SI
SI

 Technology Stocks | ONI Systems Corp. (ONIS)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: SemiBull who wrote (130)11/1/2001 4:18:26 PM
From: Maverick   of 227
 
mergers will bring together “best of breed” companies such as Telium, ONI and Juniper.

TELLABS COURTS SYCAMORE FOR OPTICAL EXPANSION
industryclick.com 
Liane H. LaBarba

Telephony, Oct 29, 2001 Brought to you by:

Print-friendly format
E-mail this information

Product lines fit together, but can they muster the money?

Despite tight-lipped responses from both companies, Tellabs and Sycamore Networks are working on a potential deal.

According to one source, the companies are discussing a merger that would bring together two entities that had high hopes riding into this year but have been hit hard by carriers' capital spending cuts.

TELLABS' GOODS
Optical networking

Titan 5300 digital cross-connect
Titan 5500 digital cross-connect
Titan 6100 optical transport system
Titan 6500 multiservice switch
Titan 6700 optical switch
Focus transport systems
(multiplexers, access nodes, DWDM systems)
Access

Cablespan line
Focus SDH
Echo cancellation


“We didn't see Tellabs people walking around in the halls or anything,” said a former Sycamore employee, who noted that Sycamore has started considering how the two companies' product lines might fit together (see boxes below). “Anything is possible. The stimulation of consolidation might get things moving again.”

Another potential clue: Tellabs recently built a facility down the street from Sycamore's headquarters and quickly put it up for sale, leading some to believe that the companies see an easy transition into nearby offices.

Regardless of the conjecture, the companies' product lines mesh well.

In the one area of competition — between Tellabs' Titan 6700 and Sycamore's SN 10000 — Sycamore's strength in software would combine well with Tellabs' hardware expertise.

SYCAMORE'S GOODS
Transport gear

SN 8000 intelligent optical transport node
SN 10000 intelligent optical transport system
Switching
SN 3000 optical access switch
SN4000 optical edge switch
SN1600 intelligent optical switch
SILVX network management software


Despite the fit, some question Tellabs' financial capability to pull off a merger. The company has suffered from the downturn and reported a third quarter loss of $49.47 million, including a one-time $60 million restructuring charge. In addition, it was recently dealt the blow of a lost DWDM equipment deal with Verizon Communications as well as a missed access deal with SBC Communications, according to Sam Greenholz, senior analyst for CIR.

“The decline in service provider spending continues to incrementally impact our business,” said Tellabs President and CEO Richard Notebaert, noting that a similar environment will continue over the next few quarters “No one knows the full impact of Sept. 11. Our visibility remains limited.”

Sycamore's President and CEO Dan Smith painted a similar picture: “We are resizing and realigning our business to address reality in the market,” he said.

Even though the financial climate for either company isn't great, Tellabs does have some money and has been financially strong, Greenholz said. In its third quarter, Tellabs reported cash and investment values at just under $1.1 billion.

A purchase such as Sycamore would mean carrying heavy debt, although that could be lessened by a cheap price. “Tellabs feels like they have to do something, and they feel desperate,” Greenholz said. “Sycamore would be a very good buy — and a relatively inexpensive one. But I'm not sure Tellabs needs it.”

Instead, Greenholz pointed to other companies such as Calient Networks because of its strength in long haul and optical — areas where Sycamore's image has suffered.

Harry Carr, Chairman and CEO of Tellium, questioned the wisdom of the deal. “I can't imagine why Sycamore would want to merge with Tellabs.”

Regardless of motive, the effect of carriers slashing budgets is likely to mean a rapid consolidation. “There is clearly a lot of talking going on in the industry,” Carr said. “The first quarter we will see some deals. Maybe one before.”

Carr said in an earlier interview this month that he believes a number of mergers will bring together “best of breed” companies such as Telium, ONI and Juniper.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (128)11/1/2001 6:04:14 PM
From: Maverick   of 227
 
