SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Coffee Shop | Whodunit? Two Stockbrokers Murdered in Jersey; No Clues


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Janice Shell who wrote (1107)5/24/2004 4:04:42 PM
From: StockDung   of 1143
 
Sounds more like he has read this thread which has very interesting content

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: StockDung who wrote (1101)6/10/2004 2:02:58 PM
From: rrufff   of 1143
 
Was ELEC actively involved in the scam? Any opinion on it currently? Thanks in advance.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: rrufff who wrote (1109)7/20/2004 5:21:45 PM
From: StockDung   of 1143
 
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Litigation Release No. 18787 / July 20, 2004
Court Grants Summary Judgment Against Thomas Cavanagh, Frank Nicolois and Eight Other Defendants and Finds That They Engaged in Pump-and-Dump Scheme
Court Orders Over $18 Million in Disgorgement and $3.3 Million in Penalties
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Thomas Cavanagh, et al., 98 Civ. 1818 (SDNY) (DLC)
On July 15, 2004, U.S. District Judge Denise Cote granted summary judgment in favor of the Commission and against the ten remaining defendants in a civil action arising out of the fraudulent offering and sale of securities of Electro-Optical Systems Corporation. In its order, the court found that Thomas Cavanagh, Frank Nicolois, and their company U.S. Milestone had violated Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), and that Thomas Brooksbank, James Franklin, and Thomas Hantges had violated Securities Act Sections 5(a) and 5(c). The Court also granted summary judgment against relief defendants Karen Cavanagh, Beverly Nicolois, their company Cromlix, LLC, and Edward Kaufer.

In granting the Commission's motion for summary judgment, the court permanently enjoined Cavanagh, Nicolois, and Milestone from violating, directly or indirectly, Securities Act Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) and Exchange Act Section 10(b). The court permanently enjoined Brooksbank, Franklin, and Hantges from violating, directly or indirectly, Securities Act Sections 5(a) and 5(c).

The court also ordered that Cavanagh, Nicolois, and Milestone pay, jointly and severally, disgorgement of $15,564,863.02 – the total amount of the market fraud – plus interest, less any disgorgement amounts actually paid by other defendants and relief defendants. Cavanagh, Nicolois, and Milestone were also each ordered to pay a civil penalty of $1,000,000. The court ordered Brooksbank, Franklin, and Hantges to pay, jointly and severally, disgorgement of $889,275.00 plus interest. In addition, Brooksbank, Franklin, and Hantges were ordered to individually pay disgorgement of $185,337.79, $50,926.50, and $304,654.29, respectively, plus interest. These three defendants were also each ordered to pay a civil penalty of $125,000. Relief defendants Karen Cavanagh, Beverly Nicolois, and their company Cromlix were ordered to pay, jointly and severally, disgorgement of $803,660.75 plus interest. Relief defendant Edward Kaufer and defendant Brooksbank were ordered to pay, jointly and severally, disgorgement of $213,150.97 plus interest.

The Commission filed this action in March 1998, alleging that certain defendants offered and sold securities of Electro-Optical in violation of the registration and anti-fraud provisions of the securities laws. Brooksbank, Franklin, and Hantges, in concert with now-settled defendant George Chachas, were the principal shareholders of Curbstone, a shell corporation that merged with a private company, WTS Transnational, Inc. ("WTS") in late 1997 to form Electro-Optical. They sold over 2.5 million Curbstone management shares to certain nominee shell companies in Spain and provided the nominees options to acquire additional management shares, which were restricted securities that could not be resold to public investors unless pursuant to registration or an exemption. These shares of Curbstone, which after the company's merger with WTS became shares of Electro-Optical, were soon resold to the public in a massive unregistered distribution in which Cavanagh and Nicolois (together with their now-deceased lawyer William Levy) pumped up the Electro-Optical stock price and pocketed millions of dollars.

Judge Cote issued a preliminary injunction in April 1998, having found that the Commission had shown a substantial likelihood of success in proving that the defendants had violated the registration and antifraud provisions of the securities laws. The injunction was affirmed on appeal. In October 1998, the action was stayed due to the criminal investigation and prosecution of Cavanagh, Nicolois, and Levy for false statements made in connection with this litigation. Since then, approximately forty-five persons or entities have either settled by paying full disgorgement or are in default. The order granting the Commission's motion for summary judgment resolves all outstanding claims.

