Microcap & Penny Stocks | MEXP undervalued gem under $1


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: RBlatch who wrote (29)9/24/1999 1:24:00 PM
From: dfloydr   of 76
 
From the Yahoo thread on MEXP:

The Facts & Some News
by: traverse_city1
1678 of 1689
Many individual investors have clearly been in a state of some confusion regarding the state of operations of Miller Petroleum.

The following is an independant opinion concerning the status of MEXP and the reasoning why there is no present operating, financial condition, nor
known material event reflective of the recent decline in the Companies shareprice.

I humbly suggest in my personal opinion; that any shareholders who have sold shares in response to the misconceptions perpetuated by some recent
internet postings here; please review the fundamental story and value in Miller Exploration; as the core value and ongoing expectations are more postive
that at any time in the companies history.

I am not an employee, agent, or representative of Miller Exploration. This is not an "official" (ggg) response of the Company; however per the
acknowledgement of some posters here on Yahoo; many investors have spoken with the companies representatives whom are cognizant of the situation
here on this Yahoo discussion group. My opinions here, are just that; my personal opinions. But, they have been formed through vigorous research,
communication and review of the companies public statements and financial & operating information.

This is "my" opinion of the present situation with Miller Exploration.

The Bank of Montreal Loan is 100% done in principal.

There are no covenants to any minimum market pricing for Nat Gas.

Only the review of the information to be submitted Oct. 1st per prior public announcement and the ratification of the agreement on, or before Oct. 15
remeain to be finalized.

Millers confidence in the ratification of the new line can best be expressed by the purchase announcement of the Hancock County Properties, with further
options to be exercised upon Bank redetermination.

The company plans to aggressively step up drilling and cap ex spending in all core areas, including Blackfeet and the newly purchased Hancock County
Properites.

The company is cash flow positive without any borrowings.

The company has what it believes to be very positive and aggressive hedging activitites planned for the remainder of 1999 and into 1H 2000 at historically
very attractive pricing.

The Company plans to show substantial increases in production, revenue, cash flow and net earnings in each succeeding quarter.

The Company fully expects to exceed all published expectations for Q3, Q4 fiscal 1999 and year 2000 published estimates.

Due to the companies very positive drilling results and remaining drill ready prospects which can be aggressively pursued upon closing the new credit
facility; I believe the company may shortly reach production, cash flow and revenue levels supporting a substantial rise in valuation and performance
estimates from the analyst community.

I believe the company has received very postive response from the Institutional Investment Community in response to its forward looking business plan.

I believe that the present shareprices reflect an irrational reaction to nonexistant conditions it its operations and performance; and that the present
shareprice is fraction of the companies core value and is substantially below levels warranted by even the most conservative valuation modeling.

I believe that the present shareprice is a fraction of its fair value. I believe that with the announcement of Q3 operating results, the announcement of a new
credit facility and the increase drilling development of its core areas that within fiscal year 2000 Miller Exploration shares will return to its historic valuation
levels.


Posted: 9/24/1999 9:22 am EDT as a reply to: Msg 1677 by JoeDi123
View Replies to this Message


Related Links
Quote & News
Profile
Research
Insider




Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: dfloydr who wrote (30)9/24/1999 1:43:00 PM
From: RBlatch   of 76
 
That was a confirmation of my take on the situation. Thanks. As confident as I am, I was also confident (and so was the rest of Wall Street) with Centennial Tech. which was the NY Stock Exchange's biggest one year gainer. Even the best of them get fooled sometimes. Its hard to shake the cautious approach after you've been bitten once or twice. I did buy more this AM. I think I'll just put them all in a drawer until Christmas and see what I've got then. The bets have been placed. Just waiting for the wheel to stop now.
Cordially,
RBlatch

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: RBlatch who wrote (31)10/16/1999 11:28:00 AM
From: Archie Meeties   of 76
 
moneycentral.msn.com 

Of interest, production has increased appx. 32% since q2.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: RBlatch who wrote (31)10/16/1999 11:48:00 PM
From: Archie Meeties   of 76
 
Clarification of Previous post.
From the Q2 report on Aug 12: Q2 Production ending July 30, 2.254Mmcfe, avg price 2.13.

Current daily production 27.5 Mmcfe = appx 2.500 Mmcfe per quarter = 10% increase in production. Of course, some of this increase won't be present for the entire 3 months (depending on when they reached this rate). Avg. price for ng for the past three months somewhere above 2.5, resulting in a revenue increase ranging from 20-30% (all other things being equal). Someone could solidify these numbers with information about hedging.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Archie Meeties who wrote (32)10/18/1999 8:00:00 PM
From: RBlatch   of 76
 
Waiting for the next 10Q. And earnings. I've put this one in the drawer and trying not to watch it till after the first of the year. I have a ton of this stock, and it hasn't responded as I had projected. Still feel though, that patience will be a virtue here. All of the facts which are positive for the oil market are still in place. Good fortune in your investing.
Cordially, RBlatch

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: RBlatch who wrote (34)10/27/1999 4:29:00 PM
From: JGreg   of 76
 
anybody got an opinion on where the bottom is for MEXP? I didn't think the JV announcement would drag it down this much.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: JGreg who wrote (35)10/28/1999 3:23:00 AM
From: dfloydr   of 76
 
Strikes me that sellers are over anxious. But then I own MEXP so that view is not surprising.

It does seem odd that the stock would get so soggy. I doubt the JV is anything but good for MEXP. It is dilution in a sense, but dilution limited to those prospects. The alternative might have been a stock offering ... at these prices that would really be dilution and dilution across all the company's assets.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: JGreg who wrote (35)10/28/1999 8:08:00 AM
From: RBlatch   of 76
 
I would think "1" would be as low as this goes, but I sincerely do not expect to see that. It is just a matter of time, admittedly, more time than I originally thought, before this stock starts its trip back to 7. Patience is difficult. But my largest profits have come from it. Good fortune in your investing.

Cordially,
RBlatch

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Robert T. Quasius who wrote (26)11/10/1999 2:13:00 PM
From: JGreg   of 76
 
Robert, what is your take on the latest report from MEXP? Did their need for cash cripple them?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: JGreg who wrote (38)11/10/1999 5:35:00 PM
From: Robert T. Quasius   of 76
 
I'm a little disturbed at two things. First, the departure of Bill Baumgartner, the CFO. Second, there was no summary of the amended line of credit. I haven't dug through the 10q yet, but if it was good news I would have expected to read a summary in the press release. More later.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.