Politics | Politics for Pros- moderated


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (487537)5/18/2012 9:38:57 AM
From: Brumar89   of 536603
 
Rosslyn Smith wrote: It is going to be hard for the media to argue this was some inadvertent error as almost all the big names there have literary agents and know the unwritten rule that an author controls what gets said about the author.

It should be noted that many of the talking heads on cable TV have have authored books and therefore presumably have literary agents. Thus they are familiar with practices in the industry. I suspect their experience mirrors that of PJ Media founder Roger L. Simon.

... as the author of 11 books, I can say that in EVERY instance that I have been published, I have seen such material in advance. It could be that Obama is the exception, but that is highly unlikely.

It's always been my understanding the author controls what is said about the author's background by the literary agent, the editor and the publisher. That certainly was my experience both when I worked for a professional magazine and when I've written articles in professional and general interest publications. We might advise that some aspect of their background be highlighted over another but everything got double checked with the author.

...

Read more: americanthinker.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: LindyBill5/18/2012 9:41:22 AM
   of 536603
 
Video: What would Day 1 of a Romney presidency look like?
from Hot Air » Top Picks by Ed Morrissey


A pretty good day.

Campaigns are not won on attack ads alone. A candidate for any office has to roll out a positive vision of their agenda, even when running against a failing incumbent. Alternately, a campaign can do a little of both in the same spot, and that’s what Team Romney tries to do in the new ad [...]


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: LindyBill5/18/2012 9:44:15 AM
3 Recommendations   of 536603
 
Romney Introduces 'A Few More of the 23 Million'
from The Campaign Spot on National Review Online by Jim Geraghty

Mitt Romney's campaign is unveiling a web video, "A Few More of the 23 Million," spotlighting a few more individuals who are unemployed, under-employed, or struggling because of the economic decisions of the Obama administration.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: LindyBill who wrote (487559)5/18/2012 9:44:39 AM
From: sm1th1 Recommendation   of 536603
 
"If the law is partially or fully overturned they'll draw up bills to keep the popular, consumer-friendly portions in place — like allowing adult children to remain on parents' health care plans until age 26, and forcing insurance companies to provide coverage for people with pre-existing conditions. Ripping these provisions from law is too politically risky, Republicans say."

If the R's do this, they will be giving the D's their ultimate dream. It would bankrupt the private insurance industry, thus paving the way for single-payer govt run healthcare. Let's hope that they aren't that stupid.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: sm1th who wrote (487589)5/18/2012 9:49:16 AM
From: LindyBill   of 536603
 
The Republicans may redo it all to make themselves look good. Depends on what the vote looks like. But long term, our kids will be in some sort of single pay system. We are going "Euro," I'm afraid.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Brumar89 who wrote (487586)5/18/2012 9:54:43 AM
From: sm1th3 Recommendations   of 536603
 
... as the author of 11 books, I can say that in EVERY instance that I have been published, I have seen such material in advance. It could be that Obama is the exception, but that is highly unlikely.


It isn't hard to believe that he was too lazy to read it.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: LindyBill5/18/2012 10:01:27 AM
19 Recommendations   of 536603
 
I think we have finally got it. He used Kenya to get himself accepted at Columbia and Harvard.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

From: LindyBill5/18/2012 10:01:49 AM
2 Recommendations   of 536603
 
Bill Katz: He won’t be right back
from Power Line by Scott Johnson
(Scott Johnson) Occasional contributor Bill Katz holds down the fort at Urgent Agenda. Bill is a man of many parts, a few of which go back to his days as a producer on The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson. Bill writes to mark the twentieth anniversary of the last show with Johnny:

Tuesday will mark the 20th anniversary of Johnny Carson’s last show. There will be appropriate commemorations and notices. Already, PBS’s American Masters series has aired a two-hour remembrance.

But why? Why should we care? The man was a late-night host. He never appeared in a movie or had a hit record. He retired two decades ago. He died seven years ago. Most kids in college today never saw him. Those who did couldn’t possibly remember him. Many have never heard of him. What was the name of his group?

Those in the press who do remember will haul out the usual tributes: He was an institution. He was one of a kind. He was a funny man with a dark side.

He set the standard. We won’t see his like again. His retirement marked the end of an era. You can add to the list.

And yet we recall him with warmth and fondness.

As some readers may know, I worked for The Tonight Show during its golden Carson years, and attended many meetings with Johnny. Maybe I can provide a bit of additional insight as to why so many people are noting this anniversary of his retirement.

