Gold/Mining/Energy | Big Dog's Boom Boom Room


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Bob Swift who wrote (169006)5/25/2012 1:29:31 PM
From: CommanderCricket   of 178586
 
Well, that's the question.

Wish I understood the shorts argument other then IOC isn't worth anything and it's all hype. The political situation is dicey, but the share price is discounted nearly 50% off NAV already due to it.

My question is why would Shell be willing to buy Cove's NG offshore resources (East Africa) at above $2 mcf and someone not be willing to pay the same or more for IOC onshore NG resources (PNG)? Shell is rumoured to be one of the bidders for the asset and IOC states the bids are in.

Unless 3 different independent reservoir engineering firms are into the Interoil (fraud), along with Schlumberger who performed the well tests, I don't see an argument against the values.

There's something out there they believe in but I haven't a clue what it could be.

Michael

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (4)

To: tom pope who wrote (169008)5/25/2012 1:32:28 PM
From: CommanderCricket   of 178586
 
We had a thunderstorm park over us yesterday afternoon and dump 3" of rain in 2 hours. We don't need anymore rain.

Any hoo, I'm out of here and heading to Costa Rica in the morning. Let the house sitter deal with it - LOL

Michael

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: CommanderCricket who wrote (169009)5/25/2012 1:54:53 PM
From: Keith J   of 178586
 
Sorry, meant to ask yesterday - I didn't see over $2/mcf for Cove - it looked like under $1 from what I could tell.

KJ

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: CommanderCricket who wrote (169009)5/25/2012 1:59:24 PM
From: Dale Baker   of 178586
 
Once IOC partners with someone like Shell, it seems like the political risk would drop to lower than just tolerable levels since the main PNG players will have a lot invested in the arrangement. In which case the NAV plus the short squeeze could produce some fireworks.

I layered in some June 75 calls a few days back as a swing trade if news breaks in the next three weeks. Last trade $2.10.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: Dennis Roth5/25/2012 2:00:46 PM
2 Recommendations   of 178586
 
BP (BP.L)
BP after Macondo - what next?

Where next: We revisit BP’s investment case and focus on the value drivers
outside Macondo. We retain our Outperform rating mainly on valuation
grounds, with a trimmed TP of 540p/$51/ADR offering 37% potential
upside. After recent underperformance, we see BP’s current share price as
attractive on a 12-month view. Investors have been frustrated by lack of
newsflow on Macondo and the absence of visible earnings recovery, but we
believe both elements are now finally within reach.

Investment Case: (1) BP's volume growth in the next 2-3 years will be
sluggish at <1% p.a on our estimates, but we think the market is not giving
BP credit for its stronger cashflow growth from recovery in high-margin
regions (notably the GoM) and margin-accretive new barrels. After 2 years of
transition, positive momentum should return in 2H12E. (2) We think BP has
the portfolio depth (especially in deepwater) to support production growth of
2.5-3% p.a. to 2020E. Nevertheless, we would not rule out BP buying assets
to plug portfolio gaps e.g. in LNG. (3) Capex should rise from $22bn to
$26bn by mid-decade to fund this growth; but higher spend still leaves room
to raise shareholder returns. (4) We would view BP largely halting its asset
disposal plan as positive, as we expect no re-rating from future asset sales.

Catalysts: (1) Inflection point in earnings in 2H12, (2) CWA settlement in
late 2012/early 2013, a scenario we estimate could initially add 5-6% to the
share price followed by further re-rating, (3) Dividend hike (to a competitive
5.8% yield) plus buybacks, after a CWA settlement. We would not usually
advocate buybacks, but think they could make sense for BP given excess
FC generation (once Macondo is resolved) and slow growth.
Valuation: BP is trading at a 35% discount to NAV, one of the largest in the
sector. It is now looking cheap on multiples, with a 23% discount on P/E (vs
10% premium before Macondo) and 14% on EV/CF in 2013E vs peers.

37 pages and 49 figures in pdf format.
A copies are available for download at: sendspace.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Dale Baker who wrote (169012)5/25/2012 2:06:50 PM
From: CommanderCricket1 Recommendation   of 178586
 
Dale,

IOC is going to sell enough to lose their majority interest in Elk/Antelope. At that point, they are no longer the operator and all the issues of FID's, government approvals, etc...go away. If that's the short argument, IOC is going to skip under rope and let someone else deal with it.

It will no longer be IOC's problem and that can only help the share price. I don't think many understand this.

IOC will have enough money to play with it at Triceratops. That structure alone could be as large as Elk/Antelope.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Keith J who wrote (169011)5/25/2012 2:14:34 PM
From: CommanderCricket   of 178586
 
KJ,

Shell and the Thai NOC is bidding $1.9 billion for approximately 1.6 TCF of 3P offshore NG resources. So a little more then $1 MCF. Might be more representative to see what APC thinks is recoverable as they are the operator.

cove-energy.com 

They own 10% of the following


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: CommanderCricket who wrote (169010)5/25/2012 2:28:01 PM
From: kollmhn   of 178586
 
Send it down to Naples. They can use it.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: CommanderCricket who wrote (169014)5/25/2012 2:30:32 PM
From: Salt'n'Peppa   of 178586
 
Premiums in the IOC June puts have just shot up 50% even as the underlying pps is up $1. Not sure why?

The Jul & Sep puts are down, which is normal.

Some compelling put-write opportunities out there right now for the front month, such as $1.10 on the Jun50 puts with just 3 weeks to expiry and $13 (+$1 premium) headroom.
S&P

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Salt'n'Peppa who wrote (169017)5/25/2012 2:35:38 PM
From: CommanderCricket   of 178586
 
Oh my....

Horrible to time to be away from the office. Those Jun 55 puts at $2.10/$2.30 look sweet.

I see the Jul/Sep premiums going up too

Look at the Jun calls - wow! up 3k contracts in the last hour or so.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.