Politics | Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: Brumar895/3/2012 1:35:02 PM
2 Recommendations   of 717368
 











Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: joseffy who wrote (653608)5/3/2012 2:02:11 PM
From: Wayners   of 717368
 
Ewwww no....

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Taro who wrote (653622)5/3/2012 2:06:19 PM
From: joseffy4 Recommendations   of 717368
 
Obama is a man among men.

He killed bin Laden.

He has a beautiful wife.

And he takes part in the manly pastimes of bike riding and golf.

He has to be the most manly US president.

George Washington, Andrew Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt and Eisenhower are sissies compared to him.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: tejek who wrote (653655)5/3/2012 2:07:38 PM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations   of 717368
 
tejek---Are young black men the only people you like?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: i-node who wrote (653617)5/3/2012 2:08:22 PM
From: bentway   of 717368
 
That looks like EXACTLYwhat he said to me, Dave. The (R) Koch supports won't ALLOW any sort of energy plan. The party of NO.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: joseffy who wrote (653614)5/3/2012 2:08:58 PM
From: Wayners   of 717368
 
They've all sold the lie that Global Governance and the elimination of individual National Sovreignty will somehow be a utopia. It can't be a utopia because the same incompetents who run National Governments can't even create a utopia at the National level or at the State Level or at the County level or even at the Town or Municipality level. All leftists come from leftist professors. Leftist professors got their jobs through generous donations from Foundations by yesteryear's Robber Barrons. Any Global Governance will be the dream job of every nut job and lunatic world wide and the structure of course will be coopted and any semblence of checks and balanced removed. Welcome to World Tyrrany, it's so obvious that doctoral students don't notice it. What fools.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (653626)5/3/2012 2:09:09 PM
From: bentway   of 717368
 
Mitt is cool?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: bentway who wrote (653677)5/3/2012 2:10:55 PM
From: tejek   of 717368
 
Obama’s below-the-radar push builds support for healthcare bill

By Sam Baker and Elise Viebeck - 05/03/12 01:00 PM ET


The Obama administration is employing an aggressive ground game to build support for its controversial healthcare law that often reaches beyond the Beltway.

While President Obama doesn’t mention healthcare much in his public appearances, the administration consistently touts its popular reforms to make the case for a law with an approval rating stuck just below 50 percent.

In the two years since Obama signed the Affordable Care Act, the administration has released a deluge of positive reports, press releases and blog posts from the White House and the Health and Human Services Department (HHS). The administration consistently highlights new policies as they take effect and tries to keep other popular provisions, such as discounts on prescription drugs, in the news.

HHS regularly updates the total number of seniors who have benefitted from that policy. Seniors have saved roughly $3.4 billion so far because of the healthcare law, according to figures HHS released this week.

Obama will formally launch his reelection campaign on Saturday, but healthcare has so far gotten only a glancing mention in his public appearances and campaign materials.

The campaign’s first ad, titled “Forward,” makes only a brief mention of the landmark law. And Obama did not hold a public event for the second anniversary of the law after marking the one-year and six-month milestones.

Still, it’s clear the administration is trying to do its best to promote the law even if it does not always put Obama in the spotlight to do so.

The website BuzzFeed posted a document Wednesday that it said had been distributed to Obama’s political allies with the goal of making the healthcare law “more politically saleable.”

The substance of the presentation hewed closely to the bullet points the administration frequently hits: explaining that the law expands the use of private insurance, outlining its popular benefits and highlighting the Congressional Budget Office’s determination that the law will decrease the federal deficit.

Democratic strategist Douglas Schoen said the administration is simply doing the best it can with a law that’s not especially popular and might be struck down this summer by the Supreme Court. It has to defend the law, but it doesn’t suit Obama’s political purposes to constantly be front and center in defending it.

“Because there is such a risk of them potentially losing the election over healthcare, they feel they are obliged — required — to advocate for the law,” he said.

He also said the White House is trying to build support with constituencies that will benefit from the healthcare overhaul, including seniors (who get cheaper drugs in Medicare) and young voters (who can now stay on a parent's insurance plan through age 26).

“The Obama administration knows very well that healthcare lost them the 2010 election,” he said. “They believe they didn't explain it well and realize some elements are unpopular. They believe more than that they have to mobilize their base."

Much of the public-relations push over the past two years is focused on relatively small-bore policies. This week, for example, a post on the White House blog highlighted HHS grants to help build and expand community health centers.

The deluge of grant announcements and new reports has become familiar to parts of the Washington press corps, but it's often not the target audience. The community health center grants got much more attention from local media, which noted that the Affordable Care Act was sending new money to their states.

Democratic strategist Chris Lehane said it’s not surprising that the administration is touting its signature legislative achievement.?

“The White House is very comfortable in terms of how the public has responded to the policies. In a campaign situation, where you have a back and forth and you're not making an argument in a vacuum, they believe it's a winning argument,” he said. “And they're right to believe this. They're on the side of trying to reform the healthcare system.”

The Affordable Care Act hasn’t gotten any more popular in the two years since Obama signed it, but it also hasn’t gotten any less popular, even though Republicans continue to assail the law in Congress and on the campaign trail.

HHS and the White House have never stopped defending the law against Republican attacks, and at times they have been able to tie their healthcare announcements to controversies in the daily news cycle. When the tide began to turn against Republicans in the recent battle over contraception, HHS was ready with a report on the number of people who had accessed preventive services under the law.

Voters don’t love the Affordable Care Act, but polls also show that they don’t understand it very well.

An administration official said the steady stream of healthcare announcements is designed to explain new benefits under the healthcare law and the administration will continue to use its resources to explain how the act works.

Lehane said that’s a smart move.

“Healthcare reform is one of their touchstone domestic policies,” he said. “It's something that they clearly believe is a political winner, so regardless of how some people may feel about it, it's always going to be front and center of their campaign."

thehill.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: bentway who wrote (653675)5/3/2012 2:13:01 PM
From: Jim McMannis1 Recommendation   of 717368
 
LOL, what a joke. You never heard of the Kochs until you got the memo.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: i-node who wrote (653625)5/3/2012 2:14:49 PM
From: tejek   of 717368
 
When the scary guy is actually scary

By Laura Conaway
-
Thu May 3, 2012 1:55 PM EDT

Phoenix New Times
J.T. Ready is the one on the left.

As part of covering Arizona's anti-immigration politics, we've reported on former Republican State Senator Russell Pearce and his sometime friend, Neo-Nazi J.T. Ready. Now police in Arizona say Ready shot and killed four people in his extended family yesterday, and then killed himself.

No one has covered the story of the relationship between Senator Pearce and border vigilante Ready more closely than Stephen Lemon of the Phoenix New Times. Lemons' post today offers a terrific history, going back years. It's also a reminder that sometimes a scary extremist is not just goofy and strange. Sometimes, he really is scary. Lemons writes of Ready:

He could play the clown, but always menacingly. . . .

As Ready was a creative, inveterate liar, it was difficult to tear fantasy from reality when speaking with him. He once told me, on background, that he was half-Jewish on his mother's side. With a straight face, I might add. Needless to say, he could be very convincing.

He always prided himself on once being a Marine, though in reality he had been drummed out of the service after getting court-martialed twice. He was intelligent and wily, and I was always on my guard around him.


The photo above is from a New Times account of Ready's U.S. Border Guard on patrol; Ready is the one on the left. The photo after the jump is screengrabbed today from the Border Guard's website.



Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.