Related Litigation Releases:

No. 15669 / March 13, 1998
No. 15715 / April 21, 1998
No. 16035 / January 21, 1999
No. 16152 / May 19, 1999
No. 16372 / November 29, 1999
No. 16419 / January 27, 2000


Related Administrative Proceedings:

Admin. Release No. 34-49484 / March 26, 2004



sec.gov 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home Previous Page Modified: 07/20/2004

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: StockDung9/28/2004 11:21:45 AM
   of 1143
 
techstocks.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: StockDung9/28/2004 11:26:16 AM
   of 1143
 
web.archive.org 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: StockDung10/8/2004 9:39:34 AM
   of 1143
 
.10-07-04 -- Bockler, Stuart -- Indictment -- News Release

New Jersey Internet Stock Promoter Indicted for Failing to Disclose Compensation from Global Datatel, Inc.

NEWARK - A New Jersey Internet stock promoter was indicted today for failing to disclose his compensation while touting Global Datatel, Inc. to the investing public, contrary to federal securities laws, U.S. Attorney Christopher J. Christie announced.

The Indictment charges that Stuart Bockler, 52, of Marlboro Township, controlled and operated three companies and a website engaged in the business of corporate public relations activities: International Market Advisors, Inc. (IMA), International Market Call Inc., Imcadvisors, Inc., and www.imcadvisors.com.

According to the Indictment, in early January 1999, Bockler and IMA executed a consulting agreement with Global, wherein Bockler agreed to write and disseminate Global investment reports that detailed Global's products, management results, prospects, trading history, and projected results and stock performance. The agreement was for a one-year period.

Under the Consulting Agreement, in consideration of Bockler's public relations activities, Global agreed to pay IMA and Bockler: 25,000 "free trading" shares of Global stock; warrants to purchase 150,000 free trading shares of Global stock at a price of $5.50 per share; and a bonus of an additional 25,000 free trading shares, if Global's stock price reached $15 for ten trading days during the one-year period of the consulting agreement.

In Oct. 13, 1999, Bockler disseminated a Global investment report to the investing public promoting Global. Bockler posted the investment report to the IMA website and sent approximately 30,000 emails to recipients directing them to IMA's website to view the report. The investment report contained, among other things, a "Strong Buy" recommendation, and Global stock price projections of $60-$75 for the long term and a price projection of $30-$45 for the short term. The investment report failed to disclose Bockler's compensation and it further failed to disclose that Bockler had received profits of approximately $175,000 from the sale of 18,750 free trading Global shares he had received from Global in January and February 1999.

Bockler is expected to be arraigned on the one-count Indictment within the next two weeks before U.S. District Judge Joseph A. Greenaway, according to Assistant U.S. Attorney Mauro M. Wolfe. Bockler was not arrested by federal authorities.

The Indictment further charges that Bockler disseminated the October 13 report knowing that he had received and sold 18,750 free trading shares of Global stock, earning approximately $175,000 in profits, and had received 200,000 restricted shares, as renegotiated compensation.

On Oct. 13, 1999, based on a closing price of $6.50, the 200,000 restricted shares were worth approximately $1.5 million, a fact which Bockler also intentionally failed to disclose.

According to the Indictment, under federal securities laws, pursuant to Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, a stock promoter who publishes information about a public company, though not purporting to offer a security for sale, is required to disclose the existence and amount of any consideration he received or expected to receive in connection with that promotion. This provision was commonly referred to as the "Anti-Touting" provision.

This Indictment is related to a guilty plea entered earlier this year.

In April, Allen Barry Witz, 63, a Beverly Hills, Calif. attorney, pleaded guilty before Judge Greenaway to conspiracy to commit securities fraud in connection with Global Datatel, Inc., a Florida-based company that he and others fraudulently touted as a fast-growing, profitable venture, along with its Latin American subsidiary, eHola.com Online Service Network.

