Strategies & Market Trends | The New Economy and its Winners


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: Bill Harmond5/3/2012 4:24:11 PM
   of 56253
 
6:21 LNKD LinkedIn beats by $0.06, beats on revs; guides Q2 rev, EBITDA above consensus; raises FY12 guidance above consensus (109.41 +3.01)

Reports Q1 (Mar) earnings of $0.15 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.06 better than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of $0.09; revenues rose 100.7% year/year to $188.5 mln vs the $177.75 mln consensus. Revenue from Hiring Solutions products totaled $102.6 million, an increase of 121% compared to the first quarter of 2011. Hiring Solutions revenue represented 54% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2012, compared to 49% in the first quarter of 2011. Co issues upside guidance for Q2, sees Q2 revs of $210-215 mln vs. $205.40 mln Capital IQ Consensus Estimate, with adj. EBITDA of $40-42 mln, may not compare to $29 mlln ests. Co issues upside guidance for FY12, raises FY12 revs to $880-900 mln from $840-860 mln vs. $864.31 mln Capital IQ Consensus Estimate, raises adj. EBITDA to $170-175 mln from $155-165 mln vs. ests near $170 mln.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: Bill Harmond5/3/2012 4:39:58 PM
   of 56253
 
money.cnn.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (55776)5/3/2012 4:53:09 PM
From: Brian Sullivan   of 56253
 
Yahoo new CEO Scott Thompson, made an “inadvertent error" when he said that he received a "Computer Science" degree from Stonehill College near Boston in 1979.

But in official bios from his job at eBay as head of its PayPal payments division, as well as on the current Yahoo one, a degree in computer science also appears

eBay: Scott received a Bachelor's Degree in Accounting and Computer Science from Stonehill College.

The Yahoo one has been updated to remove any reference to Stonehill College

allthingsd.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (55779)5/3/2012 5:13:29 PM
From: Glenn Petersen   of 56253
 
Ankle biting for a dissident shareholder. I think that the statute of limitations has run out on that one.

On the other hand, Thompson should have fixed that error a long time ago.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (55780)5/3/2012 5:25:49 PM
From: Brian Sullivan   of 56253
 
A friend of mine was part of the downsizing at Yahoo that took place when Thompson came aboard.

So a little schadenfreude is happening.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (55777)5/3/2012 5:27:55 PM
From: Brian Sullivan   of 56253
 
Nokia woes should spur carrier rethink

April 24, 2012 By Tony Cripps


Reuters’ report highlighting a possible lack of faith among European mobile operators in Nokia’s new Windows Phone smartphones characterizes the products as not good enough to compete with established market leaders from Apple and Samsung in particular. Such beliefs are clearly widespread – Ovum too has heard similar criticisms from carriers directed towards devices and platform that exist in the smartphone badlands beyond Apple and Android-powered products. And the beleaguered Finnish handset maker’s latest financial results appear to bear this out.

But they are also missing the point. There’s little objectively wrong with many of the products competing with Apple, Samsung, and Google/Android that greater customer awareness and a big-budget marketing drive could not cure. And European carriers need to do a great deal more to assist the underdogs if they aren’t to be the engineers of their own self-fulfilling prophecy of handing all power over their subscribers to the duopoly of Apple and Google.

Are Nokia’s smartphone products really to blame? If the combined forces of Nokia and Microsoft are ultimately incapable of swaying consumer opinion away from the current zeitgeist – despite offering products that are the equal of and in certain aspects more advanced than those from the current industry leaders – then they most assuredly have a major problem on their hands. They also most assuredly need help if they are to challenge that orthodoxy. Failing to address these problems will almost certainly drive Nokia towards Android in an effort to save its business, while Microsoft’s strategy for interconnecting users and services across all connected devices will be dealt a potentially fatal body blow.

Although Microsoft was heavily castigated by industry observers over the “mini-desktop-on-a-phone” approach to smartphones it previously pursued with the Windows Mobile ancestral line, Windows Phone is a completely different beast than its predecessor. In Ovum’s view, and clearly also Nokia’s, Windows Phone is fully worthy – at least from a technical perspective – of similar success to that currently enjoyed by iOS and Android devices.

Objectively the only fair criticisms of Nokia’s Windows Phone devices (and by extension Windows Phone devices generally) are that they haven’t achieved the same amount of consumer uptake as rival products and that there are fewer apps available to download than on Android or iPhone.

In terms of user experience, Windows Phone has brought a great deal of genuinely new thinking and can safely be regarded as innovative, even if the Metro UI is not to everyone’s taste (but then nothing is). I’ve personally found it a delight to use, as have many colleagues, several of whom, like myself, have histories with smartphones running back to the original Nokia Communicator. It’s safe to say they’re not easily impressed.

While that should not be taken as an endorsement of Windows Phone, or for that matter a suggestion that Ovum doesn’t appreciate iOS or Android (neither of which is true), it does indicate to us that the product itself is not flawed.

Marketing money talks louder than technology But if not the product, then what? The only reasons for the apparent failure of Nokia and Microsoft can be those of branding, marketing, and retail. And if that’s what’s wrong with Nokia’s Windows Phones, then operators are deceiving themselves if they think anything is going to change without a major ramp-up in their own involvement in brand building and promoting these devices. Any expectation that other OEMs or platform developers will be able to challenge the smartphone industry’s dominant providers solely through their own efforts looks increasingly misguided to us.

In Ovum’s view, if carriers want to see a more diverse, more competitive smart device market – which they undoubtedly do – then they themselves need to help make that requirement a reality. Of necessity this would include a greatly increased investment in helping market and retail such products, at least in the establishing phase of new software platforms (such as Windows Phone) or to reinvigorate weakened hardware players (think Nokia and RIM, especially). US carriers are typically more proactive in this area, although even they may well need to deepen their investment.

