Biotech / Medical | Indications - Neurodegenerative


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: tuck5/17/2012 10:47:11 AM
   of 416
 
An Alzheimer's prevention trial using Genentech's crenezumab, an antibody against amyloid, in Colombian patients with mutated amyloid pathways (the only sort of population on which such a trial could be ethically done):

pipeline.corante.com 

Cheers, Tuck

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: mopgcw5/23/2012 12:03:48 PM
   of 416
 
after the FDA warning on Zamboni, this is some good news:

the-scientist.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: mopgcw who wrote (399)5/23/2012 12:55:55 PM
From: mopgcw   of 416
 
corrected link[url=http://the-scientist.com/2012/05/23/could-stem-cells-cure-ms/]

the-scientist.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: bmaz0015/23/2012 2:53:12 PM
   of 416
 
Alzheimer's, metal ions and hip resurfacing-
Alzheimer's has been in my mother's family for at least a few generations, so I'm assuming that I may be genetically predisposed to contracting this terrible disease someday. As I've aged, I've become more curious about AD and I've read that there may be an association between AD and metal ions that have accumulated in the brain. Also, several years ago I remember stories about people throwing away their aluminum cookware because they believed that Aluminum in the blood stream might play a part in developing AD. I don't have the educational background to explore and understand the role of metal ions in the development of AD and, even if I did, I'm not certain that enough research on the matter has been published to draw any conclusions. But here's my dilemma... My left hip is arthritic to the point that I need to do something about it. Pain meds no longer help. Structurally, my preference is to have my hip 'resurfaced'. However, because current resurfacing 'kits' involve metal-on-metal interfaces (Cobalt & Chromium), I'm concerned about how the metal ions might impact the progression of AD. I'd be grateful if anyone familiar with this topic is willing to offer feedback/advice. Of course, I can always have a full hip replacement done, instead of resurfacing. Metal-on-metal interfaces aren't an issue with full hip replacements. However, I lead a very active lifestyle (biking, swimming, hiking, etc.) and my understanding is that, at 55 years of age, the resurfacing approach is the better option for me (if metal ions and AD weren't a concern). Thoughts?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: bmaz001 who wrote (401)5/24/2012 4:01:36 PM
From: DewDiligence_on_SI   of 416
 
There are product options for hips that do not involve metal-on-metal technology, so you should be able to avoid whatever incremental risk the stray metal ions might induce. Regards, Dew

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: DewDiligence_on_SI who wrote (402)5/25/2012 10:27:14 AM
From: bmaz001   of 416
 
Thanks, Dew. Unfortunately, the non metal-on-metal options (that I'm aware of) are in the 'total hip replacement' category. That approach involves lopping off a large section of the upper femur. Hip resurfacing is very different in that the 'ball' of the femur is slightly ground down and then 'capped'. The 'kit' that my surgeon uses is the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system (BHR). If I knew that the ions resulting from the metal-on-metal contact were too minimal to affect neurodegenerative diseases, I'd go with the BHR approach. Unfortunately, I doubt that anyone really knows for sure at this point.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: bmaz001 who wrote (403)5/25/2012 11:13:57 AM
From: DewDiligence_on_SI   of 416
 
I would suggest that you check out other resurfacing options; some of them may employ ceramic materials rather than all metal. There are several manufacturers of these kits; however, many orthopedic surgeons work with only one company so they may not be the best source of information about the choices available.

As you noted, the stray ions from metal-on-metal may be much ado about nothing; however, if you can eliminate a potential risk without a corresponding downside, it would seem to be prudent to investigate it. I’ll be interested to know what you find out. Good luck.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: russet6/21/2012 10:14:16 PM
   of 416
 
Scientists Identify Protein Required to Regrow Injured Nerves in Limbs

siliconinvestor.com

enlarge



These are images of axon regeneration in mice two weeks after injury to the hind leg’s sciatic nerve. On the left, axons (green) of a normal mouse have regrown to their targets (red) in the muscle. On the right, a mouse lacking DLK shows no axons have regenerated, even after two weeks. (Credit: Jung Eun Shin)

ScienceDaily (June 20, 2012) — A protein required to regrow injured peripheral nerves has been identified by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.

The finding, in mice, has implications for improving recovery after nerve injury in the extremities. It also opens new avenues of investigation toward triggering nerve regeneration in the central nervous system, notorious for its inability to heal.

Peripheral nerves provide the sense of touch and drive the muscles that move arms and legs, hands and feet. Unlike nerves of the central nervous system, peripheral nerves can regenerate after they are cut or crushed. But the mechanisms behind the regeneration are not well understood.

In the new study, published online June 20 in Neuron, the scientists show that a protein called dual leucine zipper kinase (DLK) regulates signals that tell the nerve cell it has been injured -- often communicating over distances of several feet. The protein governs whether the neuron turns on its regeneration program.

