Technology Stocks | Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: etchmeister who wrote (24835)1/11/2011 11:49:59 PM
From: etchmeister   of 25269
 
This article is from
Solid State Technology

Share

Enabling lithography for the 22nm node

Technology forecasts for 22nm
Addressing defectivity will require new surface-engineering processes at 22nm
RoHS, device shrinks will continue to drive packaging technology
Tooling and process technology vital for thin packages
More collaboration is needed to improve process integration
22nm brings maskmakers, end users closer
22nm: The era of wafer bonding
Failure analysis challenges at 22nm drive the need for turn-key failure analysis solutions
A materials evolution and revolution for 22nm devices
Enabling lithography for the 22nm node
Keys to CMP and cleans: Defect reduction and process customization
Gate structure/3D stacking "winners" will determine industry direction

This is an online exclusive essay in SST's Forecast for 2011: Back to Reality series.

Nick Pugliano, Marketing Director, Advanced Pattering Technologies, Dow Electronic Materials, Marlborough, MA, USA

Nick Pugliano, Marketing Director, Advanced Pattering Technologies, Dow Electronic Materials, Marlborough, MA, USAJanuary 11, 2011 -- Though single-exposure patterning schemes are unable to meet 22nm specifications, advanced patterning technologies using ArF immersion allow us to continue shrinking critical dimensions in semiconductor devices. However, the use of ArF immersion at 22nm requires multi-step patterning processes and elaborate pitch-doubling schemes such as litho-etch-litho-etch (LELE) and self-aligned double-patterning (SADP) technologies. Although these technologies are more costly than any single-exposure process, they persist as a standard patterning solution for today’s 22nm device architectures in the absence of viable alternatives.

Yet the 22nm node also represents an inflection point, because additional shrink strategies will require further multiplication of these technologies. For example, quadruple-patterning is needed to extend these techniques beyond 22nm, but a simple multiplication of double-patterning would be costly and extremely difficult to deploy in mass production. The semiconductor industry is keenly aware that a single-exposure solution such as EUV will not be ready for 22nm due to its own set of challenges. Thus, the 22nm node has emerged as a proving ground for various innovative patterning processes geared toward on-track, low cost of ownership technologies.

Many approaches for printing critical contacts are currently under development and expect to see wide adoption at the 22nm node and beyond. Some approaches use shrink processes in new ways, but are not promising when printing the highest density patterns. Others explore tone reversal technologies that capitalize on improvements in aerial image contrast for certain feature types when using a negative, rather than positive, tone mask. Resist freezing via a track-applied, surface-curing solution or a high-temperature thermal curing step continues to be developed with the hope of reducing the number of vacuum-based CVD or etch steps, but these technologies still suffer from pattern fidelity issues and are not yet ready to displace SADP or LELE schemes.

For all immersion patterning processes, top coat use has been mainstream; however, top-coat-free technologies have been proven in foundry and memory applications. These technologies use self stratifying, surface active ingredients that control the properties of a photoresist to enable high scan speed immersion patterning, while simultaneously serving as an immersion barrier layer. On-track technologies utilizing spin-on silicon hard masks will extend as a way of lowering back-end processing costs. Finally, the use of spin-on anti-reflection coatings with precisely tuned optical properties will be important for the most critical layers, as these are needed to work in tandem with the underlying device stack to suppress back-reflected radiation from the large range of off-axis light that is present in high-NA imaging systems.

These approaches highlight the critical role that track applied materials have in enabling next-generation approaches to cost-effective patterning -- a trend that is expected to continue as the semiconductor industry attempts to follow its shrink trajectory toward 22nm and beyond.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: etchmeister1/12/2011 11:26:48 AM
   of 25269
 
Samsung has declared the completion of its DDR4 DRAM module which uses the 30nm class process technology. Claiming to be industry’s first, this module is capable of 2.133 gigabits per second data transfer rates at 1.2V on comparing with 1.35V and 1.5V DDR3 DRAM using equivalent 30nm-class technology.

