Coffee Shop | The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread.


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: Jon Koplik9/3/2011 9:21:00 AM
1 Recommendation   of 9415
 
Oil & Gas Journal on : FTC report on gasoline retailing / pricing ...........................................

Sept. 1, 2011

Oil prices still primary driver for gasoline prices, FTC says

By Nick Snow
OGJ Washington Editor


While a broad range of factors influence gasoline prices, worldwide crude oil prices continue to be the main driver, the US Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Economics concluded in a new report.

“Our report spells out the factors that determine what consumers pay at the pump, and why [gasoline] prices seem to ‘rocket up’ but ‘feather down’,” FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said on Sept. 1.

He said it also looks at how quickly retail gasoline prices adjust to wholesale gasoline and crude oil price changes; refining margins; the possible impact of futures speculation; and the effect of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.

The latest report builds on previous FTC staff reports, including a 2005 study of gasoline price factors and parts of a 2004 report that examined petroleum industry mergers, structural changes, and antitrust enforcement, according to FTC. The new report also summarizes and comments on new information from academic and other researchers, it added.

In its discussion of retail price “rockets and feathers” or asymmetric pass-through, the report said that causes are not fully understood, but researchers have suggested several possible causes. “The explanation currently with the most support is that consumers search for lower cost gasoline more intensely when prices are rising than when they are falling,” it said. “As a result, [retailers] do not face as much competitive pressure as prices fall and are less compelled to reduce price.”

Remaining questions

While there is some evidence that consumer search intensity is different when prices are increasing as opposed to decreasing, it is not clear why search costs would vary across cities which display differing degrees of price asymmetry, the report continued. It said FTC may examine consumer welfare effects of asymmetric pass-through further in the future.

The report also examined price cycling, which it described as a recurring “saw tooth” pattern of retail price movements characterized by periods of a relatively small number of large price increases, followed by a period of more numerous, but smaller price decreases.

It said analysts who have studied retail gasoline pricing in all 50 US states have not found price cycling outside of the Midwest, and only since 2000. “A number of studies that consider US data find that Midwest cycling is explained, in part, by the greater presence of independent, nonrefiner, firms in that region,” it said.

The report also found that worldwide crude prices have changed since 2005 from shifts in both supply and demand. While demand fell during the recent global recession, overall consumption grew by almost 7% between 2004 and 2010, putting upward pressure on crude prices, it said. Production increased and additional supplies moderated upward price pressure somewhat, but more than 70% of the world’s proved reserves are in OPEC member countries, it noted.

“Because OPEC’s production increased at a slower rate than that of non-OPEC countries between 1974 and 2010, its share of global production has fallen from 54% to 42%, despite its significant reserves,” the report said. It added that while OPEC has some ability to affect crude prices by trying to have its members limit exports, its effectiveness as a cartel is limited. The largest increases in non-OPEC crude supply have come from the US, Russia, Canada, and Azerbaijan, it said.

Other price influences

Factors beyond oil costs that have significantly influenced US retail gasoline prices since 2005 include refinery capacity losses and pipeline disruptions following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita that year, the report said.

“Gasoline prices also increased significantly relative to crude prices in mid-2006 and mid-2007, due to several factors including increased demand, higher ethanol prices, reduced refining capabilities, and the lingering effects of the 2005 hurricanes,” it said. “Prices fell during the 2008 recession, and generally remained low, relative to crude prices, between 2008 and fall of 2010.”

FTC analysts found only minor changes in the US petroleum and refining market structure since 2005. “While there has been a small decrease in the number of US refineries, overall refining capacity has increased by 3.6%,” the report said. “Refiners now appear to be less integrated into gasoline retailing, as several large refiners have sold parts of their retail operations.”

It said refinery capacity utilization rates have gone down recently, and the trends of a decreasing number of domestic refineries and increasing industry consolidation have abated. “Refining capacity increased by 2.3% between 2006 and 2011, a smaller increase than the 3.7% increase for between 2000 and 2005,” it said. “But despite lower distillation capacity growth, average annual capacity utilization in recent years fell below 90%, reaching about 84% in 2010, the lowest level since 1987.”

