SiliconInvestor
     Advanced Search   [ sign in ]

register
Sponsor		  register
Register

 Technology Stocks | Oracle Corporation (ORCL)

Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Qualified Opinion who wrote (16573)3/19/2002 12:15:36 PM
From: Night Writer   of 19011
 
OK Goodbye. eom

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Night Writer who wrote (16576)3/19/2002 1:09:37 PM
From: MeDroogies   of 19011
 
I think that was a joke, based on his <gggg>.
TA is great, as long as you don't live and breathe it. Good information to have, and I actually like your Amateur TA notes.

I do a bit of TA myself, and its good to figure out short term trends.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Night Writer who wrote (16576)3/19/2002 1:18:45 PM
From: Qualified Opinion   of 19011
 
Night Writer, that was a joke. Abbreviation TA has a few meanings. However, I do place more weight on fundamental than technical analysis.

My fundamental analysis places heavy weight on value relative to other stocks. It helps that Oracle has a very active repurchase program.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: ehasfjord3/20/2002 12:47:31 AM
   of 19011
 
Re: TA... Both yesterdays and todays candles show
what is known as an "inverted hammer". In a downtrend,
it should be an indication of a bullish reversal signal,
so long as there is a confirmation for the next timeframe.
Yesterday (03/18) I see the inverted hammer. Today, the
session starts higher, goes up to nearly 14 and closes
higher than yesterdays close, WITH ANOTHER INVERTED HAMMER!
You folks are correct, its chart is hard to read - except,
MACD down, Stochastics down, momentum down, RSI down,
Bollinger bands show a downward trend.

siliconinvestor.com

Bottom line, I always said buy ORCL below 13, regardless
of todays movement (+.12), I think I'll wait (and probably
kick myself in the butt for so doing).

Take Care one and all!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ehasfjord who wrote (16579)3/20/2002 1:06:56 AM
From: Night Writer   of 19011
 
Hammers have wicks on only one side. It is hard to see the shorter wicks clearly on the SI chart.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: MeDroogies who wrote (16577)3/20/2002 7:25:10 AM
From: Bipin Prasad   of 19011
 
Don't we have a guru in Advertisement industry on this bb ? I'd like to get some advise which ad company will do well during recovery? TIA!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: Qualified Opinion3/20/2002 8:25:07 AM
   of 19011
 
Financial Analyst Briefing tomorrow > link >

Link: siliconinvestor.com

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Bipin Prasad who wrote (16581)3/20/2002 8:48:03 AM
From: MeDroogies   of 19011
 
That would be me...LOL
I don't work in advertising, but I do sell it.
Umm...I'd steer clear of ad agencies. They are all in alot of turmoil. The explosion of cheap impressions on the internet has done 2 things: cheapened the cost of doing in-house advertising, and increased the number of people agencies need to manage accounts.
What SHOULD have been a boon to them is in fact a problem. Optimizers (which found the best, cheapest places to place ads) worked great in radio, print and TV. It's irrelevant on the web.

If you feel you HAVE to find an ad company, look for one that is very heavily automated, and has a heavy bias toward internet advertising. All the growth is going to be on the Web for the next 3 years. In fact, even during this "downturn", web advertising is up. Radio, TV and Print are all flat/down. 9/11 turned a recovering market into a dead one. That trend is reversing now. Currently, I can name 3 major budgets that had pulled back on 9/11 and are now releasing the cash.

The only ad agency I can think of that would be worth a look is Tribal/DDB. But there are others....I just don't think they are good investments.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: MeDroogies who wrote (16583)3/20/2002 8:53:14 AM
From: Bipin Prasad   of 19011
 
Thanks for your input! How about traditional biggie like AOL? TIA!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Bipin Prasad who wrote (16584)3/20/2002 9:38:42 AM
From: MeDroogies   of 19011
 
Responded in a PM...I don't want to post publicly what I think of them. It's a mixed message.
Personally, I hope they do well, and they have the opportunity to do exceedingly well. On the other hand, they have alot of issues.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQ
Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.