SSB:metro market will be the first segment to see a reacceleration in spending

November 1, 2001 COMPANY DESCRIPTION
ONI Systems is the only next-generation optical systems
TELECOMMUNICATIONS company to come public to date that is focused exclusively
EQUIPMENT on the metro optical markets. ONI s products were built
B. Alexander specifically for the metro arena and we believe as such
Henderson have a competitive advantage to products from its nearest
competitors such as Nortel, Lucent, CIENA, and Sycamore,
which have generalized solutions for the metro and
long-haul arenas.
INVESTMENT THESIS
The capex forecast for 2002 continues to deteriorate with almost daily
downward revisions by service providers. We are forecasting a 28%-29%
decline in 2002 capex. Within this backdrop, we expect it to be a difficult
exercise for any optical company to show momentum. However, we believe the
metro market will be the first segment to see a reacceleration in spending
and ONI is the best positioned company targeting this opportunity. Many of
the IXCs are shifting spending from the long haul segment into the metro and
regional markets in order to build out their systems to offer end to end
services. ONI's equipment is the most adept in the marketplace to enable
these advanced services and enable the service providers to deliver
additional revenue and profit opportunities. Net-net, we continue to believe
in the long-term positioning in the company, but harbor concerns relative to
how rapidly the company can rebound in the face of an extremely harsh
operating environment.RECENT RESULTS
ONI Systems reported 3Q results that were largely in line with our forecasts.
The Q-Q declines represented in the report underscore the difficult
environment in which carriers operate. ONI posted revenues of $40.2 million,
representing a 41% Q-Q decline, in line with our forecast. Consensus revenue
expectations for the vendor was $44.9 million. However, gross margins only
fell 180 basis points sequentially to 37%. This performance is perplexing
given that management insists that mix continues to move toward lower-margin
chassis relative to line cards. Management attributes the margin performance
to better efficiency, materials management, and a stable pricing environment.
Operating losses were $29 million, compared to our $27.8 million forecast as
the company continued to invest diligently on the R&D and SG&A front. ONI's
cash position stands at $684 million. Management believes this position is
large enough to fund them for four years, even if the current situation were
to last that long.
ONI added three customers in the quarter, including an IXC, an ISP/ASP, and
an ILEC, increasing the total customer base to 27. Management expects to add
another 2-3 customers by the end of 2001 bringing the total to 28-30, in line
with revised guidance but down previous expectations of 32-34 customers by
year end. Management continues to believe that ILEC deployments are still
likely to occur in the calendar 2002 timeframe, albeit likely in the 2H of
the year at which point ONI should have completed the OSMINE process
necessary to compete within this arena.
On the competitive front, management asserted they only see two competitors
consistently, Nortel and Ciena, and that neither resorted to predatory
pricing strategies in the quarter. ONI insists it continues to see strong
new trial growth and persistent strength in its working relationships with
key existing and prospective customers. ONI also insists it has not lost
business to competitors rather that programs were delayed or downsized. ONI
strongly believes its competitive position continues to improve.
The company's geographic breakdown remained relatively stable in the quarter.
While international growth opportunities appear strong, management noted
Europe and Asia continue to remain the most price sensitive regions, with
certain international competing very aggressively on pricing in Asia Pacific.
VALUATION
Using a price to sales valuation metric, ONI Systems trades at a discount to
Ciena, Corvis and Sycamore. While Corvis and Sycamore trade at approximately
10x CY02E sales, ONI and CIENA trade closer to 3x CY02E sales. From a
valuation perspective, this is misleading as shares of ONI are supported by
$5 per share in cash on the balance sheet. Similarly, Corvis and Sycamore
trade close to their cash values of $2 and $4 per share respectively.RISKS
ONI is up against very strong competition from well-funded competitors.
Nortel, Lucent, and Cisco are strong, serious competitors. Attaining and
sustaining a competitive advantage against these players will likely prove
challenging to the best of companies. With technology changes occurring at a
breakneck pace, the larger competitors have a better window to see more new
and emerging technology and could have an advantage in either garnering
component availability or in purchasing the supplier outright. This
represents a threat to the sustainability of ONI's position. We think the
the technology in ONI's line is strong enough to weather these changes.
However, we also think investors need to keep a close eye on the changing
landscape.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Glenn Petersen who started this subject11/13/2001 12:00:34 PM
From: lazarre   of 227
 
Words from the CEO, yesterday, were gutzy and, hopefully, on target. Cienna's comments on guidance---operative word, here, stabilization---couldn't have hurt either.

I'm still slightly underwater but its nice to see the sunlight beginning to shimmer thru.....can't help but think that being the purest play in metro, ONIS is ideal fodder for the likes of a CSCO or other to spur their own needs for growth; moreover, ONIS could benefit enormously tagging onto to a more established network player....though this 147 potential customer base discussed yesterday may preclude the need to hitch a ride on some mother ship.

lazarre

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Glenn Petersen who started this subject11/15/2001 3:04:10 PM
From: MSI   of 227
 
Anyone know what's up? Suddenly strong volume up.
Put covering?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: lazarre who wrote (133)11/17/2001 8:25:41 AM
From: Jerome   of 227
 
???ONIS strength.... the most recent comments about some light at the end of the tunnel by GLW, and others is all the assurance that some investors need for now. I would expect further price gains between now and the end of the year.