The Information to which Witz pleaded guilty in April 2004 identified, by initials only, two New Jersey men - J.L, of Clifton and S.B. of Marlboro - who allegedly conspired in the pump-and-dump scheme. Two other co-conspirators are identified as R.B. of Boca Raton, Fla., the chief executive officer of Global Datatel, and M.H., a Colombian citizen residing in Davie, Fla., who was president of eHola.com. All four were unindicted co-conspirators.

Witz admitted that he and his co-conspirators used false and misleading press releases and interviews, investor "road shows" and a stock-picking website, www.imcadvisors.com, to tout Global Datatel and eHola.com to raise and maintain the stock price of Global, which was traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, under the symbol GDIS. The stock-picking website was controlled by S.B., according to the Witz Information.

In today's Indictment, Bockler was not charged with knowing that the Global investment reports he disseminated were false and misleading.

The investigation surrounding Global Datatel and others associated with it continues.

On the one count of undisclosed compensation, Bockler faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine or twice the gross proceeds of the fraud or twice the loss to any victims.

Under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, the judge to whom this case is assigned would, upon conviction, determine an actual sentence based upon a formula that takes into account the severity and characteristics of the offense, and the defendant's criminal history, if any. Parole, however, has been abolished in the federal system. Under Sentencing Guidelines, defendants who are given custodial terms must serve nearly all that time.

Christie credited Special Agents of the FBI, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Joseph Billy, Jr., in Newark; Postal Inspectors with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, under the direction of Postal Inspector in Charge Martin D. Phanco; and Special Agents of the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation section, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Patricia J. Haynes.

Christie also thanked the Securities and Exchange Commission, Southeast Regional Office, headed by Regional Director David Nelson, for its considerable work in the case.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: StockDung10/8/2004 9:57:21 AM
   of 1143
 
.Fraud charge filed against associate of slain Colts Neck stock promoters
Friday, October 08, 2004
BY JOHN P. MARTIN
Star-Ledger Staff
A onetime Marlboro Township businessman was indicted yesterday for securities fraud stemming from his dealings with two penny-stock promoters who later died in a grisly, unsolved murder in Colts Neck.

Stuart Bockler, 52, faces a single count of failing to disclose his compensation for marketing Global DataTel, which touted itself as an Internet consulting firm and crashed after a stock run-up five years ago.

The company became infamous, however, for the October 1999 gangland style killings of two of its key promoters, Albert Alain Chalem and Maier Lehmann. The men were gunned down and left in a Colts Neck mansion.

Chalem, who reportedly had ties to organized crime, had been shot in his mouth, ears and eyes -- fueling whispers of a mob hit.

Bockler's indictment makes no mention of the killings.

Instead, it charges that Bockler hyped the company as a "strong buy" on an investment Web site he operated, but failed to disclose that he had been hired to market the company and that he netted $175,000 in stock profits from sales of Global shares.

The charge, a violation of securities law, carries a maximum five-year prison term.

Bockler could not be reached for comment. There is no telephone listing for him in New Jersey and prosecutors said he has not yet hired an attorney.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Mauro Wolfe said Bockler is expected to be arraigned in federal court in Newark within two weeks.

In April, a lawyer for Chalem pleaded guilty in federal court in Newark to securities fraud related to the Global Tel venture.

The lawyer, Allen Barry Witz, said that he had cooperated extensively with authorities, and that the cooperation could put him in danger. Witz would not elaborate, but denied knowing anything about the slayings.

Michael Drewniak, a spokesman for U.S. Attorney Christopher Christie, said yesterday the investigation is continuing.



