SI
SI

 Technology Stocks | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: leochardonne5/10/2012 9:38:14 AM
   of 117894
 

A4WP wireless charging: Qualcomm and Samsung team up
To promote their wireless charging systems and standardise their technology, Qualcomm and Samsung have announced the creation of the new Alliance for Wireless Power (A4WP) promotion group.

The wireless charging of mobile devices is a sector in transition for the last few years which is still yet to really make an impact, mostly due to the lack of global industry support which would allow for the direct integration of components into products.

As is often the case in new sectors, numerous technologies compete with the interoperability of competing systems not being assured, leading to market splitting and the creation of niche markets.

An initial effort to standardise wireless charging was undertaken by the WPC promotion group (Wireless Power Consortium) which pushed their induction wireless charging technology called Qi. They also developed a certification service guaranteeing the interoperability of products developed by numerous manufacturers.

But other players have also been working on their own wireless charging technologies. This is the case of Qualcomm who has been working in this field for the last few years, developing a technology which has been renamed on numerous occasions to finally become known as WiPower.

This is the technology which is being pushed by the newly formed A4WP, or Alliance for Wireless Power workgroup who is hoping to create traction in industry to allow for the massive deployment of the technology.



The A4WP has found a strong ally in South Korean group Samsung, who is one of the founding members. Among the other signatories we find Powermat, a wireless charging provider and existing Qualcomm partner who is also supporting WiPower.

The promotion group is aiming to standardize this wireless charging technology which is comprised of a transmitter and receiving antenna capable of exchanging electricity which can be used to charge multiple devices at the same time, ranging from Bluetooth earpieces to tactile tablets and smartphones.

For chipset manufacturer Qualcomm, this is an opportunity which they are hoping will develop into the large scale deployment of WiPower components into A4WP partner’s devices, with the goal being to then see this technology becoming the main technology in use over the competing WPC technology.

us.generation-nt.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (111784)5/10/2012 10:16:40 AM
From: Fiero   of 117894
 
Reading the article it seems like it might be an adhoc wifi connection to a dongle thingy connected to an HDMI port on a TV. That would use the standard wifi frequencies but since a <10 meter range could probably be assumed the adhoc wifi connection could operate at reduced power and still maintain maximum throughput and minimum latency.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: slacker7115/10/2012 10:37:01 AM
2 Recommendations   of 117894
 
I am not sure that the timing of this bodes well for Mirasol.

digitimes.com 

Amazon likely to launch color e-book readers in 2H12, say sources


Siu Han, Taipei; Steve Shen, DIGITIMES [Thursday 10 May 2012]
Amazon is likely to launch color e-book readers in the second half of 2012, with makers in the supply chain to begin shipping related parts and components in May, according to industry sources.

Amazon's new color e-book readers will be built with multi-touch capacitive touch panels instead of infrared touch panels used in the previous mono-color e-book readers, the sources noted.

E Ink Holdings also plans to unveil color EPD products soon, according to company chairman Scott Liu. The color EPD products are likely to be adopted by Amazon, indicated the sources.

Touch panel maker TPK Holding reportedly has landed touch module orders for Amazon's color e-book readers, the sources added.

Amazon is expected to ship six million e-book readers in 2012, estimated the sources.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: slacker711 who wrote (111787)5/10/2012 10:44:47 AM
From: mindy19682 Recommendations   of 117894
 
Qualcomm has surely been late to market with Mirasol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Fiero who wrote (111786)5/10/2012 10:53:06 AM
From: waitwatchwander   of 117894
 
How much would it cost to manufacture an 802.11ac chip, video decode and hdmi output logic with connector and antennae? That sounds like a $50 product at a minimum and likely double that given that the video decode logic could well be custom and 11ac chipsets are still premium product. Then there would be the cost of the phone software.

Is the 802.11ac protocol more efficient from a battery perspective or is the added umph there mostly of a performance/throughput perspective? It is likely that this application of wifi connection is only now coming within the purview of available chipset technologies.

Is it practical to consider powering the dongle with a Snapdragon chipset? That would fall into line with the Lenovo TV thrust.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: slacker711 who wrote (111787)5/10/2012 11:04:38 AM
From: waitwatchwander1 Recommendation   of 117894
 
---> Touch panel maker TPK Holding reportedly has landed touch module orders

I expect touch panels for Mirasol are being built directly into the display unit rather than being supplied as a separate module. I believe this because Mirasol units need to be totally sealed and that likely would include the conductor frame needed for implementation of capacitive touch.

Every tidbit of news coming out in this area is pointing more and more towards the Nook being the one that's getting Mirasol.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: mindy19685/10/2012 11:31:51 AM
   of 117894
 
Is qualcomm in the new nokia phone - as a processing chip as well providing the mobility? TIA

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: mindy1968 who wrote (111791)5/10/2012 11:39:11 AM
From: FUBHO   of 117894
 
Yes and yes.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Bill Wolf5/10/2012 3:12:25 PM
1 Recommendation   of 117894
 
Samsung’s Latest Tablet Takes Aim at the Kindle Fire
Published on May 10, 2012
by Bonnie Cha
On a recent vacation, my plans involved surfing and relaxing at the beach, and I brought three paperback books to keep me entertained. But after lugging them around in my heavy backpack for a week, I realized it was finally time to go digital.

