Technology Stocks | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: BoonDoggler who wrote (78370)7/9/2008 6:09:10 AM
From: mindykoeppel   of 117493
 
Boon Doggler Broadcom, Qualcomm face off in hearing

eetimes.com 

The ITC hearing is NOT the hearing today before the US Court of Appeals Federal Circuit that I am attending - I believe it is THREE patents today and NOT the power patent. It must be the appeal of the Santa Ana case.

Reuters
EE Times
(07/08/2008 6:40 PM EDT)



WASHINGTON -- Wireless chipmakers Broadcom and Qualcomm went before a U.S. appeals court Tuesday to argue a patent case that could result in BlackBerries and other advanced cell phones being banned for sale in the United States.

At issue is a patent on technology that helps cell phone chips use less power. The U.S. International Trade Commission ruled last year that Broadcom owns the patent, and that Qualcomm is wrongly selling chips for telephones that contain its technology.

In June 2007, the ITC, which hears patent cases involving imports, banned U.S. sales of some cell phone models that contain infringing Qualcomm chips. That order was stayed, to Broadcom's irritation.

"We have multiple findings of infringement and induced infringement," Broadcom's lawyer Robert Van Nest told the three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. "And no remedy."

Qualcomm appealed, supported by other high tech companies which would need to replace the chips in their phones if Broadcom prevails again.

Former U.S. solicitor general Ken Starr, speaking for 16 manufacturers and three wireless service providers, asked for the exclusion order to be canceled. "The order sweeps against us, not just Qualcomm itself," he said.

The companies included Kyocera Wireless, Motorola, Samsung, LG Electronics, Sanyo Fisher, T-Mobile, AT&T, Sprint Nextel, Palm and BlackBerry maker Research in Motion." (Reporting by Diane Bartz, editing by Leslie Gevirtz and Tim Dobbyn)


Copyright 2008 Reuters.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ggamer who wrote (78339)7/9/2008 6:29:56 AM
From: Maurice Winn3 Recommendations   of 117493
 
10%?!! There's been a rumour around for over a decade that Qualcomm's 5% for a complete system is absurdly expensive, greedy and monopolistic, with Neelie frothing at the mouth over how extorquerationate it is. Meanwhile, 16% for GSM, 12% for W-CDMA. $6 per poxy little obvious patent from Broadcon. Now the WiMAX group wants a maximum 10% royalty. <Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, NEC, NextWave Wireless, Nokia, Nokia Siemens Networks and Sony Ericsson invited all interested parties to join an initiative to keep royalty levels for essential LTE patents in mobile devices below 10 percent of the retail price, > Nokia says 1% for one patent, 3% for 5, and 5% for 10, or some such.

Hang on, Nokia, Ericsson, Siemens, Alcatel are European entities. Surely they aren't seeking such a high price while asking for Neelie and her KKK to cut Q!'s royalties. Of course they are, but the hypocrisy is astounding.

Mqurice

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: mindykoeppel who wrote (78375)7/9/2008 7:09:23 AM
From: Maurice Winn19 Recommendations   of 117493
 
Fire the ITC! They are a waste of space. The regular courts can do patent investigations and decisions.

It's absurd that two USA companies, Qualcomm and Broadcom, end up at the ITC, which is designed to protect USA companies against the depredations of foreign companies breaking USA patent laws, not to settle disputes between USA companies.

Thanks Mindy for your efforts in getting the information direct from the horse's mouth. We will greatly appreciate what you generously report.

Mqurice
=================================================================
OT - Damn you polluters.

Could all you idiots discussing oil get lost and stop polluting the place with your drivel about Peak Oil and other irrelevancy. Some of you newbies might not be aware that this is not your personal egocentric pooping place. Take a hike! You old hands should damn well know better and just because you have posted before, and often good stuff, doesn't give you license to make a mess of the place. Go indulge yourselves elsewhere. It's not as though there is a shortage of Qualcomm places where you can go off on a tangent. Next person who posts stuff like that, I'm going to hunt them down, kick their front door down, and spray paint their words all over their living room ceiling so they can enjoy them each day. Let's see how you like it. You may choose the colour you want to go with your decor.

