Technology Stocks | Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: The Phoenix who wrote (48041)2/5/2001 6:24:20 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön   of 77183
 
fortune.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (48043)2/5/2001 6:26:24 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön   of 77183
 
also, re: CSCO, fortune.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: The Phoenix who wrote (48022)2/5/2001 6:34:46 PM
From: Jack Colton   of 77183
 
LOL! I know a good 'lil Cisco integration firm, with booming business you can pick up cheap. And get a 30,000 ft building along with it. j@gym

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (48036)2/5/2001 7:15:46 PM
From: Paul Reuben   of 77183
 
So are you saying they won't make any more acquisitions? I have not heard this before.

What I'm saying is that it appears that the accounting rules re acquisitions are about to become very, very friendly to the companies who prefer the pooling method of accounting. Though they're about to abolish pooling, it seems they are going to make purchase accounting no more onerous than the pooling method is currently.

Regards,

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Paul Reuben who wrote (48046)2/5/2001 7:30:37 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön   of 77183
 
Though they're about to abolish pooling

I thought they're NOT going to abolish pooling. So to make up for it, they made purchasing easier as well. To Cisco, which uses pooling, it seems like a wash. In any case, the true cost is the continued dilution of existing shareholders. Check out that Fortune article I posted. It indicates Cisco will keep acquiring. And although their acquisition targets have been hit harder than Cisco, Cisco will nevertheless probably be diluting current shareholders if it acquires unprofitable cos.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (48047)2/5/2001 7:38:49 PM
From: Paul Reuben   of 77183
 
On Dec. 6, the FASB proposed allowing companies to keep goodwill unamortized on the balance sheet. Companies that used the pooling method cheered this tradeoff, of course, because FASB had already proposed eliminating pooling, and this new proposal would remove the aspect of purchase accounting companies loathe -- reducing earnings as a result of goodwill amortization.

As an encore, the FASB announced Dec. 20 that its proposal should be retroactive, meaning companies currently amortizing goodwill no longer have to do so......




fool.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Eric who wrote (48030)2/5/2001 7:44:35 PM
From: Victor Lazlo   of 77183
 
<<.. It's a time thing. Cisco has executed very, very well up to now and we just have to let time go by because so many people are spooked by the first slowdown the economy has had in ten years. A lot of people here were teenagers back before this run happened and they just don't understand what is going on now, they have never experienced something like this! >>

It sure is a time thing. CISCO was a business plan back before this run happened and there is no precedent for what is going on now, this company has never experienced something like this!

Victor

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: The Phoenix who wrote (48034)2/5/2001 7:45:45 PM
From: Victor Lazlo   of 77183
 
Wrong.
ever hear of Nortel Networks?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: The Phoenix who wrote (48039)2/5/2001 7:47:57 PM
From: Victor Lazlo   of 77183
 
Chambers said they did not had a fun January, flat sales.

Who is he, anyway?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: The Phoenix who wrote (48039)2/5/2001 7:50:01 PM
From: bambs   of 77183
 
I'm still waiting for barron's to do a simple long term revenue projection and show how totally insane it is to pay any more then $10 for csco now if you plan to hold long term.

bambs

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.