Technology Stocks | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Jim Mullens who wrote (110970)4/12/2012 11:53:11 AM
From: garrettjax   of 117526
 
That pretty much meets the original target, doesn't it? B^)



-G

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: engineer who wrote (110963)4/12/2012 12:08:43 PM
From: The_Net3 Recommendations   of 117526
 
“fact...then either microsoft or nokia did NOT put in the ability to do over the air updates of hte firmware. the software glitch is so bad that the phone cannot remain stable during over hte air updates.”

engineer, I don’t know where to start wrt your statement.

Let me give you a real life example first then I will write my way into the conversation. One day, an engineer walked into my office and said, “We have this state-of-the-art technology that will solve your problem if you could give me 15 minutes of your time”. Sure, I replied. I had patiently and attentively listened thru his talk. At the 15” mark, I asked, “do you know what my problem is?” He paused for a moment and said, “Honestly, I have no idea.”

Here’s what we/media know of the problem (btw, you were off in your assessment of the problem)

Software glitch: assessment done by Nokia.

Effects/End results of problem: Phones were either lost connections or no connection established; reported by consumers and Nokia.

Solutions:

Nokia: in store phone exchange or software fix thru Zune (approach).

Your: OTA approach.

You might have the right approach but for a wrong problem, just as the engineer in my example. Your approach won’t fix the problem in most cases; even worse, it might introduce a new problem in some cases. You just don’t use an OTA approach to fix “OTA” connectivity problems. It’s a very easy call. Your approach has defied both common and technical senses.

Case 1: No connectivity. You cannot push OTA if the phones didn’t connected.

Case 2: Connection established but dropping out during the software push. The OTA approach won’t even fix the problem but it might introduce a new problem due to “your unfinished business”; it’s not a reliable approach to solve this particular problem. It reminds me of the chaos theory. LOL.

Side note: updating the phone softwares thru itunes is the Apple favorite play.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: garrettjax who wrote (110973)4/12/2012 12:20:21 PM
From: somerlondon   of 117526
 
Except 12 years on, $1 doesn't equal $1...

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: slacker711 who wrote (110967)4/12/2012 1:28:43 PM
From: BDAZZ   of 117526
 
There's no way of us knowing exactly what it is. I would certainly have Qcom in this solution. The real shame is that this is such a great looking phone.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (110950)4/12/2012 1:31:33 PM
From: BDAZZ   of 117526
 
>>a good entry point?<<

Today is.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: zax who wrote (110968)4/12/2012 1:37:17 PM
From: BDAZZ   of 117526
 
>>The irony of the marketing campaign, "The smart phone beta test is over", is lost on few.<<



Thanks Zax, I did miss that and I needed that laugh.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: manning18 who wrote (110972)4/12/2012 1:42:11 PM
From: BDAZZ1 Recommendation   of 117526
 
>>
Waiting for someone to upgrade Q to with an "$100.00" evaluation....wonder when that might be?<<

Walter P has a $125 target, doesnt he?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: Bill Wolf4/12/2012 1:46:51 PM
   of 117526
 
Apple: Credit Suisse Ups Target to $750 on Smartphone Share
By Tiernan Ray

Credit Suisse’s Kulbinder Garcha this morning reiterates an Outperform rating on shares of Apple (AAPL), while raising his price target to $750 from $700, after raising his estimates for the global smartphone market and concluding that Apple’s iPhone is poised to gain share, and that Apple is prepared to “excel” in the “compute market” across its various devices.

Garcha sees Apple’s smartphone unit share rising from 18.9% globally last year to 23.2% this year and 23.3% share next year.

That would mean an increase from 89.3 million iPhones in 2011 to 159.7 million sold this year to 205.9 million next year.

Garcha’s note on Apple is accompanied by a separate, massive, 86-page note covering every conceivable aspect of the smartphone industry.

As he details in that note, he raised his 2012 and 2013 smartphone shipment estimates by 9% and 15%, respectively, he writes, to 688 million and 885 million, as the devices become more broadly affordable and more essential to everyday life.

Garcha’s estimates for global smartphone growth see an increase of 37% between now and the end of 2013, and a 26% increase in shipments, per annum, compounded annually, between now and 2015.

That would mean an increase from last year’s shipments of 471.7 million to 1.176 billion units by 2015, he writes. All together, that would represent a market of $272.28 billion come 2015, up from $156 billion last year.

Garcha bases that on the fact that there were 762 million smartphone subscribers at the end of 2011, and that “we believe that effective penetration for smartphones could rise from 33% in 2011 to slightly over 100% by 2015.

