Politics | Evolution


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (25518)4/27/2012 5:14:28 PM
From: longnshort   of 36380
 
It's not time yet grasshopper. Patience.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: longnshort who wrote (25519)4/27/2012 5:29:11 PM
From: Giordano Bruno   of 36380
 
Countries that no longer lie about the existence of extraterrestrials

1.
Argentina
2. Australia
3. Brazil
4. Canada
5. China
6. Denmark
7. Finland
8. France
9. Germany
10. India
11. Ireland
12. Japan
13. Mexico
14. New Zealand
15. Peru
16. Russia
17. Spain
18. Sweden
19. Ukraine (not in English)
20. United Nations
21. United Kingdom
22. Uruguay
23. Vatican City

educatinghumanity.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (25520)4/27/2012 5:35:25 PM
From: longnshort   of 36380
 
those countries are not in the loop with the aliens. Eisenhower made a treaty with them. it was called 'don't ask don't tell'

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: longnshort who wrote (25521)4/27/2012 5:54:33 PM
From: Giordano Bruno   of 36380
 
For you to presume who is or isn't in the loop would be a mistake.
Don't pretend to know the unknowable even though that is how most here operate.

EVOLUTION!

NO, GOD!

Lol, who gives a shit?
Neither can be proven.
Just blather away.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (25520)4/27/2012 6:31:04 PM
From: ponokee   of 36380
 
We have been indoctrinated to accept extraterrestrials as cute.

youtube.com 

Just like we have been indoctrinated to accept gays by their constant chatter.

youtube.com 

Sinister forces are at work...

Humanity is being conditioned like cows in a feed lot.


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ponokee who wrote (25523)4/27/2012 6:59:07 PM
From: Giordano Bruno   of 36380
 
That's debatable.


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (25504)4/27/2012 7:00:36 PM
From: ponokee   of 36380
 
This is really nuts... Like smokers suing smoke companies when they get sick or suing your mother for bad genes or whining and complaining the government does not do enough for their lazy ass.

Nutella sets aside $3 mn for US class action
By Robert MacPherson (AFP)–1 hour ago

WASHINGTON — The maker of Nutella is setting aside $3.05 million to resolve a sticky class action lawsuit initiated by a young California mother who disputed the hazelnut breakfast spread's wholesome image.

Notices of class action settlements declared that Ferrero USA, Inc. -- a subsidiary of Italian confectioner Ferrero Group -- would pay $4 for every jar of Nutella bought in California since August 2009, or bought anywhere else in the United States since January 2008.

In addition, Ferrero USA agreed to "modify certain marketing statements about Nutella" and to give more prominence to nutritional information on Nutella labels, said the notices posted on nutellaclassactionsettlement.com.

Consumers have until July 5 to make their claims, to a maximum of $20 per claimant. That's four days before US District Court judges in California and New Jersey are scheduled to give final approval to the settlements.

"Ferrero USA continues to stand by its product and its commitment to quality and customer satisfaction," a Ferrero spokesperson told AFP in a statement Friday.

"We believe that it is in the best interest of the company to resolve these matters, and have reached an agreement with the parties involved."

Athena Hohenberg, the mother of a preschooler in San Diego, California, launched the class action lawsuit early last year, alleging that Ferrero has pitched Nutella as something "healthier than it actually is."

She was "shocked to learn that Nutella was in fact, not 'healthy, nutritious' food, but instead was the next best thing to a candy bar, and that Nutella contains dangerous level of saturated fat," her lawsuit said.

Ferrero -- which markets Nutella worldwide as a tasty breakfast spread, and lists sugar, palm oil, hazelnuts, cocoa and skim milk as its main ingredients -- denied the allegations.

Nutella's US website ( www.nutellausa.com) recommends the chocolatey dark spread, with 200 calories per serving, as a way "to turn a balanced breakfast into a tasty one" when combined with whole grain bread or a bagel.

Hohenberg, a rental property manager, declined requests for comment. Lawyers on both sides of the case were also unavailable.

Consumers can file claims for Nutella purchased anywhere in the United States from January 1, 2008 to February 3 this year, with the exception of California, where the time frame is August 1, 2009 through January 23 this year.

It was unclear why there were separate settlements for California and the other 49 states. In the Washington capital area, a 13-ounce (368-gram) jar of Nutella typically retails for $3.99.

