SI
SI

 Technology Stocks | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: waitwatchwander who wrote (111258)4/19/2012 1:56:57 PM
From: Jim Mullens   of 117858
 
Trevor, re: Fusion / integrated WiFi, etc...............................................................................

thought S4 Snapdragon chipsets integrated wifi, bt and gps with 3G and 4G modems. I guess I need to go back and brush up on the roadmap.

I suspect you (and Mollenkopf) meant fusing to be the use of an S3 Snapdragon with an Atheros combo offering

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Yes the S4 chips are "integrated " with WiFi, BT, etc, but with the digital portion only per my understanding. Teaming the S4 with the prior mentioned Atheros WCN provides the radio / RF stuff also per my understanding.

Perhaps a techie could comment??

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ggamer who wrote (111257)4/19/2012 2:01:23 PM
From: Jim Mullens4 Recommendations   of 117858
 
ggamer, .Re: ... INTC comments re QCOM??......................................

Fromthe kind of taste that it would leave in my mouth, the Apple win would be a lot more attractive than the Qualcommwin.

You don't feel that comment strange??????????

I thought you moved on????????????????????

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: Bill Wolf4/19/2012 2:37:22 PM
   of 117858
 
Apple: October iPhone Intro Likely Given QCOM 28-Nano Issues, Says Piper
By Tiernan Ray

Piper Jaffray’s Gene Munster this afternoon reiterates an Overweight rating on shares of Apple (AAPL), while writing that the company’s “iPhone 5,” as yet unannounced, may be introduced in October, like the iPhone 4S last year, based on his “checks,” and based on remarks by Qualcomm (QCOM) in its fiscal Q2 report last night.

Qualcomm had said that it would ship fewer modem chips this quarter than last because of supply issues in getting enough chips tabbed with its foundry partners in smaller feature sizes of 28 nanometers.

One analyst, Citigroup’s chip analyst Glen Yeung, this morning opined that the actual reason for the slip was because of the wait for Apple’s new iPhone.

Munster takes the opposite approach, assuming the constrained 28-nanometer capacity for Qualcomm is forcing Apple to push back its introduction of the phone:

Based on our checks, we believe the design win momentum of QCOM’s 28nm products has been exceptionally strong and a 28nm LTE baseband is likely designed into the next iPhone. QCOM’s supply issue likely pushes the launch of the iPhone to October. Based on the increased capital spending this year from TSMC and QCOM’s efforts over the last quarter to port its 28nm designs to UMC and probably Global Foundries, we think QCOM will have the capacity to support a Q4 LTE iPhone 5 launch. Moreover, the slow wireless infrastructure spending in 1H:12 is also likely a result of the lack of availability of a low power 28nm LTE baseband modem.

Munster implies the timing is somewhat later than some may have expected, as they may have been still thinking there would be an iPhone refresh this summer.

But Munster thinks the timing is actually “irrelevant,” because the iPhone 5 is likely to be “revolutionary” in its industrial design and will be a “compelling update,” he thinks, likely making consensus estimates for an 8% year-over-year increase in iPhone sales in the December quarter too low, in his opinion.

Apple shares today are down $17.75, or almost 3%, at $590.59.

Copyright 2011 Dow Jones & Company,

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: mindy1968 who wrote (111261)4/19/2012 2:47:46 PM
From: JeffreyHF   of 117858
 
Intel would like to fab Apple's CPU/GPU chips, but they don't have a suitable Infineon chip with all necessary radio technologies. That's the niche Qualcomm fills for Apple.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: Bill Wolf4/19/2012 2:56:57 PM
   of 117858
 
Apple: Qualcomm Sees Supply Constraints; Canaccord Cuts Near-Term iPhone Ests

Several factors appear to be weighing on Apple shares Thursday morning.

For starters, Qualcomm after the close yesterday warned that June quarter financial results would be shy of Street expectations largely due to supply constraints.

Bill Davidson, Qualcomm senior VP of global marketing and investor relations, noted in an interview yesterday afternoon that the company has continued to see demand outstripping supply, and that the company intends to boost operating expense to add supply of 28 nm components. He noted that there are no issues with end demand, pointing out that the company raised its unit forecast for the year by 5 million.