After a couple of posts objecting to your pollution which got swarms of recommendations,http://siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=24737575 Message 24737998 even a half-wit should have noticed that oil and the politics of it was not a subject which people wanted discussed here, even if you think you have got it figured out. Edit... and your feet stink to high heaven. You should have a bath once a week whether you need it or not. Go and join Ilmarinen at Write What You Like... he needs your company.http://siliconinvestor.com/subject.aspx?subjectid=30581

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: slacker7117/9/2008 8:19:05 AM
   of 117493
 
Citi Initiates Coverage on Qualcomm (QCOM) with a Buy

streetinsider.com 

July 9, 2008 7:48 AM EDT

Citi initiates coverage on Qualcomm Inc (Nasdaq: QCOM) with a Buy. Price target $61.

Citi analyst says, "We are initiating coverage of QCOM with a $61 price target, predicated on our sum of the parts valuation for Qualcomm's various divisions. While we believe legal outcomes are important, our analysis suggests that interim legal milestones are not the incremental driver of share price; fundamental performance matters more. Our confidence in Qualcomm's longer-term opportunities in 3G and 4G, therefore dominates our investment view. In particular, we see significant opportunity for QCOM to benefit from 1) the growing demand for 3G phones, from which QCOM derives significant royalties; 2) the growing demand for smartphones, which drive ASP's upward, also benefiting Qualcomm's licensing business; and 3) increasing share in chipsets, as they make headway with their complete 3G solution."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: Bill Wolf7/9/2008 8:37:30 AM
1 Recommendation   of 117493
 
How the iPhone 3G is changing the wireless game

The iPhone 3G doesn’t look much different from the earlier version, but it’s poised to have a dramatic impact on the global wireless industry. Image: Apple
When Apple CEO Steve Jobs took the wraps off of the iPhone 18 months ago, the wireless establishment offered a smug response. At the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, a Nokia executive sniffed that Apple’s new gadget merely validated his company’s strategy, and voiced his surprise to journalists that the iPhone didn’t use the latest 3G networks for fast data connections. “Overall, it’s very exciting for us,” he said, implying the mighty Nokia had nothing to worry about.

A year and a half later, as the iPhone 3G arrives, Apple’s (AAPL) rivals look a lot more flummoxed. The little gadget has catalyzed the wireless industry, boosting earnings for Apple and U.S. partner AT&T (T), and inspiring an avalanche of copycat touchscreen devices. Samsung has the Instinct, a chunkier, less elegant knockoff. Research in Motion (RIMM) is readying the BlackBerry Thunder. LG has the Dare and Nokia (NOK) the dubiously codenamed “Tube” phone. Each claims to best the iPhone in some feature or other – a better camera, say, or touch-feedback.

But with the competition scrambling to develop an iPhone killer, might they be missing the point? Judging by customer raves, the iPhone’s magic isn’t in the features – not the 2-megapixel camera, or the Safari web browser, or even the music and video capabilities. It’s in Apple’s knack for making all those features easier to locate and use. What’s more, as the iPhone 3G debuts this week, Apple’s trademark simple approach is doing more than setting consumers’ tongues wagging – it’s changing the game in wireless, from phone sales to software development.

Just ask Aaron Levie. The CEO of online collaboration startup Box.net has been watching the iPhone’s impact on his business, and he marvels at the results. Though there are millions more devices out there running Windows Mobile software from Microsoft (MSFT) and BlackBerry software from RIM, his usage logs show that iPhone users are already accessing his service through the Safari browser just as often as the other gadgets – suggesting that iPhone owners are more likely to actually use advanced Internet features.

Of course, it’s still early in the iPhone’s life, and plenty could still go wrong. The forces arrayed against Apple are a who’s who of the tech world: Microsoft, Samsung, LG, Nokia and more. And Jobs & Co. have already made a few questionable moves – like dropping the price too fast on the first-generation device, and pushing carriers to give Apple a cut of the subscription fees from new iPhone subscribers. Sales so far have been promising, with Apple on track to meet its goal of selling 10 million iPhones in calendar 2008, but much depends on how businesses and overseas buyers react to the unconventional phone.

Still, the iPhone’s impact so far is much bigger than its sales figures suggest. Even detractors grudgingly admit that the bar is now higher for phone design. Confusing menus and hidden features just won’t cut it anymore. “Most smartphones are smart in name only,” says Richard Doherty, an analyst at the Envisioneering Group. “People tend to feel dumber using them.”