An e-book or tablet is travel-friendly and capable of holding multiple books; in the case of tablets, they also allow you to surf the Web, play games, watch videos and more. There is no shortage of devices to choose from, with the likes of the Amazon Kindle Fire, the iPad and the Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet. But this week, I took a look at Samsung’s latest Android tablet, the Galaxy Tab 2 7.0.

The Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 is the third model in Samsung’s Galaxy Tab series to feature a seven-inch touchscreen, and the first to run the latest version of the Android operating system, which is called Ice Cream Sandwich. At $250, it’s also one of the more affordably priced Ice Cream Sandwich tablets on the market, and because it runs on Wi-Fi, you don’t have to sign a long-term contract with a cellular provider.

It’s a great value for all the features you get, and it even offers some extras over the $199 Kindle Fire, including two cameras, expandable storage, and a year of free online storage (up to 50 gigabytes) from DropBox. However, the Kindle Fire’s user interface is slightly more polished, and Amazon offers a more vast collection of books, video, and other multimedia, so choosing between the two may come down to whether you want to use your device more as a media-consumption device, or as an extension of your laptop.

Physically, the Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 doesn’t look all that different from previous versions. In fact, if you were to compare it to the model before it, which was the Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus, you’d be hard-pressed to find the difference between the two, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing.

The Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 is slim and fairly compact, measuring 4.8 inches wide by 7.6 inches tall and is 0.41-inch thick. I usually carry a medium-size purse or a backpack, and had no problem tucking the tablet away in either bag.

It is slightly on the hefty side at 12.1 ounces, but it’s lighter than the Kindle Fire (14.6 ounces) and has tapered edges, so it’s comfortable to hold while reading books or watching video.



On back, there’s a three-megapixel camera, and though taking photos with a tablet is a bit silly, it’s nice to know you have the option if you’re in a total pinch and need to capture something. Since there’s no flash, photos taken in low-light conditions are not of the best quality, but it did a decent job outdoors. The camera on front can be used to make video calls over Wi-Fi.

The seven-inch touchscreen has the same resolution as the Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet. There are sharper displays on the market, such as the one found on the new iPad, but I found the Galaxy Tab’s display clear and bright enough to read books, watch videos, surf the Web, and play games without major problem. The only issue is that the screen tends to wash out in bright sunlight.

The Galaxy Tab 2 7.0’s main draw is its software. In the past, the Android operating system has always been a little more difficult to navigate compared to Apple’s operating system and even the Kindle Fire’s, but Ice Cream Sandwich offers a much more user-friendly approach. For example, you can now access a Task Manager that brings up a list of running apps from any screen on the tablet, so you can easily move between tasks or exit programs.

On top of that, Samsung has added its custom user interface, called TouchWiz, which brings more enhancements. One that I liked in particular was the Mini Apps toolbar along the bottom of the screen that gives you quick access to your favorite or most frequently used apps. The Kindle Fire still offers a more polished and attractive interface, but the Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 is a nice improvement over previous models.



On a couple of occasions, the Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 tripped up when trying to launch an action or changing screen orientation, but overall, the tablet’s performance was smooth and responsive. I streamed a movie from Netflix, and the video played back without any interruption. I also viewed some graphics-heavy Web pages, such as Boston.com’s Big Picture, and the tablet’s browser was able to load the page without problem.

Samsung’s estimated battery life for the tablet is 11 hours, but I didn’t get anywhere near that in my standard tablet battery test. Playing a looped video with the screen brightness set to 75 percent with Wi-Fi turned on and e-mail running in the background, the Galaxy Tab lasted six hours and 17 minutes. This is slightly better than the Kindle Fire, which clocked out after five hours and 47 minutes in the same test, performed by my colleague. In general, the Galaxy Tab’s battery was able to last most of the day with moderate usage (checking e-mail, surfing the Web, and watching some video), and I was never in a situation where I worried about running out of power.

The one nagging issue that remains with Android is that many third-party apps were designed to work on smartphones and aren’t optimized for larger screens yet. For example, I downloaded the Marvel Comics app, and I felt some of the comics didn’t take advantage of the full display, as pages displayed on only a portion of the screen.

Samsung does preload the tablet with some extra programs, including the Peel universal remote control app, Netflix, and the Amazon Kindle app. Peel is a pretty cool app. A set-up wizard helps you connect the tablet to your TV and cable box. It initially had a problem finding my Samsung TV, but after I exited and restarted the program, it was finally able to find it. After inputting my ZIP code and selecting my cable provider, I was able to use my Galaxy Tab to change channels, view the program guide and set my DVR.



