Technology Stocks | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: robcomptec who wrote (104242)8/1/2011 12:11:07 AM
From: Maurice Winn3 Recommendations   of 117522
 
Perhaps 'more widely supported" means "more snouts in the trough". <LTE has better economies of scale because of higher amounts of competition in this more widely supported standard. > If there are more companies planning on profiting from LTE patents than from WiMAX patents, perhaps that means the LTE royalties are so high that the claimed economies of scale will be overwhelmed by excessive royalties.

We have seen a LOT of royalties being lumped onto this that and the other with various companies finding a patent which entitles them to feast like a hagfish, with bids for patents now in the $billions.

With Qualcomm's self-contained CDMA, royalties were at most 5.5% and mostly about 4%. With LTE, the royaltiy rate is over 12% and climbing. W-CDMA was also high but the GSM Cartel rammed their extorquerationate ring-fenced price gouge onto everyone anyway.

If WiMAX doesn't make it, perhaps wifi will continue to grow like crazy as more people find 3G and LTE are too expensive, too slow, with poor coverage, and choked or "throttled".

Mqurice

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Jim Mullens who wrote (104268)8/1/2011 12:40:51 AM
From: Maurice Winn4 Recommendations   of 117522
 
Jim, no politics please in the wireless world. <Should be interesting with the **Big** Bucks from / to **High** Places involved > That LightSquared link is straight into anti-Obama territory.. Wait a minute, wasn't it you the other day found Art had made some obscure political reference?

GPS works fine if done right. It looks as though LightSquared will work fine too. If people have some GPS devices which are not properly designed, the devices might be dazzled by Lightsquared transmissions. But perhaps the feared interference is like the silly worries about cellphone use crashing airliners.

Al Qaeda is probably secretly turning on their phones during flight, expecting to bring down airliners by the dozen and wondering why nothing happens.

If people have GPS devices which are poorly designed and experience interference, they could put them in an aluminium bowl to screen terrestrial signals so that only signals from the sky would get in. Their aluminium or lead-lined hats could be dual-mode - wear them to keep out cosmic rays, cellphone signals, and to stop the NSA mind-reading or sending in secret signals, then, to make a GPS fix, take off the hat for a few seconds, put the GPS device in it and point it to the sky.

Mqurice

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Bill Wolf8/1/2011 8:47:57 AM
1 Recommendation   of 117522
 
Apple Suit Puts Samsung Tablet Sales in Australia on Hold
By Joe Schneider and Robert Fenner - Aug 1, 2011

Apple Inc. escalated a patent dispute against Samsung Electronics Co. and won an agreement that the South Korean company won’t sell the newest version of its tablet computer in Australia until a lawsuit is resolved.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 infringes 10 Apple patents, including the “look and feel,” and touchscreen technology of the iPad, Steven Burley, a lawyer for Apple, told Federal Court Justice Annabelle Bennett in Sydney today. The Cupertino, California-based company sought an Australian injunction and also wants to stop Samsung from selling the tablet in other countries, Burley said without specifying where.

Samsung, based in Suwon, South Korea, agreed to stop advertising the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia and not to sell the device until it wins court approval or the lawsuit is resolved, according to an accord reached by lawyers during a break in the hearing. Should Apple lose its patent infringement lawsuit, it agreed to pay Samsung damages, which weren’t specified.

The dispute between the companies began in April when Apple sued Samsung in the U.S., claiming the Galaxy products “slavishly” imitated the designs and technologies used for its iPad and iPhone. Samsung, which supplies memory chips for Apple, retaliated with lawsuits in South Korea, Japan, Germany and the U.S.
Australian Injunction

The Australian injunction is necessary because Samsung has had “announcements of an imminent launch of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 device ongoing since July 20,” Burley said before the agreement was announced.

Apple is basing today’s claim on a U.S. version of the Galaxy tablet, which is different from the one that will be sold in Australia, Samsung’s lawyer Neil Murray said.

Samsung agreed to provide Apple three samples of the Australian version of the computer tablet at least seven days before it planned to start distributing it so the U.S. company could review it, according to the agreement submitted in court.

Bennett scheduled a hearing for Aug. 29 to review the status of the case and set a trial date if necessary.

The case is: Apple Inc. (AAPL) v. Samsung Electronics Co. NSD1243/2011. Federal Court of Australia (Sydney).

