been around for awhile and deserves repeating.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


"Gene Simmons Military Tribute"

youtube.com 



Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: alanrs who wrote (487783)5/20/2012 12:09:12 AM
From: skinowski   of 536088
 
Cats and dogs are excellent communicators. One never has any doubts about what they want. I am friendly with my neighbors dog, a beautiful golden retriever, regrettably not one of the smarter ones among God's creatures - but he sure is smart enough to have me trained not to forget to buy dog food every time I'm in a supermarket... :)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Sr K who wrote (487820)5/20/2012 12:40:49 AM
From: LindyBill1 Recommendation   of 536088
 
Obama was born in Hawaii. That is all that counts. If it had come out in the last election that He faked his way though college as a Kenyan, that might have done him in.

It may be an interesting side bar to this election, IMO.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: LindyBill who wrote (487825)5/20/2012 12:46:45 AM
From: Sr K   of 536088
 
How many days or posts back do I have to go to see the gist of your conclusion?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: LindyBill5/20/2012 12:50:55 AM
   of 536088
 
The Fight Over Who Fights in Israel
NEW YORK TIMES
By JODI RUDOREN

JERUSALEM

As the first chief rabbi for the modern state of Israel, Isaac Herzog helped persuade Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion to exempt 400 ultra-Orthodox men from the draft so they could study full time in yeshivas.

“After the horrible Shoah, in which tens of thousands of students in Europe, their teachers and sages were destroyed,” Rabbi Herzog wrote in 1949, “they should be released from the army in order to allow these few to continue to study our holy Torah, which is also a need and an honor for our state.”

Yet when his own son Chaim wanted to abandon the yeshiva to dedicate his life to the new Israel Defense Forces, Rabbi Herzog was enthusiastic. “His father told him, ‘If you’re not going to be a rabbi, there’s no greater honor than to be an officer in the army of the Jewish state,’ ” recalled Chaim’s son, also named Isaac, now a Labor Party member of the Israeli Parliament.

Chaim Herzog, of course, went on to become a major general in the army, heading its intelligence wing, and later president of Israel. Meanwhile, the loophole has allowed the original 400 yeshiva boys a year to morph into some 58,000 draft-age Orthodox men skipping the army today. “He would feel it’s gone too much to the extreme,” the younger Isaac Herzog said of his grandfather.

After decades of hand-wringing, deal making and court rulings, the question of what to do about the ultra-Orthodox — known as Haredim — and the army has now come to what Moshe Halbertal, a professor of Jewish philosophy at Hebrew University, described as “a boiling point, a moral crisis.”

Israel’s Supreme Court ruled in February that the draft exemption, known as the Tal Law, was unconstitutional. The new unity government formed early this month by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu named as its top priority rewriting it by Aug. 1, the deadline set by the court for the law to expire. A high-level commission is being formed to negotiate a compromise, set quotas and either guide a reluctant military into absorbing large numbers of soldiers with vastly different preparations and personal needs or create a vast (and expensive) new bureaucracy of civilian national service.

But the battle over the draft is really a proxy for a more fundamental fight over Israeli identity itself, a cleavage here that some see as a far greater threat to the future of the state than its external enemies.

Haredim currently make up about 9 percent of the population, but by some estimates collect as much as half of the welfare payments — yeshiva students get subsidies, and many depend also on public housing, as well as direct payments for the poor. Work force participation among Haredi men is about 35 percent, and their schools emphasize Torah study at the expense of math, English and science. Astronomical fertility makes the situation all the more dire: by 2030, one demographer recently estimated, this impoverished, ghettoized community will be close to a quarter of the Israeli population, something virtually everyone sees as unsustainable.

The resentment, even demonization, of Haredim is deep and growing, most profoundly among the strictly observant Jews known here as Modern Orthodox or National Religious. In Ramot, an elegant area of East Jerusalem, and in the exploding city of Beit Shemesh, many of these religious Jews — people whose children study in yeshivas before and after their army tours; people who find time to study Torah as an avocation alongside serious careers; in some cases men so religious they do not shake hands with women — talk about having to leave their beloved neighborhoods because the Haredim are taking over. What to think, as Zehava Alon, a leader of the universal-draft movement put it, of a state where “there is a law that says our kids’ blood is less valuable”?