You can download more books, as well as music, videos, and games from Samsung’s various media hubs (Media, Music, Games and Readers) and the Google Play store. However, Amazon remains king when it comes to selection and on-demand content. Plus, the Kindle Fire gives Amazon Prime customers access to free books, but the same feature isn’t available on the Galaxy Tab.

If you’re an Amazon Prime customer or get a lot of your content from Amazon, the Kindle Fire is the way to go, since it’s so well-integrated with the company’s services. Given the lack of hardware and design improvements on the Galaxy Tab 2 7.0, there’s not a huge need for current Tab owners to upgrade. However, if you’re curious about Android and aren’t married to a particular ecosystem, or just desire the extra features, the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 is a great introduction at a good value.

allthingsd.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Bill Wolf5/10/2012 3:21:24 PM
1 Recommendation   of 117894
 
Mozilla, Google, Blast IE-Only ARM Tablets

Internet Explorer will be only Web browser to have access to core system functionality in Windows RT on ARM-based systems, rivals warn.

By Mathew J. Schwartz, InformationWeek
May 10, 2012


Welcome to Browser Wars 2.0: Mozilla is warning that only Internet Explorer will have access to advanced system functionality in Windows RT (formerly known as Windows on ARM), thus effectively blocking rival Web browsers such as Mozilla's Firefox or Google Chrome from using the tablet-friendly new operating system.

"Unfortunately, the upcoming release of Windows for the ARM processor architecture and Microsoft's browser practices regarding Windows 8 Metro signal an unwelcome return to the digital dark ages where users and developers didn't have browser choices," said Harvey Anderson, general counsel for Mozilla, in a blog post. AdTech Ad

Windows RT (for runtime) is a version of the new Windows 8 operating system designed for devices with an ARM chip. Windows RT will ship with a minimal set of included applications, including Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote, and then only run applications procured from Microsoft or via the Windows Store. A key feature of the operating system will be the Metro interface which is designed to be friendly with touch screens, and which borrows heavily from the Windows Phone 7 interface.

[ Microsoft continues to release tidbits of information on Windows 8. Learn more by reading Windows 8 OS: 8 New Must-Know Facts. ]

Anderson, however, is accusing Microsoft of purposefully blocking rival browsers from the "Windows Classic" environment, which allows applications built to run in non-ARM environments to work on Windows RT, even though they're not compatible with the Metro touch-screen interface.

"By allowing only IE to perform the advanced functions of a modern Web browser, third-party browsers are effectively excluded from the platform. This matters for users of today's tablets and tomorrow's PCs. While ARM chipsets may be primarily built into phones and tablets today, in the future ARM will be significant on the PC hardware platform as well," said Anderson.

Anderson suggested that preventing rival browsers from accessing the functionality might "have antitrust implications" for Microsoft, based on its 2002 settlement with the Justice Department, which required that it ensure its products would interoperate with products from rivals.

He also suggested the move would harm innovation. "These environments currently have intense browser competition that benefits both users and developers," he said. "When you expand the view of the PC to cover a much wider range of form factors and designs as Microsoft and others forecast, it's easy to imagine Windows running on ARM in laptops, tablets, phones, and a whole range of devices. That means users will only have one browser choice whenever there's a Windows ARM environment."

Microsoft is definitely eying new form factors with Windows RT. Microsoft's Steven Sinofsky said in a February 2012 blog post that the operating system was being designed to create "super thin and light PCs, with great battery life, and high-quality engineering providing a great experience with apps and services that are Designed for Windows 8."

To do that, Sinofsky also said that many components of the operating system had been redesigned from the ground up, and suggested that Windows RT--which won't include an emulator for running 32-bit Windows 7 software--wouldn't be suitable for everyone. "If you need to run existing x86/64 software, then you will be best served with Windows 8 on x86/64. If you're already considering a non-Windows device, then we think [Windows on ARM] will be an even better alternative when you consider the potential of form factors, peripherals, Windows Store apps (and developer platform), and Office applications as well as a broad set of intrinsic Windows capabilities," he said.

In other words, Microsoft seems to be taking a play from the Apple playbook by creating a relatively locked-down operating system environment, tweaked to make the most of a particular chipset, and optimized for high levels of performance and battery life, despite the potentially small form factors. Apple requires anyone who wants to build an iOS browser to use its underlying WebKit libraries.

But Anderson said this move potentially blocked other browser makers from being able to offer a cutting-edge user experience on future versions of Windows. "Windows on ARM prohibits any browser except for Internet Explorer from running in the privileged 'Windows Classic' environment. In practice, this means that only Internet Explorer will be able to perform many of the advanced computing functions vital to modern browsers in terms of speed, stability, and security to which users have grown accustomed," he said. "Given that IE can run in Windows on ARM, there is no technical reason to conclude other browsers can't do the same."

Google is backing Mozilla's concerns. "We've always welcomed innovation in the browser space across all platforms and strongly believe that having great competitors makes us all work harder. In the end, consumers and developers benefit the most from robust competition," said a Google spokeswoman via email.

A Microsoft spokeswoman said the company currently had no comment on the matter.


informationweek.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.