SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Politics | Politics for Pros- moderated


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Carolyn who wrote (480430)4/3/2012 12:16:01 PM
From: DMaA   of 538020
 
I believe Alito did not attend the subsequent SOU speech.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Carolyn who wrote (480430)4/3/2012 12:16:23 PM
From: ManyMoose   of 538020
 
Smithee corrected my mistake and I corrected my message in time.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: DMaA who wrote (480435)4/3/2012 12:22:20 PM
From: Carolyn   of 538020
 
No, he didn't. Several stayed home.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Carolyn who wrote (480434)4/3/2012 12:22:30 PM
From: Farmboy   of 538020
 
Remember ... their regular diet is "fanatical intolerance" ..


Eat it, live it, sleep it.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ManyMoose who wrote (480436)4/3/2012 12:23:08 PM
From: Carolyn   of 538020
 
That darn 15 minute window!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Farmboy who wrote (480438)4/3/2012 12:23:34 PM
From: Carolyn   of 538020
 
So true.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: ManyMoose who wrote (480426)4/3/2012 12:25:06 PM
From: Brumar8910 Recommendations   of 538020
 
WaPo's Ruth Marcus Scolds...Barack Obama?

By Noel Sheppard | April 03, 2012 | 11:27

Here's something you don't see every day.

One of the Washington Post's perilously liberal columnists, Ruth Marcus, actually scolded President Obama Monday for his "unsettling" "preemptive strike" on the Supreme Court:

Obama’s assault on “an unelected group of people” stopped me cold. Because, as the former constitutional law professor certainly understands, it is the essence of our governmental system to vest in the court the ultimate power to decide the meaning of the constitution. Even if, as the president said, it means overturning “a duly constituted and passed law.”

Of course, acts of Congress are entitled to judicial deference and a presumption of constitutionality. The decision to declare a statute unconstitutional, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in 1927, is “the gravest and most delicate duty that this court is called on to perform.”

But the president went too far in asserting that it “would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step” for the court to overturn “a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.” That’s what courts have done since Marbury v. Madison. The size of the congressional majority is of no constitutional significance. We give the ultimate authority to decide constitutional questions to “a group of unelected people” precisely to insulate them from public opinion.

I would lament a ruling striking down the individual mandate, but I would not denounce it as conservative justices run amok. Listening to the arguments and reading the transcript, the justices struck me as a group wrestling with a legitimate, even difficult, constitutional question. For the president to imply that the only explanation for a constitutional conclusion contrary to his own would be out-of-control conservative justices does the court a disservice.



If you wanted to check the link again to reconfirm this was Marcus and not Post contributors Charles Krauthammer or George Will, be my guest.

I'm still quite shocked.

Somebody pinch me.





Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/04/03/wapos-ruth-marcus-scoldsbarack-obama#ixzz1qzldHNrs

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: D. Long who wrote (480417)4/3/2012 12:53:55 PM
From: Brian Sullivan   of 538020
 
For the most part, only minorities get that money.

Isn't being a minority today basically self declared.
So couldn't anyone be a white-hispanic or an african-american like Charlize.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (480424)4/3/2012 12:55:52 PM
From: Brian Sullivan   of 538020
 
I was hoping for a "wise latino" to side with the Catholic church against Obama care.

I know, I know, dream on.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Sdgla4/3/2012 1:02:43 PM
   of 538020
 
Anyone watching the one claim cutting spending is not possible ?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.