Technology Stocks | ahhaha's ahs


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: ahhaha who wrote (20900)4/30/2012 3:29:58 PM
From: gladman of 23272
 
Looks like KBH right shoulder is 2 Bucks

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: gladman who wrote (20901)4/30/2012 11:31:39 PM
From: ahhaha of 23272
 
Good read.

Look at GOOG. I believe it put in a major top on Mar 28. On that day it gapped up and tried to go but there was no fuel in the tank, because of the fundamental reasons i gave on this thread. Basically, a failing biz model. Falling revs and rising costs to support their hippy lib cultural. Often one sees a major top on the smallest yearly volume day or on the smallest five day average volume for the recent year. That happened with GOOG. Then, on Apr 12 it gapped up again on volume only to horribly fail the next day on substantially more volume. ET flow peaked on 7/26/11. Looks like GOOG will fall 30%.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ahhaha who wrote (20902)4/30/2012 11:49:13 PM
From: ahhaha of 23272
 
What else looks particularly bad?

Big money center banks, JPM, GS, BAC, C. They have potential downside that will test the 2009 bottom.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: frankw1900 who wrote (20898)4/30/2012 11:56:39 PM
From: ahhaha of 23272
 
The chart doesn't convey the importance of the latest entry since it's a rate of change chart. During an expansion even if only an alleged expansion a negative entry to NRFI of that magnitude is disastrous. When that has happened since 1947 the economy has a recession, or some kind of financial bust, in sight. The last one was seen in early 2007. What's truly remarkable here is the interest rate structure. NRFI usually starts down because rates are rising and biting. We don't have that but we do have the same psychology caused by rising and biting rates during the usual cycle.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: ahhaha5/1/2012 11:51:38 AM
of 23272
 
AG when Ron Paul asked him why FED doesn't go back to a gold standard : "You can't have a gold standard as long as you have a welfare state."

For a welfare state to exist it must grow. Eventually it grows so large that the financial system has to impose a gold standard in order to save itself. The gold standard then destroys the welfare state.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ahhaha who wrote (20904)5/1/2012 1:11:29 PM
From: frankw1900 of 23272
 
Yes, since I have found the BEA site which has a plethora of info.

a negative entry to NRFI of that magnitude is disastrous.

So the rate of change chart can be a problem cuz significant individual events/entries can be masked. right? So I've been looking at the tables, as well.

bea.gov 

Looked at nos since '47.

Gotta go.






The chart doesn't convey the importance of the latest entry since it's a rate of change chart. During an expansion even if only an alleged expansion a negative entry to NRFI of that magnitude is disastrous. When that has happened since 1947 the economy has a recession, or some kind of financial bust, in sight. The last one was seen in early 2007. What's truly remarkable here is the interest rate structure. NRFI usually starts down because rates are rising and biting. We don't have that but we do have the same psychology caused by rising and biting rates during the usual cycle.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ahhaha who wrote (20905)5/1/2012 3:54:42 PM
From: Lhn5 of 23272
 
AG? Alan Greenspan? He really said that in public?

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Lhn5 who wrote (20907)5/1/2012 6:02:12 PM
From: Brian Sullivan of 23272
 
AG? Alan Greenspan? He really said that in public?

I wonder what Andrea Mitchell sees in him?

I found this:
usagold.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: frankw1900 who wrote (20906)5/2/2012 1:46:10 AM
From: ahhaha of 23272
 
1. The BEA data is inconsistent. You can discover this if you compare "download all data" fields with "download data shown" fields. No explanation for this discrepancy is given.

2. Taking the BEA data as given, investigate line 14, "industrial equipment" series, by computing a cumulative percentage change since 1947. This can be done easily in an Excel spreadsheet. Download the two .CSVs, open in Excel, create a new sheet with contiguous data(you'll have to do a copy - paste.special(transpose) to create a column) . Then, enter a formula like =B4/B3-1+C3 and do a copy paste. Finally, Insert --->Chart--->Line, and you'll get your series graphed. You can expand the graph and delete the legend. What do you see?

3. You see the jig is up. The major uptrend has remained broken even though the series has charged up over the last several years in its usual fashion where usual is defined by similar periods in the past. No biggee. There's many econ time series.data that look like this chart. One could say that the decade has been flat so you can't expect much here either.

4. If one repeats this exercise for each of the component lines one gets some stronger and some weaker. To integrate all of these without simply going for a total which is what NFRI gives you one has to do a stochastic diffusion analysis on the data series. Don't bother. Many of the series show a marked slowing which is reminiscent of previous precursors of trouble.

5. You can look at line 16, "other equipment", which consists primarily of furniture and fixtures, agricultural machinery, construction machinery, mining and oil field machinery, service industry machinery, and electrical equipment not elsewhere classified.Like industrial equipment, it's very worrisome.

6. Which period has the most similarity to 1Q 12? 2Q '79. For example, using "industrial equipment", it occurs around entry 130. The current situation though is much worse since during 2Q '79 we had sky high inflation and interest rates to contain it. FED had something to work with. Now, they can't make anything happen except sky high inflation. How does FED entice buyers of industrial equipment to buy except by creating inflation fueling money?

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Lhn5 who wrote (20907)5/2/2012 1:47:04 AM
From: ahhaha of 23272
 
Yes. Today.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.