Technology Stocks | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (109536)2/14/2012 11:43:25 AM
From: Jim Mullens   of 117493
 
Art / ggamer / Badger, re: Samsung / Apple / QCOM licenses………………


Art- Didn't we learn from discovery in one of the Apple-Samsung disputes that Apple does actually have a license from Qualcomm?
_________________________________________________________________________

A word search on this board would have found….” Apple indeed has a QCOM license / contract..” as derived from a Foss article stating ….” Samsung allowed to show Apple-Qualcomm contracts,…”

readmsg.aspx?msgid=27911968

However, in parsing legalese…………we’ve noticed “license” is not mentioned is several later documents, rather “customer” as the chosen word. Does Qualcomm “customer” / “contract” infer .. a license - ???????????

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

gg- Shouldn't this be public knowledge? (Apple license/ contract/ agreement)

Why QCOM did not come out and inform share holders that they came to an agreement with Apple?

__________________________________________________________________________________


As most of us have learned over the years, Apple’s “rules of the road” requires the highest levels of secrecy…NDA!!

Are you suggesting that QCOM turn down Apple business so as we as investors would have privilege to that knowledge???

Have you noticed that over the years QCOM has won numerous awards for being one of the most “investor friendly” companies? Have you compared what QCOM shares with us (frequency / level of detail / archived downloadable docs, etc) versus that of other companies?

How about Apple? Are you satisfied with what it provides its investors and ease of access??? For the fun of it I just tried to take a peek, finally found their investor link and got this from both Firefox and AOL / Internet Explorer.

investor.apple.com 

Server not found

Firefox can't find the server at investor.apple.com.

Add- I see the link now works???

Not much there tho.... archived- investor presentations / webcasts ?? , earnings webcasts???

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Badger- I still don't see APPLE on the list of QTL licensees..maybe there was no "agreement" to report
____________________________________________________________________________


Correct, I understand that **not** all licensees are on the list, namely those stipulating NDA.


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (109556)2/14/2012 12:08:58 PM
From: waitwatchwander   of 117493
 
There has to be a fine line between anyone's NDA and fair shareholder disclosure. Telling shareholders you have risk due to a large portion of your sales being made to a single customer is required. Trading shares knowing the details behind an NDA can also be construed as a form of "long term" insider trading (via 105-B's or whatever). When does an NDA overrule those commitments? It all looks like nothing but a huge moldable pile in my mind but that's kind of irrelevant to those who could actually do something about this clearly foggy matter.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: waitwatchwander2/14/2012 1:10:42 PM
   of 117493
 
DoT rejects Qualcomm offer to secure Tulip's dues

NEW DELHI: The Department of Telecom (DoT) has rejected Qualcomm's offer to secure the dues of its partner Tulip Telecom to hasten the process of issuing licence and spectrum for BWA services to the US-based chip-maker.

In its reply, the DoT has informed the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) that Qualcomm cannot secure the dues of its partner by way of bank guarantee. The DoT further contended that it was a matter of revenue and it can not be secured by bank guarantee. During the proceedings of the tribunal, counsel appearing for Qualcomm sought time to take instruction from the client on the matter. Following that TDSAT adjourned the matter to next Tuesday for hearing. DoT's reply has come over TDSAT's direction file reply over Qualcomm's undertaking and plea.

Tulip is a 13 per cent shareholder in the consortium which had bid for Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) spectrum along with Qualcomm. As per the rules, operators have to get a no-dues certificate from DoT for obtaining the licences. In December, DoT had issued a show-cause notice to Tulip claiming a due of Rs 146 crore for 2009-10 and 2010-11.

Earlier, Qualcomm had offered before TDSAT that it would file an undertaking along with an affidavit to clear the dues of its Indian partner. Qualcomm had challenged the DoT notice for cancelling the allotment of BWA spectrum in four circles that it bagged last year through auction. Qualcomm's application for licence was rejected by DoT on the basis that it had made four nominees for the spectrum. The company was fearing that its licence may be revoked and spectrum may be allotted to someone else.

On December 2, Qualcomm had sought time to verify the authenticity of the dues claimed by DoT and said if that was correct, then would pay it. DoT had also informed the TDSAT that if the dues were verified and cleared by them, then the ISP licence would be given to Qualcomm within a day. DoT had further submitted that after the grant of ISP licence, Qualcomm would have to apply for spectrum and it would be given in two weeks.

Qualcomm had bagged BWA spectrum for Delhi, Mumbai, Haryana and Kerala circles and LoIs were allotted to it.

economictimes.indiatimes.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: Jim Mullens2/14/2012 1:12:45 PM
1 Recommendation   of 117493
 
Dr. Paul Jacobs- 2/14/12//@ 1:15PM PT- Goldman Sachs Technology and Internet Conference 2012 Goldman Sachs Technology and Internet Conference 2012 Feb 14, 2012 1:15 PM PT

Location: Palace Hotel - San Francisco, CA Speaker: Paul Jacobs, Chairman and CEO (Keynote Presentation)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (109551)2/14/2012 1:12:49 PM
From: engineer   of 117493
 
that sounds like there is a fixed buffer that fills up and once that is done, the video and hte wirelss channel have to compete for resources and the system can't handle both.....

If there is a way to adjust the up front buffer, then this would change the time point.

I suspect that the GPU, the Video decoder, and hte wireless radio are all in play at once and loading hte processor inisde to much...

If it plays ok for 1 min, then the MIrsol display would play ok for a year.....it is the data feeding it that is not good.

I would wonder if you have a fixed canned video that is inside it and you buffer it up alot as to what would happen...