More vigorous involvement by carriers seems vital if the near-duopoly of Apple and Samsung/Android is ever to be challenged, let alone broken. The smartphone market clearly favors relentless and compelling marketing efforts that only a very tiny number of device-side protagonists can themselves muster.

Unfortunately for carriers, Apple and Google (in particular) are also the companies causing the most erosion to carriers’ relationships with their subscribers through their powerful disintermediating effects. As such, it would appear to be in the best interest of carries to provide a great deal more in the way of marketing and retail support to other smartphone OS providers. In return, grateful OEMs and platform providers would surely return the favor in terms of greater subsidies (and potentially other benefits) if they felt their efforts were being adequately supported.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (55781)5/3/2012 6:53:06 PM
From: Glenn Petersen   of 56253
 
I still have a dog-eared copy of the original Yahoo prospectus sitting in a file cabinet somewhere. I used it to help me write an Internet-centric business plan for a Nasdaq delisting hearing. I lost my appeal.

As a result (and in spite of losing the appeal), I have a soft spot for Yahoo. Yahoo should have taken the buyout offer from Microsoft.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Bill Harmond5/4/2012 8:10:42 PM
   of 56253
 
miamiherald.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Bill Harmond5/5/2012 12:35:16 AM
   of 56253
 
reuters.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (55781)5/5/2012 3:54:40 AM
From: Glenn Petersen   of 56253
 
The Thompson story has legs. The knives are out.

Hedge Fund Intensifies Attack on Yahoo Amid Storm Over Padded Résumés

By MICHAEL J. DE LA MERCED
DealBook
New York Times
May 4, 2012, 9:03 pm

Third Point has intensified its assault against Yahoo.

On Friday, the hedge fund, which is the middle of a contentious proxy battle with Yahoo, called for the dismissal of the technology company’s chief executive, Scott Thompson, after revealing that he had inaccurately stated his credentials.

Mr. Thompson had previously claimed to have earned degrees in both accounting and computer science from Stonehill College. After prodding by Third Point, Yahoo conceded that Mr. Thompson had only an accounting degree, calling it an “inadvertent error.”

Yahoo also said that Patti S. Hart, the director who led the company’s chief executive search, did not graduate with a degree in marketing and economics from Illinois State University. Instead, she earned a degree in business administration.

In a letter to shareholders on Friday, Third Point’s founder, Daniel S. Loeb, called for Mr. Thompson to be fired and for Ms. Hart to resign. Mr. Loeb also raised concerns about whether Yahoo had filed erroneous information in securities filings and other documents.

“Irreparable damage to Yahoo’s culture will continue every day that the board allows Mr. Thompson and Ms. Hart to remain at the helm of the company after having clearly demonstrated that they lack even the ‘minimum qualifications for service as a director of the company,’ ” Mr. Loeb wrote.

A spokeswoman for Yahoo, Amanda Pires, said in a statement: “As we have previously said, the board is reviewing this matter and, upon completion of its review, will make an appropriate disclosure to shareholders.”

Earlier this year, Third Point started an aggressive battle against Yahoo, questioning the company’s strategic direction and its choice of new directors, who Mr. Loeb said lacked advertising and media expertise. The hedge fund is seeking four board seats at Yahoo.

The revelations about Mr. Thompson and Ms. Hart are the latest blow to Yahoo, which has been under pressure from shareholders to redefine itself in a world where Facebook and Google dominate. The struggling Web pioneer had staked its latest turnaround campaign on Mr. Thompson, who was hired in January from eBay’s PayPal unit.

Mr. Thompson sent an e-mail to Yahoo’s employees on Friday, acknowledging the reports and urging them to stay focused on the mission, according two people with knowledge of the matter.

“I’m doing what I hope all of you are doing — staying focused on our customers, our shareholders, our team and moving Yahoo forward, fast,” Mr. Thompson said in the note.

Some corporate governance experts say that the errors in Mr. Thompson’s academic record are unsettling. At a time of uncertainty for Yahoo shareholders, any questions about the integrity of the company’s chief executive may cast doubt on investors’ faith in its turnaround plans.

“It really diminishes his credibility,” said Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld, the senior associate dean for executive programs at Yale School of Management.

F. Daniel Siciliano, a professor at Stanford Law School, noted that Mr. Thompson and Ms. Hart seemingly had run afoul of Yahoo’s own code of ethics. But he added that the code appeared to allow for some leeway in the board’s response, and that the company’s directors must carefully weigh their next steps.

“The real duty the board has is to ask what is in the best interest of the shareholders,” he said. “If they don’t have a succession plan in place, it might be a costly move to fire him.”

Executives who inflate their credentials have previously found themselves in a tenuous positions. David Edmondson, who became RadioShack’s chief executive in 2005, claimed to have graduated from Pacific Coast Baptist College with bachelor’s degrees in theology and psychology. He later admitted that he did not have either degree, and resigned in early 2006.

Not all executives caught with padded résumés are forced to resign, however. In 2002, Ronald Zarrella, then the chief executive of Bausch & Lomb, admitted that while he attended New York University’s Stern School of Business at night, he did not graduate. Mr. Zarrella retired from Bausch & Lomb in 2008.

Professor Siciliano said the Yahoo board faced a difficult decision. “There are omissions, and there are complete misrepresentations of your fundamental credentials,” he said of Mr. Thompson. “His misrepresentation is to the left of that, but it’s still pretty bad.”

dealbook.nytimes.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.