To contact the reporters on this story: Joe Schneider in Sydney at jschneider5@bloomberg.net; Robert Fenner in Melbourne at rfenner@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Douglas Wong at dwong19@bloomberg.net; Young-Sam Cho at ycho2@bloomberg.net
®2011 BLOOMBERG L.P. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Bill Wolf8/1/2011 9:03:03 AM
   of 117522
 
Verizon Wireless and American Express Find an Intermediary Path to Mobile Payments
Published on August 1, 2011
by Tricia Duryee

Verizon Wireless is announcing a partnership with American Express this morning that will enable its 100-million-plus mobile subscribers to pay for digital or physical goods online using their phone number.

To do so, the subscriber will enter their phone number and a pin code at checkout, rather than entering a 16-digit credit card number. It will work for shopping on any Internet-connected device, including a PC, phone or tablet.

Subscribers will also have to sign up for a Serve account through American Express, which is very similar to a PayPal account and can be funded by a bank account or a credit card.

While the system is designed to make checking out more simple, it could take awhile for consumers and merchants to adopt it. Not only will Verizon subscribers be required to have a Serve account, but online retailers will also have had to integrate Serve as a payment mechanism.

“Yes, they have to be Verizon and a Serve customer, but we are preloading a number of devices — smartphones or tablets — with the Serve app, and when you preload there’s a much greater uptake,” said Dan Schulman, group president, Enterprise Growth, American Express. “They’ll be able to simply or easily transact for any size good, whether it’s a virtual good or hard good.”

Schulman declined to say how many customers have signed up for Serve since it launched in April, but said that the deal with Verizon Wireless is not an exclusive, meaning it could partner with other carriers in the future.

Despite these hurdles, this may be a logical intermediary before we see people using their phones to pay for items in the store using near-field communication. A number of companies are scrambling to become a player in the digital wallet space, including Google, PayPal, Square and the credit card and payment providers, so this will easily be one of many options consumers will be able to choose from.

Verizon Wireless has also formed a joint venture called ISIS with AT&T and T-Mobile USA that will launch a near-field communication trial next year.

A number of companies have also pursued carrier billing as an option, but convincing carriers to allow large payments on the bill for physical goods has proven difficult. Companies that fall into this bucket include BOKU, BilltoMobile and Zong, which was just acquired by PayPal.

Up until now, most items charged to a carrier bill are ringtones, or virtual goods that are purchased inside online games.

Greg Haller, Verizon’s president of enterprise and government, said its partnership with American Express is not designed to compete with carrier billing or its ISIS joint venture. “We’ll still allow virtual goods to go on the bill, but the real opportunity now going forward is that a customer won’t have to go in a shopping cart and enter a 16-digit number. This really turns it into a one-click process. The benefit is the simplicity for the customer, who can now buy it on their phone, by entering their mobile number.”

Over time, additional services will be added, such as coupons and loyalty programs. One partner is vente-privee.com, a French-owned flash sales site, which partnered with American Express to enter the U.S.

“We are pleased and we are deploying with more and more functionality all the time,” Schulman said. “We’ve announced a number of partnerships, all of which are being integrated, this being the largest and most strategic that we have. We’ll start to integrate and be in market [with Verizon Wireless] by the end of the year, and we have high hopes for it spurring mobile commerce.”

American Express and Verizon Wireless are also working with Payfone, a New York-based company that the two backed financially in the spring. Payfone is running all the authentication in the background to ensure that the phone number entered is valid and corresponds with the correct account.


allthingsd.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Bill Wolf8/1/2011 9:13:42 AM
   of 117522
 
Verizon to Integrate American Express’ Serve on Wireless Phones and Tablets

Verizon Wireless customers to have access to simple and easy mobile payments powered by Serve, American Express’ new digital payment platform


finance.yahoo.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Bill Wolf8/1/2011 10:00:34 AM
1 Recommendation   of 117522
 
Apple Launching New iPhone in October, Not September
Published on August 1, 2011
by John Paczkowski

So those rumors claiming the iPhone 5 will debut in late September? They’re wrong.

Instead, it’s going to be an October surprise — the month in which Apple will be launching its next-generation iPhone.

Sources with knowledge of the situation say reports claiming AT&T has blacked out employee vacations during the last two weeks of September in preparation for the retail debut of the next iPhone are misinformed.

“I don’t know why AT&T’s calling for all hands on deck those weeks, but it’s not for an iPhone launch,” a source familiar with Apple’s plans said.

So when can we expect the company to uncrate the iPhone 5?

“October,” the source said, while declining to offer a hard-launch date. Other sources said it will be later in the month, rather than earlier.

The source offered no details on the device’s design, but supply-chain chatter has previously indicated that the iPhone 5 will use the faster A5 processor on which the iPad 2 runs, a Qualcomm dual mode GSM/CDMA baseband, and a higher resolution eight-megapixel rear camera.


allthingsd.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Jim Mullens8/1/2011 11:37:29 AM
   of 117522
 
MOD Droid 3 Review-........................................