Several reasons account for the refinery capacity utilization rate reduction, including capacity additions (although at a slower rate than in the early years of the last decade); increased use of ethanol as a gasoline blend stock since 2005, which effectively expanded refining output capacity; and reduced refined product demand after 2008 during the general economic recession, the new FTC report said.

Contact Nick Snow at nicks@pennwell.com

Copyright © 2011 PennWell Corporation.

.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (9362)9/14/2011 11:26:11 AM
From: Neeka   of 9415
 
"iPhone 5 Concept Features"

youtube.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Bill Wolf11/7/2011 10:43:01 AM
1 Recommendation   of 9415
 
Verizon 4G LTE to offer double the data for the same price
Tyler Lee 11/07/2011 07:33 PST

Verizon subscribers will be happy to know that come 8th of November 2011, Verizon will be offering a pretty sweet deal for the LTE subscribers, whereby they will double the amount of data they give you, meaning that if you were to subscribe to the 2GB a month plan, they will instead offer you 4GB at the same price. This is applicable to both new and current customers who are willing to sign on for a two year contract.

With AT&T starting to roll out a 4G LTE network of their own, and despite Verizon already ahead in terms of LTE coverage, it looks like they’re interested in keeping ahead by attempting to attract new customers and keeping existing customers with this deal. With the Motorola Droid RAZR and Samsung Galaxy Nexus making its way onto Verizon with LTE capabilities, this appears to be a pretty attractive offer. Any takers?

ubergizmo.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Bill Wolf11/22/2011 11:26:21 AM
1 Recommendation   of 9415
 
Seoul Votes a Chaotic Yes to Free Trade With U.S. By CHOE SANG-HUN Published: November 22, 2011

SEOUL — Members of President Lee Myung-bak’s governing party, coughing from tear gas sprayed by an opposition legislator, rammed a free-trade agreement between South Korea and the United States through Parliament on Tuesday, ratifying a deal that has sharpened a political divide between the government and the opposition and between big business and voters unhappy with deepening economic inequality.

Enlarge This Image

Yonhap/Reuters An opposition lawmaker detonated a tear gas canister near the chairman's seat at Seoul's National Assembly on Tuesday.

Enlarge This Image

Yonhap/Reuters Tear gas stung lawmakers and threw the chamber into chaos.


Lawmakers of the governing Grand National Party caught the opposition by surprise by calling a snap plenary session. Opposition legislators rushed in but were too late to prevent their rivals from putting the bill to a vote.

In a desperate attempt, one opposition lawmaker detonated a tear gas canister, throwing the National Assembly chamber into chaos. A scuffle erupted, but members of the governing party outnumbered their foes and, while sneezing and wiping tears, passed the deal in a vote of 151 to 7. In the 299-seat National Assembly, 170 members showed up for the vote Tuesday, most of them governing party lawmakers. The opposition members either voted against the bill or abstained.

Glass doors were shattered as legislative aides from the opposition parties tried to barge in, and security guards formed a human barricade.

The government had urged quick approval of the deal, first signed in 2007 but long unratified by either country, arguing that it would help the economy grow. It also said the deal would lessen South Korea’s dependence on trade with China and deepen its alliance with the United States at a time of growing military threats from North Korea.

The opposition argued that the deal would fatten the pockets of big export companies, which dominate the economy, while depriving farmers and small merchants of their livelihoods. Amid widespread distrust of big business and resentment of what is seen as increasing economic inequality, such fears have led thousands of farmers and labor activists to hold almost daily protest rallies outside the Parliament building. In occasional clashes, the police fired water cannons at protesters to stop them from entering Parliament.

“The government will actively pursue measures for farmers and smaller business owners to help improve their competitiveness,” said Choe Guem-nak, the president’s spokesman. “We will also make sure that the free trade agreement will rejuvenate the economy and above all, create jobs for young people.”