He sees similarities between the iPod’s shakeup of the music industry earlier in the decade and what the iPhone is starting to do to wireless. A key difference, though: Unlike the iPod, which some music moguls blame for lost revenue, the iPhone represents a trend that could make a lot of telcos richer.

With that in mind, it’s no wonder that wireless carriers around the world are in a tizzy over the iPhone 3G. Their business hawking voice minutes to subscribers is becoming less profitable with competition driving prices down, and their best alternative is to sell mobile Internet access on top of their voice plans. But to do that, carriers need easy-to-use mobile gadgets to hook consumers – and that’s where the iPhone comes in.

“There’s no doubt in my mind that a really positive effect of the iPhone was to focus mainstream people on the idea of using their device for data,” Qualcomm (QCOM) CEO Paul Jacobs told The New York Times last year. “Qualcomm could have spent huge amounts of money advertising 3G and not gotten the point across as well as the iPhone has.” (Qualcomm, whose technology powers many of the world’s 3G networks, has much to gain from iPhone fever.)

The mobile Internet hype should only accelerate now that the iPhone has 3G speed, and is arriving in more countries. Until now, the iPhone has been available in just six countries; on July 11 the number jumps to 21 markets, representing roughly a third of the world’s 3G networks based on WCDMA and WCDMA-HSPA.

These new locations are a goldmine of wireless subscribers: According to data provider Wireless Intelligence, the top ten new iPhone carrier markets have 31.6 million 3G subscribers already, and the number is growing fast. Why does that matter? The iPhone makes people hungry for 3G, and 3G subscribers spend more. That makes the iPhone an important strategic weapon. Wireless Intelligence analyst Will Croft wrote in a recent report that carriers who sign up 3G subscribers will have extra money to upgrade their networks and outgun the competition.

The iPhone’s mobile renaissance doesn’t stop there. Apple seems to be having just as big an impact on the way software companies write programs for mobile phones. The concept of open development for phones isn’t new; Microsoft has courted developers for years with its Windows Mobile software, Palm (PALM) and Nokia-backed Symbian have done the same with their software platforms, and Google (GOOG) is jumping into the fray with its Linux-based Android offering.

But by serving up straightforward iPhone development tools based on its polished OS X operating system, Apple has generated more buzz than any of them. Game developers and corporate IT shops alike have clamored to build programs for the iPhone, and to add them to a marketplace that also launches this week.

Coincidentally, Nokia recently announced plans to dramatically retool Symbian, taking the code open source and cutting the fees for developers to write authorized software. Says Envisioneering’s Doherty: “We have no doubt that they only took these moves because of the developer attention they’ve seen drained by Apple, and a little bit of Android.”

The iPhone is drumming up enough interest that the establishment isn’t shrugging off its impact anymore. In the U.K., heavy preorders of iPhone 3G crashed the website of carrier O2 on Monday morning. In India, interest in the iPhone is so high that even though the country has yet to settle on 3G spectrum auction rules, carriers Vodafone Essar and Bharti have committed to carrying it on their 2G networks until the kinks get worked out.

And remember Nokia? Executives there sound a lot less excited these days. CEO Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo was quoted last month saying the iPhone’s launch in India, where Nokia has been gaining market share, is sure to have a negative impact on his company.

bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Bill Wolf who wrote (78379)7/9/2008 9:50:28 AM
From: ggamer6 Recommendations   of 117493
 
“There’s no doubt in my mind that a really positive effect of the iPhone was to focus mainstream people on the idea of using their device for data,” Qualcomm (QCOM) CEO Paul Jacobs told The New York Times last year. “Qualcomm could have spent huge amounts of money advertising 3G and not gotten the point across as well as the iPhone has.” (Qualcomm, whose technology powers many of the world’s 3G networks, has much to gain from iPhone fever.)


At least PJ is honest enough to admit that their marketing really suck! And here is one reason why -

Jeff Jacobs serves as executive vice president and chief marketing officer for Qualcomm where he oversees global marketing, external communications, and standards-related efforts. He is a member of Qualcomm's executive committee.

Jacobs previously served as executive vice president and president of global development for Qualcomm where he oversaw the worldwide proliferation of Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) technology through business development, technology marketing, program management and investments.