Snips>>>>>>>>>

The problem is that there’s no LTE onboard, which seems in retrospect like a major tactical error on Motorola’s part until you consider that adding that in would likely dramatically change the Droid 3’s size and battery life. Like it or not, we’re still in the first generation of LTE modems, all of which are 45nm at present. Qualcomm’s LTE MDM9600 baseband, which is at the core of an overwhelming majority of current Verizon Wireless LTE devices, is a 45nm part and not directly voice enabled. Around mid 2012, MDM9615 will begin shipping, bringing 28nm LTE/EVDO/DC-HSPA+ connectivity in a slightly smaller, less power-hungry package, and also bringing onboard voice to bear. Only at that point (or with MSM8960 potentially sooner) and with similar parts does LTE connectivity on the device become something you can include without a complicated dual-baseband solution.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

anandtech.com 

M otorola Droid 3 Review - Third Time's a Charm

by Brian Klug on 7/30/2011 12:01:00 AM
Posted in smartphones , Droid 3 , android , OMAP 4 , Droid

Concluding Thoughts

So here we are, one year after the Droid 2, and now we have the Droid 3. Dual core smartphones are now pretty much the norm, and overall smartphone adoption shows little to no signs of slowing down anytime soon. On its own, the Droid 3 is a considerable upgrade over the Droid 2. You get a vastly better keyboard, higher resolution display, better cameras, higher resolution and better quality video recording, much better CPU and GPU performance, a better baseband with GSM/WCDMA compatibility out of the box, and Android 2.3.4. One short year later, the same price buys you a considerably better device in almost every possible category.

The problem is that there’s no LTE onboard, which seems in retrospect like a major tactical error on Motorola’s part until you consider that adding that in would likely dramatically change the Droid 3’s size and battery life. Like it or not, we’re still in the first generation of LTE modems, all of which are 45nm at present. Qualcomm’s LTE MDM9600 baseband, which is at the core of an overwhelming majority of current Verizon Wireless LTE devices, is a 45nm part and not directly voice enabled. Around mid 2012, MDM9615 will begin shipping, bringing 28nm LTE/EVDO/DC-HSPA+ connectivity in a slightly smaller, less power-hungry package, and also bringing onboard voice to bear. Only at that point (or with MSM8960 potentially sooner) and with similar parts does LTE connectivity on the device become something you can include without a complicated dual-baseband solution.



It’s roundabout, but basically what looks at first like a tactical error on Motorola’s part really isn’t - they made a design tradeoff and instead the Droid 3 is one of the thinnest (if not the thinnest) devices with a slide-out keyboard. Instead, if you want LTE and a physical keyboard, you’re going to have to wait a while until Samsung or another partner brings it to bear. That said, Motorola does have some LTE-enabled devices headed to Verizon, which we’ll look at in due time, but they likely won’t include keyboards.

If you’re in a market that Verizon hasn’t included in its official list for deployment by the end of 2011, there’s really no point to owning a first generation LTE smartphone. At that point, current devices like the Droid X2 or Droid 3 make sense, or waiting for devices based on some less power-hungry second generation basebands that will no doubt be the rage around the same time next year.

I like the Droid 3 a lot more than I thought I would going into it, just because of how much importance I personally put on having the fastest cellular connectivity. It’s sort of a running joke among friends and people that know me that I spend far too much time running speed tests, and so I went into this review ready to be underwhelmed by more EVDO slowness. I was definitely wrong about how great this device really turned out to be. Keyboard, display, OMAP4, and overall size culminate to a device that feels like way more than just an updated Droid 2.

The device has had another unintended side-effect as well. The Droid 3’s awesome keyboard has made me wish more of the Android flagship, triple-A devices had physical keyboards. Capacitive multitouch keyboards are great, but something is always going to get lost in the process of making a keyboard virtual. It’s also clear to me that developer focus has shifted away from landscape view, with so many Android applications forcing you into portrait-only mode because there’s so much more attention on portrait than landscape devices with keyboards. Maybe it’s time for a Nexus device with a keyboard to remind developers that landscape still exists.


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Jim Mullens8/1/2011 11:42:18 AM
1 Recommendation   of 117522
 
Modoff on Q2 Handset Landscape …………………………..



With all of the handset vendors having reported, we took a look at how the overall handset

landscape shaped up in Q2. We do this every quarter, and it used to be a straightforward

task. The top 5 handset vendors accounted for 90% of units and they all reported their unit

numbers. That has changed. The make-up of the Top 5 is now very different, and some

companies are not as good about reporting units. Most of the data we gathered below

comes from press releases, but a few items are sourced from IDC or generated by DB

analysts’ estimates.



