SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Technology Stocks | ahhaha's ahs


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: ahhaha who wrote (20218)12/22/2011 12:04:11 AM
From: gladman of 23552
 
ORCL took the market down in the morning, a bunch of related names went down with it and turns out that was nonsense. You know ORCL is stuck in the Relational World

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: rich evans who wrote (20220)12/22/2011 12:11:41 AM
From: ahhaha of 23552
 
That's ok. You have a buy and hold approach which will most likely work based on historical evidence. There's old history and then there's new history. Buy and hold will be wrong if the new history becomes the old history. The new history is being defined by a ten year down trend which I have termed in the past as, "the major deflationary downtrend". I've also referred to the pseudo bull markets we get as "rallies up to the major deflationary downtrend". What is the historical dynamo driving this development? Socialism. It looks like socialism won't be ending any time soon, and so, there's a growing body of evidence that buy and hold approach is dead wrong. You'd have to sell and hold if socialism persists.

My post was directed to those who are active in markets for whatever reason. Active means take a position long or short until conditions indicate the position should be eliminated. This approach means possibly buying and selling something one knows over and over. What is accomplished? Defense. One might be substantially in cash when the Big Kahuna hits, or when an unfavorable earnings report wracks your entire portfolio.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: gladman who wrote (20221)12/22/2011 12:31:50 AM
From: ahhaha of 23552
 
It's interesting that each has a different perspective on today's market. ORCL definitely got the ball rolling but it was a side show. Europe calls all shots.

ORCL isn't as stuck as you imply. Everyone has to be in the cloud with whatever they got, and that fact is forcing software into new configs. One could say that IBM was once stuck on mainframe. It still is, but it has found a way to leverage that legacy within a cloud storm to profit world wide. Ellison, or Hurd, has been making huge investments, and no doubt they have something cooking especially since they've allowed marginal costs to catch up with top line growth. That often occurs when a company like them, or AAPL is burring the midnight oil in the skunkworks.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: ahhaha12/22/2011 12:37:04 AM
of 23552
 
Recession? 21-Dec-11 09:06 pm

We are in a recession, it never ended.

There never was a recession at least not since 2008. A recession refers to the result of placing a constraint on excess GDP growth. That didn't happen.

What did happen was an agreed upon stoppage of activity due to fear of money soundness. The fear came from a bust in public speculation in RE.

After the bust and acceptance of stoppage the economy reverted back to its true equilibrium. At equilibrium since every aspect of US society has been distorted by socialism work is undermined, and this results in stable equilibrium unemployment around 9%. The 91% are doing pretty well because there's no overt inflation, and one sees this in the packed malls.


Re: Ben must do QE3 soon

At some point they are going to have to do something

Nope. The economy is in employment equilibrium. "They" can do nothing. If they try, they'll only make things worse.

other than buy worthless paper, and figure how to put people to work.

This is 'crat thinking. Some authority has to do something. That attitude assumes people are helpless. Such an assumption is at the root of the problem of slow growth and is contrary to what it is to be an American.

The only people that QE helps is banks and some traders.

In fact, none of the QEs have done what you suggest. QE1 was applied only to remove toxic assets off bank balance sheets so that the banks could operate. QE2 was an attempt to increase the monetary base to stimulate final demand. However, just because there's more money available to borrow, doesn't mean people will borrow it. Not when they're fearful about the business punishing conditions that arise from the socialism the 'crats seek to apply.

I bet 2012 will be the biggest year ever for bankruptcies.

Most likely you're wrong with the proviso there's no Hormuz event.



Re: How many more millions spent buying Euros tomorrow by the ECB?

They better save some money for the run on the banks in euroville.

Nope. No run at this time. The threat that was developing was one of liquidity, not of solvency. "liquidity" here means the ability to borrow funds overnight in size under the assumption that the funds will be restored next day. Solvency preempts satisfactory liquidity since funds can't be gotten at any price. Runs develop primarily when solvency is at issue, and can develop if a state of illiquidity persists. This is what was happening until Draghi + G6 CBs waded in and reliquified 500+ EU banks. When, if, or until, those banks run down the dough and their respective economies fail to apply discipline, one can assume a flow back to normalcy. This should be seen in a correction in EuroBOR, and more noteworthy in weak sister's sovereigns. I expect to see weako's CDS come in too.