In financial terms, settling the Nutella lawsuit was peanuts for Ferrero. On its website, it said it made pre-tax earnings of 856 million euros ($1.13 billion) on sales of 7.2 billion euros ($9.5 billion) in its most recent accounting year.

Sold in more than 100 countries, Nutella was invented in 1944 by Pietro Ferrero in a pastry shop in Alba, northern Italy. He died in 1949, but the company, which also makes Ferrero Rocher chocolates and Tic Tac candies, stayed in family hands.

Hohenberg's lawsuit drew scorn from some quarters when it was filed, including the LA Weekly newspaper which advised "litigious California mothers" to act responsibly and read food labels more closely.

"Try making your own snacks for your kids," it said. "If you normally feed them good food, a jar of Nutella now and then isn't going to kill anyone. And it's damn good on homemade buckwheat crepes."

Copyright © 2012 AFP. All rights reserved. More »

google.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: ponokee who wrote (25525)4/28/2012 11:49:22 AM
From: 2MAR$   of 36380
 
Nutella's about 50% Palm oil which is solid at room temp first drew interest by the Brit traders mid 1800's who tried to introduce it as a cooking oil but wouldnt catch on though used widely thru west Africa to fry foods. It did find good use as industrial lubricants & later heavily for soap which Unilever & Palmolive based themselves on .Its in lots of edibles now especially if your poorer & buying on the cheap , living in the ghetto , on food stamps & shopping at discount stores buying lots of cheap brand cookies & pastries .

Great shelf life & solid stability , good for biodeisel , Nutella basically equivilent to putting chocolate coloring in Crisco adding equal parts of sugar & calling it a healthy breakfast spread . Your right though , if people want to remain ignorant to how much of this is put into stabilizing many of the foods they now consume its their fault . Just have to laugh at their advertising though which is just a little misleading ? They boast 50 hazelnuts in each jar which ground into butter would fill the jar up 1/10th of the way with the rest being this Crisco~Palm grease , 1/3cup of cocoa powder & 2cups sugar....

They say the world machinery runs on Oil , also true the human machinery runs on it too , Palm oil is going to make up 1/2 of the estimated 250mil tons of oil that will be consumed in 2050 double that now . They're planting millions of acres of it now all over , some serious deforestation issues & loss of habitat , wonder just how much of this they use in margarines now .
en.wikipedia.org 

Gives me the idea for a healthier product to compete with them , since experimenting with my own fresh blend of ground hazelnuts , chocolate sauce & condensed milk ....already field tested & has great energy for trading all day & tastes wonderful & quick.

Wonder how much of this they're adding to margarines now ?





Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (25526)4/28/2012 12:06:10 PM
From: ponokee   of 36380
 
You might enjoy this rendition of an old song...

youtube.com 


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: ponokee who wrote (25525)4/28/2012 12:25:21 PM
From: 2MAR$   of 36380
 
Just a quick glance over to margarines ...finds that they were banned in Canada (for 50yrs!) but those dam brits over in Newfoundland were smuggling in margarine made from whale , seal & sardine oil anyways !!

That's too funny , apparently Canadians sort of had some pride about what their authentic sources of cooking
oils & butters were ? Sounds like a major class action suit to me :
en.wikipedia.org 

Canada/Margarine

In Canada, margarine was banned from 1886 until 1948 though this ban was temporarily lifted from 1917 until 1923 due to dairy shortages. [8] Nevertheless, bootleg margarine was produced in the neighbouring British colony of Newfoundland from whale, seal and fish oil by the Newfoundland Butter Company (which, in fact, produced only margarine) and was smuggled to Canada where it was widely sold for half the price of butter. The Supreme Court of Canada lifted the margarine ban in 1948 in the Margarine Reference.

In 1950, as a result of a court ruling giving provinces the right to regulate the product, rules were implemented in much of Canada regarding margarine's colour, requiring it to be bright yellow or orange in some provinces or colourless in others. By the 1980s, most provinces had lifted the restriction, however, in Ontario it was not legal to sell butter-coloured margarine until 1995. [8] Quebec, the last Canadian province to regulate margarine colouring, repealed its law requiring margarine to be colorless in July 2008. [9]

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.