Politics | RAMTRONIAN's Cache Inn


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Jonas who wrote (6911)11/23/1998 9:10:00 AM
From: ShamukE   of 14464
 
Jonas

I think that nothing can be gained by spreading the misery around. The old adage that misery loves company should not be applied in this case. For one yes RCOM is struggling. There is nothing wrong with a growth co. suffering through this stage of development. If RMTR had more to do with the control of Racom I'm quite certain that the stink will rub off. Remember CUB they are doing quite well at this time. Some of their projects are closely associated with Racom. If Racom became tainted would the disease spread further? I feel that the mess should be contained not spread out. Capital is usually available to a clean operation that shows that it has a future.

Sorry Neil I was in a hurry.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ShamukE who wrote (6912)11/23/1998 9:58:00 AM
From: Jonas   of 14464
 
ShamukE,

re <mess should be contained>

That's why I explicitly proposed an enlarged
role for rcom management...

IMO there would be little further ill to spread
provided the preferred issue is settled...and
the suit...does rmtr's ascent this morning imply
there'sno merit to DEER PARK's case?
too early to tell...

re <... nothing wrong with a growth co. suffering through this
stage of development>

rcom also needs cash and there is overlap in some areas -
if existing rcom management would not be constrained by rmtr management I think the sum might be larger than the whole.

Re Capital <...usually available to a clean operation >

Well, if Capital "on reasonable terms" is readily available
I wonder why rmtr decided to get funds at unreasonable levels
from Capello...still an issue that hasn't been answered to
my satisfaction.

Both companies have a future - the question of course is to what
extent common holders will benefit - if a closer integration between the two were to make the combined entity stronger, than capital
should be available on better terms...

Jonas

BTW - This is not my final view


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Jonas who wrote (6913)11/23/1998 10:41:00 AM
From: ShamukE   of 14464
 
Jonas

Whenever examining a situation the first thing that I recommend is the smell test. If it stinks it's probably bad. I would apply this to items one and two.

As to the capital question. Remember that RMTR had already been bankrupt and every now and then the rumor would crop up that the gentleman that ultimately threw it into bankruptcy was trying to get back in.

When you take all things into consideration I feel that the best thing to do is to keep away from any entangling alliances.

I'm beginning to think that I should have gotten out at $1/shr.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Gutterball who wrote (6891)11/23/1998 11:28:00 AM
From: Gutterball   of 14464
 
I'm hurt nobody responded to my question about what RMTR has in common with CMYN, CXI, KKRO (now KKRE), ORVX, PPH, QDEK, and TCLN for it is an important relationship. As investors in Ramtron and under the present situation wouldn't you want to know these are some of the companies left bloodied and dying after playing the preferred financing game with Cappello and Company.

With so many companies that Cappello and Company have graciously stepped in to help out of their fortunes and into their misfortunes it begs the question how did Cappello and Company become the largest "small-cap" common stock investor on the block? Dare we think that one man's gain is anothers loss?

Now let's not be hasty. Cappello indicates it has helped out 25 companies on their home page. To date I have identified 8 of those companies -- including Ramtron. All companies have had their life's blood sucked but I'm hoping somebody can point me to a company that is actually better off for having met Cappello and Company before we begin drawing conclusions.

Anyway, here is the tale of the tape.

CMYN - Casmyn
Year: 5 1/8 to 1/64; delisted 7/31
A Cappello now chairman.

The good news is, there is still a little blood left. Here it is... Pursuant to the Preferred Stock Investment Agreement the Company is required to pay a penalty in cash of an amount equal to 3% of the Total Purchase Price of Shares during any period in excess of 30 days that the Common Stock of the Company is not listed and traded on NASDAQ. Given that the Company's common shares have been officially delisted from Nasdaq on July 31, 1998, a penalty of $810,000 may be payable on September 4, 1998 and monthly thereafter. biz.yahoo.com 


CXI - Commodor Applied Technologies
Year: 6 3/4 to 3/16; Last 5/8


KKRO (now KKRE) Koo Koo Roo
Year: 4 1/16 to 1/2 Last: 25/32
10/30 merges with Family Rest.
11/03 changes name to Koo Koo Roo Enterprises.
A Cappello, Director

ORVX - Oravax
Year: 3 3/8 to 3/16; Last 5/16
11/17 delisted from NASDAQ, now trades OTC
Looking to merge with Peptide Therapeutics Q1 1991

PPH
Year: 17 15/16 to 5/8; Last 13/16 (11/13/98)
files Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, 11/19/98

QDEK - Quarterdeck
Year: 3 to 1/4; Last 1/2
Acquired by Symantec 11/4/98
55 million shares (about 60 percent) were tendered when Symantec's tender offer expired. Symantec intends to acquire Quarterdeck's remaining shares through a cash merger at the tender offer price of $0.52 a share.

