Politics | PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: rrufff who wrote (484730)10/31/2003 7:46:15 PM
From: Emile Vidrine   of 769617
 
Hey rruff, as a Jew, are you also opposed to equal rights for European Americans like other Jews. Do you oppose proportional representation and proportional admittance policies for Euro-Americans.

Jews preach mult-culturalism in America, but in Israel they support a racist Jewish state where only Jews have full civil rights and where Christians and Moslems are blocked from proportional representation in the Israeli government, in the Israeli military, in the Israeli civil service. Christians and Moslems are also blocked from using 90% of Israeli land protected under a JEWISH TRUST which explicitly states that the land is for JEWISH USE ONLY.

So you support all these racist Israelis laws but then pretend that you are a champion of civil rights here in America. This hypocrisy is typical for your tribe.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Gordon A. Langston who wrote (484777)10/31/2003 7:47:14 PM
From: American Spirit   of 769617
 
A 12 gauge means closer range, obviously. That's why I posted it. A rifle shot at 100 meters is something Kerry could make though. He's a very good marksman. What's wrong with that? Bush doesn't know how to use a gun, a computer and doesn't even read anything but briefings. he says he's a pilot but can't even fly a Cessna. He was a cheerleader in college and doesn't even do sports. Not exactly a macho man except in his simplistic rhetoric whch usually just gets him in trouble, antagonizes the rest of the world and costs our troops their lives.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: George Coyne who wrote (484780)10/31/2003 7:48:02 PM
From: American Spirit   of 769617
 
Why do you righties keep bashing gays then?
What has a gay ever done to you? Maybe you'd LIKE them to do something for you. Wouldn't surprize me.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: jlallen who wrote (484746)10/31/2003 7:48:25 PM
From: Orcastraiter   of 769617
 
I am willing to spar with rational people

Bahahahahahaha.

Anyone who does not agree with Bush lock stock and barrel is considered irrational by you...therefore you can continue to insult and reply with " Baloney...silly post."

Your one dimensional thinking process has you backed up against the wall gnashing your teeth as you know that Bush's policies are flawed and ill conceived. Now you cannot admit error for fear of loss of face. Same as Bush. Painted into a corner and can't admit that he's screwed up big time. His whining session in front the of the UN was despicable.

Orca

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: George Coyne who wrote (484753)10/31/2003 7:52:45 PM
From: American Spirit   of 769617
 
The Bushie lies about the tax codes are legion.
He said they were for everyone. False.
He said they were not weighted toward the rich. False.
He said they would create jobs. False.
He said they would fix the economy. Jury still out.
He said they were good economic policy. Only if you like deficits for as far as the eye can see.
He said "its your money" but didn't also tell us "it's your debt".
He said the estate tax cuts were for family farmers and small businessmen. LOL. More like Archer-Midland-Daniels and Walmart heirs.
He said he cares about average Americans, but his policies are skewed toward the richest only.

I agree with middle-class tax cuts to stimulate the economy. But the rich needed no help, especially in war time with deficits going to the moon. It's all about bankrupting the Treasury, isn't it? Privatizing everything and doing away with SS and Medicare even though they've already been paid for by workers. That's the longterm goal.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: American Spirit who wrote (484783)10/31/2003 7:53:13 PM
From: George Coyne   of 769617
 
Why don't you stick to individual conversation? I have never bashed a gay. Your discrimination between individuals and groups is deficient.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: George Coyne who wrote (484774)10/31/2003 7:53:22 PM
From: TigerPaw   of 769617
 
It is valid to point out that just because some seniors have a characteristic, such as owning some dividend bearing stock, that it does not apply to all of them.

Even if all seniors owned dividend bearing stocks, the dividend payment would be distributed far beyond the ranks of the seniors. What percentage of dividend payments do you think senior, who are not already millionares, get? 5% 2% some fraction of 1%? To top it off, it is the taxes on dividends that are under discussion and that is just a mite on a flea of the dog, a very small part of the dividend payout.

In return, the government gives up a lot of revenue which could go to social security, and virtually all of that funding would come directly out of senior's pockets.

TP

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: American Spirit who wrote (484778)10/31/2003 7:54:06 PM
From: Peter O'Brien   of 769617
 
Why don't we just cut everyone's SS benefits
by about 20% for one year to come up with the $87B?

These greedy elderly people were never adequately
taxed for their SS benefits in the first place.

Why should they continue to benefit from
a fraudulent program?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: sylvester80 who wrote (475124)10/31/2003 7:54:28 PM
From: Zoltan!   of 769617
 
Dopes like you are so funny.

Sorry. Actually, you aspire to be a dope.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: TigerPaw who wrote (484787)10/31/2003 7:56:14 PM
From: George Coyne   of 769617
 
Do you not understand that the preponderance of dividend producing stocks are owned by seniors?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.