Re: Ben must do QE3 soon

There is absolutely no justification for QE3.

Keynesians don't think like you or me. They believe in eternal prosperity. Such prosperity needs continual pumping since it can't stand on its own. FED staff is dominated(99%) by Keynesian demand management types.

Markets are doing very well,

This statement contradicts your claim that's there's no justification for QE3. Seemingly, you may think it affirms it, but the affirmation makes the tacit assumption that QE3 isn't occurring when, in fact, it is. Every day FED buys anywhere from $2B - $5B in Permanent. You see, they sterilize the purchases out the back door through bill and note sales, so markets don't go berserk with the kindling of rational expectations for inflation.

Market are self directed

Then how could you expect that QEx could have any effect? Do you think "self directed markets" can be fooled? After all, "markets are doing well" may only be possible with the inevitably destructive ongoing sterilized QEx, as long as they will! To make it a little more transparent, the sterilization will start to bite by causing the ff rate to advance to the prime credit rate. That would be attended by notably increased economic activity. If that's the case and if the stock market anticipates such, then the stock market will advance, and,

I lost money in the stock market today,

you should hold or retake.


Re: Ben must do QE3 soon

Backdoor QE? More like Euro Banks that had nowhere else to turn.

Backdoor QE has nothing to do with EU. When FED buys Permanent in the NY bond market, as it were, actually through the dealer network, it has to sterilize the purchases so that they have no direct monetary effect.

How about QE2? FED didn't sterilize those purchases. QE2 took place while there was a run-off of loans so the increase in reserves had no effect. The reserves idly sat in member's FRBs.

That is no longer the case. For the last year C&I loans are moving up so reserve additions can lead to broad pricing power. Accordingly, FED must sterilize its ongoing Permanent purchases, or risk rational expectations for inflation.

A clear example of a liquidity crisis that is just at its outset.

Watch and see if the "crisis" in the EU doesn't subside along the lines I previously indicated. That doesn't mean it will clear up altogether. That's a workout situation that depends upon whether these societies, these socialist societies, will discipline themselves. I believe that no socialist society can ever do that because socialism breeds resentment and irresponsibility since by nature it's an elitist system.


qe3 is very much on the table.

Nope. C&I is growing and FED pumps every day, so why do they need to flood the system? Don't dare, because they're afraid to launch +rocGPL and then they'd have to raise the ff rate.

economic growth rates lowered from 3.7 to 2.5% which was the forcast in june.

Let me clue you in. FED does not act on its own forecasts much less on those of others. Instead, they react to what the economy has done. The economy is doing well currently, as well as it can without becoming unstable. US growth CAN'T exceed the growth of the world average because the US has a high tax rate and is unit labor cost inefficient.

...unemployment at a consistant lower range of 8.5 to 8.7%.....all spells RECESSION.

Hmm. The stock market underwent a two year bull run to 2000 highs with your "high unemployment" in place. Does that spell RECESSION? No. There never was a recession.

..with the backdrop of financial stresses and ineffective fiscal policy from washington.

You buy into that hype? What an amateur. There's so much data that refutes those assertions that it shows that you aren't investigating.

....you better believe the fed is willing and able to initiate qe3.

FED daily pumps $2 - $5B in Permanent. Please tell me what you are talking about if you think FED isn't engaged in QE now.

..wake up

Here you are, a retail broker, making endless contradictory claims. Predictable, and useless.

Instead, you should study what i have to say.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: frankw190012/22/2011 6:46:07 AM
of 23552
 
Slow motion default continues:

ekathimerini.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: frankw1900 who wrote (20225)12/22/2011 9:21:41 AM
From: ahhaha of 23552
 
That's not evidence of the slow motion default.

Let me point out that Bloomberg is lib media, and as such, is horribly biased. Their bias is similar to that of the NYT which I consider unreliable, unreadable, and clearly motivated throughout all its departments to promote the lib agenda, truth be damned.

Consider. This article starts with:

Greece’s creditors are resisting pressure from the International Monetary Fund to accept bigger losses on holdings of the indebted nation’s government bonds, said three people with direct knowledge of the discussions.

