>>Let's see.
IMF/World Bank offers unrepayable loans for, employment generating, national infrastructure projects.
(except western companies do the work instead)<<
not just western companies - but those companies owned and controlled by the people who run the IMF. you can almost think of them as front companies for this int'l banking cartel since they already know what needs to get done before they offer the loans.
>>In exchange for privatized, western controlled, profiteering of their local natural resources.<<
change "western" to "int'l banker front company" and i think you have it.
>>Leaving them dirt poor, at all costs, thus insuring a ready made inexpensive labor force.
However, if there are too many of them we then vaccinate/sterilize them.
Is that about it?<<
all under the guise of reducing "mother earth's" global carbon foot print.
they do it out of "love."
youtube.com 
how much money do you think big pharma is spending to study why this happens and prevent it?
maybe almost nothing? don't want to expose problems with their cash cow, no would they?
gardasil deaths...
youtube.com
but hey, bill is excited at the reduction in carbon emissions!
after all, gates lives in a tent and uses a solar oven to cook.
no? really?
let me get this right... as long as the neurological problems and deaths are below a certain level, all is good?
and nobody is told what that number is even though big pharma knows in advance?
what, exactly, is that level and are former/future big pharma big wigs in government making those decisions?
youtube.com
naturalnews.com |
