SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Gold/Mining/Energy | Big Dog's Boom Boom Room


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Paul Kern who wrote (79049)1/29/2007 3:03:55 PM
From: wolfdog2   of 179038
 
<<WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--Saudi Arabia ambassador to the US Turki al Faisal said Monday that not only would a nuclear armed Iran be "a nightmare," but so would't U.S. military strike on Iran to interrupt an alleged nuclear weapons program.>>

Translated that means we're scared stiff that Iran will get nuclear weapons, but we don't want Iran attacking us so we'll oppose airstrikes against Iran.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: wolfdog2 who wrote (79052)1/29/2007 3:06:00 PM
From: Snowshoe   of 179038
 
>>so we'll oppose airstrikes against Iran<<

Translation: so we'll publicly oppose airstrikes against Iran.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Tommaso who wrote (79047)1/29/2007 3:06:27 PM
From: wolfdog2   of 179038
 
<<I predict crude oil selling at $100 (USD) within two years and gasoline at over $4.00 a gallon.>>

I hope you're wrong, but betting that you're right.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: aerosappy who wrote (78823)1/29/2007 3:11:28 PM
From: aerosappy1 Recommendation   of 179038
 
RJ EnergyGroup, Monday, January 29, 2007 8:32 AM
Daily Update


Energy Market: Crude oil prices are trading lower this morning due to a report that Saudi Arabia may be content to maintain oil prices around $50. It is rumored that last week the Saudi's vetoed an OPEC emergency meeting to help prop up prices. According to Saudi energy officials, prices around $50 per barrel are not too high to hurt the global economy and not too low to hurt their own economy. Last year's record oil prices meant that the growth in global oil demand slowed to 1% in 2006, compared with a 4% increase at its peak in 2004.

On a bullish note, the Wall Street Journal reported Saturday that the Cantarell Field in Mexico, the world's second largest oil field, continues to decline faster than predicted. According to the Mexican government, output at the field declined by half a million barrels last year, with 1.99 million barrels per day produced in January 2006 compared to only 1.5 million barrels per day in December. Although Pemex was able to offset some of the decline in production, Mexico's December production fell by 0.4 million barrels per day to under 3 million barrels per day, its lowest output since 2000. For 2007, most are expecting Cantarell's production decline rate to continue to increase.

We believe that Mexico's problems mirror the problems facing the global oil markets. The majority of the world's largest oil fields are mature and could be facing sharp declines in the near future.

On the natural gas front, gas prices are trading up this morning as the market is still expecting cool winter weather across the Midwest and East Coast, as depicted in the 8-14 day outlook.

"Stat of the Week": The Ethanol Construction Boom: A Growing Driver of U.S. Natural Gas Demand Natural gas is the fuel of choice for the ethanol industry, and the ongoing ethanol plant construction boom bodes well for domestic gas demand. This is especially true because ethanol plants provide a source of industrial gas demand, which does not have the sharp seasonality associated with residential gas demand. While obviously ethanol-driven gas demand cannot compensate for, say, a second consecutive winter of warmer-than-normal weather, it certainly helps. As the new ethanol plants, most of them gas-fired, commence operation, we expect gas demand to increase as a result. This will naturally be a gradual, long-term process - not a sudden spike - but it is nonetheless a theme of which energy investors should be aware. Depending on the specific assumptions, we see the potential for new ethanol plants to add between 0.7% and 1.0% to domestic gas demand over the next 18 to 36 months. This is a meaningful increase within the context of what tends to be a slow-growing market, and so we view it as a bullish driver for U.S. natural gas prices in the coming years.

Chesapeake Energy (CHK/$29.00/Strong Buy): Adverse jury award in West Virginia. The company announced that its subsidiary, Chesapeake Appalachia LLC, and NiSource subsidiary Columbia Energy Group, received an unfavorable jury judgment regarding royalties on production in West Virginia. The verdict against the defendants totaled $404 million, including $134 million in compensatory damages and $270 million in punitive damages. Chesapeake was surprised by the verdict, which also holds a negative impact for all gas producers in West Virginia. To note, the case was filed in 2003 against Columbia Natural Resources LLC before it was acquired by Chesapeake (and subsequently renamed "Chesapeake Appalachia LLC"). Chesapeake had previously set aside a legal reserve that it believes will cover any judgment, including a prospective appeal.


SunPower Corp. (SPWR/$43.30/Outperform) plans offering of convertible debt. SunPower has filed with the SEC for a proposed offering of $130 million of senior convertible debentures, due 2027 (potentially upsized to $149.5 million). The interest rate, conversion rate, conversion price, and other terms will be determined at the time of pricing. Net proceeds will be used for working capital and capital expenditures. In a related transaction, the company will also issue common shares on a lending basis to facilitate hedging by the convertible investors.

Cameron International (CAM/$52.02/Outperform) settled a class action lawsuit for a total charge of $9.0 million, or $0.05 per share. The results will be included in the company's upcoming 4Q06 earnings release (scheduled for Friday of this week). The lawsuit, filed in 2002, stems from contaminated underground water near a former manufacturing facility in Houston, Texas.

