Politics | Politics for Pros- moderated


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: LindyBill4/9/2012 3:41:43 PM
   of 536384
 
These two just sold out to Facebook for one Billion. Stanford Grads seem to be where it's at.

"
About Us

When we were kids we loved playing around with cameras -- we loved how all the old Polaroid cameras marketed themselves as "instant" (something we take for granted today). We also felt that the snapshots people were taking were kind of like telegrams in that they got sent over the wire to others -- so we figured why not combine the two?

Instagram came from that inspiration—could we make sharing your life as instant and magic as those first Polaroid pictures must have felt? Our first product is Instagram for iPhone, and we're just getting started. If you're interested, why not join our team?
The Team
Kevin Systrom (CEO)

Kevin graduated from Stanford University in 2006 with a BS in Management Science & Engineering—he got his first taste of the startup world when he was an intern at Odeo that later became Twitter. He spent two years at Google—the first of which was working on Gmail, Google Reader, and other products and the latter where he worked on the Corporate Development team. Kevin has always had a passion for social products that enable people to communicate more easily, and combined with his passion for photography Instagram is a natural fit.
Mike Krieger

Mike also graduated from Stanford University where he studied Symbolic Systems with a focus in Human-Computer Interaction. During his undergrad, he interned at Microsoft's PowerPoint team as a PM and at Foxmarks (now Xmarks) as a software developer. He wrote his Master's thesis on how user interfaces can better support collaboration on a large scale. After graduating, he worked at Meebo for a year and a half as a user experience designer and as a front-end engineer before joining the Instagram team doing design & development."

instagr.am 



Facebook grabs Instagram on the way to huge IPO
By Jessica Guynn | 11:36 a.m.

The social networking giant pays $1 billion for the photo-sharing startup that has 13 employees. Nearing its IPO, Facebook saw the company as a competitor.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Neeka who wrote (481517)4/9/2012 3:53:25 PM
From: Geoff Altman9 Recommendations   of 536384
 
The video has been blocked..... I wonder if they'd have blocked it if it was white on black crime or black on black crime..... I doubt it.

Let's be honest with the way things are today in our society. When was the last time that you heard of a racially motivated white on black crime? I'm talking about a real hate crime, not something made up by the race baiters like they did with Zimmerman..... Granted, I don't look for these things in the news everyday but the last white on black hate crime I heard about is when they dragged that poor man behind a truck down in Texas and that was over 10 years ago. Why is that? If we're so racist a country wouldn't we see more news about it? It's because that since the civil rights era white racist groups have been shunned, denigrated (as they should be) and constantly monitored by the government. White society has rejected racism on a whole as immoral. We've gone from being a country of institutionalised racism to being racial appeasers......

It's no longer whites that have a race problem, it's blacks, just ask a Korean person that has a business in a black neighborhood........ Yet we hear no out cry from blacks about racially motivated attacks on asians....

PS. When the upcoming food riots happen, asian stores will be targeted first..... When I see black people defending asians' stores from rioters I'll know we've turned a new leaf.....

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: LindyBill4/9/2012 4:03:10 PM
   of 536384
 

About Th Obama Campaign Views Romney as ‘Almost a Joke’

By Jim Geraghty
April 9, 2012 3:06 P.M.
Comments
1





Over at BuzzFeed, Ben Smith. Michael Hastings and Zeke Miller get the grand tour of the Obama campaign headquarters in Chicago, and report:

  • To say that the campaign doesn’t fear Romney is an understatement — he’s viewed as almost a joke. (The campaign named their sixth floor elevators for cars to mock Romney’s planned over-the-top addition to his La Jolla, CA home.)
Of course.


Such is life for political partisans; because we so strongly disagree with the candidates of the other side, we have a hard time believing anyone else could find them appealing.

When partisans do express fear or a belief that the opposition can win, it generally is because they see the candidate as appealing to them, not that they actually believe the candidate appeals to the electorate as a whole. (Most of those passionate about politics have a hard time believing that an American electorate of more than 130 million people might collectively prefer different candidates than they do.) Think about those few GOP presidential candidates who have generated ripples of praise or interest from Democrats. On those rare occasions, Democrats tend to like the aspects of the Republican candidates that are least conservative and least aligned with the rest of the GOP. In 2008, many Democrats thought Huckabee could be the toughest competitor – largely because his populist streak; Huckabee’s attack on the Club for Growth as a “Club for Greed” aligned with what they already thought about fiscal conservatives. Some Democrats like Ron Paul’s antiwar/isolationist views and opposition to the war on drugs. Some Democrats liked Jon Huntsman this cycle because he seemed the least aligned with the conservative base of the party.