“There’s nothing structurally unsound” about the market, he said. But he added that the company’s guidance is “based on what we can ship, not what we wish we can ship.”

That has some investors nervous that Apple could face its own supply constraints due to the issues at Qualcomm, which provides baseband radio chips for the iPhone.

Jefferies analyst Peter Misek asserted in a note last night that concerns of a gap in iPhone sales before the arrival of iPhone are overblown. Misek writes that he finds “comfort” in Qualcomm’s full year unit guidance with capacity expected to improve later in the year.

Meanwhile, Canaccord Genuity analyst T. Michael Walkley this morning repeated his Buy rating on Apple shares and upped his target price on the stock to $740, from $710. But he also cut his forecast for iPhone sales for the June and September quarters. While he maintains his forecast of 32.6 million iPhones for the March quarter – which Apple will report after the close next Tuesday – he chopped his June forecast to 29.34 million units from 33.6 million, and likewise chopped September to 26.11 million from the same level, 33.6 million. He inched up his December quarter forecast to 49.61 million units from 48.7 million.

“Based on strong global iPhone sales and the successful launch of the new iPad, we believe Apple will post strong FY Q2 results,” he writes in a research note. “However, our recent channel checks indicate modestly slowing iPhone 4S sell-through trends in developed markets. We have lowered near-term iPhone unit estimates, but we have increased our FY 2013 iPhone estimates as we anticipate very strong demand for an LTE iPhone 5 ramping during the December quarter.”

Walkley trimmed his FY 2012 EPS forecast to $43.13 a share from $44.58, while lifting 2013 to $52.79, from $50.68.

Apple shares have been volatile in recent sessions, and the trend continues today: the stock is off $9.45, or 1.6%, to $598.89.


forbes.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: JeffreyHF who wrote (111265)4/19/2012 2:58:47 PM
From: mindy1968   of 117858
 
thanks Jeffrey

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: ggamer who wrote (111257)4/19/2012 3:11:05 PM
From: The_Net1 Recommendation   of 117858
 
Apple shares fall more than 3% on Qualcomm comment
April 19, 2012, 2:42 p.m. EDT

By Wallace Witkowski

Apple Inc. AAPL -3.13% shares fell more than 3% Thursday after one of its major suppliers said capacity issues will weigh on its outlook for the year. Shares of Apple, the heaviest weighted stock on the Nasdaq Composite Index COMP -0.91% , fell 3.5% to $586.75 in recent activity. The drop comes after Qualcomm Inc. QCOM -6.70% , which makes key chips for Apple's iPhones, reported it is working to boost a shortage in manufacturing capacity.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (111262)4/19/2012 3:28:36 PM
From: waitwatchwander1 Recommendation   of 117858
 
My understanding was that it was all available within one physical chip. Radios are an analog implementation and there integration into a single chip is likely a matter of packaging. Having simultaneous radio operation (3G or 4G + wifi or BT) within the same package might be an issue. Do today's combo chips (wifi, BT and GPS) transmit and/or receive simultaneously or is their operation time sliced? BT and wifi both operate at 2.4GHz so they may well be time sliced. GPS runs around 1.5GHz and that one is receive onl;y which might be less of an interference issue. Then there is the numerous stream processors and various caches feeding bits all over the place. Issues here would also affect nVidia's Tegra implementations.

When it comes to yield with an integrated chipset design, it's hard to say what the issues are?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: hedgefund4/19/2012 3:31:29 PM
8 Recommendations   of 117858
 
This long term shareholder, absent a more compelling explanation, believes management handled this supply constraint issue poorly, Surely there was a more intelligent way to manage expectations than to be compelled to divulge the implications during a quarterly conference call. When did management learn the implications of this shortage, yesterday when it was preparing its remarks? HF

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (111269)4/19/2012 3:32:47 PM
From: slacker7111 Recommendation   of 117858
 
My understanding was that it was all available within one physical chip. Radios are an analog implementation and there integration into a single chip is likely a matter of packaging.

I dont know the issues, but I am fairly positive that a separate radio chip is required for WiFi/BT/GPS. Q's idea of integration is pretty loose here.

Slacker

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.