On Friday, Rowan Companies (RDC/$30.91/Outperform) announced that it has lost the lawsuit regarding the Rowan-Halifax, but said it plans to appeal. Rowan operated the Rowan-Halifax under a charter agreement that spanned from 1984-2008. Recall that during the summer of 2005, the Rowan-Halifax was lost in a hurricane. Rowan was responsible for the insurance on the rig, and had insured it for $43.4 million. Rowan was of the understanding that this amount satisfied the charter agreement and was sufficient to cover the $6.3 million carrying value of Rowan's equipment that was installed on the rig. However, the owner of the rig believed that the rig should have been insured for the fair market value of $83 million. On January 25, it was announced that the court ruled that Rowan will be liable for the difference between the owner's claim and the insurance amount (~$40 million). Rowan adamantly believes that it is in the right and plans to actively pursue an appeal to overturn the most recent ruling. If Rowan is not able to win an appeal, the ~$40 million that the company will have to pay will obviously take down potential free cash and therefore hurt interest income. However, aside from potentially lower interest income, we believe this to be an historical event and therefore it should not affect numbers going forward.


Magellan Midstream Partners (MMP/$39.89/Strong Buy) and Magellan Midstream Holdings (MGG/$24.23/Strong Buy) announce distribution increases. Magellan Midstream Partners declared an increase from $0.59/unit to $0.6025/unit ($2.41/unit annualized), which was in-line with our estimate. The general partner, Magellan Midstream Holdings, also declared a distribution increase from $0.233/unit to $0.246/unit ($0.984/unit annualized), which was slightly above our estimate of $0.245/unit. The distributions represent increases of 2.1% and 5.6% over the prior quarter for the LP and GP units, respectively. The two entities are scheduled to report earnings on Wednesday.



Barron's article comments on the ethanol market. Barron's published an article entitled "Review & Preview Follow-Up: The Limits of Ethanol" this past weekend, discussing the recent weakness in ethanol prices and the resulting sell-off in ethanol company shares. The article points out that corn prices soared exactly at the same time as oil prices (and hence gasoline and ethanol prices) fell, putting pressure on the crush spread and hence the profitability of these companies. The article also suggests that the U.S. corn industry will struggle to produce the necessary corn to meet the ethanol industry's growing demand. Bottom line: This was a fairly balanced piece on the recent challenges faced by the ethanol industry, and of course we do not dispute that ethanol profit margins inherently get squeezed when oil prices are down and corn prices are up. But given our long-term bullish view on oil prices ($70 vs. $55 currently), along with the potential for sustainable growth in U.S. corn supply driven by greater per-acre productivity, we think margins are set to rebound as 2007 progresses and beyond.



The Baker-Hughes (BHI/$66.63/Strong Buy) rig count was down 46 from last week to 1,699; the rig count is now up 14% y/y.


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: allevett1/29/2007 3:35:55 PM
2 Recommendations   of 179038
 
Energy giant Exxon ignores Bush ethanol bid

Marianne StigsetandBruce Blythe

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

If US President George W Bush thought he had the remedy for America's oil woes when he proposed an increase in ethanol production, he is getting no support in the boardroom of the world's biggest energy company and no respect in the stock market, where producers of the corn-based fuel are among the biggest losers.

The State of the Union address made ethanol the centerpiece of a plan to reduce gasoline consumption 20 percent in 10 years by raising the federal mandate for renewable-fuel use almost fivefold to 35 billion gallons a year by 2017.

Shares of ethanol producers Archer Daniels Midland, Pacific Ethanol and Xethanol Corp have lost between 25 percent and 63 percent of their value since July 14, when oil peaked at US$78.40 (HK$611.52) a barrel. Pacific Ethanol fell another 3 percent since Bush's address.

Exxon Mobil, the world's largest energy company, considers ethanol irrelevant as a solution to an addiction that forces the United States to import two-thirds of its oil. No "viable, meaningful business proposition" exists for Exxon in ethanol, senior vice president Stuart McGill told investors at a conference arranged by Goldman Sachs.

"The nature of the science as it stands today and the technology involved requires significant forms of subsidies and mandates to make a lot of sense," McGill said in New York, dismissing an industry that counts Microsoft founder Bill Gates and David Rubenstein, co-founder of the Carlyle Group, the private equity firm, among its biggest enthusiasts.

Ethanol, after almost doubling in price in five years, is falling as prices for corn, the main raw material for the fuel in the United States, reach the highest in a decade. Oil has plunged 29 percent to US$55.42 a barrel from July's record, cutting gasoline prices. Oil must be above US$70 for ethanol to be profitable, according to research by Sanford C Bernstein.

"The gold rush is over," said Michael Liebreich, chief executive officer of London-based New Energy Finance, which advises investors in clean energy. "Many of the new plants that have been announced will never see the light of the day."

Ethanol is distilled from crops and used as a substitute or additive to gasoline. In the United States, ethanol comes from corn, while Brazil, the world's biggest producer and consumer, makes it from sugarcane. More than half the cars in Brazil can burn ethanol.

Corn-based ethanol "is not a good thing," Jose Sergio Gabrielli, chief executive officer of Petroleo Brasileiro, Brazil's state-controlled oil company, said. "It's not as energy-efficient as sugar and there's big protection for corn in the US."

