Gold/Mining/Energy | Big Dog's Boom Boom Room


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: quehubo who wrote (35184)9/21/2004 10:32:44 AM
From: profile_14   of 178568
 
Quehubo, a sell off is still in the cards since while productive equipment may have been damaged for a period of time, operations altogether were hampered and that is a negative for any service company, as any potential increase in day rates down the road will not make up for the lost day rate minus the idle day rate. That difference is much larger than the potential one hopes to get. Also, remember that day rates are applied on a contract by contract basis for equipment, so that the perception of all equipment rolling off one contract rate and going onto a much higher rate is not accurate, as I am sure you know. But it makes sense to reiterate the obvious in that this industry has been slow to move up this time around, that its profitability has not been great given the level of the commodity prices and the discipline exerted by the E&Ps, and that there will likely be another opportunity before December to scoop up some good names.

Best regards,

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Big Dog who started this subject9/21/2004 11:01:08 AM
From: CommanderCricket   of 178568
 
The traders seemed to arrived to patch - very frothy day for the micro/small cap E&P's.

Watching EGY and SNG is fun. Own EGY but wouldn't touch SNG with a long ugly stick.

Michael

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Big Dog who started this subject9/21/2004 11:47:52 AM
From: Rex Martin   of 178568
 
RRI looks like it can't get above it's 50 DMA. Any commnts ?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Big Dog who started this subject9/21/2004 12:25:02 PM
From: Frank   of 178568
 
That 255 "excess" NG Y/Y will be eroding steadily as the Y/Y comparisons with 2003 become unreachable due to Ivan, depletion, nuclear outages and coal issues. For example, in 2003 the next five injections averaged about 90.Then we added even more and had a moderate winter. Yet, a whole group of analysts and press stay in denial saying " "comfortable", "bearish", " surplus". Enerfax today even had the numbers incorrect saying the injection last year was 64 when it was 100. Andy's shock and awe has an inevitable ring---Frank

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Rex Martin who wrote (35189)9/21/2004 1:54:34 PM
From: kodiak_bull   of 178568
 
Rex,

I don't think these comments on RRI are going to be particularly enlightening, but it's a quiet day. I noted many weeks ago (on HTP, I think, but maybe here as well) that RRI was entering a range (9.80 to 8.80, although in hindsight it looks like 10.00 to 8.80 is more accurate) where it would stay until something, technically, changed on the stock.

We can go into minute technical detail on money flows, volume, support & resistance, moving averages but it all doesn't mean a whole lot (and to the fundamentalists here it means less than nothing), but the technical reality is this stock will stay in this channel until something changes, until one of the trends conquers the other. The short term trend I see started in July with a top that then failed and retreated to support at 10 where it could not find support. Since then it has traded on ever lower volume, money flowing out of the stock, punters losing interest, in the channel I described.

Its longer term trend is up and began with that magnificent bottom in October of 02 and continues intact. Maybe.

Will the longer term trend finally conquer the shorter term trend, or has RRI seen its "day" in all reasonable timeframes? Difficult to say.

To me, this kind of trading pattern HAS TO test at least once again the bottom of the channel, 8.80 or so, and see if buyers show up again for the stock. That level is very quickly coming into contact with the 200 dma, and might prove interesting enough so that the stock will make its bottom and then continue on the major trend line (up) again.

I think, however, it is more likely than not that it will test and then pierce down through that support line. When it does, look out below, as the next support is down at about 5.50, and that would be quite a haircut for anyone holding RRI from $10 or so.

So, unless you are trading this channel (selling in the high 9s, buying to close in the low 9s, etc.) this stock offers nothing until it either breaks down through 8.70 or up over 10.20, on volume.

JMVVHO, of course, and YMMV,

Kb

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: kodiak_bull who wrote (35191)9/21/2004 2:29:26 PM
From: excardog   of 178568
 
ILA is getting it's financial house back in order. It has been pretty strong of late and could have more upside in the near term than RRI. FWIW

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: excardog who wrote (35192)9/21/2004 2:33:22 PM
From: kodiak_bull   of 178568
 
And it's got a very nice chart. Very nice.

Kb

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Frank who wrote (35182)9/21/2004 3:30:09 PM
From: russwinter   of 178568
 
Today's (9/21) MMS, almost no improvement from yesterday:

Production still shut in as of 1130 CDT
Oil 665,665 BPD - 39% of daily production(yesterday:41.1%)
Gas 2.7 BCFD - 22.6% of daily production (yesterday: 23.5%)

Cumulative post- Ivan:
Oil - 8,469,446 bbls.
Gas - 36.119 BCF

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Big Dog who started this subject9/21/2004 4:49:54 PM
From: excardog   of 178568
 
Ship owners more reluctant to move YUKOS exports
Tue Sep 21, 2004 12:04 PM ET
By Stefano Ambrogi
LONDON, Sept 21 (Reuters) - Finding seaborne transportation for supplies from troubled Russian oil giant YUKOS (YUKO.RTS: Quote, Profile, Research) is becoming harder as top ship owners shy away, chartering sources said on Tuesday.

While some top shipping firms are still coming forward to load YUKOS ' oil, other big names had signalled that they would prefer to deal with other clients, the sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

"Since the summer fewer (ship) owners have been willing to fix them, and some daren't risk it at all -- I think the pressure really is on. They have had trouble finding willing parties to move the oil," said a broker that regularly deals with covering spot cargoes for YUKOS out of the Baltic Sea.

Russia's biggest oil exporter sent shock waves rippling through global oil and financial markets at the weekend after it said it would cut oil supplies to China in the remaining months of 2004 because it lacked the money to pay export fees.

The move represented the first cut to exports blamed on the company's ongoing financial turmoil and heightened speculation that more cuts could follow.

In early August a number of chartering sources told Reuters that Teekay (TK.N: Quote, Profile, Research) Shipping Corporation, one of the world's largest oil transportation firms carrying more than 10 percent of the world's seaborne oil, had refused to do business with YUKOS because of its precarious situation. Teekay said previously it did not comment on market speculation.

"If owners begin to pull out big-time then no oil is going to move apart from domestic and by rail. No amount of promises from Moscow will fix a lack of faith that people will get paid," another broker familiar with YUKOS chartering said.

YUKOS exports more than half of its crude oil -- around 950,000 bpd -- mostly to CIS countries and Western Europe, primarily through ports in the Baltic, the Black Sea and the Druzhba pipeline system. Rail shipments account for a quarter of its total sales.

Despite the concerns, forward bookings show YUKOS, through its Swiss-based marketing and transportation arm Petroval, has booked up oil tankers to the end of September.

Brokers said the oil major had in the last week booked two 80,000 tonne crude oil tankers -- the Iran Amol and the Antarctica -- to load oil from the Black Sea port of Kavkaz on September 27 and 28. Kavkaz is supplied by rail and river shipments, which would immediately be affected if transport bills went unpaid.

YUKOS, through Petroval, is also continuing to book up ships to load fuel oil and crude from Butinge in Lithuania, and Klaipeda amongst other Baltic ports through late September, brokers said.

"They've asked to be covered for a fuel oil cargo loading ex-Baltic, but I can't give you any detail on that," one broker said.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: CommanderCricket who wrote (35188)9/21/2004 6:00:36 PM
From: sammaster   of 178568
 
why not touch sng?
technical or fundamental reason?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.