Technology Stocks | LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: elmatador who wrote (11747)7/16/2001 1:29:31 PM
From: Raymond Duray   of 12814
 
Bellheads vs. Netheads Redux

Hi elmat,

I nonconcur that there's anything "nascent" about the opposition to the Bellheads. We've been on the case for a long, long time. :) I can recall mouthing George Gilder's quotable "copper cage" argument as early as 1995..... and look where that got us.... <bg> Into DSL hell.

Cheerio, Ray :)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (11748)7/17/2001 7:46:15 AM
From: elmatador   of 12814
 
Pretty soon a politician -being who they are- will take this as his cause.

The digital divide: Ignore it at our own risk

By Klaus Schwab
July 17, 2001



It's clear that a divide exists between those who have access to electricity and those who do not. A similar divide exists between those who have access to a telephone and those who do not. And a divide exists between those who have access to a broadband connection to the Internet and those who do not.
But most of us would agree that electricity and telephone services, access to clean drinking water and adequate healthcare--and a long list of other necessities--are certainly more important than broadband access. So why, then, should governments, social planners and economists show more than a passing interest in the "digital divide"? Our basic and guaranteed rights as individuals, according to democratic principles, provide for equal rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Are electricity and telephone services basic rights? Is broadband access a basic right?

Michael Powell, the new Chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, thinks the whole issue of the digital divide has been overplayed. "I think the term (digital divide) sometimes is dangerous in the sense that it suggests that the minute a new and innovative technology is introduced in the market, there is a divide unless it is equitably distributed among every part of the society, and that is just an unreal understanding of an American capitalist system...I think there's a Mercedes divide, I'd like one, but I can't afford it...I'm not meaning to be completely flip about this--I think it is an important social issue--but it shouldn't be used to justify the notion of, essentially, the socialization of deployment of the infrastructure."

I think Mr. Powell's comments miss the point.

Digital technology is not a luxury item like a Mercedes Benz. It is, instead, the key that opens the door to the knowledge economy. And if we fail to provide access to digital technology to countries in the developing world we are, essentially, denying them an opportunity to participate in the new economy of the 21st century.

It's important to remember that while "bridging the digital divide" may not mean guaranteeing equal access to every new technological development, it should mean more than just bringing Internet connectivity to a few carefully selected classrooms. The key point is that the global effort underway among governments, businesses, academia and the philanthropic community to bridge the digital divide isn't about distributing sophisticated technology to the undeserving, it's about how to expand access to information and communication technologies to promote social and economic development.

New technologies offer opportunities for empowerment to individuals and communities. Street children in the favelas in Brazil can acquire literacy and citizen awareness, not to mention IT skills, if they are introduced to computers. Indian rural communities can secure documentation of land rights on Internet kiosks. And crucial public health and environmental information can be provided to villages in Costa Rica through a network of community tele-centers.

But while technology may offer a wealth of possibilities, it is the individuals behind the technology that provide the invigorating push for new answers to traditional social and economic questions. Entrepreneurs are the catalytic force for innovation and growth in a market-based economy and entrepreneurship is, in my view, the necessary ingredient if we are to bridge the digital divide. Entrepreneurs are change experts, and they understand better than others how technological change can be applied to redefine how we view our world.

The energy and innovation brought to the table by the new generation of entrepreneurs is redefining how we work together to solve the social questions that face us.

Martin Varsavsky, President and Founder of Jazztel Telecom, provides an inspirational and instructive example of the way entrepreneurial activity can change lives. In partnership with the government of Argentina, Varsavsky created Educ.ar, a national education portal for the country's public school system. Today Educ.ar provides school children and teachers in Argentina's 40,000 schools with Internet access that assists learning and broadens horizons. Varsavsky's entrepreneurial efforts are revolutionizing information technology in Latin America.

But there is more to do.

If we are ever to bridge the digital divide and open the knowledge economy to people in the developing world, entrepreneurs worldwide will need to spread the "entrepreneurial gospel." They will need to join with others to promote entrepreneurship and they will need to serve as role models and mentors for those creating new enterprises.

Entrepreneurs can also help identify sustainable, wealth-generating opportunities in disadvantaged areas, and they can apply business innovation to critical challenges like literacy and healthcare. Finally, entrepreneurs can and must support education and training initiatives in schools and communities.

So when we talk about information and communication technologies as tools to realize "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," I see a tremendous opportunity for entrepreneurs. The digital divide may be difficult to bridge, but opportunities to apply new technologies for economic development and social good continue to grow.




More Perspectives





on the soapbox
Klaus Schwab is the Founder and President of the World Economic Forum, a not-for-profit Foundation in Geneva, Switzerland, which he created in 1971.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: frankw1900 who wrote (11739)7/17/2001 8:39:06 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine   of 12814
 
Hi frankw1900,

From Lightpointe's website:
lightpointe.com  < click on News, then July 16 financing announcement

Free-Space Optics is a true complement to fiber in a variety of telecommunications applications, including Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) services, metro network extension, SONET ring closures, wireless backhaul and LAN-to-LAN connectivity, as well as ``last mile'' access. LightPointe was recently granted a U.S. patent on technology that eliminates the need for electro-optical (E-O) conversion between fiber and free-space optical links, allowing for the seamless all-optical integration of FSO with existing optical network infrastructure.

LightPointe's carrier-class FSO products are also protocol and topology agnostic, allowing carrier customers and enterprise customers the freedom to easily integrate systems within their existing network infrastructure.