During the quarter, every vendor tracked except for Nokia and Sony Ericsson grew units

sequentially. However, the decline at Nokia was so sharp that as a whole these top 9

vendors as a whole shrunk sequentially.



The star performers in the quarter were HTC, ZTE and Apple. Showing considerable growth

both sequentially and annually. Motorola also grew well QoQ, albeit off a smaller base.

Another interesting trend has been the growth in prices. Average ASPs (not the best

statistical measure) were up 9% year on year, and 4% sequentially. This is the third

consecutive quarter for this trend, and is evidence of the shift in mix towards smartphones.

We anticipate this will turn negative at some point next year as smartphones reach more

mainstream prices.



Smartphone data is still difficult to obtain as not all vendors break this out. Excluding ZTE, the

other top 8 vendors shipped 83.9 million smartphones in the quarter, which equates to 34%

of their volume, up from 21% in June 2010. This is obviously an important shift. By our

estimate, there were about 38 million Android phones sold in 2Q. If you exclude RIM, Apple

and Nokia from Q2 smartphone numbers that equates to 34 million phones. This is

noteworthy because that most of the Android shipments come from major brands (4 million

Android from ZTE sounds like it is in the right ballpark). Recall our comments from China that

most of the Chinese OEMs have yet to start building Android in volume, but all have large

smartphone portfolios coming to market in the next 12 months. As these companies push

volume into their now global distribution channels we expect to see a major shift in the

industry, one which may not be readily apparent in the published data from the top vendors.

Overall, we see strong smartphone growth continuing. Brightpoint, who held their earnings

call this morning, noted low channel inventories and are anticipating a strong holiday season

with many new devices hitting the shelves. This is another positive sign for a smartphone

unit growth. Depending on how you count it, smartphone units grew at about double the rate

of the whole market in the quarter. A rate which we think will continue for some time. We

think this will become a growing problem for feature phone heavy vendors like LG, Nokia and

RIM. Conversely, we see this as a positive for component vendors who are seeing a good

mix shift towards the higher end of their product range. This remains a core tenet of our

investment thesis on Qualcomm.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: phatbstrd8/1/2011 12:06:44 PM
   of 117522
 
Forgive me, but I don't recall if the ITC decision on HTC/AAPL is tomorrow, Aug 2??

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Jim Mullens8/1/2011 12:17:49 PM
5 Recommendations   of 117522
 
Modoff on QCOM Q3 FY11 Results............................


Snips>>>>>>>>>


Qualcomm : Q3 FY11 Results

Solid results and raised guide

Qualcomm reported solid Q3 results with revenues of $3.6 b, ahead of our estimate of $3.4 b

and consensus of $3.6 b. PF EPS of $0.73 beat our estimate of $0.72 and consensus of

$0.71. The company also raised guidance for the next quarter. We think Qualcomm's solid

product portfolio and WCDMA share above 50% provides support for continued good results

through the year - meriting our Buy rating.

Pricing trends continue to improve

Pricing appears to be headed in a positive direction after last year’s weak mix shift.

Additionally, concerns that the Chinese market may require lower-pricing now seems to be

overblown. The company has shown ability to cost-down products on smaller geometries to

address this market. They are now shipping their 7xxx series basebands with integrated apps

processors likely at or above corporate gross margin averages. We believe these trends will

continue to persist and provide leverage to their operating model.

Smartphone shipments continue upward trajectory

Despite the widely-held belief that smartphone shipments are slowing, we see the opposite.

It is a market share shift taking place among handset vendors. With Motorola, Sony Ericsson,

RIM and Nokia ceding share while Samsung and HTC continue do well. We think the market

is likely undercounting the growing share of smartphones from ZTE and Huawei, both large

Qualcomm customers. Apple will likely ship new phones next quarter and we believe

Qualcomm is set to gain baseband sockets in those new models as well. Overall,

Qualcomm’s competitive position is strong enough that OEM share shifts generally work to

the company’s benefit.

Maintain our Buy rating, raising estimates and price target to $67 from $65



Conclusions This was another good quarter from Qualcomm. Market sentiment has turned negative on

tech recently, but we found little to complain about in Qualcomm’s numbers. In fact, we

were surprised that the market has reacted somewhat negatively to numbers – with the

stock off after-hours, most questions taking a negative slant on the call and a limited number

of investor calls since the print. Apparently, the glass is now officially half empty, or maybe

one-third empty.