Mr. Lee’s rapport with President Barack Obama bore fruit last month when the U.S. Congress passed the free-trade deal by a wide margin despite underlying concerns about the effect it might have on U.S. manufacturing, notably the car industry. The deal was approved by Congress while Mr. Lee was visiting Washington.

“This was an inevitable action we had to take, because we could not make one step of progress in our talks with the opposition, which thought only about its partisan interest,” Kim Ki-hyun, a governing party spokesman, said of the hurried vote. “But we apologize to the people for failing to have a negotiated approval of the deal.”

“We apologize to the people for failing to stop this coup,” said Sohn Hak-kyu, head of the main opposition Democratic Party. “From now on, we will fight to have the deal nullified.”

Farmers’ groups across the country issued statements accusing the government of “giving up our economic sovereignty.”

The Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry said in a statement welcoming the bill’s approval that the deal would “pave an economic highway” to the United States and make South Korea a trading hub for Asia, Europe and North America.

South Korea, a major exporter of industrial goods like automobiles and consumer electronics, has aggressively sought free-trade deals and has several in effect, with countries including Chile, India, the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the European Union. South Korea hopes the deal with the United States will go into effect Jan. 1, said Cho Byung-jae, spokesman for the Foreign Ministry.

After Mr. Obama signed the U.S. side of the South Korean agreement into law, Mr. Lee’s government has felt the pressure to get it ratified here, too. But weeks of negotiations became bogged down in squabbling over technicalities few ordinary South Koreans could understand.

The governing and opposition camps both admitted that it had become politically impossible to reach a compromise, especially after the opposition rejected Mr. Lee’s offer last week that his government would renegotiate a key sticking point if the opposition first ratified the trade deal.

A violent clash was inevitable, given the parties’ penchant for resorting to physical confrontations to railroad measures through Parliament. The rival parties focused on how to use such a clash to create a favorable impression for themselves before parliamentary and presidential elections next year.

Government economists believe that the free-trade deal could increase trade between South Korea and the United States, tallied at $90 billion last year, by as much as a quarter.

The U.S. International Trade Commission estimates that the deal will lift U.S. exports to South Korea as much by as $10.9 billion in its first year of full effect. The deal is the biggest U.S. trade pact since the North America Free Trade Agreement, which went into force in 1994.

The trade accord removes tariffs on almost two-thirds of U.S. farm exports and phases out duties on more than 95 percent of industrial goods within five years. It will help South Korea’s economy expand by 5.7 percent within a decade, according to government estimates. Automobile, electronics and chemical exporters will benefit the most, while the farming sector is expected to suffer a big loss in production.

The opposition wants better protection for farmers and the country’s nonmanufacturing industries. Kim Jin-pyo, floor leader of the Democratic Party, warned that the deal would “deepen the polarization of wealth.”

Both governments signed the deal in 2007, but lawmakers’ approval of it has been delayed by changes in governments in both countries and by U.S. demands that South Korea take steps to reduce an imbalance in auto trade. South Korea eventually compromised and addressed U.S. worries on cars through additional negotiations.

As Mr. Lee nears the last year of his five-year term, he faces declining popularity amid corruption scandals involving his former aides, concerns about deteriorating ties with North Korea and a widening wealth gap. But he is proud of the closer ties with the United States under his government — a relationship he wanted to reaffirm by having Parliament pass the trade bill.

He likes to cite surveys showing that a majority of South Koreans support the deal. But last month, a vocal critic of his policies, including the trade agreement, won the election for Seoul mayor. Young voters were frustrated over the lack of employment opportunities, although the country’s big businesses rake in huge profits through exports.

nytimes.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: waitwatchwander1/12/2012 11:12:28 PM
   of 9415
 
Holy Moly ... those diligent Chinese ...

torontosun.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (9366)1/25/2012 11:40:19 AM
From: Maurice Winn3 Recommendations   of 9415
 
Qualcomm now five times Nokia's market capitalisation - $100 billion versus $20 billion. Apple at $417 billion, which includes $100 billion of cash, is doing what I had hoped Qualcomm would do with the pdQ, Eudora, Leap Wireless, Globalstar, Infrastructure, and all the rest.