The US government gives refiners and wholesalers a 51-cent tax break for every gallon of ethanol that is blended with gasoline. To limit supplies and bolster prices, a 54 cent-a-gallon US tariff blocks imports, except from the Caribbean and Central America.

Vinod Khosla, the venture capitalist who 25 years ago helped start Sun Microsystems, likens his ethanol investments to the early days of the Internet. "In the long haul, this is going to be a large market, and we should be investing in it," he said. "When the dotcom bubble burst, I didn't feel like we needed to change our Internet plans, and guess what, one didn't need to."

Skeptics say ethanol will never become a significant part of energy use in the US because the country cannot produce enough corn.

On current use, reaching Bush's 2017 goal would require more than 12.5 billion bushels of grain, more than the US harvest last year. None would be left for hogs, cattle or chickens, or to make corn-based sweeteners for Coca-Cola and other consumers.

As demand for the corn needed to make ethanol increased, grain prices jumped. Corn is at the highest in a decade and may gain another 38 percent to a record US$5.50 a bushel as inventories shrink, according to Jim Gerlach, president of AC Trading. By the end of August, US stockpiles may plunge to 725 million bushels, the lowest since 1996, the Department of Agriculture forecasts. BLOOMBERG

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: allevett1/29/2007 3:37:30 PM
1 Recommendation   of 179038
 
Take to the fields
Jeremy Leggett

January 29, 2007 06:45 PM

commentisfree.guardian.co.uk 

On Friday and Saturday last week, a potentially historic meeting took place in the rather unpromising location of the CIA, otherwise known as the Cardiff International Arena. Britain's organic farming community gathered en masse for the annual meeting of the Soil Association, and their theme was peak oil and farming in the post-petroleum era. Organisers and peak-oil whistleblowers alike thought that perhaps this was the first time an organisation in a critically affected sector has held a conference on the theme of peak oil.

If the peak-oil proposition is correct, the tipping point of global oil production will happen - largely unexpectedly - in this decade or early in the next, accompanied by a dire energy shock. The people in the room will be in the front rank of those first affected. They can also be in the vanguard of those who can offer a proactive vision of what a survivable post-shock future could look like.

Discussion ranged across many potential impacts and implications. Let me choose just two: the number of farmers, and where they farm. So oil-dependent is modern industrial agriculture, and so relatively few are the people employed in it, that we will need to redefine the very concept of a farmer after the peak hits us. Today our typical farmer might tend 500 acres with tractors and other expensive bits of oil-addicted kit. But in the post-peak era - with the oil price sky high, and oil supplies fast-shrinking and therefore probably rationed - our farmers will need to be tending an area of maybe one-tenth the size, using more human labour and strategic use of a tractor powered by something other than petroleum, plus good old-fashioned draft animals. Many more people will need to be working the land if we are to feed ourselves. When the collapsing Soviet Union turned the oil taps off on Cuba, 15-25% of the population had to take to the fields in some form or other. (The good news is that they succeeded, to the extent that nobody starved.) Today in the UK, 1% of us farm. In 1900, before mass addiction to oil, fully 40% did.

We will need to be farming in the cities and towns as well as the countryside. The conference heard encouraging stories of urban farming in Cuba, and how surprising amounts of fruit and veg can be grown on astonishingly small areas of land in cities.

Who is planning for this kind of counter-intuitive impact? Not governments, for certain, and very few individuals and organisations. There are oases of foresight. In the US, the City of Oakland has a target of growing 30% of its own food within the city boundaries by 2020. In the British Isles, community-level responses are underway in Kinsale, Totnes and other towns. The list is not long. Most people and institutions are either unaware of the coming tsunami, or in denial.

However, as became clear over the two days of discussion, there is much that organic farmers are doing that moves us away from oil and other fossil fuels. And there are many ideas on offer for what more could be done. As the director of the Soil Association, Patrick Holden, put it: "What I have found is that the prospect of developing a strategic plan to do everything we can to equip ourselves for a post-fossil fuels age is, strangely, an inspirational proposition."

Let us hope it proves so to many people. Different it will surely be.

The Soil Association's website has podcasts of presentations including my own.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: tom pope who wrote (79045)1/29/2007 3:49:42 PM
From: Wowzer   of 179038
 
Anyone...who are the major refiners for the west coast, i.e. California and Oregon?

Thanks

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

From: whitepine1/29/2007 4:01:39 PM
1 Recommendation   of 179038
 
Bullish NG perspective on the thread. Cold re-enters the Midwest and a long, cold week is forecast.

So.......

EOG down.

NG with a 6 handle from 7 last week.

????

I am listening.

wp

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Wowzer who wrote (79058)1/29/2007 4:11:17 PM
From: Webster Groves   of 179038
 
Google knows:

energy.ca.gov 

ludb.clui.org 

ludb.clui.org 

Try Googling,

wg

PS - For the big picture:

tonto.eia.doe.gov 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Webster Groves who wrote (79060)1/29/2007 4:20:48 PM
From: Wowzer   of 179038
 
Thanks!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.