Lenders want the 70 billion euros ($91 billion) of new bonds the government will issue in return for existing securities to carry a coupon of about 5 percent, said the people, who declined to be identified because the negotiations are private.


There's no way to verify the first paragraph, but anyway, of course Greeks creditors are resisting. I'd advise them to do so. What would you do?

The article ends with :

Vega Asset Management LLC resigned this month from a committee of Greek creditors negotiating the debt swap with European authorities, because the Madrid-based hedge fund refused to accept a net present value loss exceeding 50 percent, according to a Dec. 7 e-mail sent to other panel members, which was obtained by Bloomberg News.

This is irrelevant sensationalism. A hedge fund didn't like the terms? So friggin' what?

This is the smoker :

“Vega needs to start considering all available legal options to refuse and challenge any exchange” that leads to a loss of more than 50 percent, Vega wrote in the e-mail. “Vega wants to avoid any conflicts of interest where its own legal strategy could compromise the ability of other members of the committee to reach an agreement.”

This is doubletalk. Don't you see they're saying, "if you don't give us our money, we'll sue". They wouldn't sue no matter what. Don't be fooled by innuendo from weaklings. This innuendo shows that rather than slow motion default, in this case what you have is slow motion resolution.

Do you see my ability? I won't budge on the truth and I'm not afraid of our world of kiddies. That's all we have these days. The adults in this era are like eloi. They issue hollow threats. I slap them down on paper, AND in the real world.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: ahhaha who wrote (20223)12/22/2011 9:45:45 AM
From: gladman of 23552
 
One could say that IBM was once stuck on mainframe. It still is, but it has found a way to leverage that legacy within a cloud storm to profit world wide.

Great point, they're marketing geniuses by rebranding their on-premise apps(most junk) under the Websphere brand to capitalize on the Internet in the late 90's then scaling up Global Services into a powerhouse. They call themselves a Technology Enabled Service Firm meaning they sell expensive junk and even more expensive people to implement it.

Ellison, or Hurd, has been making huge investments

No doubt they'll figure it out but these were the same guys laughing at the cloud just a few years ago. Remember a few months ago when Ellison canceled Benioff's keynote at Oracle World, Benioff tweeted "Larry kicked me out of his show because I was mean to him on Facebook". I agree their investments will pay off, they have the install base to sell in to with their new cloud products from recent acquisitions.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: ahhaha12/22/2011 10:13:17 AM
of 23552
 
From Briefings:

GDP in the third quarter was revised down from 2.0% in the second estimate to 1.8% in the third estimate.

In the third estimate? This degree of correction is extreme. A .2% change in what was last reported (3Q) seems small, but in that kind of economic data, it's incredible.

Further, a third estimate? Clearly, nobody knows nuttin'. However, what have I said about these kinds of results? Results about jobs, unemployment. final sales, savings, etc., are irrelevant for economic policy because they come in after the fact. It is irrational to design economic policy around their report, yet that's what we have especially at the authoritative FED level. They're reacting to the past. When authority reacts to the past it has no idea about what its current actions will do, ever.

What is right economic policy? Policy based on principle. Which principles? The ones the people of a society puts in place, stays with, and work, all of which were learned in the 20th century. Economic science is solved. World economies don't need to go back and retry socialism.

One might say that's what's done by policy designed by fly-by-the-seat-of-the-pants, but that kind of policy reacts incrementally and instantaneously to specific data items, and it's motivated by a superficial addressing of perceptions that come from ulterior motives. Too often ulterior motives are nefarious.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: gladman who wrote (20227)12/22/2011 10:21:46 AM
From: ahhaha of 23552
 
I heard Cramer on CNBC about an hour ago say that ORCL was no good because they were too hardware intensive!

Hardware intensive? Huh? Must be he keeps his horses in the cowshed.

As far as I know the only hardware ORCL has came from their purchase of Sun, that is, Solaris servers, which they maintain for purposes of software/hardware integrated legacy support somewhat along the strategy line that IBM is employing. The strategy seeks to gradually morph the fairly large installed Sun base into current systems while concurrently retiring incrementally the Sun server hardware.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ahhaha who wrote (20228)12/22/2011 10:36:43 AM
From: DMaA of 23552
 
It is suspicious when revisions always make things worse.

Quarter results - Page 1
Quarter revisions - page 11.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.