Apple has the advantage of offering wares across different computing devices, writes Garcha:

For now at least we believe that Apple is materially advantaged, principally because the company’s vertically integrated structure allows it to simultaneously address all three markets ie PCs, tablets and smartphones effectively. Moreover, much of the innovation comes in software. Add to this the broad range of “i-Services” that are built well beyond iTunes; to include an apps store, iAd service, iBooks and now iCloud; the company allows consumers to seamlessly access content across multiple devices. The issue is that when considered in the context of the entire compute market in volume terms Apple have a ~17% share, this will rise given their exposure to the relatively faster growth smartphone and tablet end markets to 27% longer term.

A good chunk of that growth will come from emerging markets, writes Garcha, and not just China:

The next 50 carriers in EMs [emerging markets] could add over 50 million units per year. Having analyzed the telecom market by carrier, we create a list of top 50 carriers in EMs (in terms of mobile subscriptions) where Apple still does not have any carrier relationship for selling the iPhone. Put together, these top 50 carriers account for 1.84bn mobile subscriptions, as we show in Figure 81. We expect this number to grow to close to 2bn by next year. As a reminder, 2bn subscriptions will account for 32% of the global subscriber base in 2012. This shows that Apple can significantly expand its opportunity in EMs by simply addressing these carriers.

From a financial perspective, Garcha is estimating Apple will generate $170 billion in revenue this fiscal year ending in September, and $46.43 in EPS.

Apple shares today are up $2.82, or half a percent, at $628.99.

Copyright 2011 Dow Jones & Company,

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: The_Net who wrote (110974)4/12/2012 1:53:06 PM
From: BDAZZ   of 117526
 
Net, aside from Nokia prs, is there confirmation that they have a fix that can now be downloaded?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Bill Wolf4/12/2012 1:56:39 PM
   of 117526
 
U.S., China Tout Progress in Intellectual-Property Protection
By LORETTA CHAO

BEIJING—U.S. and Chinese officials touted recent progress in intellectual-property protection in China and called for continued efforts, even as U.S. and Chinese companies engage in high-profile battles over famous names such as iPad and Michael Jordan.

U.S. officials continued to complain that high piracy rates in China are cutting into profits for rights owners, despite recent efforts by the Chinese government to crack down on Internet and software piracy. On Thursday the U.S. called for greater cooperation by China with intellectual-property agencies in other countries as well as more consistent enforcement.

"China's IP system still makes it difficult for both foreign and Chinese companies to compete on a level playing field," U.S. ambassador to China Gary Locke said at a roundtable in Beijing about intellectual-property protection in China.

Chinese officials at the event, part of which was open to reporters, asked critics to be "objective" and to recognize the differences between the U.S. and China. "Equality and respect…are the basis for cooperation," said Chong Quan, assistant minister at China's Commerce Ministry. "China and the U.S. have different cultural and historical traditions. We are in different stages of economic development."

Still, officials and executives from both countries listed recent achievements in the government and private sectors. As one example, they cited an agreement last year by Chinese Internet-search company Baidu Inc. to pay three major record labels for the rights to offer free, licensed downloading and streaming of their tracks. The companies had complained that Baidu was a significant source of pirated music.

Mr. Locke, who visited Baidu two weeks ago, cited it as an example of a Chinese company that "sees the link between intellectual property and jobs."

The roundtable came as companies and legal experts inside and outside China have said that IP protection is getting a new focus as China develops its own intellectual property. Chinese government statistics show that about 50,000 IP cases were litigated in 2010, most of which were disputes between Chinese companies.

"Ten to 15 years ago, most people saw intellectual-property protection as something only U.S. and foreign companies cared about," Mr. Locke said.

But U.S. and Chinese companies increasingly are at loggerheads as foreign companies look to to tap China's developing consumer market. Apple Inc. is battling in a Chinese court over the Chinese rights to the iPad trademark. Former basketball star Mr. Jordan in February sued Chinese sportswear chain Qiaodan Sports Co., saying the company improperly used the Chinese version of his name to sell its products.

Teresa Stanek Rea, deputy director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, said China can make a number of improvements in its system, such as examining patent and trademark filings more closely.

Representatives from Baidu, Microsoft Corp., Qualcomm Inc., the Motion Picture Association and Chinese Internet company Sohu.com Inc. also attended the roundtable.

Mike Ellis, president and managing director, Asia-Pacific for the Motion Picture Association, said pirated DVDs and downloads also hurt the Chinese film industry. U.S. films get about 70% of their sales outside theaters, such as through DVD sales. But pirated copies, at least in part, mean Chinese films get only about 10% and have to rely more heavily on box-office sales. "China and the U.S. are two nations that have a growing and shared stake in a healthy, legitimate market," he said.

Copyright 2012 Dow Jones & Company,

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.