Strategies & Market Trends | The Residential Real Estate Crash Index


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: The Jack of Hearts who wrote (134487)7/16/2008 4:56:35 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone of 306800
 
Toyota hybrids suck in the cold.
They don`t run so good in the heat either!!!
2007 Toyota Prius: Real-World Mileage


Tell someone you drive a Toyota Prius, and they might conclude you also enjoy tofu scramble and "West Wing" reruns. Rest assured, I have no idea how tofu ever got scrambled, and I’m no "Wing"-man either. But I did get considerable seat time in a 2007 Prius Touring Edition last week.

The Prius has been praised for bringing hybrid technology to the masses, but many have criticized its real-world gas mileage, which is nowhere near EPA estimates. I averaged just 34 mpg in a 104-mile week of frugal, A/C-free driving. That’s a far cry from the car’s window sticker, which reads a lofty 60 mpg in city driving and 51 mpg on the highway. New EPA regulations for the 2008 model year are reportedly going to lower mileage estimates on hybrids by roughly 30%.



The engine switches on and off almost seamlessly, and it takes an alert driver to detect it. The only indications are the noise level, which goes from eerie silence to a light drone, and the fuel consumption gauge, which drops from 99.9 mpg to a more believable 25 or 30 mpg.

I found enough electric propulsion to accelerate to about 10 mph. The Prius can do 20 or 30 mph on battery juice alone, but that requires lots of patience — and a complete disregard for the cars behind you because you have to milk the accelerator. For all intents and purposes, meaningful oomph beyond 15 mph requires the engine.

Returning to electric mode is tricky. Oftentimes the engine shuts off on its own during deceleration, when the vehicle’s braking friction recharges its battery. With a light foot and low enough speed, I found it possible to pick back up in electric mode afterward. But other times — especially in cold temperatures, when the car’s heater was active — the engine remained on after deceleration. It took a complete stop and a few seconds of waiting for the Prius to transition back to electric mode, if it ever did. Try doing that in heavy traffic.

Over time, I found that city driving did not give me the best gas mileage. As careful as I was noting the traffic around me and planning my acceleration to stay as long as possible in electric mode, my hard-earned mileage gains were quickly erased every time I needed to make a yellow light or merge with faster traffic.

If you get a Prius, drive it lightly — but don’t become obsessed with the electric motor. Clock lots of time on the highway at 55 mph, and the engine will yield gas mileage in the mid-40s. Around town, a prudent stretch or two in electric mode will balance out the times you need to accelerate quickly. And with any luck, you’ll achieve respectable gas mileage — not 50 or 60 mpg, but something you still couldn’t dream of in another car.

Update: Over the course of the week I commuted 4.5 miles to work — in downtown Chicago, from Lincoln Park to the Loop — and drove a mix of short (less than a mile) and medium (12-15 mile) distances at mostly sub-highway speeds in varying traffic conditions. Weather ranged from the mid-30s to mid-50s, and apart from a few parking garages, elevation changes throughout the week were minimal. The air conditioning remained off almost all week. The Prius Touring Edition I tested features 16-inch wheels and tires, compared to the standard model’s 15-inch combination.

Posted by Kelsey Mays on October 19, 2006 in Car Reviews, Hybrids/Alternative Fuels, Prius, Toyota | Permalink | Comments (209) | TrackBack (0)



What are these guys thinking?

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (4)

To: XBrit who wrote (134495)7/16/2008 4:58:50 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor of 306800
 
It's quite possible that in managing baskets of stocks like this, you do have to execute multiple trades quickly. Clearly tagging short shares is gonna slow that down. I'm not saying they were naked shorting, but I'm not saying they weren't either....<G>

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: XBrit who wrote (134496)7/16/2008 5:02:36 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor of 306800
 
I'll give it 48 hours.....<G>

Seriously, nothing has changed except a bank failed and we got a lot of happy talk from Ben and Hank. Oh, and Cox said he'd start doing his job......<G/NG>

AFA oil goes, nothing has changed except some State Department Clown is gonna sit in with the UN negotiators, who've accomplished zero to date in getting Iran to give up their nuke program. Like he's gonna make 'em an offer they can't refuse? ROTFLMAO!

Net oil/product imports were down AGAIN, which implies this inventory build will be short lived (particularly with the recent strike in Brazil). Got Oil? China's got
"ours".....

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: Peter V who wrote (134502)7/16/2008 5:05:46 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor of 306800
 
If the trade is working, let it run....if 129 breaks on crude you'll get a fast flush to 121 (a fast pop in DTO). I put the odds of that happening as 4:1 against.

The only thing that trades whackier than crude is natural gas (and maybe SKF<G>)

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Amy J who wrote (134505)7/16/2008 5:11:56 PM
From: MulhollandDrive of 306800
 
Easy Al Greenspan and Congress were the problem.

Give the Feds the power to say "no" to Congressional spending.


huh???


what????


'feds' as in federal reserve bank?

greenspan=federal reserve




if not, the 'feds' (meaning congress) already has the power to reign in spending, but there are just too many bridges to nowhere that must be built to satisfy constituents....

we have a chance this election cycle to 'just say no' to governmental incompetence and flagrant deficit spending

"We did produce a near perfect REPUBLIC. Will we keep it or, in the enjoyment of it, lose the memory of freedom? Material abundance without character is the surest way to destruction.”

~Fisher Ames

en.wikipedia.org 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (134508)7/16/2008 5:11:59 PM
From: Elroy Jetson of 306800
 
I just transferred some money into my IndyMac account which will temporarily place me well above the $100k FDIC limit.

I assume it would be bad form for IndyMac to fail twice in one month. (smile)

I'd guess the new IndyMac Federal Bank is the safest bank in the nation for the next two months.


A friend went to the Santa Monica branch on Monday. He said most of the people he met who had more than $100k were foreign-born and middle-aged to elderly.

He met one elderly man from Iran who had $700k on deposit there. That means he'll take an initial loss of $300k, which may prove to be less as the FDIC liquidates the bank.
.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (4)

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (134511)7/16/2008 5:14:01 PM
From: XBrit of 306800
 
If rescuing IMB is going to cost the FDIC $4-8 Billion, why on earth is anybody over the limit even getting ANY of it back?

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Les H who wrote (134471)7/16/2008 5:14:34 PM
From: Les H of 306800
 
8 cents for Comstock

finance.yahoo.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (134507)7/16/2008 5:18:39 PM
From: XBrit of 306800
 
Yeah there's a good article just showed up at Minyanville that says pretty much what you said. Interesting description of some of the mechanisms. The author kinda hints that market-makers' uncertainty over whether it's OK to short financials might have been some of the up-fuel today.

minyanville.com 

Actually Minyanville was awesome today, Todd H and Kevin D both had must-read articles:

minyanville.com 

minyanville.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (134510)7/16/2008 5:19:54 PM
From: Amy J of 306800
 
RE: "'feds' as in federal reserve bank?"

Yes

RE: "greenspan=federal reserve"

Yes

RE: "we have a chance this election cycle to 'just say no'"

Wish it would happen, but I've given up the notion any Democracy will vote to control its spending. People will always vote themselves entitlements. Even the Republican Party turned into big spenders.

The only way out, is to give power to another organization such as the Federal Reserve, to stop spending by Congress - "sorry, you're over your spending limit."

The Federal Reserve only has the power to print money - they should be given the power to say "no" to over-spending by Congress.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.