SI
SI

 Gold/Mining/Energy | CANADIAN OIL & GAS COMPANIES


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: a.handbag. who wrote (19043)4/28/2012 7:18:38 PM
From: westslope   of 21595
 
I agree that natural gas infrastructure will not encounter the same kind of opposition as the Northern Gateway Pipeline. Dead in the water captures the state of the NGP. Enbridge doesn't really need it. I doubt the Harper Conservative government is willing to gamble too much to ram through the project, which in any event would be an incredibly bad idea.

But that natural gas pipeline to Kitimat will use NE BC nat. gas feed. And it won't be up and operational for at least 3 years. I don't know anybody who invests based on planned infrastructure that is at least 3 years out. Do you?

My experience investing in developing base metals with massive reserves has been overall rather disappointing.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: westslope who wrote (19046)4/28/2012 7:46:00 PM
From: a.handbag.1 Recommendation   of 21595
 
Mining and energy stocks are out of favor, and the herd is stampeding into bond funds. This is clearly shown by the redemption and purchase numbers. As always this is a recipe for disaster, and a signal that the things to buy are mining and energy. To make the waiting easier it helps to get divvies. I am also hoping for a little excitement from M&A. Someone, anybody for CLL,BXE,FEL,AAV,SOQ,STP,AOS?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: westslope who wrote (19045)4/29/2012 5:37:38 AM
From: kidl   of 21595
 
Don't you think that the pipeline conversion from NG to oil will require Environment Canada's approval and don't you think that "green" groups will be all over this conversion?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: westslope who wrote (19046)4/29/2012 6:28:06 AM
From: kidl   of 21595
 
Transmountain: Same pipeline, new realities

Claudia Cattaneo Apr 27, 2012 – 8:09 AM ET | Last Updated: Apr 27, 2012 8:13 AM ET

In 2008, Kinder Morgan Canada added 75,000 barrels of capacity to its Trans Mountain pipeline from Edmonton to Vancouver at a cost of $750-million, which included 13 new pump stations, twinning the system through Jasper National Park in Alberta and Mount Robson Provincial Park in British Columbia.

It faced little opposition, completed its regulatory hearing within a week, and provided contracting and employment to the Aseniwuche Winewak and Simpcw First Nations and the Alberta Metis Zone IV community.

When the project was completed, the Town of Jasper and the Village of Valemount thanked Kinder Morgan Canada for the opportunity.

Today, the company’s president, Ian Anderson, has cleared his deck and plans to dedicate the next five years of his career to a single goal — win support for and build a $5-billion expansion of the same pipeline, which has been in operation for 62 years. He is planning a campaign of unprecedented magnitude for his company, a unit of the Houston-based infrastructure giant, Kinder Morgan Energy Partners.

It’s a measure of how the Canadian pipeline business has changed as a result of activists targeting export pipelines to choke oil sands growth and rousing fear in affected communities about risks to the environment.

More ...
http://business.financialpost.com/2012/04/27/transmountain-same-pipeline-new-realities/

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: kidl who wrote (19048)4/29/2012 1:20:38 PM
From: westslope   of 21595
 
Yes, Environment Canada's approval is likely necessary but not an issue beyond the usual delays. I do agree with you that the enviro-activists could hold up conversion of the natural gas pipelines to oil.

Anything that slows or somehow penalizes oilsands exports is fair game. I personally believe that these activists could be 'neutralized' but that would take some aggressive and very astute activism on the part of oil sector companies and associations.

At the risk of preaching to the converted.... conventional oil is dirty, oilsands oil is slightly dirtier. Light sweet crude has a big footprint; oilsands have a slightly bigger footprint. Harassing supply is not the answer; better demand management is the answer. It is noteworthy that economists and other pundits spanning the political spectrum are in agreement with this notion of disciplining demand.

Now if these activists were effectively challenged into abandoning all things made of petrochemical products, then they couldn't send out news releases or field telephone calls from journalists. I doubt a string and a tin-can would work very well. Morse code might work.


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: kidl4/29/2012 2:31:02 PM
   of 21595
 
Colombia is Canada's new best friend

May look OT at first glance but isn't.
A little long but well worth reading:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-magazine/colombia-is-canadas-new-best-friend/article2411536/singlepage/#articlecontent

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: westslope who wrote (19050)4/29/2012 3:00:43 PM
From: teevee3 Recommendations   of 21595
 
To bring you up to date, Environment Canada will no longer have any approval authority. They can only make recommendations. Thankfully, under the new legislation about to be passed, in addition to limiting review period to 2 years, and streamlining to only one review, authority to approve will reside with the Prime Minister and caucus. Minority and special interest groups, both domestic and foreign, and their environmental lawyers can all find something else to protest about as the oil pipeline to Kitimat is built along with an oil terminal to fill oil tankers.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: westslope who wrote (19021)4/30/2012 1:00:51 PM
From: yyz_man   of 21595
 
Regarding PRE, what is the level of concern regarding the old post on Setty's blog? I really don't like it if a company misleads on production.

settysoutham.wordpress.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: LoneClone who wrote (19040)4/30/2012 1:13:20 PM
From: Aerofagia72   of 21595
 
A double in 12 months (not 2) looks reasonable

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Aerofagia72 who wrote (19054)4/30/2012 4:24:06 PM
From: Tim Lamb   of 21595
 
If you look at the monthly on Mart once it breaks $1.32 (or if it breaks it) there is no resistance. Heck of a cup and handle.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.