TCLN
Year: 3 1/16 to 15/32; Last 1 1/32

Here's the Giant killer in TCLN last bit of financing with Cappello... "Initially, future stock issuances under the equity line were to be priced at a 15 percent discount to the then current market, but on September 17, 1998, in exchange for certain concessions from the investors, future issuances under the equity line will be priced at the greater of a $0.20 discount or a 17.5 percent discount to the then current market price."
biz.yahoo.com 

I read this to mean, all trades under a buck will be at 20% discount or greater. Now consider price falls to 1/4, talk about dilution. These guys are hung and don't know it.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (4)

To: Gutterball who wrote (6915)11/23/1998 12:22:00 PM
From: ShamukE   of 14464
 
I'm quite certain that Capello feels that he arranged financing that was sorely needed and not available elsewhere. It was the other guy who supplied the funds that sucked the cos. dry. Good guy Bad guy.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ShamukE who wrote (6916)11/23/1998 12:54:00 PM
From: Gutterball   of 14464
 
That "other guy" you refer to was Cappello. Check the S-3, Those DFA Group Trusts listed, that's Cappello. Also, the $4.4 million Reg D private placement, that was Cappello. In short, Cappello is the big boy on the block in this placement -- Deere Park is his lap dog. This whole mess was created by Cappello for his benefit. Get that through you're head!

BTW, this is Cappello's job and how he makes his money. He is very adept in what he does. So adept, most people don't know he is there. That's why you must...

VOTE NO !!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Gutterball who wrote (6915)11/23/1998 1:07:00 PM
From: Jonas   of 14464
 
Dan, no reason to be "hurt"...I knew this
must be the answer to my question on the
"statistics"...

Perhaps You are a reasonable man and he's
innocent until proven guilty...

I'm not - on this issue at least; Fleischman
could probably demonstrate mathematically
how such financing exerts downward pressure
on a stock...from a rational valuation perspective;
...especially when all that's needed may be a twinkle
of an eye for the portfolio manager at say, Sweetchild
Investment Management to understand that it's safe to
short this one - since downward pressure = increasing
dilution, my verdict remains guilty.

Now if by some miracle a company were to be
found where the stock didn't take a substantial
dive,after such financing my ASSUMTION would
be that something went wrong here for the gang....
hey, sometimes accidents do happen...so my verdict
would still remain: GUILTY

IMO common holders ought to have a right to such deals
before any select group of self-described "investment boutiquers"
and the only reason I can think of as a CFO agreeing to
such a deal would be:

a) if I have a promising job waiting there...;
b) because it's the only alternative after having left financial
planning so late...or
c) the commercial potential of the company is so questionable
that ripping off common holders is the only way to save
it...
(d)"really" no alternative - then common holders should at least
be offered first

Could CIBC Oppenheimer not have been called to arrange something
in the first case?

"....indicates it has helped 25 companies"......therebye helping itself (all legal of course) and priviliged preferred investors at
the expense of common stock holders.

Jonas

BTW: ShamukE, I like the fragrance...sorry

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Jonas who wrote (6918)11/23/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: Pat Pending   of 14464
 
Isn't most of the $17,000,000 still in the bank
So isn't it Sikes?

Pat

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Gutterball who wrote (6915)11/23/1998 7:52:00 PM
From: EZLibra   of 14464
 
Message 6537456

Good Luck!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Jonas who wrote (6886)11/24/1998 5:05:00 PM
From: Jonas   of 14464
 
Chip-Card Growth To Increase
techweb.com 
(11/23/98, 5:31 p.m. ET)
By Staff, Semiconductor Business News

Chip-card market growth will be strongest in the United
States and Japan during the next four years, according
to a new study by Dataquest.

The report predicts U.S. chip-card revenue will grow
from about $20 million in 1997 to $532 million in 2002,
while Japanese sales will go from $14 million to $390 in
the same time frame.

The Dataquest report also concluded smart-card
revenue in the chip-card market will represent about 70
percent of the total business worldwide in 2002
compared with about 56 percent in 1997. Smart cards
contain processor chips along with memory-storage
capabilities.

Despite the strong growth rates in the United States and
Japan, Europe is expected to remain the geographical
market for chip cards with nearly 49 percent of the
revenue coming from that region, according to
Dataquest's report. In 1997, Europe's chip card
consumption represented about 77 percent of the
world's market, the report says.

"Chip cards have entered a stage of explosive growth,
which will see sales expand more than fourfold over a
five-year period," said analyst Jonathan Cassell, who
was responsible for the Dataquest study. "Driving this
growth will be the worldwide proliferation of chip-card
technology, combined with expansion of chip cards into
new, high-value, high-growth applications."

The report found Gemplus of France was the world's
top supplier of chip cards. In 1997, Gemplus' total
revenue exceeded $590 million.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.