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: engineer who wrote (109560)2/14/2012 1:28:12 PM
From: waitwatchwander   of 117493
 
---> I would wonder if you have a fixed canned video that is inside it and you buffer it up a lot as to what would happen...

I would of thought this would have been any easy fix with the assignment of more resources too but the product did get released this way. The above is likely what is happening with the canned videos Qualcomm is using for their demos. Then again, the canned Mirasol demo that is shown here runs for just under 2 minutes and then repeats.

I've yet to play with EBS videos (due to needing to understand Korean in order to get signed up) but I'd be surprised if those videos stuttered. I guess I now have a higher need to visit with my Korean friend.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (109558)2/14/2012 1:36:25 PM
From: waitwatchwander   of 117493
 
Sanjay Jain resigns as Tulip CEO
TT Correspondent | 10 Feb 2012

Tulip Telecom’s Chief Executive Officer Sanjay Jain has quit the company on Thursday. He has cited personal reasons for his resignation. "I am taking break from IT segment and hope to start my new assignment soon in a month or so," he said. "Sanjay Jain, CEO of the company has resigned from the services of the company due to his personal reason," Tulip Telecom told the BSE.

Jain who had earlier worked for Eicher Group, Avantha Group and Essel Group joined Tulip in 2010 for augmentation, operations and service excellence for the company.

telecomtiger.com 
...

I wonder if this is an important development!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (109558)2/14/2012 2:03:02 PM
From: LEIGH7   of 117493
 
Can someone explain this convoluted article, or just give me the bottom line.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (109556)2/14/2012 2:09:00 PM
From: LEIGH7   of 117493
 
Jim can you access Qcom''s conference calls and analysts events with Apple computers?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (109553)2/14/2012 2:24:15 PM
From: Maurice Winn9 Recommendations   of 117493
 
User pays is a great way to treat customers. In the democratic political world, the hippie commune approach to life is the norm [which ends like Greece when opm runs out, with producers paying for bludgers and free-loaders hanging on wherever they can get a grip]. A fixed $30 a month charge is not recognizing individuals and their individual requirements and charging them accordingly. It's a one-size-fits-all, arpu-style, Kremlinized way of thinking.

So let's build a network and when a customer shows up, let's figure out how much to charge them. Hey, here comes one now [a customer]. "Hi, I saw you just built a great-looking network. Can I use it please?"

"Sure, we want swarms of customers, quickly, because we built a pretty big network which cost umpty$billion and it's depreciating quickly towards obsolescence."

"I've got an iPad, iPhone, a voice-only DeVice, a car-phone, a netbook, a Kindle and one of those new mirasol things. Can your network work with all those and deliver fast data so I can watch videos, send email with big attachments and has it got really low latency so I can conduct voice conversations and video without that really annoying lag that some networks cause?"

"Yes, our network can, but you'll need to open an account for each DeVice and that's $50 a throw. Then you'll need to pay $30 a month but it's eat-all-you-like data unless it strangles after 2GB. So that'll be 7 x $50 + 7 x $30 a month = $560 [plus taxes] to start and you'll need to pay $210 each time the moon goes around whether you use any data or not on each DeVice. "

"Are you totally out of your mind? What does the moon have to do with it? And mostly I just use my iPhone, just connecting with those other DeVices now and then. I don't want to pay $30 a month to read a couple of magazines on my mirasol at the beach."

"Well, we have to amortize our network and we haven't got a lot of customers as you can see. You are the first. So we have heavy amortization costs. And we have to manage your account every month too. Plus we have got big salaries, flash offices, and you can go in a draw to win some discounted megabytes and play some on-line games our MBA marketing gurus said you'd love to do to earn more air-miles which are easily understood after a couple of days of reading."

"Look, I just want to buy data when I want it, where I want it, and I just want one account which I will even prepay so you don't have any credit risk. So why don't I give you $20, and you provide me with 2GB which I can use on any of my DeVices any time? When I am running low on my allocation, I'll put more money in and you can allocate me another 2GB. And I don't want any lucky draw rubbish, or air-miles. If I wanted air-miles, I'd go to a travel agent. I just want my DeVices to get data."

"Well, who is going to pay our air-miles team and the lucky draw marketing plan development and the MBA marketing courses? And how are we going to amortize those $billions?"

"Why don't you put a sign on your website saying "Really cheap unstrangled data. Only 1c per MB. No marketing muck to wade through. No horrible pricing "plans" to figure out. Click here to buy credit." Then you'll get millions of people buying credit and using your network. You can just sit on the beach with a mirasol screen and download the money. The computers will do the rest. They don't go on strike or cause sexual harassment legal problems. There's no gender discrimination or EEO stuff to comply with. Your marketing teams can get real jobs more attuned to their talents."

"Groan. You don't understand. We are not allowed to commoditize our product. Price destruction is bad. We need arpu and lots of it. Fortunately, there isn't much competition and they went to the same marketing schools, so you are stuck."

"Okay, it seems that I'll have to just stick with wifi and you can get on with your marketing blather and amortization. Hey look, here comes another customer with a bag full of electronics. Good luck with them. Bye."


There isn't a cost in "managing the account" in electronic DeVice comunication. It's all done by computers which can handle umpty megabits per second of connection and monitoring data. The computers get a connection, check that the person has credit in their account, then turn them loose on the data, counting packets until the credit is used up. The person then has to buy more credit. They don't go to a shop and take up space and talk to a person, thereby costing money, meaning there would have to be a charge. They just buy more credit on-line, with computers handling the transactions.

Mqurice

PS. Thanks for the reports about actually using mirasol.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.