Technology Stocks | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: planetsurf who wrote (111746)5/18/2012 10:37:03 AM
From: waitwatchwander1 Recommendation   of 117481
 
If Halo is as efficient as Qualcomm tells us, fleets are a sector where someone like Qualcomm "might" be able to make inroads.

Beyond that EV Wireless Charging is a niche rich drive-to-work commuter market. The chicken and egg matter favours hybrids which have yet to move into their phase II deployment cycle. That's the next baby step for mass market penetration and that only moves us from version 1.0 to version 1.2. Pricing on the hybrid front is what one needs to watch and that is very hard to drive via innovation. Lower pricing is more of a manufacturing cost efficiency matter and mostly comes about due to higher demand.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: Bill Wolf5/18/2012 11:08:26 AM
   of 117481
 
AAPL: iPhone Subsidy Cuts Tricky, Says BMO
By Tiernan Ray

BMO Capital’s Keith Bachman this morning reiterates an Outperform rating on shares of Apple (AAPL) and a $695 price target, writing that his conversations with “a large European wireless carrier and a smaller North American carrier” recently suggest to him that lowering subsidies for the iPhone is something the telcos would like to do, but that’s it’s a difficult matter to achieve.

Writes Bachman, there may be some changes in subsidies around the fringe, but not likely a groundswell anytime soon, especially in front of what may be a version of the iPhone based on “long term evolution,” or LTE, cellular technology:

We continue to believe carriers would lower iPhone subsidies if they collectively felt that competing devices would drive the same economics (high ARPU, low churn) as iPhones. However, we don’t think this is a simple decision since carriers would fear much higher churn if they could not longer sell iPhones. In other words, we believe carriers would optimize economic outcomes by acting collectively in a region, in pushing back the amount of iPhone subsidy levels, to mitigate the risks of a spike in churn. Net, we don’t see risks to near-term changes in subsidy levels, but we do think 1) this is the number one risk to the Apple story, and 2) it will change at some point in the future, for the reasons mentioned above. However, we believe carriers would prefer to move subscribers to LTE networks to free spectrum, and thus promote devices through subsidies, including the new LTE iPhone.

Bachman writes that in Spain, for example, carriers are reluctant to lower subsidy levels on existing subscribers, because retention is important.

In North America, the phone company he talked to is promoting more phones based on Google’s (GOOG) “Android” operating system, hoping to create more of a “level playing field” in devices before considering any subsidy cut.

However, “the carrier noted that if other large North American carriers decide to reduce smartphone subsidies, then other carriers would potentially follow, similar to Spain.”

Apple shares today are up $10.77, or 2%, at $540.89.

Copyright 2011 Dow Jones & Company,

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Bill Wolf5/18/2012 11:09:42 AM
   of 117481
 
A Bullish Call for Wireless
Credit Suisse says investors should overweight the sector.

Credit Suisse

We have turned more positive on wireless following signs that the carriers are being more disciplined on pricing and subsidies.

We upgraded AT&T (ticker: T) and Verizon Communications (VZ) and also see upside to Sprint Nextel (S) from these trends.

The carriers are reining in upgrades and subsidies. We saw the upgrade rate improve 90 basis points year-over-year; the first real improvement since mid-2010 (third-quarter 2011 doesn't count due to a shift in the Apple (AAPL) iPhone launch).

We expect the upgrade rate to improve 300-400 basis points for the industry in 2012 which, coupled with the introduction of upgrade fees, will drive a 130-180 basis-point improvement in industry margins.

Investors have been Underweight on the sector; we believe they should be Overweight into these improving trends.

Sprint is back to being our top pick following evidence that Network Vision is on-track and operating trends are improving. Also, improving industry pricing should benefit Sprint most of all. We upgraded AT&T and Verizon on improving pricing and subsidy trends.

