Strategies & Market Trends | The Financial Collapse of 2001 and Beyond


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: ponokee who wrote (88820)4/6/2012 6:22:30 AM
From: Snowshoe   of 100750
 
Similar case here...

Woman's Ponzi scheme dupes investors out of $7.4 million
adn.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (88815)4/6/2012 8:20:16 AM
From: Amelia Carhartt   of 100750
 
Apparently, they have money burning a hole in their pockets and everything American is incredibly cheap for them due to the exchange rate. Montana property prices, compared to theirs, is at Salvation Army prices. I suppose they don't think it can get any cheaper. Or, they just want to have fun and don't really care. Most are not moving here. Most are second homes.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: The Jack of Hearts who wrote (88814)4/6/2012 8:21:17 AM
From: Amelia Carhartt   of 100750
 
What are those? RE: Tax implications.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: abuelita who wrote (88812)4/6/2012 8:23:12 AM
From: Amelia Carhartt   of 100750
 
Yes, the majority are Albertans but quite a good number of BC'ers too.

People in this part of the country say that if it weren't for the Canadians our economy me would be completely dead in the water and I believe it.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Amelia Carhartt who wrote (88823)4/6/2012 9:57:12 AM
From: The Jack of Hearts   of 100750
 
BNN had a show on up here recently on different rules and caveats for Canadian buyers of US real estate. seemed like a lot more i's to dot and t's to cross for a foreigner to think about.. including taxation than buying here.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: The Jack of Hearts who wrote (88825)4/6/2012 10:04:36 AM
From: Amelia Carhartt   of 100750
 
Many of the buyers are from Calgary. Those guys have money to burn.

I don't know if you are familiar with the real estate market in Alberta and BC but their prices would make our prices during the bubble look like a distress sale.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: yoremopnhoj4/6/2012 11:16:22 AM
   of 100750
 
Who said the government is afraid to release a bad jobs report because the stock market might throw a hissy fit? Of course if the market is closed for a holiday than I guess they will be a little less hesitant. Lee Adler last night predicted the low jobs gain.
wallstreetexaminer.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (88818)4/6/2012 11:29:04 AM
From: Lazarus   of 100750
 
MW - i must say you, bring an entirely new concept to meaning of the crucifix

>>>>The reason they have models of Jesus on the cross is a permanent warning to everyone about what will happen to you if you defy the church or the state.<<<<

pity me, for over 40 yrs i've entertained the notion God Himself paid this planet a visit and wasn't well received.

i heartily agree with your conclusion though:

>>>>Most people are in favour of such repression. Americans will vote for anyone but Ron Paul in droves.<<<<

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: carranza24/6/2012 11:51:23 AM
   of 100750
 
The NFP figures were not good and couldn't be fudged (much), but read on...with thanks to ZH and in the spirit of Shadow Stats:

zerohedge.com 

Sick of the BLS propaganda? Then do the following calculation with us: using BLS data, the US civilian non-institutional population was 242,269 in January, an increase of 1.7 million month over month: apply the long-term average labor force participation rate of 65.8% to this number (because as chart 2 below shows, people are not retiring as the popular propaganda goes: in fact labor participation in those aged 55 and over has been soaring as more and more old people have to work overtime, forget retiring), and you get 159.4 million: that is what the real labor force should be. The BLS reported one? 154.4 million: a tiny 5 million difference. Then add these people who the BLS is purposefully ignoring yet who most certainly are in dire need of labor and/or a job to the 12.758 million reported unemployed by the BLS and you get 17.776 million in real unemployed workers. What does this mean? That using just the BLS denominator in calculating the unemployed rate of 154.4 million, the real unemployment rate actually rose in January to 11.5%. Compare that with the BLS reported decline from 8.5% to 8.3%. It also means that the spread between the reported and implied unemployment rate just soared to a fresh 30 year high of 3.2%. And that is how with a calculator and just one minute of math, one strips away countless hours of BLS propaganda.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: carranza2 who wrote (88829)4/6/2012 12:44:05 PM
From: bart132 Recommendations   of 100750
 
U7 unemployment rate - 21.4%. Lowest since Oct 2009.











Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.