Menachem Friedman, professor emeritus of sociology at Bar Ilan University, said, “That in the Jewish state, people will consider the ultra-Orthodox as ‘the enemy’ is a tragic thing.

“Most of the people hate the Haredim,” he added. “It’s bad for Israel, bad for the Jewish people, even bad for the government.”

Professor Friedman described the current situation as “bizarre,” “abnormal” and “unprecedented in Jewish history.” The Torah does not exempt yeshiva students from the military or the work force, and the sages of history all had day jobs: Moses Ben Maimon, known in the West as Maimonides, was a medical doctor; the scholars who wrote the Mishnah are identified by profession — Yochanan the shoemaker, Yochanan the metalworker.

WHILE most agreed after the Holocaust that reviving the decimated Haredi community was important, “this defensive strategy doesn’t make sense at the point where the community is actually thriving and growing,” Professor Halbertal said. Yedidia Stern, who runs the religion and state program at the Israel Democracy Institute, said the essence of the issue was really assimilation. “The real reason for the clash — and I can sympathize with the real reason — is the ultra-Orthodox are afraid that if their kids go to the army, they may change,” he said.

One Haredi rabbi, Shmuel Jacobovits of the Torah Institute of Contemporary Issues, acknowledged that the current situation was “unnatural.” But he said that widespread yeshiva study among Haredim was essential because other Jews were not committed enough to Torah study, which he sees as “the primary function, purpose, raison d’être of the Jewish people.”

“This is national service no less than anything else,” he said. “In our minds, it’s more so.”

Mr. Herzog, son of a president, grandson of a grand rabbi, sat on the commission in 1998 that established the draft-exemption law. He has suggested that 4,000 yeshiva students should now be exempt — a population-adjusted version of Ben-Gurion’s 400. He is also more optimistic than most on the subject, pointing to a growing number of Haredim serving in specialized army units catering to their needs, a growing number in secular universities, a growing number entering the work force.

In Haredi neighborhoods, where those who do join the military have historically had a harder time finding a suitable spouse, “you can see army uniforms hanging out in the laundry,” he said. “People are not afraid to wear them anymore.

“Not a revolution,” Mr. Herzog said, “an evolution.”


Jodi Rudoren is the Jerusalem bureau chief of The New York Times.




nytimes.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Sr K who wrote (487826)5/20/2012 12:56:06 AM
From: LindyBill6 Recommendations   of 536088
 
I just gave you the gist of my opinion. It didn't come down from Mt Sinai.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: LindyBill who wrote (487185)5/20/2012 1:01:45 AM
From: Sr K   of 536088
 
I still say it's HFCS, and then portion-size inflation. Diabetes is not contagious yet we have an epidemic since the early 1980s.

Confusing fat with getting fat may be part of the problem, and in that category, misinformation, processed foods, and sugar, and sugar, and sugar.

Have a drink of water a few times a day.

On your Moped do you have an option to pedal wheels for exercise? If not, who does offer it? Honda or KIA could do it.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: LindyBill who wrote (487661)5/20/2012 1:02:02 AM
From: Nadine Carroll12 Recommendations   of 536088
 
If he did fake it to get in the Colleges, it would have killed him four years ago. Now the exposure wouldn't, IMO

As Jay Severin says, it might not kill him but it would nick him. If you nick an artery, you begin to bleed votes. Might not look much at first, but it can add up. Add lies in his background to all the broken promises of his presidency, and the whisper campaign becomes: he was a bs artist all along.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: LindyBill5/20/2012 1:03:05 AM
4 Recommendations   of 536088
 
Bain or Bane?
by John Hinderaker
(John Hinderaker) One of my law partners asked me yesterday whether I thought the Democrats’ attacks on Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital days can be effective. I said I don’t think so. Voters understand that Romney was very successful in business, and if you are successful, that means companies are growing and employees are, in all likelihood, being hired. I think most people believe it is high time that we had someone in the White House who understands how the economy works, and the more the Democrats talk about Romney’s days in the private sector, and Romney’s campaign responds to those attacks, the more obvious it will be that Romney fits that description.

That’s my hope, anyway. Michael Ramirez sees it the same way. Here he contrasts Romney’s successful leadership of Bain with Obama’s failures as the bane of our economy:




Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.