John P. Martin covers federal courts. He can be reached at jmartin@starledger.com or (973) 622-3405.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: StockDung10/9/2004 2:09:26 PM
   of 1143
 
From: hotpicks (richman@laol.com)
Subject: HOT Stock Pick
View: Complete Thread (5 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.invest.stocks
Date: 1999/02/28


The Stock Investor Newsletter
February 26, 1999 5:00 PM EST
Major News issued by Global DataTel (February Buy Recommendation)

Strong Buy Recommendation: Global DataTel Inc.
Ticker Symbol: GDIS
Current Price: $9.75
Target Price: $35.00 to $45.00 per share
Past 10 day High/Low: High: $13.25 Low: $7.68
Shares Outstanding: 7.5 million
Recommendation Issued by International Market Advisiors

MAJOR NEWS RELEASE ISSUED BY GLOBAL DATATEL INC.
Global DataTel to Raise $50.0 Million in Cash
Today, Global DataTel released news that they have signed a letter of
intent with Dirks and Company, Inc. to raise $50.0 million in cash for
Global DataTel. This funding would allow Global DataTel to complete
several additional acquisitions as well as fund Global DataTel's Latin
American On-Line. If you recall, Global DataTel is in the beginning
stages of undergoing a major marketing campaign for their internet
portal Latin American On-Line (eLAOL). Just as American On-Line (AOL:
$89.00 per share) underwent their advertising campaign by mailing out
hundreds of thousands of free AOL disks, Global DataTel will be doing
the same. With the completion of this financing, Global DataTel will be
able to reach a far greater audience.
With the announcement of today's financing, Global DataTel should become
one of the dominant Internet Service Providers (ISP's) to Latin America
just as American On-Line is one of the dominant ISP's in the Unites
States. In the previous 12 months alone, AOL's stock has gone from
$12.00 per share to over $90.00 per share.
One significant factor in the deal signed by Global DataTel and Dirks
and Company, Inc. can be found in the financing package. Dirks and
Company, Inc. has agreed to fund Global DataTel with a convertible
debenture that would convert at a stock price 25% to 50% above the
current market bid price. (This price would become definitive on the
Effective Date once closed.) What exactly does this mean? If the
Effective Date were today, (the stock is currently trading at $9.75),
that would mean that the group of investment bankers and investors would
be purchasing stock in Global DataTel at a minimum price of $12.18 per
share and a maximum price of $14.62 per share. Obviously they must feel
that Global DataTel's stock is going to rise significantly higher in
price.
The bottom line is this: Once fully converted, a group of investment
bankers is willing to buy $50.0 million worth of stock of Global DataTel
at $12.18 to $14.62 per share.
A few other factors to consider. Let us look at 4 companies that
recently raised between $45.0 million and $76.0 million to see what
happened to their stock prices. Please note that these 4 companies were
all Initial Public Offerings that were completed within the past 45
days.
1) Viagene Inc. (Ticker: VIGN) This company went public on 2/18/99 and

raised $76.0 million. The financing was completed at $19.00 per share.
The stock has traded as high as $52.75 and is currently trading at
$46.00 per share. The company lost $-1.46 per share in 1998 or -$26.2
million. The company had gross revenue of $16.2 million.
2) Webtrends Corp. (Ticker: WEBT) This company went public on 2/18/99
and raised $45.5 million. The financing was completed at $13.00 per
share. The stock has traded as high as $38.00 and is currently trading
at $25.00 per share. The company had a profit of $0.02 per share in
1998 or $219,000. The company had gross revenue of $8.01 million.
3) Verticalnet Inc. (Ticker: VERT) This company went public on 2/10/99

and raised $56.0 million. The financing was completed at $16.00 per
share. The stock has traded as high as $55.42 and is currently trading
at $41.00 per share. The company lost $-0.93 per share in 1998 or -$5.7
million. The company had gross revenue of $1.2 million.
4) Marketwatch.com (Ticker: MKTW) This company went public on 1/15/99
and raised $46.75 million. The financing was completed at $17.00 per
share. The stock has traded as high as $130.00 and is currently trading

at $67.00 per share. The company lost $-1.38 per share in 1998 or
-$8.25 million. The company had gross revenue of $7.03 million.
What do the numbers look like for Global DataTel? (This assumes
completion of the financing and includes pro-forma numbers for 1998.)
Global DataTel Inc. (Ticker: GDIS) Dirks and Company to raise $50.0
million. The financing will be completed at 20% to 30% above market
price. Global DataTel had a profit of $0.38 per share in 1998 or $3.0
million. The company had gross revenue of $29.0 million in 1998.
What will be the future of Global DataTel's stock price. In 1998,
Global DataTel had larger revenues, earnings per share, and net earnings
than all 4 companies mentioned above. Yet, Global DataTel's stock is
far less than all of the above companies. Time will tell. Then again
this news has only been public for less than a few hours.
We have enclosed today's news release for your review:

