SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Politics | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (12877)12/5/2001 5:13:15 PM
From: FaultLine   of 280801
 
Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA)
Domination by Infantry in The Battle of Crecy

Message 16523440

fas.org 

CRS Report for Congress
Revolution in Military Affairs?
Competing Concepts, Organizational Responses, Outstanding Issues
Theodor W. Galdi
Specialist in International Security
Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division
December 11, 1995

[excerpt]
The outcome of the Battle of Crecy -- which marked the end of cavalry supremacy -- provides an example of the overwhelming dominance that becomes evident from the completion of an RMA. In that battle the French lost 1,542 knights and lords, and suffered over 10,000 casualties among crossbowmen and other support troops. The victorious English, relying on disciplined formations of infantry with unprecedented use of longbowmen, lost two knights, one squire, forty other men-at-arms and archers, and "a few dozen Welsh."

[fl: sounds like the Gulf War where the US had about a 10,000 to 1 kill ratio ]

========

Use Google to search on the quoted string

"Revolution in Military Affairs"

You will get a lot interesting hits.

--ken/fl

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Jerry in Omaha who wrote (12882)12/5/2001 5:14:43 PM
From: unclewest   of 280801
 
just in case ya'll don't know....many of our very finest spend time training with crucible. McCann is no fluke.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: unclewest who wrote (12887)12/5/2001 5:20:08 PM
From: Jerry in Omaha   of 280801
 
unclewest,

Roger that, unc!

Jerry in Omaha

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: jjkirk who wrote (12818)12/5/2001 5:20:09 PM
From: Rollcast...   of 280801
 
<He hasn't the luxury of living the life of the "protected class" of the pampered liberal lap dog who knows only how to mouth criticisms>

Well said.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: unclewest who wrote (12883)12/5/2001 5:26:14 PM
From: TimF   of 280801
 
there is another country that comes to mind where virtually every able bodied man is
trained, armed and part of the national strategic reserve.

which country?

would you believe switzerland?


True but I wouldn't call all those able bodied men part of Switzerland's army, nor do I think they would be very useful for Switzerland in a mobile war of conquest. They would be useful in harrassing and delaying any invader, and they would provide a pool from which men could be called up for refesher training and added to regular units, but Switzerland could never use most of them in an invasion if they had any desire to invade a neighbor. If you count all those reserves as part of Switzerland's army it would be larger then Germany's but I don't think it would have much chance of takeing over Germany, or even Italy or France.


Also I think 8.5 million is more then every able bodied man in North Korea. They would have to have something like 150% of the able bodied men in their country as part of their army to have so many soldiers or over 200% if you accept the CIA factbook's estimate of men 15-49 that are "fit for military service"

Tim

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: unclewest who wrote (12831)12/5/2001 5:58:30 PM
From: jjkirk   of 280801
 
Unclewest,

Re: these guys will do what it takes to accomplish their mission. i suggest a moment of silence for their families and kids

Amen.

My condolences to the families of the brave warriors who were KIA, DOW, and WIA. America has occasion to be proud of these hard working, finely trained, dedicated men for their unparalleled service during this war. Your generation began a valuable and lasting tradition of excellence, Unk. Thanks.......jj

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: no name chump who wrote (12879)12/5/2001 6:19:56 PM
From: Machaon   of 280801
 
<< Are Palestinians Human? >>

Do they act like human beings?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: FaultLine who started this subject12/5/2001 6:24:40 PM
From: Elsewhere   of 280801
 
Donor conference in Berlin has started: link list

Afghanistan: Donors Ponder Aid in the Wake of Agreement
By Yojana Sharma, Inter Press Service
Wednesday December 05 02:53 PM EST
dailynews.yahoo.com 

Afghan power-sharing deal brightens aid conference in Berlin
Thursday December 6, 3:50 AM
sg.news.yahoo.com 

Wealthy nations urged to aid Afghans
By Stephen Graham, Associated Press Writer
Wednesday December 5 2:37 PM ET
dailynews.yahoo.com 

Afghanistan government plan (graphic)
dailynews.yahoo.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (12862)12/5/2001 6:39:56 PM
From: sim chambers   of 280801
 
hawkmoon, i wrote it

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: FaultLine who started this subject12/5/2001 6:50:06 PM
From: Elsewhere   of 280801
 
"Globalization, Growth and Poverty" (World Bank report)

econ.worldbank.org 
(Individual chapters as PDF files, total size about 2 MB)

Not directly "Enduring Freedom"-related but background material for the "How could this happen?" question.

econ.worldbank.org 

Globalization, Growth and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World Economy

Globalization has helped reduce poverty in a large number of developing countries but it must be harnessed better to help the world’s poorest, most marginalized countries improve the lives of their citizens, according to the report Globalization, Growth and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World Economy . This is especially important in the wake of September 11 and the worldwide economic slowdown, which is expected to hit poor people particularly hard.