We would avoid Leap Wireless International (LEAP) and MetroPCS Communications (PCS) on fundamentals; however, there may be strategic opportunities. Tower trends were broadly supportive of our positive stance, and SBA Communications (SBAC) remains our top pick of this group.

Telecom is the fourth best-performing sector in the S&P year-to-date on a total return basis, with almost all of the positive performance for the year coming on the heels of first-quarter results. We believe the sector will continue to outperform as sentiment improves and estimates rise. We believe valuations are reasonable once you account for yield and growth.

Revenue grew 5.9%, consistent with the last couple of quarters. Postpaid growth accelerated to 4.6%, the fastest growth since mid-2008. Two-thirds of the growth came from average revenue per user (ARPU) growth, compared to half, a year ago, and one-third the year before.

Prepaid growth slowed from 18% to 15% with subscription and ARPU slowing. We expect continued stable growth in coming quarters with gradually slowing subscriber growth offset by robust ARPU growth.

Margins increased 130 basis points year-over-year due to strong ARPU growth coupled with a decline in gross adds and an improvement in the upgrade rate.

Average subsidy per handset continued to increase year-over-year (although it was down sharply quarter-over-quarter); however, this growth was largely offset by the 6.5% decline in handset volumes.

New discipline should drive further margin expansion. The carriers are being more disciplined on pricing and subsidies. Recent price increases should drive continued robust ARPU growth.

The pushing out of early upgrade eligibility should drive further improvements in the upgrade rate, while the addition of upgrade fees should help offset device subsidies. These impacts will really start to show up in second-quarter 2012, due to the timing of policy changes at the carriers.

The prepaid market continued to grow at a robust rate; however, the national carriers are taking share from the likes of Leap Wireless, MetroPCS and TracFone [a subsidiary of America Movil (AMX)].

We saw AT&T, Verizon and [Deutsche Telekom unit] T-Mobile all increase their share of gross adds and lower churn this quarter following the launch of new prepaid unlimited offers and, in the case of T-Mobile in particular, a renewed focus on the segment. The next few quarters may prove challenging for Leap Wireless and MetroPCS.

Organic growth was better-than-expected this quarter, and every tower company increased full-year organic growth guidance. Tower companies are seeing strong demand from carriers as all of the major carriers are upgrading their networks at the same time, for the first time since the late 1990s.

Additionally, inorganic growth was greater than expected—tower companies closed on more sites this quarter than expected and increased expectations for acquisitions for the rest of the year.

[We rate the following companies at Outperform: American Tower; AT&T; SBA Communications; Sprint; and Verizon. We rate the following companies at Neutral: Leap Wireless; and MetroPCS].

-- Jonathan Chaplin
-- Spencer Kurn
-- Felix Wai

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: FUBHO who wrote (111917)5/18/2012 11:23:42 AM
From: lml1 Recommendation   of 117481
 
Think you miss my point. I pointed to Asia because you attributed recent sell off to Europe. That's an excuse. I just pointed out with respect to QCOM that it has other markets it looks to for stronger growth THAN Europe.

My point was that the factors you looked to as rationale for recent sell off have been hovering around for quite some time. Issue is why now? Answer is not fundamental, but sentiment. Time to take profits, take down valuations, which is merely a metric, albeit a strong one, to trigger more selling. In short, instill fear to motivate others to sell. Market moves on sentiment. Europe is an excuse. How many days ago were pundits repeating how US stock market was de-coupled from European markets?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (111908)5/18/2012 11:24:52 AM
From: Jim Mullens3 Recommendations   of 117481
 
Jeffrey, re: Facebook vs QCOM……………………………………………………

Incredible hype on CNBC this AM. How many are current pre-IPO investors hoping to unload on the small guy? One hypester commented it was all about monetizing its 900 million subscribers. Yup, but how many of those are kids or young folks **without** a job?

I also see where GM just pulled is $10M ad budget for Facebook on ROI concerns.