Friday February 26, 12:14 pm Eastern Time
Global DataTel to Raise $50 Million
Company To Use Proceeds for Latin American Online Network and
Acquisitions
DELRAY BEACH, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 26, 1999--Global DataTel, Inc.
(OTCBB:GDIS - news) announced today that it has signed a letter of
intent with Dirks & Co., of New York, a well-known securities firm, to
raise $50 million through a convertible bond issue, which conversion
price will be at a 25-50 percent premium to the stock price at the time
of the offering.
Richard Baker, Chief Executive Officer of Global DataTel, said proceeds
from the offering would be used to market the company's Latin American
online network, e-Latin American On-Line (eLAOL), scheduled to be
launched in March 1999, as well as for future acquisitions and to fund
the company's growth in general.
"This funding will provide Global DataTel with the strength to
capitalize on the tremendous opportunities that exist for our company
with the new Latin American network we are establishing, and for our
growth as an IBM Business Partner in this region," Baker said.
Global DataTel, a first tier IBM Business Partner, is the Latin American
leader in medium to large system integration projects. Global also
partners with Compaq, Dell, Hewlett-Packard and Cisco, and is a
Microsoft Certified Solution Provider, Lotus Premier Team Provider and
is an exclusive distributor of JBA International, an E.R.P. solution
company.
Global offers continent-wide information system expertise in such
diverse areas as inter/intranet implementation, e-commerce, enterprise
resources planning and Y2K testing and compliance. The company has
offices in Managua, Nicaragua; San Jose, Costa Rica; and Barranquilla,
Bogota, Cali and Medellin, Colombia. The company is headquartered in
Delray Beach, Florida.
For additional information, visit the company's web site at:
www.globaldatatel.com.
This release contains forward-looking statements that are made pursuant
to the safe harbor provisions of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Forward-looking statements involve the known and unknown risks and
uncertainties which may cause the company's actual results in future
periods to differ materially from what is anticipated.
Contact: MARTIN E. JANIS & COMPANY
Media Contact: Hal Schweig, 312/943-1100
or
Investor Contact:
Bev Jedynak, 312/943-1100

All statements and expressions are the opinion of The Stock Investor
Inc. and are not an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities
mentioned. While we believe all sources of information to be factual and
reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy thereof, nor
the statements made herein. The Stock Investor Inc. is not an Investment
Advisor, Financial Planning Service or Stock Brokerage Firm and as such
Stock Investor Inc. is not giving investment advise or promoting
investment strategies. The Stock Investor Inc. is not offering
securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell
securities. An offer to buy or sell can be made only with accompanying
disclosure documents and only in the states and provinces for which they
are approved. All claims should be verified by the reader. Investing in
securities is speculative and carries a high degree of risk. From time
to time investors may lose all of their investment. This document may be
quoted, in context, provided that the proper credit is given. Any
investor should use this report only as a starting point. We strongly
recommend that investors complete their own independent
research before investing. The Stock Investor Inc. may have financial
dealing with the company. As of this date The Stock Investor has not
received compensation from any of the companies featured. The reader is
cautioned that small and micro-cap stocks are high risk and that a
portion of or all investment dollars can be lost. Please consult a
professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. Important
information about Penny Stocks can be found at
www.wallstreetdaily.net/penny.html. The Securities and Exchange
Commission has developed an extensive amount of information concerning
on-line investing. The Stock Investor Inc. encourages its readers to
visit the SEC's website and read this invaluable information
www.sec.gov. Please do your own due diligence before investing in any
security mentioned. This newsletter contains or incorporates by
reference "forward-looking statements," including certain information
with respect to plans and strategies of the featured company. For this
purpose, any statements contained herein or incorporated herein by
reference that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be

forward-looking statements. Without limiting the forgoing, the words
"believe(s)", "anticipate(s)", "plan(s)", "expect(s)", "project(s)" and
similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking
statements". There are a number of important factors that could cause
actual events or actual results of the Company herein discussed to
differ materially from these indicated by such forward-looking
statements.

