Technology Stocks | DELL


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Yaacov who wrote (161767)10/5/2000 2:53:07 PM
From: mepci   of 176342
 
Kemble said what he saw and added his optimism. There is nothing for him to be ashamed of. Disappointed, may be.
I don't see anything to be ashamed of in what kemble said. It is one man's opinion.
The stock does belong here at this point. May be the stock always belonged here for the last 2 years.
I still don't see anything earthshattering about the Dell's announcements yesterday.
May be we got rid of a lot of quick profit chasers. And a lot of small people like us got hurt temporarily.
I still need to see proof positive that this company is not a good company to put your money in.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: mepci who wrote (161771)10/5/2000 2:59:48 PM
From: Lucretius   of 176342
 
i'm not sure that I would take it on, but i certainly know someone who would take it on. we can discuss it more tonight.... i'll see what i can do to help you guys out.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: mepci who wrote (161773)10/5/2000 3:12:03 PM
From: edamo   of 176342
 
mepci re: "maybe we got rid of a lot of the quick profit chasers"

100mm + shares traded ....it appears to be institutional large block distribution...

over the past year institutions have sold much dell...without this support, a stock as dell with a large float does not move up swiftly.

kudos to whoever is handling the selling today...being performed very orderly...no panic, slowly notching downward.....moves up a bit, moves down further...next sequence may violate 25....hopefully not for those as you..

consider the intc sell off....a secondary wave normally appears within a week...

dell is a good company...depends on what return you require...along with a time frame.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Meathead who wrote (161766)10/5/2000 3:13:12 PM
From: Ali Chen   of 176342
 
<You are totally out of touch if you think AMD covers
nearly the number of market segments or has the
product offerings in wireless, Server and notebook
space Intel does.>

Isn't it true that historically the key to
economical progress is in narrow specialization
and division of labor?

We know examples of "covering" too many
segments in some countries, with centralized
resource re-allocation, subsidies, etc...
You know what happened then, do you?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Nick who wrote (161756)10/5/2000 3:17:04 PM
From: SecularBull   of 176342
 
You are almost right. By my estimate, Fleckenstein is still underwater at $10. He went bearish in the Summer of 1997.

LoF

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: JRI who wrote (161772)10/5/2000 3:26:26 PM
From: GVTucker   of 176342
 
OT, RE: Quiet periods

There is SEC mandated quiet period related to earnings.

If there was, there would be no way for a company to warn.

When a company refers to a quiet period, it is entirely self-imposed. Occasionally, a spokesperson who is unaware of the logic states that the quiet period is SEC mandated. This is not the case. The spokesperson is merely using the SEC as an excuse not to comment. Heck, most companies don't even use quiet periods anymore. Gateway and Oracle are two that come to mind.

The only part of quiet periods that is connected to an SEC mandate is the quiet period surrounding an IPO. Even there, the quiet period is not mandated by the SEC. The company is obligated to avoid any promotion of an IPO while the issue is in registration. Many securities attorneys take this to an extreme and just shut off the flow of all information in order not to cross swords with the SEC. A quiet period is thus perhaps advisable prior to an IPO, but is still not mandated.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: GVTucker who wrote (161778)10/5/2000 3:59:27 PM
From: JRI   of 176342
 
OT- I believe you meant to write (in bold, first line): there is NO sec....

Thanks GV, that's what I thought...also, I had remembered your previous posts correctly on this (see, I do read/remember all your posts- especially your infamous EMC call-g)....

Amazing that investor relations departments allow this charade to go on and/or financial journalists are allowed to repeat this mantra...

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: JRI who wrote (161779)10/5/2000 4:06:37 PM
From: GVTucker   of 176342
 
Geez, you'd think if I put something in boldface I'd get it right.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: JRI who wrote (161779)10/5/2000 4:18:01 PM
From: Bob Kim   of 176342
 
OT - Amazing that investor relations departments allow this charade to go on and/or financial journalists are allowed to repeat this mantra...

JRI, It seems to me that very few financial journalists have much knowledge of the industry they cover.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: edamo who wrote (161775)10/5/2000 4:24:42 PM
From: Stockman_77079   of 176342
 
Quick profit chasers are all stuck in this stock because they are way under water. Watch out, when Dell does go up, these very profit chasers will dump the stocks to get out close to their entry point. It will be bloody for a while.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.