It allows low power consumption by 40 percent when applied to a notebook. Using the Pseudo Open Drain (POD) technology, the module allows DDR4 DRAM to consume half the electric current while reading or writing. With new circuit architecture, the Samsung DDR4 runs from 1.6 up to 3.2Gbps.
(this only applies to memory power budget but as always it's the sum of all components that improve a product)

“Samsung has been actively supporting the IT industry with our green memory initiative by coming up with eco-friendly, innovative memory products providing higher performance and power efficiency every year,” said Dong Soo Jun, president, memory division, Samsung Electronics. “The new DDR4 DRAM will build even greater confidence in our cutting-edge green memory, particularly when we introduce four-gigabit (Gb) DDR4-based products using next generation process technology for mainstream application.”

After delivering 1.2V 2 gigabyte (2GB) DDR4 unbuffered dual in-line memory modules for testing to a controller maker, Samsung decides to further strengthen its position. The company plans to work with several server makers for completing the JEDEC standardization of DDR4 technologies during the latter half of the year.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: etchmeister who wrote (24838)1/12/2011 11:32:47 AM
From: etchmeister   of 25269
 
“The new DDR4 DRAM will build even greater confidence in our cutting-edge green memory, particularly when we introduce four-gigabit (Gb) DDR4-based products using next generation process technology for mainstream application.”

C O N S O L I D A T I O N

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: etchmeister who wrote (24839)1/12/2011 12:28:16 PM
From: Cary Salsberg   of 25269
 
There has been much discussion of the decline in DRAM demand because of the success of smart phones and tablets and the market share these take from laptops.

Computing is moving from the PC platform to a mobile platform. Current smart phones and tablets are the first version of the mobile platform. Web browser functions are the main computing on this first version along with simple apps and data streaming.

Future versions of the mobile platform will link a user to many devices which are also networked. These devices will be personal to a particular user and might be better interacted with via programs on the mobile device rather than on servers in the cloud. This will require permanent storage and DRAM for active programs on the mobile platform.

As the cost and power consumption of NAND Flash and DRAM decline, it seems likely that Flash drives and large DRAM memory will become standard on the mobile platform and the amounts will grow as the cost and power consumption decline.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (24840)1/12/2011 1:17:23 PM
From: cluka   of 25269
 
Cary,

Everything points to slowing if not declining usage of DRAM. Mobile device' browser based apps simply won't need 4GB+ DRAM.

Same is true for cloud computing.

Samsung has gone nuts trying to kill competition in DRAM, there will be oversupply in DRAM for a very long time.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: cluka who wrote (24841)1/12/2011 4:37:21 PM
From: Archie Meeties   of 25269
 
Short LRCX?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Archie Meeties who wrote (24842)1/12/2011 4:45:19 PM
From: cluka   of 25269
 
Yes

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (24840)1/12/2011 9:44:12 PM
From: etchmeister   of 25269
 
As the cost and power consumption of NAND Flash and DRAM decline, it seems likely that Flash drives and large DRAM memory will become standard on the mobile platform and the amounts will grow as the cost and power consumption decline.

Besides cost (the traditional driver) now power consumption appears becoming a (new) key driver for DRAM - so one could argue (following Hill's logic) low power DRAM is an application follower.
The "beauty" is while shrinking (= lower cost) they consume less power.
Right now everything is focused on low power - but how much battery lifetime does one need?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: etchmeister1/12/2011 10:08:18 PM
   of 25269
 
Next-Generation DDR4 Memory to Reach 4.266GHz - Report.

DDR4 Memory to Feature Point-to-Point Topology
[08/16/2010 12:43 PM]
by Anton Shilov

The next-generation DDR4 SDRAM memory will bring rather ultimate performance improvements to both desktops and laptops as well as servers and workstations. But the new performance heights will demand a rather radical change to topology of memory sub-system.