Regards, Jerome

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Jerome who wrote (135)11/21/2001 11:52:08 PM
From: Maverick   of 227
 
NT's upgraded metro DWDM may put further pressure on ONIS
NOVEMBER 21, 2001
PREVIOUS NEWS ANALYSIS

Metro DWDM Game Heats Up
lightreading.com 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Healthy competition is shaping up among Nortel Networks Corp. (NYSE/Toronto: NT - message board), ONI Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: ONIS - message board), and Ciena Corp. (Nasdaq: CIEN - message board) in the metro DWDM market.

Earlier this week, Nortel announced upgrades to its Optera Metro 5200 DWDM platform. And new numbers from Dell'Oro Group show that Ciena is gaining on the top two players in the market: Nortel and ONI.

The latest version of the Optera Metro 5200, a product that’s been around for about two years, includes new hardware that will enable it to scale to 10 Gbit/s, which will allow it to support Sonet/SDH, OC192, STM64 and 10-gigabit Ethernet applications.

The addition of 10-Gbit/s functionality comes out of necessity, say some analysts. Competitors ONI and Ciena both have already announced 10 Gbit/s on their platforms.

"ONI has been shipping its 10-Gbit/s product for a couple of quarters at least,” says Rick Schafer, an analyst with CIBC World Markets. "That’s one of the differentiators between them. Nortel had to add 10 Gbit/s.”

This is a critical time in the metro DWDM market. For the first time in its short history, ONI has lost market share there. According to the Dell'Oro report published last week, ONI’s market share dropped to 26 percent in Q3 from 34 percent in Q2 (see Dell'Oro Plots Ups and Downs ). Nortel kept its number one position with 37 percent of the market, the same as the previous quarter.

The biggest surprise is Ciena’s gain in market share. It was the only company to increase market share from Q2 to Q3. It jumped to 23 percent in Q3 from 18 percent in Q2. Ciena, which has a strong long-haul DWDM product, now seems to be making headway with its metro platform, MultiWave Metro. Even though the product has been around for a few years, competitors like Nortel have criticized it as a scaled-down version of the company’s long-haul product. But judging from these new numbers, carriers don’t seem to mind.

For the third quarter, the entire metro DWDM market declined about 25 percent, according to Dell'Oro. This is the first decline ever for this market. And the future doesn’t look much better. This year, the entire DWDM metro market is estimated to be $676 million, which includes actual numbers from the last three quarters and an estimate for the fourth quarter of 2001. In 2002, Dell'Oro expects the market to grow only about $12 million to $688 million.

Joe Padgett, director of marketing for optical metro for Nortel, says he isn’t worried about competition from Ciena or ONI. "They [ONI] are a novelty,” says Padgett. "They have one decent product out there today. A lot of our service providers have put them in the labs, but when you look at the numbers, we are still leading the market in deployments.”

Analysts and carriers see things a little differently. They applaud ONI for its technological prowess, but note that the product's real issue may be the price tag. During the past quarter, the cost game has played out in Nortel’s favor, particularly in Asia, where carriers are much more cost conscious than their North American counterparts.

"Where we’ve seen Nortel succeed is overseas,” says CIBC's Schafer. “They don’t have the same feature set as ONI, but sometimes the Asian carriers don’t need all that functionality."

Also hurting ONI is the fact that the company still doesn’t have its Osmine certification. This is important for companies selling to RBOCs. ONI officials placed new emphasis on the Osmine process in the last quarter's conference cakk, saying they would spend significant resources on it (see ONI Stock Takes a Hit ). The company is also focusing on diversifying its customer. The company has depended largely on sales to competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), which make up almost 50 percent of its total customer base.

Ciena could also run into trouble down the road as it tries to increase market share, because it hasn’t certified its metro product with Osmine either.

Nortel, on the other hand, announced last month that it has finished its Osmine certification, something the company says helped it land a deal as the primary provider of DWDM technology for SBC Communications Inc. (NYSE: SBC - message board) under a multiyear metro optical contract.