Jacobs is a founding board member of the San Diego Telecom Council, a board member of the San Diego Software and Internet Council, a member of the UCSD CONNECT Leadership Council, and a member of the UC Berkeley Haas Business School Board of Advisors. Jacobs also serves on the board of both the San Diego Sports Council and the Big Brothers and Big Sisters organization, is a cabinet member of the SDSU Director's Cabinet, and is on the Scripps International Advisory Board for the Scripps Foundation of Medicine and Science. Jacobs funded the Jeffrey A. Jacobs Distinguished Professorship of Business and Technology at UC Berkeley.

Jacobs holds a bachelor of arts degree in international economics from the University of California, Berkeley.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: slacker711 who wrote (78378)7/9/2008 10:07:16 AM
From: Gansett1 Recommendation   of 117493
 
8 July 2008 - 40 pages

Qualcomm Inc (QCOM) Initiation of
Initiate Buy: Leveraged Play in 3G & Natural Share Gainer coverage Y

* Initiating with a Buy - We are initiating coverage of
Qualcomm Incorporated with a $61 price target, predicated
on our sum of the parts valuation for Qualcomm's various
divisions.
* A Unique Handset Play - Qualcomm is unique amongst
handset chip companies in that it derives 31% of revenues
and 71% of EBIT from technology licensing. While this
alone drives a premium to its comparable chip peers, the
benefit of this licensing model is increasing as 3G phones
outgrow the overall handset market-Qualcomm derives a
royalty on ALL 3G phones (except for Nokia with whom there
is ongoing litigation). Meanwhile, the proliferation of
smartphones, that carry 83% higher ASP's than average
handsets compound the benefit to Qualcomm as their
royalties are a percentage of wholesale ASP's.
* A Natural Share Gainer - Meanwhile, by virtue of its high
R&D, profitable execution, and relatively complete product
portfolio, we view Qualcomm as a natural share gainer in
the chipset market for handsets. Indeed, this has been
borne out by recent QCT (QCOM CDMA Technologies) growth.
Consolidation amongst the fragmented peer group ought to
further benefit QCT share as customers consolidate around
proven product portfolios.
* Above Consensus Estimates - We model above consensus
revenues and proforma EPS (2009), primarily reflecting
solid ASP trends and high share targets. Our target price
implicitly values Qualcomm's licensing business (QTL) at
23x 2009 EBIT (inline with comparables) and its chip
business (QCT) at 19x 2009 EBIT (above comparables). The
resulting 34% ETR substantiates our "Buy" rating.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: ggamer who wrote (78380)7/9/2008 12:37:37 PM
From: tripperd25 Recommendations   of 117493
 
i totally disagree with that statment. newer technologies seem to catch on only when people start to see what is possible, and all the advertising in the world by Qualcomm would not have helped. The interface needed to be cool and easy, and last I checked Qualcomm was not in the business of design. Price is a factor also, and I think where 3G will really catch on is when it comes down to reasonable pricing. Ijust got VCast on my phone for 15 bucks a month, which I think is reasonable. I would not have subscribed for more than 35 or 40 dollars a month. Mass acceptance of 3g will be driven when regular people like me who dont use cell phones for work, but more for entertainment(following giants games pitch by pitch, checking stock quotes, restaurant reviews etc... is reasonable priced. It is catching on, the speed is fantastic even in rural pennsylvania, but again I dont see this as qualcomms problem, but verizon, sprint et al...

Trip

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: tripperd2 who wrote (78382)7/9/2008 12:58:14 PM
From: ggamer   of 117493
 
i totally disagree with that statment. newer technologies seem to catch on only when people start to see what is possible, and all the advertising in the world by Qualcomm would not have helped.

Why so many people ask for an Intel Pentium when buying a PC or laptop? I think Intel's advertising had something to do with the need for better and faster pc's.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ggamer who wrote (78383)7/9/2008 1:16:37 PM
From: tripperd22 Recommendations   of 117493
 
I just don't think the two situations are analogous. perhaps in future as we move more and more to a wireless world, if there is a true difference in product perhaps advertising would be wise.For now I prefer that Qualcomm continue to do what they do well, which is out engineer everyone, continue to hire the best available talent, and work closely with carriers. The fruit of that approach is finally taking hold as their market share of chips goes up. They are doing so well here, that even with the inevitable loss in royalties, I think growth in earnings over at least next five years will give a very nice return on investment.
Trip

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.