At a recent MemCon conference in Tokyo, Japan, Bill Gervasi, vice president of engineering at US Modular and a member of the JEDEC board of directors, revealed that the target effective clock-speeds for DDR4 memory would be 2133MHz - 4266MHz, an increase from previously discussed frequencies. Apparently, JEDEC and memory manufacturers decided that the progress of DDR3 leaves no space for DDR4 data rates below 2133Mb/s.

The designers of DDR4 memory are looking forward 1.2V and 1.1V voltage settings for the new memory type and are even considering 1.05V option to greatly reduce power consumption of the forthcoming systems. It is expected that manufacturers of dynamic random access memory (DRAM) will have to use advanced fabrication technology to make the DDR4 chips. The first chips are likely to be made using 32nm or 36nm process technologies.

At present JEDEC expects to finalize the DDR4 specification in 2011 and start commercial production in 2012. Actual mass transition to the next-generation memory is projected to occur towards 2015.

But extreme performance will require a tradeoff. In DDR4 memory sub-systems every memory channel will only support one memory module, reports PC Watch web-site, since the developers substituted current multi-drop bus in facour of point-to-point topology. In order to overcome potential inability to install appropriate amount of memory into high-end clients as well as servers, the developers have reportedly presented two approaches:

* DRAM manufacturers will need to dramatically increase capacities of memory chips by using multi-layer technique with through silicon via (TSV) technology. As a result, DDR4 memory chips with very high density will become relatively inexpensive. Obviously, this will naturally make memory upgrades slightly more complicated as in order to sustain multi-channel memory performance, all memory modules will have to replaced with more advanced DIMMs.
* In case of server multi-layer DRAM IC approach only will not be viable for high-end machines. As a result, it is proposed that special switches are installed onto mainboards to allow multiple memory modules to work on a single memory channel.

The transition to DDR3 memory has taken a long time already and will take a couple more years to complete. But the transition to DDR4 memory will take even longer since it will be much more complicated for all the participants of the ecosystem: the DRAM chip makers, memory module manufacturers, mainboard makers, microprocessor producers, system builders and end-users.

xbitlabs.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: etchmeister1/13/2011 11:23:00 AM
   of 25269
 
Macbook Air triggered the evolution of new NAND Flash Storage

Published Jan.5 2011, 09:45 AM (GMT+8)

Macbook Air triggered the evolution of new NAND Flash Storage

Solid-State Drive is always the potential target from Flash vendor perspective since the flash consumption is several times of the consumption from UFD and memory card. From consumer views, SSD transmission speed is twice faster than traditional HDD (Hard-Disk Drive) and featured with better power consumption and anti-shocking design. With the potential growing demand from High-Definition multimedia and large files, SSD demand will be steadily pulled up given the falling Flash price in coming future.

Due to sustained high level of Flash price in 2009 and 2010, SSD penetration rate in notebook cannot be significantly improve. However, Apple launched new Macbook Air in 4Q10 featured with new m-SATA interface SSD given the ultra-thin outlook design. We found the performance will not be compromised under the thinner design from the help of outperformed SSD. Thus, other notebook vendors are said to considering putting m-SATA concept in next generation notebook design.

Featured with light and thin form factor, m-SATA SSD is also the appropriate solution for the emerging devices such as tablet PC and embedded device. Since 2011 will be the strong year for smartphone and tablet PC, Flash vendors also aggressively launch the similar product such as Intel introduced new SSD 310 series in December. DRAMeXchange expect the new SSD is not only benefited for consumers but also will help Flash vendors to boost the NAND Flash demand. Thus, 2011 NAND Flash demand application will be more diversified and healthy.

Supposedly (recalling comments from the Barclay tech conference several equipment guys) felt that NAND would be "kicking in" during the second half.
I don't think Apple can take credit for this one - there are other PC vendors.
And it appears (high) NAND price is still an issue - so they need to shrink and reduce cost.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.