If you’re working for the Obama campaign, chances are that the president represents, if not your ideal political leader, then political leader on the national scene right now who you deem closest to the ideal. With that as your ideal or near-ideal leader, undoubtedly you would find Romney laughably unappealing. Obama wants a bigger, more active government that taxes and spends more; Romney wants a smaller, less expansive government that taxes and spends less. Obama sees “Obamacare” as his masterpiece; Romney has pledged to repeal it. Obama habitually demonizes the private sector (Wall Street, banks, oil companies, big businesses, ATMs, the wealthy) as the source of most of America’s problems; Romney comes from it, thrived in it, and believes it will thrive again if government gets out of the way.

A lot of the Right underestimated Obama’s appeal in 2008; he was so far from what we wanted in a president that many of us couldn’t believe that 69 million Americans might prefer him to John McCain. Perhaps our initial instincts were right, and the sudden collapse of Lehman Brothers, the Wall Street meltdown, the rapidly-worsening economic collapse and the sight of the country’s wealthiest bankers coming to Washington to beg for taxpayer money scrambled voters’ usual notions of who they wanted in the Oval Office. We can succumb to our own Pauline Kael effect. But one would figure that most Obama campaign staffers spend most of their waking hours marinating in an environment where the assumption that Mitt Romney is an unelectable joke candidate goes unchallenged.

Put another way, how many wise, experienced, wary and cautionary voices do you suspect exist in this crowd of campaign staffers?



So Romney’s a joke, hmm? Noted. Of course, this time he represents change. And the “right direction/wrong track” numbers continue to be abysmal.

And all of those poll numbers showing Obama comfortably ahead in a head-to-head matchup lately are of registered voters. The two pollsters who filtered for likely voters, Rasmussen and Bloomberg, show Obama ahead by 2 percentage points and tied, respectively.

Of course, one then wonders about the assessment from Obama campaign manager Jim Messina back on March 13: “All you really need to know: According to a new poll, if the general election were held today, we would lose to Mitt Romney.”




Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: LindyBill4/9/2012 4:05:38 PM
1 Recommendation   of 536384
 
Re: Derb

By Mark Steyn
April 9, 2012 2:59 P.M.

Andy, for what it’s worth, I regret the loss of John Derbyshire to National Review. Short version: Didn’t like the piece, but don’t think NR should have hustled him into the drive-thru guillotine on the basis of 24 hours of hysteria from the Internet’s sans-culottes. Longer version:

I didn’t agree with Derb on many things, from Ron Paul and talk radio to God and science. For his part, he reckoned I was a bit of a wimp on what he called “ the Great Unmentionables.” He thought that neuroscientists and geneticists’ understanding of race trumped my touching belief in “culture.” I’m not so sure: Why is Haiti Haiti and Barbados Barbados? Why is India India and Pakistan Pakistan? Skin color and biological determinism don’t get you very far on that.

But I almost always learned something from his columns, and, at a time when punditry is increasingly parochial, I appreciated his range of historical and literary allusion (his recent “Duke of Marlborough moment,” for example). He will be impossible to replace on that front.

On the career-detonating column, I don’t have anything terribly useful to add. But Derb’s wife is Chinese and his children are biracial. And I can see why, in a world in which a four-time mayor of America’s capital city can disparage your own family’s race (“these Asians coming in . . . those dirty shops . . . they ought to go”) and pay no price, a chap might come to resent the way polite society’s indulgence of racism is so highly selective.

So I don’t share Andy’s insouciance about how what’s sauce for the MSNBC race huckster, Hollywood address-tweeter and New Black Panther bounty-offerer should be a “hanging offense” for the iconoclastic right-wing gander, and them’s the rules and we just have to accept it. The Left is pretty clear about its objectives on everything from climate change to immigration to gay marriage: Rather than win the debate, they’d just as soon shut it down. They’ve had great success in shrinking the bounds of public discourse, and rendering whole areas of public policy all but undiscussable. In such a climate, my default position is that I’d rather put up with whatever racist/sexist/homophobic/Islamophobic/whateverphobic excess everybody’s got the vapors about this week than accept ever tighter constraints on “acceptable” opinion. The latter kills everything, not least the writing skills of the ideologically conformist: Note how cringe-makingly limp the Derbyshire “ satires” are, even in the marquee publications.

The net result of Derb’s summary execution by NR will be further to shrivel the parameters, and confine debate in this area to ever more unreal fatuities. He knew that mentioning the Great Unmentionables would sooner or later do him in, and, in an age when shrieking “That’s totally racist!” is totally gay, he at least has the rare satisfaction of having earned his colors. Yet what are we to make of wee, inoffensive Dave Weigel over at Slate? The water still churning with blood, the sharks are circling poor old Dave for the sin of insufficiently denouncing the racist Derbyshire. Weigel must go for not enthusiastically bellowing, “Derbyshire must go!” Come to think of it, I should probably go for querying whether Weigel should go.

NR shouldn’t be rewarding those who want to play this game. The more sacrifices you offer up, the more ravenously the volcano belches.

PS If Derb’s piece is sufficiently beyond the pale that its author must be terminated immediately, why is its publisher — our old friend Taki — proudly listed on the NR masthead?




Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: KLP who wrote (481526)4/9/2012 4:09:21 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie1 Recommendation   of 536384
 
Any idea of how the white car/truck drove through the same area just before the convey, and the white vehicle was not hit, but the convoy was? Where was that convoy? It appears to have been a convoy of 5 vehicles....did anyone live through that? That is just so very sad...

Often there will be a small enemy team associated with the IED. They will often shoot on the convoy to get them to slow down and then they pull the trigger.

In other words, the IED is triggered by someone who selects the target. (I'm sure uw could give more details).

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Crony who wrote (481533)4/9/2012 4:26:25 PM
From: HPilot   of 536384
 
And what makes them socialists? Banking with agendas?

Funding socialist causes mostly. George Soros is the best known. Though he is mostly a stock trader, I think he may also be a banker.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: longnshort who wrote (481534)4/9/2012 4:28:25 PM
From: HPilot   of 536384
 
I would think if they found in favor of Zimmerman they would have sent it to the Grand Jury?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: DMaA who wrote (481491)4/9/2012 4:31:22 PM
From: jlallen   of 536384
 
Not really.....that kind of ignorance is usually in your face kind of stuff......

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: simplicity4/9/2012 4:52:11 PM
17 Recommendations   of 536384
 
Every few months I have my hair cut by Sophia, a neighbor who styles hair in a local beauty salon but also has a small shop in her home. She is a lovely woman but completely unaware of what is occurring in the country and the world. We had never talked politics until today.

While she was washing my hair she happened to mention that virtually everyone in the salon where she works 'loves Obama', and it's becoming difficult to get them to talk about anything else to the customers. I asked her what they generally say about politics, and she responded, 'I don't usually pay much attention, because I'm not interested in politics, but the things I remember are':

(1) Obama cares about the American people
(2) Bush and Cheney were crooks who just wanted to make money and help their rich friends
(3) Romney is a Mormon and a womanizer
(4) Santorum doesn't really know anything about how government works and he wants to 'keep women down'
(5) People won't get good healthcare unless Obama is re-elected

First of all, I don't know where the 'womanizer' thing came from, but I imagine the rest of the allegations came right off the talking point lists of the DNC/ABC/CBS/NBC/CNN.

Secondly, even though I was sitting in a little private beauty shop owned by a woman who 'doesn't care about politics', I literally felt physically sick, hearing firsthand about a group of people in my own area who have unanimously swallowed the leftist swill, who are dispensing that swill to others, and whose votes will count every bit as much as my own.

After regaining my mental composure, I reminded myself that fretting over things that are out of one's control is never a good exercise, and I said to Sophia, 'How do you feel about what they are saying?' She responded that she really didn't have enough knowledge to know whether their comments were right or wrong.

I spent the rest of my time with her (about a half hour), gently trying to tell her that 'caring about politics' nowadays really amounts to caring about her children and grandchildren. That the current administration does not have their best interests at heart, and that the foundations upon which America was built are in danger.

She asked quite a few questions, such as, 'Why do all of my co-workers believe these things if they aren't true?', so I attempted to give her a brief, ten-sentence overview of the bias of the mainstream media.

In my job, I often have conversations of a political nature with others -- most often 'preaching to the choir' conversations in which we simply re-affirm each others' views, but also with people on the opposite end of the spectrum, whose opinions are every bit as strongly-held as my own. The latter conversations/debates can occasionally become heated and result in nothing more than raised blood pressure.

But I don't often talk with someone who has no political opinions to speak of, and yet who is open-minded and interested enough to listen to me express mine. I know I didn't turn a woman whose world does not include a desire to understand the political situation in America into someone who is now thirsting to learn more. But I do believe I did provide her a small foundation from which to at least question the claims she hears day in and day out during her workday. And I suspect that we will talk about politics and the world situation more frequently than we used to (which amounted to never), simply because she was very interested in hearing 'the other side'.

One of the discouraging aspects of this kind of experience is that it is difficult to know where to begin. The left has such a long and lurid history of offenses to liberty, and has enjoyed such a successful campaign, along with their cohorts in 'higher education' and the media, of covering up their real motives and disguising them in altruistic masks and platitudes, that it is difficult to know where to begin to educate someone who is a blank slate. I firmly believe, that, when the opportunity to do so arises, we must seize it. But we must be careful not to overload or preach, basing the amount of information we offer on the continued receptiveness of the receiver.

And yet, for everyone we meet who is like Sophia, there are dozens who are falling prey to the leftist propaganda, who believe their opinions are well-informed, who will disseminate their 'knowledge' as if it were written in stone, and who will not be swayed by reason or common sense.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Neeka who wrote (481527)4/9/2012 5:16:13 PM
From: CF Rebel3 Recommendations   of 536384
 
In this tense world that BO and his ag have created, I'm very confused about what is and is not allowed.

Use the same standards and wisdom you've always used. To hell with those who have no principles. Listen to your soul.

CF Rebel

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.