Technology Stocks | ahhaha's ahs


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: gladman4/27/2010 11:53:10 AM
of 23301
 
These Goldman guys are priceless. Touche' mr. Chairman or should I say Douche'

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: gladman who wrote (16780)4/27/2010 11:56:03 AM
From: DMaA of 23301
 
Hang 'em all - starting with the dozens that are running the current administration.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: ahhaha4/27/2010 11:57:51 AM
of 23301
 
Do you have a duty to act in the best interest of your client?

This question is absurd since it presumes that one knows the best interest of one's clients. Assuming that one presumes to know the best interest by arbitrarily taking it is what leads to broken fiduciary duty. A broker must have written permission, called discretion, in order to operate outside of any undetermined client interest.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: DMaA who wrote (16781)4/27/2010 12:04:19 PM
From: ahhaha of 23301
 
If you have a criticism of those being interviewed, please make it so I can clarify the issue.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: ahhaha who wrote (16775)4/27/2010 12:14:04 PM
From: GraceZ of 23301
 
In my experience, people will find endless fundamental reasons to support price inflation in assets during a period of negative real rates, it HAS to be worth that because that is what people will pay for it (SI provides a fairly accurate recording of that history).

I listened to a long line of people telling me just how much sense it made for them to "pull money out of" their house. I'm sure some of these same people are now looking for adjustments in their principal. Now that RE is officially dead, that free money has to go somewhere and it sure isn't going into productive enterprise.

After the Fed tightens and it all comes crashing down, when it becomes clear to everyone that the prices were irrational, we then get subjected to the kinds of stupid Congressional hearings like I'm listening to as I write this.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ahhaha who wrote (16783)4/27/2010 12:16:58 PM
From: DMaA of 23301
 
I was saying that if the democrats pull on the thread hard enough they might not like what unravels.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: GraceZ who wrote (16784)4/27/2010 12:56:21 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie of 23301
 
Something bad happened
Someone must be to blame
And it certainly can't be you or me
well......me at least
there must be the illusion of doing something
regulate something
Ban something
punish someone
just please don't make us take responsibility for our own actions.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: GraceZ who wrote (16771)4/27/2010 1:14:02 PM
From: NickSE of 23301
 
Whatever someone is willing to pay for it?

What is the stock worth?

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ahhaha who wrote (16783)4/27/2010 1:28:48 PM
From: DMaA of 23301
 
This is a slight of hand. The magicians are distracting us from the REAL crime - the CCX.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: NickSE who wrote (16787)4/27/2010 1:34:19 PM
From: GraceZ of 23301
 
I was being facetious when I wrote that.

A stock can't be removed from the underlying asset. The company, the enterprise, has a real fundamental value. While that value changes relative to the price of money, relative to expected inflation rates, the price of other assets of similar risk, etc. the enterprise produces a product and that product produces profits, the company has a historical and theoretical future growth rate. All those things can be assigned a value. Now you and I might not agree on HOW to assign that value, what weight to give each aspect related to value, but if I'm going to buy or sell something using my hard earned money, I sure as hell want to assign SOME value to the company which has a little more meaning than simply the price someone on the other side of the transaction is willing to provide for.

A few million RE holders found out the hard way that transaction price can be ephemeral whereas the debt incurred to buy the asset, not so much.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.