--
Posted via Talkway - talkway.com 
Surf Usenet at home, on the road, and by email -- always at Talkway.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Google Home - Advertising Programs - Business Solutions - About Google

©2004 Google

======================================

groups.google.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: StockDung10/9/2004 2:56:42 PM
   of 1143
 
Message Boards | Five Dollars and Under : TheBigHub.com (OTC:BHUB)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Reply | Prvt Reply | Mark as Last Read | File Previous 10 | Next 10 | Previous | Next
To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (608) 5/23/1999 5:25:00 PM
From: Francois Goelo Read Replies (1) of 664

BHUB shareholders, why accept being shafted by the new Management?...

1) Here what's clear, IMHO:

+ New Management (NM) wants 20 Millions to further their plans AND control the Company through a secret deal, distributing cheap shares to their cronies.

+ Skyridge who has access to more information than most says the PP deal is not yet done.

2) Possible alternative:

+ Shareholders are pissed at the PP deal made at their expense and want to fight back. They complain to NM and SEC to have the deal cancelled as being unfair to them.

+ NM, under pressure from both agrees to cancel the PP. The share price responds and, say settles around $10.00 for the time being.

3) Rights issue to raise 20 Millions:

+ NM still needs its 20 Millions and is now convinced (with the help of the complaints and the SEC) to act fairly towards its shareholders and renounce the idea of controlling the Company's voting power.

+ It offers a one for one Rights issue at a discount of 25% to the market which, for simplicity of the argument is at $10.00 per share. This grants every shareholder the right to acquire one additional share of BHUB at $7.50! Many longs would be happy at this opportunity.

+ Those who don't want to take advantage of the offered opportunity, because they don't have the money or for whatever reason, CAN RESELL their rights at a profit. The discount to the market being $2.50, savvy investors would be willing to pay, say $1.50 for each Right to own a BHUB share at $7.50, thereby saving themselves $1.00/share compared to market.

4) Conclusion:

The issue of Rights is a very common way to raise capital for Companies that are not primarily interested in shafting their shareholders and would be perfectly suitable in the case of BHUB. Of course, the figures are only an example and would have to be fined tuned to obtain the exact amount of financing required.

IT WOULD NOT DILUTE CAPITAL AT THE EXPENSE OF SHAREHOLDERS OR VEST CONTROL OF BHUB IN THE HANDS OF A FEW SELECT INSIDERS.

The above scenario can still be done if all interested parties write the Company and complain to the SEC at: enforcement@sec.gov

Regards, F. Goelo + + +


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: StockDung10/27/2004 4:32:43 PM
   of 1143
 
New clues in killings of stock promoters Divorce case sheds light on'99 slayings in manse
Wednesday, October 27, 2004
BY TOM FEENEY
Star-Ledger Staff
A group of Russian émigrés threatened the lives of two penny stock promoters shortly before they were found slain in a Colts Neck mansion five years ago this week.

That threat and other details about the relationship between the murdered men and Russian businessmen are described in a sealed grand jury document that has become public in a Passaic County divorce case.


The document offers some insight into what prosecutors knew or suspected about the execution-style killings of Albert Alain Chalem and Maier Lehmann.

Prosecutors tried to force a close business associate of the two men to testify before a grand jury 10 months after the murders. But the associate, Joe T. Logan Jr., formerly of Clifton, refused, invoking his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. A judge's ruling in that dispute contains many of the questions prosecutors had planned to ask Logan.

Logan was never a suspect, but prosecutors wanted to ask him what he knew about the Russian investors Chalem was dealing with at the time of the murders. And they wanted him to tell them more about the meeting at which the group of Russians threatened Chalem and Lehmann.

A confidential informant had told detectives that Chalem and Logan had had a conversation a week before the murders about someone they were afraid of. Prosecutors wanted Logan to identify that person.

They also wanted to ask if Chalem had told Logan about problems he'd had in the weeks before the murders with brothers Michael and Boris Vax. The Vaxes are Russian émigrés and convicted racketeers.