The differences between companies which have the same opportunities are phenomenal.

Nokia won't be the first $1 trillion company, Qualcomm is more like a utility without any sky-high imagineering. Apple has lost the Steve Jobs factor but has plenty in the works it seems.

Nokia got the low royalty rate but as I hoped, they have lost market share so there is little lost with Apple paying real royalty rates. The higher royalty rate did NOT slow them down from selling spectacularly, showing once again that the supposedly high Qualcomm royalty rate [of only 5%] had nothing to do with the adoption of CDMA and sales of DeVices. Nokia and the Koreans whined and litigated about royalties instead of bowing gratefully to Dr Irwin Jacobs and co in deep appreciation. Steve Jobs and Apple did not do any whining.

Mqurice

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Maurice Winn2/21/2012 3:33:33 AM
2 Recommendations   of 9415
 
Would all you Americans please vote for Ron Paul < “Instead of trying to impose new global taxes, President Obama and Mr. Sperling should join me in supporting repealing all taxes on the repatriation of foreign capital. This would inject trillions of dollars into the American economy and help create new businesses and new jobs. Tax-free capital repatriation is a major part of my Plan to Restore America. >

Mqurice

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (9368)2/21/2012 3:39:41 AM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation   of 9415
 
That's right, but wait, there's more: <“My Plan to Restore America also begins to rein in the Federal Reserve by conducting a full audit of the Fed and legalizing competing currencies so the American people can protect themselves from the economic chaos caused by the Fed.“The Plan to Restore America frees American entrepreneurs and workers from unconstitutional, job-destroying regulations. On my first day as President, I will order the federal bureaucracy to stop enforcing the unconstitutional National Health Care, Dodd-Frank, and Sarbanes-Oxley laws. I will also impose an immediate moratorium on all new regulations.

“Of the five men seeking the presidency in the major parties - President Obama, Governor Romney, Speaker Gingrich, Senator Santorum, and myself - I am the only one who predicted the economic meltdown and the only one who has proposed a serious plan to balance the budget, reduce taxes, and create jobs.”
>

How can anybody vote against such ideas? After a couple of hundred years there should be enough regulations to be going on with. Has anybody actually read all of them?

Would you all please get serious and vote for Ron Paul to replace President Obama? Obama got Osama. Enough of kevlar armour, let's cut the drama, go with genki dama. dragonball.wikia.com 

Mqurice pour amour

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (9369)2/21/2012 4:01:53 AM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation   of 9415
 
So all you people who are sick of your shovel-ready diluted dough going to bail out the Federal Reserve and banks, you know what to do: <“My Plan to Restore America also begins to rein in the Federal Reserve by conducting a full audit of the Fed and legalizing competing currencies so the American people can protect themselves from the economic chaos caused by the Fed.“>


Mqurice

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Maurice Winn2/27/2012 9:29:25 PM
3 Recommendations   of 9415
 
NOK market value $20 billion, QCOM $107 billion. Now 5 times as much. Intel still bigger at $136 billion. Texas Instruments only $37 billion. Google only $198 bn. MSFT $263 bn. Apple almost $500 billion for all time world record amazing champion of champions.

That collection of mobile Cyberspace companies adds up to well over $1 trillion.

Cisco neck and neck with Qualcomm at $108 billion. IBM $229 billion remains huge after half a century and a 1990s near-death experience like Apple before the Second Coming with Steve Jobs.

The mobile Cyberspace industry [and Cyberspace in general] is now enormous but just warming up.

The oil and car industries used to be a big deal. Look at people now, ignoring their 3D surroundings and diving into Cyberspace: Microsoft's "Season of the Witch"
youtube.com  While it's only a Microsoft advertisement, the scene is increasingly realistic.
Mqurice

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.