Johnny Carson was great, and is remembered, because he was national. He was one of the few last entertainers who understood that he was speaking to an entire nation. Not once in all the meetings I attended did I ever hear Johnny use the word “demographics.” Not once. He appealed across generations. The old laughed, the young laughed. His successors, who surely bring their own talents, direct their attentions mostly to the “young demographic.” If you feel left out, you feel correctly. If you’re not in that young demographic, they just don’t care.

Today we are in an age where Hollywood, guided by the trendies in the intellectual and collegiate worlds, divides the nation into groups and sub-groups. Our national motto, “E pluribus unum” – “Out of many, one” – has been turned around. In Hollywood it’s now, “Out of one, many.” That was never Carson’s way, and the nation loved him for it.

Many say that Johnny did political humor, but he really didn’t. He did “politician” humor, poking fun at the gents with titles in front of their names, but never getting seriously involved in issues. To this day I don’t know whether he was a Democrat or a Republican, or neither. He never championed causes on the show. I don’t think he ever did standup in a coffee house or a comedy club. There were no fundraisers at Johnny’s home in Bel Air.

For Johnny never saw The Tonight Show as a talk show. He always reminded us that it was a variety show. The purpose of the talk was entertainment.

The interview notes he used, based on pre-interviews that the staff had conducted with guests, always contained zingers provided by our writers, typed in red print, for Johnny to toss in to keep things light.

Occasionally we’d get the sober cause seeker and savior to the world – the folksinger Buffy St. Marie comes to mind – but such types rarely became regular guests.

Johnny went through the sixties, seventies, and eighties, but we identify him with none of those decades. He was a national comedian who worked over the years, through convulsive change, but never went out of fashion.

He felt there was honor in giving people a few hours of good entertainment. He revered Jack Benny, who had the same attitude.

Nor did Johnny’s retirement end an era. That is nonsense. It is very rare that the departure of one person ends an era. Yes, we can say that Franklin D. Roosevelt’s death in 1945 ended the Roosevelt era, but he’d been elected president four times. The Victorian era in England ended with Victoria’s death, but she had lasted the better part of a century.

Eras end when a number of key people pass, and when a cultural definition of a time or nation fades away. We could just as easily say that Frank Sinatra’s death in 1998 ended an era, or Dean Martin’s in 1995. Or Elizabeth Taylor’s or Steve Jobs’s just recently. Or Ronald Reagan’s in 2004. Each, in his or her own way, was as defining as Johnny, in Reagan’s case more so.

But consider this: When Johnny retired in 1992, the youngest serviceman to have fought in World War II would have been about 64. Today that service member, if still with us, is 84.

That’s the era that’s passing – the era of our protectors, of heroes, of an America that believed in itself. And I think, subliminally, we identify Johnny Carson with that era. He was one of the last of the great entertainers to have served in World War II. (So had Ed McMahon.) He had, in effect, signed up for his generation’s call.

He was one of the most disciplined men I’ve ever met…if only in his work habits. If we were in the middle of a staff meeting at a certain point in the afternoon, he’d look at his watch and say, “I’ve got to do the monologue.” And he’d get up and leave. Just a few hours later we’d be taping, and all we’d see on Johnny’s cue cards were key phrases. He’d memorized the jokes. He only needed a few reminders.

He took seriously the very tough business of comedy. If you don’t think it’s hard, try making someone laugh for an hour, intentionally, and with your clothes on. Then do it five nights a week.

It would be almost impossible to sum up Johnny’s legacy in a glib phrase. But if I had to, I’d say that no one in Johnny Carson’s audience ever felt excluded. I don’t know where his soul now resides. But I can assure you that, wherever Johnny is, he’s not worrying about how to appeal to the “young demographic.”


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: LindyBill5/18/2012 10:05:08 AM
7 Recommendations   of 536603
 
Bigoted anti-bigots: How the gay-marriage mob slimed Manny Pacquiao
from Michelle Malkin by Michelle Malkin


How the Gay-Marriage Mob Slimed Manny Pacquiao
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2012

Boxing champion Manny Pacquiao is guilty — of being true to his Catholic faith. The gay-marriage mob is guilty — of the very ugly bigotry it claims to abhor. And left-wing media outlets are guilty — of stoking false narratives that shamelessly demonize religion in the name of compassion.

The attempted crucifixion of Pacquiao this week was fueled by an online army of cultural shakedown artists, generously funded by billionaire George Soros and other so-called progressive philanthropists.

On Tuesday, a freelance writer for the Examiner.com published an interview with Pacquiao conducted at his Los Angeles residence. Journalist Granville Ampong asked the pugilist his views on gay marriage in light of President Obama’s flip-flop-flip on the issue. “God’s words first,” Pacquiao said. “Obey God’s law first before considering the laws of man.”