Barron's, the financial newspaper, reported shortly after the Colts Neck murders that Lehmann had approached the newspaper in December 1998 to complain that the brothers had threatened physical harm against investors in a venture connected to Ivana Trump, a charge the Vaxes denied. Calls to the Vaxes' homes this week were not returned.

Prosecutors also wanted to ask Logan about a visit the Vax brothers paid to his home. Their questions indicate the Vaxes discussed Chalem with Logan and that Chalem was angry with Logan when he learned about the meeting. The prosecutors had information that Chalem had punched Logan in the face two weeks before the murder, and they wanted to ask him why.

Neither Logan nor his attorney responded to requests for comment.

Monmouth County Prosecutor John Kaye declined to say during an interview this week whether the questions his office had hoped to ask Logan were ever answered.

"It's still an open case," Kaye said. "It's not a full-time job any more, but we still get leads and we still follow them up."

Federal authorities -- who have brought cases in recent months against two known business associates of Chalem and Lehmann -- also are continuing to investigate.

"We are still actively looking at possible motives on this," said Steve Kodak, spokesman for the FBI's Newark division. Like Kaye, Kodak declined to discuss specifics of the investigation.

Chalem, who lived in the Colts Neck mansion, was 41 at the time of his murder. Lehmann, who lived with his wife and five young children in Woodmere, N.Y., was 37. Both men had been involved in so-called "pump-and-dump" deals -- schemes to artificially inflate the value of cheap stocks by hyping them on the Internet and then selling them to unsuspecting investors before the value crashed.

Two theories emerged about the murders -- the first held that Chalem and Lehmann were slain by someone they had cheated in a stock deal; the other held that they were slain because one or both were cooperating with authorities investigating stock fraud.

The one clear thing about the murders was that they intended to send a message. Each man was shot many times at close range. Chalem was shot once in the chest, once in the nose, once in each ear and once in the forehead. Lehmann was shot once in the leg and three times in the left side of the head.

Investigators have believed from the beginning that the two men were murdered by professional killers, Kaye said.

The killer, or killers, left one significant clue behind in the sparsely furnished mansion -- a trail of blood. Investigators found droplets on the stairs and in every room and every closet, Kaye said.

They theorized that the gunman had cut a finger on the slide of one of the semiautomatic handguns used in the murders, Kaye said. As he walked through the house with the gun down at this side, blood dripped from the wound onto the floor.

Shortly after the murders, prosecutors had a prime suspect -- a career criminal with a history of violent offenses, Kaye said. Detectives found him one day in a delicatessen on Staten Island, and as they stood beside him in line they noticed that his hand was bandaged, suggesting a wound just like they one they had theorized.

"I thought the case was solved," Kaye said.

The suspect agreed to let the prosecutors test his DNA. He was released from custody after the test proved that the blood dripped in the mansion was not his.

Logan emerged early in the investigation as a key witness. Not only did he have close ties to the dead men, but he was with them in Colts Neck on the day they were murdered, prosecutors said. He also called them several times that night.

Logan's business dealings were the subject of a federal securities investigation at the time. His attorneys argued when he was called to testify in front of the Monmouth County grand jury in the Colts Neck case that his answers could have been used against him in the securities case. The prosecutor's office disputed his right to Fifth Amendment protection and tried to compel him to appear in front of the grand jury, but Superior Court Judge Lawrence M. Lawson sided with Logan.

Lawson's 11-page ruling was part of the sealed grand jury record in Monmouth County, but it was made public in Passaic County when Logan's now former wife included it in her motion for divorce in 2002.

Logan has not been charged with any offenses, but in April he was named an unindicted co-conspirator when an attorney with ties to Chalem pleaded guilty to securities fraud. The attorney, Allen Barry Witz, was charged with artificially inflating the value of stock in a tech company called Global DataTel Inc. Witz told investigators that he and Logan were silent partners in the company.

Another of the co-conspirators, Stuart Bockler of Marlboro, has since been indicted in the case. He pleaded not guilty at an arraignment last week. His trial is scheduled to begin Dec. 7.



Staff writer John Martin contributed to this report.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.