— Marguerite Reardon, Senior Editor, Light Reading

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Maverick who wrote (136)11/22/2001 8:16:03 AM
From: Jerome   of 227
 
Mav...thanks for the report...I'm not sure what to make of it .I own CIEN, NT, and ONIS. If the market rebounds I believe there will be plenty of business for all three. In a shrinking market none look good. I plan on keeping my positions until the second quarter on next year. Outlooks will be clearer then.

Have a good Thanksgiving....Jerome

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Jerome who wrote (137)11/22/2001 10:58:27 AM
From: lazarre   of 227
 
hello Jerome and all,

I sold my entire position the morning I read the d'ellorio(sp?) report indicating ONIS lost share to Cienna in the metro arena....took a loss but, imo, from here on in its the survival of the fattest and ONIS's share erosion scared the heck outta me in terms of their ability to tough it out. No doubt in my mind ONIS is now up for grabs but at what price?

saw this happen too many times to the likes of a digital island ( bought for pennies where hordes of folks bought it for big dollars, hoping for the rebound which never came ).

I think if it ever gets back to 6 or so I'll be there--can't imagine a buyout for less than 8 or so.

lazarre

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: lazarre who wrote (138)11/30/2001 5:44:47 PM
From: Labrador   of 227
 
Bought some ONI today [7.26] after selling off at $10 just a couple of days ago. I suspect that it will trend southwards.

Anyone with anything positive to say about ONI, other that its cash position?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Labrador who wrote (139)12/4/2001 1:17:20 PM
From: Maverick   of 227
 
SSB:4Q MAY BE ON TRACK DESPITE CONCERNS, WE ARE NERVOUS ABOUT 1H02
Excerpts from Salomon Smith Barney ~ December 4, 2001 follow.
We had an opportunity to meet with senior management at ONI Systems during
our Silicon Valley bus tour. The constructive takeaway is that the company
seems poised to meet expectations for the 4Q timeframe. This is in spite of
cautious commentary that was attributed to the company related to their
presentation at a competitor's conference recently. According to
management, they did not intend to convey any change in confidence in their
outlook. This is an incremental constructive data point as we were quite
concerned with the 4Q outlook given the tough economic conditions. However,
our viewpoint on the outlook for 2002 remains unchanged. We still believe
that 2002 numbers are at risk as we believe that their orders from Qwest are
likely to remain subdued for at least for the first quarter of next year.
Furthermore, we question the timing of additional ILEC orders which was
expected to be a key source of growth in 2002.
Commentary At Competitors' Conference Taken Out Of Context. One of the
issues that has recently impacted the shares relates to cautious comments
attributed to management during a investors' conference presentation. During
our conversation with management, they repeatedly reiterated did not intend
to communicate a change in guidance, tone, or confidence. Specifically, they
noted that they continue to see tough competition from Ciena (CIEN, 3H--
$17.06) and Nortel (NT, 2H--$7.47), consistent with previous management
statements. What they did not state, however, was that it would be a stretch
for them to meet their 4Q expectations. Their energetic insistence on
repeatedly emphasizing this point leads us to believe that the current
quarter is on track. This belief is bolstered by the fact that management
suggested that the quarter was essentially completed. The company shut down
operations for two days during the week of Thanksgiving and intends to shut
down again during the week between Christmas and New Years. Furthermore,
unlike in previous years when December quarter tended to be quite back-end
loaded as customers attempted to exhaust their remaining annual budgets,
management expects no such surge this quarter. Again this suggests that 4Q
is essentially done and management's continued confidence in the outlook is a
key data point.
Still Concerned About 2002. While we are increasingly comfortable with ONI's
ability to meet 4Q EPS expectations, we still harbor significant concern
about the 2002 outlook. First, we believe that ONI's business is likely to
suffer the drag of subdued spending from Qwest (Q, 1M rated by J. Grubman--
$11.88) into the 2002 timeframe. While we believe it is possible that the
carrier's IP-related spending could rebound by the end of the calendar 1Q02
period, we think optical-related spending could suffer into 2Q. Second, we
are concerned about whether the RBOC community will begin to meaningfully
deploy next-gen optical systems in 2002 given the eroding competitive threat
from emerging carriers. Management also acknowledged that visibility from
the domestic ILEC community remained quite limited and cited pushouts in
deployment timetables. On the PTT front, they did note that France Telecom
and Deutsche Telecom remain some of the most aggressive in evaluating the
technology but noted less current interest from British Telecom.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.