"DLK is a key molecule linking an injury to the nerve's response to that injury, allowing the nerve to regenerate," says Aaron DiAntonio, MD, PhD, professor of developmental biology. "How does an injured nerve know that it is injured? How does it take that information and turn on a regenerative program and regrow connections? And why does only the peripheral nervous system respond this way, while the central nervous system does not? We think DLK is part of the answer."

The nerve cell body containing the nucleus or "brain" of a peripheral nerve resides in the spinal cord. During early development, these nerves send long, thin, branching wires, called axons, out to the tips of the fingers and toes. Once the axons reach their targets (a muscle, for example), they stop extending and remain mostly unchanged for the life of the organism. Unless they're damaged.

If an axon is severed somewhere between the cell body in the spinal cord and the muscle, the piece of axon that is no longer connected to the cell body begins to disintegrate. Earlier work showed that DLK helps regulate this axonal degeneration. And in worms and flies, DLK also is known to govern the formation of an axon's growth cone, the structure responsible for extending the tip of a growing axon whether after injury or during development.

The formation of the growth cone is an important part of the early, local response of a nerve to injury. But a later response, traveling over greater distances, proves vital for relaying the signals that activate genes promoting regeneration. This late response can happen hours or even days after injury.

But in mice, unlike worms and flies, DiAntonio and his colleagues found that DLK is not involved in an axon's early response to injury. Even without DLK, the growth cone forms. But a lack of DLK means the nerve cell body, nestled in the spinal cord far from the injury, doesn't get the message that it's injured. Without the signals relaying the injury message, the cell body doesn't turn on its regeneration program and the growth cone's progress in extending the axon stalls.

In addition, it was shown many years ago that axons regrow faster after a second injury than axons injured only once. In other words, injury itself increases an axon's ability to regenerate. Furthering this work, first author Jung Eun Shin, graduate research assistant, and her colleagues found that DLK is required to promote this accelerated growth.

"A neuron that has seen a previous injury now has a different regenerative program than one that has never been damaged," Shin says. "We hope to be able to identify what is different between these two neurons -- specifically what factors lead to the improved regeneration after a second injury. We have found that activated DLK is one such factor. We would like to activate DLK in a newly injured neuron to see if it has improved regeneration."

In addition to speeding peripheral nerve recovery, DiAntonio and Shin see possible implications in the central nervous system. It is known for example, that some of the important factors regulated and ramped up by DLK are not activated in the central nervous system.

"Since this sort of signaling doesn't appear to happen in the central nervous system, it's possible these nerves don't 'know' when they are injured," DiAntonio says. "It's an exciting idea -- but not at all proven -- that activating DLK in the central nervous system could promote its regeneration."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: DewDiligence_on_SI7/17/2012 6:26:47 PM
   of 416
 
Gammagard shows promising results in small phase-2 extension study:

investorshub.advfn.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: John McCarthy8/6/2012 3:13:42 PM
   of 416
 
Chronic 'Butter Flavoring' Exposure Linked to Harmful Brain Process HealthDay – 57 mins ago

MONDAY, Aug. 6 (HealthDay News) -- Chronic exposure to an artificial butter flavoring ingredient, known as diacetyl, may worsen the harmful effects of a protein in the brain linked to Alzheimer's disease, according to a new study.

The findings should serve as a red flag for factory workers with significant exposure to the food-flavoring ingredient, researchers from the University of Minnesota said in the report published in a recent issue of the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology.

Diacetyl is used to give a buttery taste and aroma to common food items such as margarines, snack foods, candy, baked goods, pet foods and other products.

The investigators pointed out that previous studies have already linked diacetyl to respiratory and other health problems among workers at microwave popcorn and food-flavoring plants.

Although diacetyl forms naturally in fermented beverages, such as beer and wine, its chemical structure is similar to a substance that makes beta-amyloid proteins clump together in the brain. This clumping, the study authors noted, is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease.

In their study, the researchers found that diacetyl also increases the amount of beta-amyloid clumping in the brain. And it worsened the beta-amyloid protein's harmful effects on nerve cells grown in a lab when the cells were exposed to the same levels of diacetyl that factory workers might be exposed to in their jobs.

The study authors pointed out that other experiments revealed that diacetyl also crosses the "blood-brain barrier," which helps protect the brain from dangerous substances. Diacetyl also prevented a beneficial protein from protecting nerve cells.

"In light of the chronic exposure of industry workers to diacetyl, this study raises the troubling possibility of long-term neurological toxicity mediated by diacetyl," Robert Vince and colleagues concluded in a news release from the American Chemical Society.

The study was funded by the Center for Drug Design research endowment funds at the University of Minnesota.

While the study found an association between chronic diacetyl exposure and certain brain protein processes, it did not prove a cause-and-effect relationship.

More information

The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about Alzheimer's disease.

news.yahoo.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.