They also commented on the potential ad revenue from Mobile which they haven’t determined how to tap yet. Just what we need, already small mobile pages cluttered with ads!!!!!!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: lml who wrote (111932)5/18/2012 11:26:57 AM
From: FUBHO   of 117481
 
Worldwide economic fundamentals are looking poor. That affects all companies.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: lml who wrote (111932)5/18/2012 11:33:36 AM
From: slacker7112 Recommendations   of 117481
 
Answer is not fundamental, but sentiment.

The two pieces of fundamental news that have come out over the last few days that were negative were the fact that Gartner estimated that handset sales were down in Q1 by 2% and that V/AT&T again made noises about cutting subsidies. The latter is noise, but the Gartner numbers were surprising and disappointing. Those numbers reflect sales prior to the latest bout of Euro angst and dont bode well for mobile growth in Q2.

Slacker

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (4)

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (111933)5/18/2012 11:43:25 AM
From: waitwatchwander1 Recommendation   of 117481
 
Hopefully this thread doesn't become plagued with fb posts like it did with appl posts when that issue got hot.

Just thought I'd get this out before rather than after.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (111928)5/18/2012 11:48:05 AM
From: engineer   of 117481
 
Maybe Lightsquared would have been better off spending their entire money on buying Dish, just as a spectrum play...

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/dish-wont-launch-its-lte-advanced-network-until-2016-or-later/2012-05-18?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

Dish won't launch its LTE Advanced network until 2016 - or later


May 18, 2012 — 10:23am ET | By Sue Marek
Dish Network said that it will not be able to launch its proposed LTE Advanced network using 40 MHz of S-Band spectrum until 2016 or later. This is about 12 months longer than the FCC's current proposed buildout schedule, which requires Dish to launch its network in three years covering 30 percent of the U.S. population. However, Dish has indicated that when it does launch its network, it will cover 60 percent of the U.S. population.

In a filing to the FCC, Dish provided details of its deployment plans. The company said that it will take at least 48 months from the time the 3rd Generation Partnership Project finalizes the S-Band specifications for LTE Advanced for Dish to launch its network. The 3GPP is not expected to finalize those specs until December, which means that Dish will not launch its network until at least December 2016 or later.

The FCC, which approved Dish's acquisition of S-Band satellite spectrum, has so far denied the company's request for a waiver to allow it to build a terrestrial wireless network. Instead, the agency has initiated a rule-making process that covers the topic. Initial comments on the proceeding were due May 17, replies are due June 1 and the agency would rule sometime after that.

Dish is arguing that the FCC's buildout requirements are not feasible and are not in line with similar requirements for terrestrial services. For example, Verizon Wireless ( NYSE:VZ) and AT&T Mobility ( NYSE:T) have 10 years to cover 75 percent of the population using the 700 MHz spectrum licenses they won at auction.

In its filing, Dish said it needs 48 months after the LTE Advanced specifications are finalized to obtain network infrastructure equipment, chipsets and devices. The company also will have to upgrade its customer service and billing systems to support the new services as well as develop systems to meet regulatory requirements such as E911. In addition, the company will have to construct its backhaul network, deploy cell sites, and trial its service before launching.

Earlier this month, during Dish's quarterly earnings call, Dish Chairman Charlie Ergen noted that Dish is willing to partner with other wireless companies to launch its proposed LTE Advanced network. "We're talking to everybody out there that has some piece of the wireless business that we think can help us either as a vendor or a partner or a customer, whether that be in the chipsets, the handsets, the towers and so forth and so on," he said.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: slacker711 who wrote (111935)5/18/2012 11:49:51 AM
From: waitwatchwander   of 117481
 
---> Gartner 2% decline

The Gartner post caught my attention too. It was Q1 year over year though and if anything is susceptible to random fluctuation, it would be that number. I can't remember the trend in quarterly numbers but haven't we had an annual Q1 decline like that in the past? Just given the volatility over the last decade and a bit, I'd be surprised if we haven't.

Maybe Eric can pipe in on this matter.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.