For those inclined to look at those negatives, we found a few nits in today’s numbers. QCT

margins were below our expectations, at 20% to our 22.5% estimate. This includes some

dilution from Atheros which has lower margins overall. Teasing the numbers apart though is

difficult as there were only five weeks of Atheros in Qualcomm numbers, and this typically

means the acquirer is incurring the full costs of the target without getting the full revenue

impact. A second complaint we heard from investors was that MSM Q4 guidance were

below expectations at 120 million to 125 million, but in line with our 124 million estimate.

This strikes us as ironic given that all last year everyone was concerned that unit shipments

were too high but revenue was light as mix shifted to lower priced chips. We will gladly

accept more revenue and higher priced chips. A third minor issue was the company lowered

their expectation for CDMA shipments globally for 2011, but this was offset by raised their

estimates for WCDMA, for a net increase to their forecast of 5 million units.



Of all these issues, the only one that we consider meaningful is QCT margins. As noted, the

addition of Atheros skews this metric slightly. The company reported that Atheros

contributed $100 million in revenue and $10 million in net income to Qualcomm on five

weeks of results. By contrast, our somewhat dated Atheros model was looking for $256

million in Q2 Atheros revenue and $45 million in net income. So Qualcomm recorded 40% of

Atheros revenues, but only 22% of net income. To us, this implies a timing issue common to

all acquisitions. For the year, we had modeled Atheros operating margins at 20%, this is

somewhat dilutive to the 24% we had been modeling for Qualcomm. So we expect some

erosion in operating margin percentage, but we suspect that cost synergies will come into

play and mute even that impact.



The company also indicated they expect to continue to add cost to QCT R&D next quarter.

The company is on track to spend $2.5 billion in R&D this year. That is a large amount, but

appears to be fully seen in the marketplace. We were particularly encouraged by the early

sampling of the quad-core MSM8960 which is being targeted at Windows 8 (i.e. Big

Windows, not Mobile) devices as well as smartphones. As these products are not likely to be

on the market until late next year, it is important that Qualcomm can be early to the game.

While we are cautious about how much impact ARM-based laptops will have on the overall

PC landscape, we see it as a positive that Qualcomm continues to execute well on many

product fronts.



We see many things to be positive about in the quarter. A year ago, the Street was grappling

with negative mix shift at Qualcomm as low-priced dongles and emerging markets feature

phones swamped numbers. That trend seems to be operating in reverse, with the company

noting several instances of prices going up. Qualcomm-licensed devices are becoming more

expensive as the category expands to include tablets and ever-more-high-powered

smartphones. Six months ago, we expressed concern that the company might have to lower

pricing expectations as their business among Chinese handset vendors picked up. As noted

in our commentary after our latest trip to China, this concern is easing. Owing to a variety of

factors, Qualcomm is now able to pick up considerable share among the so-called shanzhai

without having to get price aggressive or dip down their normal cost curve. An important

dynamic here is the company’s ability to cost-down products on smaller geometries to

address this market. In particular, the company is shipping 7xxx series basebands with

integrated applications processors. These are going into a huge array of emerging markets

smartphones, but likely offer gross margins at or above corporate averages. The company

implied as much in their commentary noting that integrated applications processors are

gaining traction across their product range.



Prior to the call, the Street was concerned that smartphone shipments are slowing. We see

no sign of this. Importantly, there is a market share shift taking place among handset

vendors. With Motorola, Sony Ericsson, RIM and Nokia ceding share while Samsung and

HTC continue do well. We think the market is likely undercounting the growing share of

smartphones from ZTE and Huawei, both large Qualcomm customers. ZTE is now likely one

of Qualcomm’s largest customers. It is also goes without saying that Apple will likely ship

new phones next quarter, and we believe Qualcomm is set to gain baseband sockets in

those new models. The build for that should start soon, but we expect more of the volume to

come in the December quarter. Overall, Qualcomm’s competitive position is strong enough

that OEM share shifts generally work to the company’s benefit. (We detailed this in our State

of the Baseband S2N note last month.)

In sum, we think this was a solid quarter for Qualcomm. We see nothing of substance to

alter this view in today’s results. We think the company’s solid product portfolio and

WCDMA share approaching 50% provides support for continued good results through the

year. We reiterate our Buy rating and raise our price target from $65 to $67..




Valuation & Risks


Downside risks include slower than expected industry growth rates, particularly for the adoption and growth of 3G networks and consumer demand, a slower than expected

expansion of CDMA and WCDMA in emerging markets such as China and India. The

company could also experience greater than anticipated competition in several of its market

segments, especially in WCDMA. Finally, Qualcomm operates under the threat of an ITC

injunction banning imports of its customers’ products into the US. We cannot handicap the

outcome of this or any other pending litigation.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.