The study shows that 24 developing countries that increased their integration into the world economy over two decades ending in the late 1990s achieved higher growth in incomes, longer life expectancy and better schooling. These countries, home to some 3 billion people, enjoyed an average 5 percent growth rate in income per capita in the 1990s compared to 2 percent in rich countries. Many of these countries -such as China, India, Hungary and Mexico- have adopted domestic policies and institutions that have enabled people to take advantage of global markets and have thus sharply increased the share of trade in their GDP. These countries have been catching up with the rich ones – their annual growth rates increased from 1 percent in the 1960s to 5 percent in the 1990s. People in these integrating countries saw their wages rise, and the number of people in poverty declined.

But not all countries have integrated successfully into the global economy. The report says that some 2 billion people – particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and the former Soviet Union – live in countries that are being left behind. These countries have been unable to increase their integration with the world economy, their ratio of trade to GDP either remained flat or actually declined. On average, these economies have contracted, poverty has risen, and education levels have risen less rapidly than in the more globalized countries.

The study puts forth a seven-point plan to help all developing countries better take advantage of the benefits of globalization while managing the risks. It calls on poor countries to improve their investment climates and put in place better social protection to support poor people in adapting to and taking advantage of opportunities in a changing economic environment. It also calls upon rich countries to open their markets to exports from developing countries and to slash their large agricultural subsidies, which undercut poor country exports. The report argues for a substantial increase in development assistance, particularly to address problems in education and health.

Specifically, the seven-point plan of action calls for:

A ‘Development Round’ of Trade Talks – Developing countries would gain enormously if rich nations make the WTO Doha Development Agenda a reality and agreed to bring down their trade barriers. Poor workers in developing countries today face tariffs twice as high as workers in rich countries. This must change. Rich countries must also take action to reduce dramatically their agricultural subsidies – which currently stand at $350 billion a year, roughly seven times what rich countries spend on development aid. These subsidies not only hurt poor people in developing countries, they also mean higher taxes and higher prices for people in rich countries. Developing countries would also benefit from better access to each other’s markets – barriers between them are still higher than the barriers they face in rich countries.

Improving the Investment Climate in Developing Countries – Encouraging investment and creating jobs requires good economic governance – measures to combat corruption, better-functioning bureaucracies and better regulation, contract enforcement, and protection of property rights. This is especially important for small and medium-sized firms and farms which are key to job creation and to raising living standards of the rural poor.

Improving Delivery of Education and Health Services – The developing countries that have gained the most from integrating into the world economy have shown impressive gains in primary education and infant mortality. This suggests that many countries have made investments in education and health services that enable the poor to benefit from growth.

Provide Social Protection to a Changing Labor Market – Tailoring social protection to the needs of a changing economy helps individual workers adjust to the challenges of a more open economy. Better social protection enables workers and entrepreneurs to take more risks and to avail themselves of new opportunities.

Rich Nations Should Increase Foreign Aid – Evidence shows that private investors can be slow to respond when low-income countries improve their investment climate and social services. It is precisely at this stage when large-scale aid can have a great impact on growth and poverty reduction. Aid should also address the serious health and geographic problems of the most marginalized countries. Foreign aid has fallen to 0.22 percent of donor countries' GDP --its smallest proportion since it was first institutionalized with the Marshall Plan in 1947.

Support Debt Relief for Reformers – Reducing the debt of the most marginalized countries, especially in Africa, will enable them to participate more in globalization and the benefits it can bring. Debt relief is particularly powerful for those countries that improve their investment climate and social services. Debt relief packages are now in place for 25 countries under the enhanced HIPC Initiative for which total committed assistance is estimated at some US$36 billion. It is critical, though, that further debt relief should not come out of the shrinking pie of foreign aid, which would simply move aid resources around. Debt relief must come in addition to foreign aid.

Tackling Greenhouse Gases – There is broad agreement among scientists that human activity is leading to potentially disastrous global warming, and that these changes in climate will be especially burdensome for poor countries and poor people. The report urges more effective international cooperation to address these problems.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.