SI
SI

 Strategies & Market Trends | Fatty's Donut Shop


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Matt Brown who wrote (3918)10/14/1999 11:43:00 PM
From: Lola   of 5039
 
This is not the memo but it's a related news release that has to do with the same subject

Message 11336993

Lola:)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Vision who wrote (3906)10/15/1999 2:44:00 AM
From: The Devil Dog   of 5039
 
Evening to the thread, 1st time posting here, you all seem
to be a nice tight little group.

I presently hold CVIA.


Manfred !!!!!!!! What on earth are you on about re: CVIA

I just cant tell whether your chastising K A Anderson or what!
This guy is the real deal, PLAIN & SIMPLE !!
I personally feel that your critiquing something that you
are either lacking sufficient knowledge of OR are deliberately antagonizing Keith.

I am not here to raise sh*t, but all the facts are out there for all to see,
and you just couldn't get better communication from the management,
so wheres the problem?

Please set me straight!

Best Regards

WB

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: The Devil Dog who wrote (3922)10/15/1999 8:21:00 AM
From: Michael Graham   of 5039
 
Wayne, I think he just has a different opinion. He has probably seen too many stocks say they have $XXX,XXX,XXX in this, that, or the other thing (i.e. ICVI said they had $200 mill). IMO, he is skeptical, nothing more.

Mike

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Matt Brown who wrote (3908)10/15/1999 8:54:00 AM
From: KZAP   of 5039
 
Thanks Matt!!!
I saw that on SW's thread. I think it is really, really
great news!!! Now maybe we have a better chance for
a certain stock I've been in for a long time that has
been shorted to near death. Also, they took our case
to court and the judge didn't allow their request for
stock to cover their short position.
Can we see short squeezes coming!
This should really help some OTC stocks.

Yeehaww!
Happy investing!

KZAP

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Lola who wrote (3917)10/15/1999 11:17:00 AM
From: IJReilly   of 5039
 
Lola-

Many people are saying this memo is a fabrication; since no attribution is given anywhere it is easy to see why people would come to that conclusion. Do you have a link to the news story you mentioned, or the name of the firm or the head guy you talked about?

Thanks

IJ

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: IJReilly who wrote (3925)10/15/1999 11:25:00 AM
From: Lola   of 5039
 
The guy who sent out the memo regarding no more naked shorting of BBs to his staff is Peter Brown, Chairman and CEO of Canaccord (a Canadian brokerage house). Canaccord is one of the companies under heavy pressure from the US SEC right now as they have continued the practice of naked shorting even after warnings to stop.

Lola:)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: IJReilly who wrote (3925)10/15/1999 11:25:00 AM
From: Lola   of 5039
 
damn double posts . . . having trouble posting to SI lately

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Lola who wrote (3926)10/15/1999 11:27:00 AM
From: IJReilly   of 5039
 
Thanks Lola, how about the news story? What paper was it in? Thanks again,

IJ

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: IJReilly who wrote (3928)10/15/1999 11:30:00 AM
From: Lola   of 5039
 
News story re: naked shorting in Canada by Canadian brokerage firms . . .

Message 11365494

As I said before it's my opinion that Peter Brown had that story planted as a news piece in an attempt to cover the company's butt. How often do CEO's leak inter office memos?

Lola:)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Lola who wrote (3929)10/15/1999 12:01:00 PM
From: IJReilly   of 5039
 
Thanks for the quick response Lola. However I think the memo referred to in the article is not the same as the one being pasted around as proof of no more naked shorting in Canada. Note that the memo in question is dated 10/13, and refers to ..."REGULATORY CHANGES BEING FORCED ON BY NATIONAL SECURITIES CLEARING CORP (NSCC) IN THE U.S..."

Message 11553914

The article you linked is dated 9/22, and makes no mention of regulatory changes. It discusses changes in policy at Canaccord only.

It appears that the source (and validity) of the 10/13 memo are still in question.

Thanks again,

IJ

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.