After suggesting that Obama should consult the Bible as his “manual for life,” Pacquiao added in earnest: “It should not be of the same sex so as to adulterate the altar of matrimony, like in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah of Old.”

The interview then included a scriptural reference to Leviticus 20:13, which states: “If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.”

Publications including USA Today, LA Weekly and Village Voice all ran outraged pieces on Pacquiao’s “homophobic” calls for violence.

But it was the interviewer, not Pacquiao, who made the citation. Ampong demanded apologies on behalf of Pacquiao. Feckless professional journalists blamed Ampong for their own biased reading and then grudgingly “clarified” the truth in buried updates.

I didn’t say that, that’s a lie,” Pacquiao told anyone who would listen on his website. “I didn’t know that quote from Leviticus because I haven’t read the Book of Leviticus yet.” Too late. The politically correct bloodhounds were in full hunting mode.

The Courage Campaign, a community-organizing outfit that claims to have 750,000 members and is funded by the radical Tides Foundation, immediately called on Pacquiao-sponsor Nike to drop him over his “hate speech against gays.” The group took to Twitter to demand that the athletic shoe company “Drop Manny,” the “homophobic boxer.” The call was amplified by Think Progress, an online character assassination squad backed by George Soros.

L.A. bigwig developer Rick Caruso, who has mayoral aspirations, squeezed himself into the Catholic-bashing clown car. He announced on Twitter that Pacquiao would be banned from his trendy shopping complex, The Grove. The mall, Caruso wrote, “is a gathering place for all Angelenos, not a place for intolerance.”

Except for intolerance of completely mainstream views on gay marriage held by millions of practicing people of faith.

While L.A. media outlets reported that The Grove has retracted its ban, Caruso had failed as of late Thursday evening to apologize on Twitter or acknowledge the false smears against Pacquiao that prompted the Soros goon squad’s boycott demands. Caruso also refused to answer questions about his own rancid double standards:

Did he ban President Obama from his retail developments for publicly opposing gay marriage before he supported it?

Would Caruso be banning devout anti-gay Muslims from The Grove?

What kind of similarly selective tolerance litmus tests would Caruso support if elected to public office?

And how does Caruso square his vehement condemnation of Catholic Pacquiao with his funding of the University of Southern California Caruso Catholic Center? As Breitbart.com editor Ben Shapiro noted, the center’s director, Father Lawrence Seyer, opposes gay marriage and voted for California’s Proposition 8 upholding the traditional definition of marriage.

The Courage Campaign was also mum on its hit job late Thursday and was instead touting its “online organizing” to “change (Pacquiao’s native) Philippines and USA.”

This bigoted anti-bigot brigade mimics a wave of similar campaigns against both social and fiscal heretics who refuse to conform to “progressive” values. Targets include Rush Limbaugh, the American Legislative Exchange Council, Mitt Romney donors, Wisconsin’s union-reforming governor, lieutenant governor and GOP state legislators, Catholic health care providers, and now black church leaders and boxers who dare to state their religious views publicly.

Let this be a teachable moment on pernicious “community organizing” and brazen liberal hypocrisy. There is nothing more intolerant and chilling than the self-appointed, self-unaware tolerance police.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: LindyBill who wrote (487588)5/18/2012 10:08:18 AM
From: Paul Smith   of 536603
 
Romney unveils debut general-election TV ad

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GzK3ZX7hvzg

<link to ad above>

Mitt Romney's campaign released its first television commercial of the general election Friday, a spot that outlines a series of "day one" goals for a Romney presidency.

The ad, expected to run in Iowa, Ohio, North Carolina and Virginia, features a narrator speaking over stock footage of the American heartland and Romney on the campaign trail, outlining what "a Romney presidency would be like."

“Day one, President Romney immediately approves the Keystone pipeline, creating thousands of jobs that Obama blocked. President Romney introduces tax cuts and reforms that reward job creators, not punish them. President Romney issues order to begin replacing ObamaCare with common-sense healthcare reform," the voiceover continues.

The campaign is expected to spend $1.3 million on the commercial, according to NBC News, a relatively small purchase. The Obama campaign, by comparison, is in the midst of a $25 million television campaign.

Romney spoke about the commercial on the campaign trail Thursday, telling reporters in Jacksonville that unlike one of the Obama campaign's ads critical of his tenure at Bain Capital, his commercials would take a positive tone.

"It will be a positive ad about the things I will do if I were president. It's contrasting with the president's ad, which came out, once again, as a character assassination ad," Romney said.

The campaign is notably also releasing a version of the ad in Spanish.

thehill.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.