SI - Site Forums | Questions and Answers with SI Admin (s)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: SI Dave who wrote (2984)11/7/2006 6:44:21 PM
From: Generic   of 3865
 
Is this where one asks that a ticker be updated on a thread? ITEK has been IMKI for a while:

Subject 56381

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (2960)11/7/2006 8:39:47 PM
From: Bill Ulrich1 Recommendation   of 3865
 
The only problem with that is, ... some people are perpetual idiots. >>"It's time to put a time limit on bans.....
Message 22956021
"

It's apparent from your link that poster "2.718281828..." doesn't like you much and is likely to remain so disposed. Why should that affect your life so dearly? If you're upset because you can't "make" him like you, I reckon you're in for a lifetime of disappointment on a whole lotta levels. Or you could just ... get over it.

Your choice.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (2988)11/7/2006 11:41:11 PM
From: Sidney Reilly   of 3865
 
You don't know me from Adam or my reason's for asking to be unbanned. It's certainly not because I care if LPS5 likes me or not. We have disagreed at times over the years but with civility. And I don't want to post again on his board. I thought he was OK and would unban me because it's been 3 years and I asked. GROUND ZERO unbanned me when I asked. There's nothing wrong with wanting a clean slate.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (2988)11/8/2006 12:10:19 AM
From: Dale Baker   of 3865
 
Who wouldn't want to be a dynamic player in those 27 posts the last three months? Alas, some can only dream.......LOL.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (2989)11/8/2006 3:03:04 AM
From: Bill Ulrich1 Recommendation   of 3865
 
Oh. Is it three years now, eh? These past 11 months alone, you've pestered the guy a bunch o' times about it:

Message 22383554
Message 22450921
Message 22481226
Message 22956021

So you couldn't get your way, now you come here requesting a feature change --- a software programming hours soak on the site owner's part --- all this obsession for: some random dude you've met on the internet? It's not even some ex-girlfriend, fer cyring out loud...! Which, if it were an ex-girlfriend, would still be weird, but at least kinda empathetically understandable for a minute or two.

Site owner is not obligated to provide you free programming hours for your compulsions. I'm just making a rough guess here, but I suspect poster "2.7182818" doesn't want to continue the relationship. Once again: Your choice -- get over it. Or not.

And "no" in advance, we don't really want to know where you buried the ex-girlfriends, if you're this sensitive over some random internet guy whom you can't seem to force into liking you. That would be waaay TMI.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Dale Baker who wrote (2990)11/8/2006 3:41:14 AM
From: Bill Ulrich   of 3865
 
I'm gonna have a Sally Fields moment here if any more of this breaks out. <g>

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (2992)11/8/2006 7:29:41 AM
From: Dale Baker   of 3865
 
Since my only other ban is for calling Anthony Elgindy a criminal - kind of a matter of public record - it's all very Kafkaesque, LOL.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (2991)11/8/2006 10:12:45 AM
From: Sidney Reilly   of 3865
 
You seem very worried about this issue. How come you care so much about me "pestering" LPS5? The management has said btw that a time limit on bans is something they want to do in the future. I'm just encouraging it to be sooner than later. I think we need an SI ban "Jubilee".

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Susie924 who wrote (2985)11/8/2006 1:20:00 PM
From: Generic   of 3865
 
iHub croaked?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: SI Dave who wrote (2984)12/30/2006 11:07:18 AM
From: kpf   of 3865
 
Dave,

probably been asked before...
Is it a big deal to extend ihub's search function beyond postings of the current year? It would add significant value to ihub, imo. More advances search function would be even better. Any plans it the works in these respects?

tia

Klaus

p.s: Just as a sidenote, the above links sibob.com  and siliconinvestor.com
do not work for me. That's why I post it publicly, here.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.