``LightPointe's work with two of the world's largest networking leaders underscores the growing role of free-space optics,'' said Randall Haley, Optical Analyst with The Strategis Group, in Washington D.C. ``The technology is well-suited for a number of metro optical and other applications, and free-space optics has the potential to fuel the robust growth expected in optical networking.''

LightPointe's FSO product line includes systems with bandwidth of 10 megabits per second (Mbps), 155 Mbps, 622 Mbps and 1.25 gigabits per second (Gbps). This fall, the company will make commercially available a 2.5 Gbps product, and during the fourth quarter, LightPointe is scheduled to release a Free-Space Optics DWDM product with 10 Gbps throughput.

petere
PS I am personally involved in this one, and have done diligence on the field since March 1999. FSO, and 'fiberless optics' are near critical mass. 10Mbps thru 10Gbps without digging is critical mass.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Peter Ecclesine who wrote (11750)7/17/2001 9:50:06 AM
From: MikeM54321   of 12814
 
10Mbps thru 10Gbps without digging is critical mass.

Peter- With this throughput, who do you think will be the customers of Lightpoint's products? Isn't there enough fiber in the ILEC's metro network to make FSO a non-event for them?

I'm so shell-shocked that I'm beginning to believe if it's not an ILEC who will buy it, then one can almost assume a major uphill battle. -MikeM(From Florida)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: MikeM54321 who wrote (11751)7/17/2001 12:23:20 PM
From: Sector Investor   of 12814
 
<<With this throughput, who do you think will be the customers of Lightpoint's products? Isn't there enough fiber in the ILEC's metro network to make FSO a non-event for them?>>

Gee Mike, did those ILECs bury fiber in every city worldwide?

FSO is going to be big to apartment complexes - in China, Hong Kong, Moscow, and many other places without major fiber plants. Also, isn't there a problem digging in D.C. and New York?

And 10Gig is moving up the feed chain quite a bit, but Optical Access says later this year they will have 40Gig (16 x 2.5Gbps) available. That kind of access should create whole new FSO markets, right?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: MikeM54321 who wrote (11751)7/17/2001 12:57:42 PM
From: elmatador   of 12814
 
Look who wants content for free, Mike:
Operators too desperate for 3G returns - analyst
By Ray Le Maistre, Total Telecom


17 July 2001




Mobile operators with 3G debt burdens are being too aggressive with their plans to claw their license and build-out costs back, according to an analyst at London-based telecoms consultancy Schema.

Speaking Tuesday at an industry discussion on How to bill for 3G services, organized by OSS (operations support system) vendor ADC, Lisa Danielsson said she was concerned "to see how operators are approaching this [their revenue strategies]. They want to recoup the money they have spent so quickly that the figures they expect to get back from content providers [which deliver their content across the mobile networks to users] is frightening. They are asking for a 40% or even 50% cut, and content owners are not prepared to give up that sort of amount," said Danielsson.

And Teresa Cottam, of London-based billing specialist Chorleywood Consulting, agreed. "The content providers are appalled at how greedy the operators are," she told the meeting.

Danielsson went on to say that Schema survey results had shown that people would be prepared to pay for mobile data services, but that users "would need to understand better how to use their mobile phones to do this - currently they don't."

In terms of the services that would best deliver the revenues the operators so desperately crave, Danielsson added that one operator Schema had spoken to said "the killer application for 3G services will be killing time."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: elmatador who wrote (11753)7/17/2001 2:14:39 PM
From: MikeM54321   of 12814
 
They are asking for a 40% or even 50% cut, and content owners are not prepared to give up that sort of amount," said Danielsson.

elmatador- This is totally backwards when one compares the MSO to Content company relationship today. IMO, it should always have been the content companies should pay to push their stuff to subs. Interesting 3G world is starting off wanting a cut, not paying! -MikeM(From Florida)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: MikeM54321 who wrote (11754)7/17/2001 2:16:59 PM
From: elmatador   of 12814
 
Looks like a sign of despair, Mike.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Sector Investor who wrote (11752)7/17/2001 2:21:23 PM
From: MikeM54321   of 12814
 
FSO is going to be big to apartment complexes - in China, Hong Kong, Moscow, and many other places without major fiber plants. Also, isn't there a problem digging in D.C. and New York?

Sector- Well that's access you mention. And we all know how competitive access providers have gone the last year--Badly. So I'm wondering if Lightpoint will target ILECs as customers.

Two years ago the figure was something around 20% of the trunking network was fiber. Don't know what it is today. Also, wonder how much it would cost an ILEC, who has the right of way nailed down, to pull fiber using the coax as a snake(so to speak).

Does anyone know the current estimates of how much fiber there is in the USA ILEC metro/trunking network? -MikeM(From Florida)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: MikeM54321 who wrote (11756)7/17/2001 3:08:28 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio   of 12814
 
Mike, with some exceptions (maybe in rural areas where copper trunk cables are still used with regularity between central offices) the trunking network [which typically connotes inter-office cable routes] is almost entirely fiber-based at this time. Only the closest, adjacent central offices make use of inter-office copper trunking anymore, and many of those cases fall outside the realm of normal networked applications. One such application might be to extend a metallic loop over an extended distance beyond the boundaries of a central office's normal serving area, for whatever reason. This has been the case for several years now. Also, your reference to using coax... the only coax being used by ILECs is for special service grade program video feeds [where they have not already transitioned to fiber, too] and some other highly specialized 'special services' applications, many of which are transitioning to fiber, as well. FAC

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.